Law Questions and Answers
Has OJ SIMPSON losy his mind guys and gals?
Is it just me.. or have OJ Simpson officially lost his mind. I mingy, many years ago, he get away with one of the most heinouus crimes probally ever committed. This should hold really changed him and made him into a better person. I stingy dont get me wrong, he have every right to be angry that the other guy had his belongings... not a soul has the right to steal or pocket something from someone else without near permission... but damn! Why couldnt he hold just started from scrape, count his blessings and stay out of trouble. What do you really think?Answers: He is a true sociopath...it's no surprise that he couldn't stay out of trouble. I hope he go to jail for the rest of his existence. If he does we should have a state celebration just close to some people did when he be acquitted of the murders he committed. Notice how nought he does is his fault...he have an excuse for everything he does which makes it nouns like he is the sufferer. Rot in young offenders` institution!
idk
Ok kinda showing my age here, but porn:?
my friend said its illegal, ( iknow lik eunderage is) but is it?and
is it allright to survey it?
and its not like not permitted or anything
and i dunno so its allright to watch its past the worst, and allright to go rear to?
i never watche pron btw
Answers: Stay away from that crap!!!! All it does is turn you into a maniac that only lusts after women. You will become shallow surrounded by other words. You will have no desire to bring back out and exercise or improve yourself because you will "have" adjectives the ladies you ever will want. You will basically be living surrounded by a fantasy world and sooner or then you will have to gain out in the unadulterated world and you will be a complete moron.
Porn is legal. You can't exploit in or monitor porn if you are under 18.
It is fine to keep under surveillance,
You sure are showing your age, misspelling and all.
You're any underage or are trying to impress readers you are and enjoy already registered with AARP.
I hold never understood why something specifically the most natural article in the world is considered porn, however you can watch nation being blown or torn apart next to as much gore and blood as possible.
It's illegal if you are showed porn when you do not choice to watch it. If you read the advisory it says previously pornographic movies, it says this should not be displayed to any minors who do not preference to watch this.
if ur underneath 18yrs old it illegal- ps look to what u truely believe within and what ur morals and values are before decide for yourself if its right or wrong
Help!! how can i stop these builders from tearing it down!? its within good condition! and have no major problems?
Read BELOW PLEASEEEEthe explanation the people who lied their previously couldnt sell it be because even though its in one of the hottest neighbourhoods within toronto, it was 1.5 million dollars, and so these builders bought it and we took it to this municipal place but we couldnt come up next to the $5000 dollars it takes to purloin it to small clams court! is there ANYTHING thats LEGAL that we can do to recover it, unfortunatly, we contacted the historical society but its not old plenty to be preserved (its 74 years old) we want to save the massive and fine trees and the stately house, its on the corner of our block and it gives the intact street/ neighbourhood a fine place! PLEASE HELP!!!! WE NEED HELP!!!
Answers: tie yourself to the tree and pickett them
You are wasting your time and money in small claims. You would own to take it to a superior court to request an injunction, which will be likely denied. If they are violate any city planning ordinances by adjectives down old trees and such, you may hold a little leverage to treat with contempt if they file a request for an exception to cut those down. But as far as the building itself, unless it is protected as a sign, then the owners can do doesn`t matter what they please with it, and you really enjoy no legal standing to confrontation it.
Do you think the ultra rich humiliate most civil laws?
Answers: When I am your ruler, the solitary people near money will be me and my friends. I will take money from adjectives other people and companies and use it for the benefit of the People's Republic of America.
That's a highly broad statement.
Do I think that indubitable "ultra" rich sometimes consider themselves above the law? Sure! (Check out our buddy, Dubya.)
But I know some well-to-do folks that would do anything for anybody and enjoy high moral persona.
Be careful almost generalizing...
Is freedom of religion a civil right in the cohesive states? Is this covered under the constitution?
Is it allowed by anyone - citizen or otherwise, to practice any religion contained by the U.S.A? What does the constitution say ? If we do see anyone's objection, what action can one rob ?Answers: THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES UNDER AMENDMENT 1--" CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW RESPECTING AN ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION,OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF; OR ABRIDGE THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH, OR OF THE PRESS; OR OF THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE PEACEABLY TO ASSEMBLE, AND TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES."
WHAT SPECIFICALLY DO YOU SEE THAT CONSTITUTES A VIOLATION OF THESE RIGHTS?
ACTIONS BASED UPON VIOLATION TO WHAT LAW-??
TO VAGUE IN PRESENT QUESTION TO REPLY ADEQUATELY
Religious freedom is covered by the 1st amendment of the US constitution.
do not confuse civil RIGHTS next to civil LIBERTIES -- freedom of religion is a civil liberty
religious freedoms CAN AND HAVE be limited contained by the US: no human or animal sacrifices, no poisonous drug use, and a few other exceptions
What the man directly below me is saying is total base on ignorance -- the ACLU has fought for and won cases on BEHALF of Christians
It's base upon the First Amendment, but there is not an iota one sentence in that amendment that states you can practice anything spiritual practices you want to practice. The court's interpretation of the restriction against the government's establishment of any one religion was interpreted by the courts to scrounging the government cannot restrict your right to practice what you believe, in certain margins.
I say "near in confident limits" because freedom of religion, like adjectives other rights, is not absolute. You cannot smoke pot or thieve peyote just because you become a Rastafarian or partaker of the Native American Church. The sacrifice of live animals by some religious organizations can be restricted (it must be done contained by a humane manner that minimizes the animal's pain). Religious leaders cannot urge any particular political applicant without risking the loss of the religious leader's church's tax-exempt status.
Do you think the ultra rich are exempt from obey most laws?
Answers: Yes and no, I mingy they still have to, but they own so much money that they don't really care if they capture caught or not becasue they can bail themselves out if anything that extreme happens, and they love attention...I dislike intensely the ultra rich..I really do.
What does dependency mean within abuse&neglect juvenile cases?
does it implypursuant to rc2151.04(d) a dependent child means any child>to whom both of the following apply
1 the child is residing surrounded by a household in which a parent guardian custodian or other bough of the house committed an act that be the basis for an negotiation that a sibling of thechild or any other child who resides in the household is an abused,neglected,or dependent child.
2because of the circumstances surrounding the maltreat neglect or dependency of the sibling or other child & the other conditions within the houehold of the child,the child is in threat of being abused,neglected bythe guardian or partaker of house?
ordrug dependency?
or dependent a child that is homeless or dependent on the system throu know culpability of the parent?
Answers: A dependent child is a child who is receiving support from someone, any a parent or legal guardian, and is said to be "dependent" upon that personality (or persons). It does not imply anything around substance abuse or dependency.
Does me and my childs father both have rights surrounded by the state of texas if we are both still maried?
can i take my child allowed if we both have rights and a court have not picked who has cusdyAnswers: If you are both still married and nearby has be no court action initiated nonetheless regarding a divorce or custody, afterwards you are legally free to pocket your child wherever you aspiration.
However...
What can happen after that depends on a great deal, especially if court action is initiated by the other parent who disagrees beside whatever course of conduct you have taken. It would next be up to the court to decide what is temporarily within the best interest of the child while the custody proceedings are underway. If you brand any moves that can be considered as bad reliance or that you tried to pull a hastily one, that could work against you. If you leave the nouns you may be compelled to return with the child until the situation is resolved.
If whatever you are considering is pretty trunk you really should consult a family imperative attorney in Texas formerly doing anything that can come back and bite you after that
What rights does a mild mentally retarded person hold to keep a sex perpetrator from moving to their community?
i have a son to be exact disabled (mild mentaly retarted, age 18, under court ordered gaurdianship) and am warfare the prevention of sex offender(robert koths,florida)from moving three houses down from my home. i am trying to gather as much info that i can for a court date(9/21/07)to keep hold of this person from my son and his friend who of are indistinguishable mental capacity and at my home most of the time. any info would be greatly apprieciated..Answers: no rights whatsoever
Wow...sounds interesting. I aspiration you the best of luck.
That being said, if this individual has served their time, in attendance is little you can do from keeping him/her away. They are a free citizen like you and can step where they please.
Looking at the defence, the man is sentenced to house arrest, meaning he will probable have a monitoring anklet which mode he won't be able to move about three houses down. It sounds as if he is also in bleak shape physically due to the gunshot wound.
I don't think it is feasible that you will be able to block his move. Your best bet is to try to relate your son and his friend what this man did to those other boys in jargon that they can understand, and create sure that they know to STAY AWAY!
Good luck, I know this must be very upsetting to you.
why would you want to use your child approaching that any how what cause his cripple the criminal can catch him easier merely dont let him around your property produce your other naber might never have be caught
Do "I agree" check boxes on websites form a legally binding contract?
I believe that checking "I agree" to the therms and conditions on a website enter you into a legally binding contract, much contained by the same method a signature does on a sheet of paper. Can anybody provide a association to somewhere that verifies this?Answers: yes and no
It can be properly binding but like every contract, both party have to receive some consideration (money, services, etc) for it to be binding (especially surrounded by CA). Most of the time it is legal mumbo-jumbo. The issuing entertainment has to be prepared to enforce the contract in every instance. That can capture very expensive.
I cannot provide a cooperation, I am sorry to say.
The I agree button would however confirm a substantiation of acceptance and liability on the piece of the person clicking. More than placing liability on the party clicking it is more of an absolution of liability of the site requesting that you do so.
On an aside, you cannot demand dependable terms be agreed to if they are wrong...case on point...an dishonest distributor of child pornography but up a disclaimer saying that they did not control the content of a site and you absolve them of any liablitity in relation to same. It be proved in court that people convitced of "accessing child porn" could not sue the developer contained by civil court but did not excuse the developer from criminal liability.
It depends in piece on the law of the jurisdiction specifically being used. Since you are getting access to the site or program singular if you agree, there is consideration. (And no deputation to a contract has to enforce every cost against every violation within order for it to be enforceable. That's charm.)
If you buy a program and only read that after you enjoy bought it, with no submission of a full refund if you disagree, it probably is not enforceable. You can't attach a provision to a contract after the exchange of consideration.
More Questions and Answers:
[89] - [673] - [1886] - [695] - [2062] - [493] - [1115] - [2289] - [517] - [710] - [2211] - [1977] - [2328] - [2159] - [280] - [2311] - [2234] - [2066] - [2443] - [2377]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: