Law Questions and Answers
What does this mean to you?
All^ah nouns you as regards your children's (inheritance); to the mannish, a portion equal to that of two females; if (there are) only daughters, two or more, their share is two thirds of the inheritance; if one and only one, her share is half. For parents, a sixth share of inheritance to respectively if the deceased not here children; if no children, and the parents are the (only) heirs, the mother have a third; if the deceased not here brothers or (sisters), the mother has a sixth. (The distribution surrounded by all cases is) after the expenditure of legacies he may have bequeathed or debts. You know not which of them, whether your parents or your children, are nearest to you within benefit, (these fixed shares) are ordained by All^ah. And All^ah is Ever All-Knower, All-Wise.Answers: Capitan America Says:
It means my world and my afterlife!
What it method is that a religion is dictating to people what their Last Will & Testament must read aloud, and how a person's assets must be divided.
What is your actual question? Trying to carry help to integer out the math, or is it a question give or take a few Islam?
It means that if I'm Muslim, I don't own to concern myself with inheritances, coming or going. My religion have relieved me of the need to suggest about such things.
***
Don't scrounging Shite to me as i live in 2007AD...not 2007BC.shame others don't enlarge there eyes and see the world have changed.maybe we would enjoy less war and get on...
it vehicle you've stumbled upon the "peaceful religion of Is-lame" which fascinatingly enough is responsible for more terrorist murders than any other religion surrounded by the world... Hmmm... what does that mean?
What is the legal age 18yrs or 21yrs?
Parents other say "they're 18 they can do what they want, but I overheard leaglly you're still responsible until they are 21yrs antiquated. Any Info?Answers: in the United States, at 18 an individual is considered an grown with the legally recognized rights, and responsibilities, of an adult.
However, for things approaching taxes and insurance, there are dependent relationships where on earth a parent can retain some responsibility, but not in language of legal rights.
Depends on surrounded by which state "you" reside.
New York, 21. Most other states, 18
Depends on what state you live in and what you want to do. Different states own different laws.
The dictum my parents always said be, "I'm 18, white, and legal. I can do what I want."
Legality contained by the US is not a matter of age,but of the assets one can put as "Response".Sad,but true.Legality (?)sucks!
Ask O.J,Donald Trump,R.Cheney or Michael Jackson
18 within reguards to criminal law & rights to owning property signing contracts. 21 as far as Liquor, Cigatettes & the duty law. (Your perents can still claim you if still surrounded by school up to age 21). There are so various laws covered by the federal management and state laws that may fluctuate.
Selling vs. donating organs?
I was wondering why it is dubious to received financial compensation for your harvested organs. Why must it be a donation? I acquire the whole helping others article and what if one day I requirement an organ. But it seems everyone else is getting compensated big bucks. The surgeons, nurses, anasthesiologist, social workers,ect. If Im throwing the party whats wrong next to getting a few bucks put into my estate for my contribution. The hospitals have no problem charging hundreds of thousands for an operation to be exact taking place because of my free donation.Answers: Because once organs can be a profit floor, it creates too many ethical concerns:
People selling organs to take-home pay off debts
"Organ intermediaries" becoming organ brokers
Organ harvest from unwilling individuals (if the prices is high enough)
Selling organs begin putting a price on human life. If you hold a problem with hospitals charging, you own made an argument for univeral health contemplation.
Um- you can't take it next to you.
The money that is- and donating organs when you're alive (other than a kidney) might prove to be a little tricky.
In China, populace are kidnapped and incarcerated in special "hospitals" and chain to hospital beds while organs are cut out of their bodies to be used to slake the need for transplanted organs. The prisoners are blinded/incapacitated/killed contained by the process. This is a huge and growing industry, and somebody (not the "doners") is making an enormous, morbid profit. This also happens contained by some South American countries, except there the "doners" in actuality get salaried some small token or fee. In the United States, protection is abstractly offered to doners/recipients because there is no financial gain. So until (and unless) the US become as immune to our personal liberties as have (for example) China, the phenomenom of organ donation will continue to remain a trait of good will. And patients will be forced automatically to wait much longer times to receive their fresh organ. And hospitals fees, albeit always glorious, will not include the donated organ.
I hear ya. While I understand why it could be kinda tricky as far as the discouraging things that could happen ( similar to organ pirating and the like) I do think nearby are some things that they should think in the order of paying you for. Like bone marrow for example. I really don't see the harm, and decent young college kids would file up.
After all, they do settle up you for blood, plasma, sperm, eggs, and everything else. It doesn't matter to me anyway though, I'm not an organ donor.
Could my girlfriend’s mother use a 4 year old “private” video we made to bring charges against me???
Four years ago, I gather round the girl who is now my girlfriend, and may soon be my fiancée, underneath somewhat interesting circumstances which resulted in us making an “adult” video. Since this video terminated up becoming the start of our relationship, she has hung on to it.*Despite the reality that my girlfriend has kept this video within her private collection, it has become something of an instigate secret surrounded by our town and was just now discovered by her mother (who, for some unexplained reason, have used the hide-a-key to enter my girlfriends apartment and was rifling through her things when she found the video), who is immediately threatening to use it to bring criminal charges against me (and telling anyone who’ll listen that she intends to use this video to bring criminal charges against me).
Answers: Unless she wishes to have her daughter charged near public indecency and whatever other morals charges here would be, I doubt she'd do it.
As far as giving her alcohol, is there any evidence surrounded by the video that you gave her alcohol? Could it be proven, 4 years after the certainty, that anything you handed her within the video was in fact alcohol? I doubt it.
Tell her she is going to ruin her daughter by going to court. And tell her your girlfriend can enjoy her arrested for stealing her property.
And eat your pudding within private, next time, lol
Sounds approaching a jealous woman to me
I don't guess anyone would do anything about it, seeing as though you be both over 18.
You were BOTH over 18 close to you said right?
Your girlfriends name and reputation would be subject to public eye, is that what she wishes?
I would counter with a breaking and entering charge along beside Thieft charges if she persuses this ridiculous attempt at running other peoples lives.
A) Is there a date on the picture of the cassette? How can she prove that you were both just 20? Can she prove that you gave her daughter the alcohol?
Does the video show you drinking alcohol? even if it shows you drinking out of a beer bottle or liquor bottle, in attendance is really no way they can prove short a reasonable doubt that near were liquor surrounded by the bottles.
B) I think at hand is a statute of limitations of a Public indecency charge that you have surpassed. Not to mention usually these types of tickets are usually lone given after a complaint is made by someone ( on the date it occurs) and an officer catches them contained by the act.
C) I can't fathom what else she would try and charge you near but I don't think you own anything to worry around. She may try and charge you but I think the probability are 99% in your favor of you.
Interesting story. Check the statute of limitations to be sure but you are probably undisruptive. If in extreme circumstances charges be pressed they would have to charge your girlfriend as powerfully. I doubt her mother would want that. Also, any decent attorney would have this thrown out within no time. Law enforcement was never intended to be used at someones whim. You enjoy nothing to verbs about.
You could consider file a harassment lawsuit. Turn-about is fair-minded play.
If the video is not date verified in some opening, the contributing charge is unlikely to happen.
For public indecency charges to stick somebody would own to see ithe actual act (other than the camera soul, who is a participant), or it isn't public. Those charges would also have to be laid against both of you, and the camera human being.
Why she would want to charge her daughter is beyond me, she has already lost her relationship and any destiny of her trust ever again. I would be pretty ticked if my mother not only interfered near my life contained by such a manner, but turned out to be a adjectives thief.
Absolutely.. Most imagined you will be charged.. Keep in mind that charges are freshly accusations near the slightest bit of merit.. It DOESN'T MEAN YOU ARE GUILTY!
Most likely, she is basically trying to scare you.. Think of it as an annoyance, but don't pinch it too seriously.. Also, don't blow it off, I'd consult a legal representative and perhaps ask for a bit of direction and perhaps even consider a restraining decree..
You absolutely can conflict them in the court of canon and in certainty can turn the tables around and charge her beside a number of things as okay such as intruding onto private property, unlawfully obtaining evidence in need a search warrant, etc. etc.. In lots cases, if evidence (such as a tape or paper) be obtained lacking a police authorized search warrant, consequently that evidence can be thrown out in a court of decree.. Just something to keep within mind, chances are the explanation why she ran contained by herself and took it was because she wasn't competent to get a court search warrant. . And contained by most states, intruding on private property is a very fatty punishment, probably much more than whatever she would know how to get you near..
If there be NO sex between you & your girlfriend and you were both Under 18, There would be not much she can generate of the video. They can charge a person who have or had sex beside a person younger than 18 (At the time the video be made) as child endangerment. If one of you was 16 and the other 18 (Also Statutory rape.) Yes you could be charged beside rape. If both of you were 15 or16 here in not much they can do.
Also law differ by state, So try checking your state law.
you be both 20 when the video was made. you be not minors.
if you were both drinking at 20 I don`t know the real issue for a prosecutor is who provided the alcohol, the subsidiary issue is who consumed it.
i doubt a DA, even mom's close personal well connected friend who is the prosecutor, would 'stoop' to letting someone roughly use their license to prosecute you when, so far in your ask, her crime is that she broke into your gf's apartment.
What criminal charge does she have surrounded by mind? So far she's all huff and fluff.
You may want to spend a bit of time contained by the library or picking up a little more information from academy civics.
Don't see it happening and the mother would be a fool to try because even if she could carry the DA to bring charges, it would be against BOTH you and her daughter for underage drinking (if she could indeed someone prove when the tape be made and that you were both underage and that what you be drinking was alcohol) and indecent exposure/lewd conduct surrounded by public for having sex contained by a public place (and be able to prove where on earth it occurred be in public view)
You be both over 18 at the time the incident occured, the incident occurred 4 years ago and the cartridge was obtain by an illegal search out and seizure by her mother.
You stipulation a lawyer, right away. You call for to know what is the law and what is not.
I don't understand why she go to jail?
In this story http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070909/ap_o...I still dont reasonably understand why she go to jail for accidently over-salting the meat. Shouldn't of the supervisor gotten punished instead? I parsimonious she told her manager & supervisor and they didn't do anything almost it. And why did the cop make a huge business deal about it and throw someone surrounded by jail?
Please abet me understand.
Answers: The cop is an ***, and must of have a real discouraging day.. I totally agree beside you that the supervisor or the manager should of get in trouble, not the cook. If I be the lady I would tell to the owner and tell him or her that she informed them nearly the salt within the burger and they blew her off. She should of never go to jail over this, its not close to she put a drug in the meat so the officer would capture sick, it just have to much salt, and if the cop wasn't such an idiot he would of simply took one bite of the burger and realized it be to salty, and took it rear legs.
She acted on the instructions of her supervisor, so I agree with you here.
I understand that some population have a medical condition that make them need to study their salt intake, but really...should those empire be eating express food at all within that case?
Short story...grumpy cop have a bad hours of daylight.
It's just an rude cop using his badge to -- ahem, engender up for what he lacks.
Obviously, if he wasn't a cop, he would have have to either complain just about the salty meat or stop intake it -- or at the worst, file a civil suit when he get sick -- like everyone else, but he chose to acquire it lab-tested and arrest someone instead. Not to mention the fact that there's no describing how much actual crime went un-noticed while he be getting his salty meat tested. I can't continue until that employee sues the police department for police misconduct.
Then it should own been turned over to the HEALTH dept, NOT a cop that Just considered necessary to make an arrest. So the bastard cop looked-for to give a personage a Arrest record for a stupid chance. That is the trouble with some cops. Even approaching this one in the video below.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=oaHyuWgir8U
Did this health inspector enjoy a right to enter this property without a warrant?
http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm...Answers: I'm not an expert, But it seem she should have be able to state what the Violation she be looking for or what the complaint was. She did not even know what she be looking for. Also private property is NOT the same as a restaurant which is used by the public.
administrative inspections, if allowed by local ruling, are recognized by the Supreme Court as an exception to the warrant requirement. Most states enjoy lots of different administrative exceptions. For instance, health inspectors can enter a restaurant lacking a warrant.
I live in San Francisco, CA and want to start bottling slap water to put up for sale in stores.?
What are the authority issues regarding bottling hit water? Does it enjoy to be FDA approved? Can I just do it or do I obligation some type of approval?Answers: YOU MUST THINK PEOPLE ARE AS STUPID AS YOU ARE. WHY NOT SELL AN EMPTY BOTTLE AND CALL IT INSTANT WATER WITH THE DIRECTIONS STATING THAT ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS ADD WATER?
And the source is in that place...?
Better forget it!
There are plenty of allowed issues involved here. Licensing, health permit, disclosures, etc. Go see a business lawyer and ask adjectives of your questions!
Read a daily, dear. The city of San Fran just become one of the first to disallow plastic bottles when tap marine is available.
Placer county criminal defense lawyers? Opinions?
Answers: You may own to try somewhere else for a good response to your enquiry or look for a referral.
Can I Sue?
Answers: You can sue anyone for anything. The question of whether you will win is up within the air.
Is California an at-will state?
when it comes to employment?Answers: Yes, it is.
If it isn't and you're an employee, why should it concern to you? If your employer doesn't want to employ you any longer, why should he/she be forced to do so? If in that were law forcing employees to stay near an employer, they would be rejected as slavery, so the same should be the suitcase with law forcing employers to hire culture against their will.
More Questions and Answers:
[188] - [1903] - [484] - [858] - [787] - [1877] - [2520] - [1444] - [1476] - [1406] - [458] - [691] - [2156] - [1529] - [2158] - [1769] - [1655] - [1006] - [2512] - [1758]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: