Law Questions and Answers
Is it legal for a collection agency to send for 3 + times a day?
I don't answer the phone (thank god for guest ID), but are they allowed to call multiple times per morning when I don't pick up? Thanks!Answers: Actually, if you're not picking up the phone, they are supposed to leave a message. However, several collection agencies are lax on their interpretation of the laws that govern collections. My suggestion is arm yourself near knowledge. The law that govern collections and their applications are included in the Fair Debt Act of 1977. This obviously is a long and tedious document that be written by lawyers. However, the FTC have created a wonderful FAQ about what's included. Here's the join: http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/cred... This will cover any questions you may hold about what creditors and collection agencies can and can NOT do.
Yes. You owe them money and they want it spinal column.
Quite frankly, I'm surprised they don't call at 3 am.
If you owed me money, I would.
You're lucky it is a corporation you owe money to and not Joe Paluka and his baseball bat.
I have a sneaking suspicion that it is... they're trying to connect with you because you owe them money.
A few years ago when my financial situation wasn't so great, I get collections calls every single daylight and the caller be basically outright asking me what daylight of the week I got paid- they be that anxious!
I'm not sure if THAT is completely legal... but I am immensely glad to be back on my foot again, and that the whole ordeal is over.
Here is a join to the Federal Fair Debt Collections Act:
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/cred...
They can unless you send them, via registered post, a cease and desist communication. See 805(c):
http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fdcpa/fdc...
NO that is harrassment. Check out the intermingle below and click on your state.
I was presented a "lawsuit" surrounded by the mail.is it actual?
I got a vastly "real looking" weekly in the e-mail from the law firm that took over a credit card that I did not settle up on. While I am guilty of not paying, I have sent surrounded by numerous letters describing them I am awaiting disability and have no income (the truth). It looks actual and threatening but I was not served, it be mailed. What do I requirement to do at this point?Answers: Take it seriously, because there are federal law that prohibit a debt collector from threatening a lawsuit if they don't intend to file a lawsuit.
My personal belief, and you shouldn't necessarily take this direction, would be to call them and enlighten them to stop contacting you. Tell them you have no money to pay packet, and that it was charged rotten as a bad debt. Tell them again to stop contacting you, and that if they craving to continue the situation, to take you to court.
If they mail you and are serious about file a lawsuit, they will do so whether you contact them or not. If they are not serious, they will let the business go.
I believe the federal ruling is something like The Fair Debt Collection Act, which give debtors rights against being harrassed by debt collectors.
Good luck.
Well, I am not sure what you imply by 'real looking.' If it is surrounded by letter format, afterwards it is probably a demand memorandum for payment. If it have a caption on it, it might be a complaint agains you. If it is, later personal or substitute service is neccessary, unles you are avoiding service and the lawyers get leave of court to serve you via alternative vehicle, such as by first-class mail.
In some jurisdiction, mail service is proper.
The truth is, you should try to contact them and work out some sensitive of payment plan.
Just cut this paper because this is not a lawsuit. This basically another form of harassment by creditors within order to alarm you and to make you pay packet a debt. Real lawsuits do not come in the communication as they supposed to be served on you in party. Credit card companies usually do not sue people who owns them money. Collection agency purchased your debt and trying to collect. They will keep hold of calling you, sending you letters, etc.
If you do not want to be bothered further by them, do not phone them, do not provide them with any of your personal information. I guarantee you they are not going to profile a real lawsuit as they never do since they know themselves that this will be throw away of money and effort. If you do not own resources to pay within is no point of suing you.
Unless they are imaginary, adjectives papers should be "real looking." No one here have seen what you've gotten, so no "advice" anyone here give you about it is worth anything. If you enjoy a real concern, pocket it to a lawyer to whom you can SHOW it.
What is your anwer if your neighbor don't let you buid the paling between your house and his...?
He say :"You can't do that! This fence'll violatre my rights to be in motion to your property and stay there.forever!". It's not a funny story but a true one that you 're hear everyday if you live in the USAAnswers: kill in cold blood him.
Local or state regulations may dictate how close you can build a fence, or anything, to your property strip.
Check with your town planning board on the law on erecting a fence. Odds are, you can build a obstruction whether or not your neighbor likes it. The simply question is how close to the property splash you can build it.
Also, maybe your neighbor like to watch you or your spouse?
Only two things can stop you from building your paling.
1. Municipal codes, some restrict where fence can be built, the types of fences and the height above sea level of fences.
2. The covenants on your property, plentifully of housing additions have covenants within them that forbid you from doing all copious of things. Often they restrict where fence can be and can't be and are usually more onerous than the municipal codes.
If none of those apply build away. If you lucky surrounded by live in a state that respects your property rights consequently when your neighbor tried to damage your blockade you can blow his head sour... God bless Texas.
Can someone be tried more than one time for the same charge?
i thought the answer be no i.e. double jepordybut i read the paper 2day and it said this
Prosecutors could ask the state Supreme Court to review the outcome, or they could put Jesperson on trial a fourth time
all for equal original charge how can they do this?
Answers: Usually when they're conversation about the possibility of a exotic trial (on the same exact charges) is because something happen during the original trial that be serious enough to warrant a up to date trial. Most often it be a mistrial. Like if the trial judge permitted infallible evidence that weren't appropriate, or the defense or prosecution pulled something that was dishonourable, as later deem by a higher court (usually court of appeals). There are solid grounds, then, to affirm a mistrial. In that case, next, the higher court will admit a new trial.
If the trial resulted contained by a hung jury, an additional trial is possible on like charge. Or if charges were dropped in need the accused ever coming to trial.
In this overnight case, it seems the prosecutors are looking for mortgage advice on whether this valise can be retried.
used to be that way but presently they have a civil court
What is the best thing to do to solve my bag oral defamation?
3yrs ago the baggage oral defamation file agaist me but i run away even im not guilty coz i dont have money to money the bailbond but now i want to settle that overnight case coz i want to go vertebrae on my home and im studying now im scar that this case might affect on my study...please endow with me an adviceluisa
Answers: Here is an excerpt from Oedipus the King by Sophocles. It is the debut scene and Oedipus is talking to the priest.
Oh my children, the exotic blood of ancient Thebes
why are you here? huddling my alter
praying before me, your branches wound contained by wool
our city reeks beside the smoke of burning incense
rings with cries for the healer and wailing for the unmoving
i thought it wrong my children, to hear the truth
from others, messengers, here i am myself
you all know me, the world know my fame
i am oedipus
speak up antiquated man your years
your dignity you should speak for the others.
i hope this helps.
I don't know where on earth you are, but in the states vilification is a tort, or a civil matter and not a criminal one. There would be no bail, it is a suit and not a indictment. You would enjoy your day surrounded by court, there is no warrant out at hand. Were you served papers and did not respond? If you were served and run away without responding, they would know how to get a evasion judgment against you. They would presently have to find you and serve you next to the default result and try to collect. This they can do but they would have to stir to court again to get approval and an command to collect by attaching your salary, if you hold any, and this also gives you a haphazard to respond and limit the amount they would hold. Meantime, wait until they take in for questioning up with you which would probably be similar to...NEVER... I think you are worrying for zilch, but if they do, wait until you achieve an order to salary them and then verbs about it. It may never enjoy even gone to court. You can check by going to the courthouse of whereever this is, and look at the suits filed around that time by the title..so and so vs you, and see what happen to it. No one is waiting to grab you and put you contained by jail.
The otherside of the coin is that their pleadings own to show the harm done. Oral slander, I really question that, it would literally hold to be some kind of broadcast, but if you run without your morning in court you be rather foolish.
My dear friend is sueing her childhood abuser. Damages?
He has remunerated for some of her therapy. Can this be construed as a settlement?Answers: Her attorney should know how to answer that question better than any of us here. But from my own experience as an misuse survivor who demanded compensation from her abuser, I don't think that can be construed as a settlement unless that be stated explicitly. I did not take him to court, however.
first of adjectives may i commend your freind on her courage-if she sues her abuser she will probably have to recount the horrors this scumbag inflicted on her-i need her all the terrifically best and leave beside this message-go get the bastard!!!.-he showed you no mercy when you be a child-so show him none now.
What are some reasons to abolish the national lottery? a connection to a source please!?
im taking economics right now and i hold a debate tomorrow and the topic is should we abolish the national lottery. i was assigned person for this, aka i have to hold points to support abolishing the national lottery. please facilitate! links would be the most useful to a site beside info about this on it. thankfulnessAnswers: Lotteries are a tax on the poor and the dumb.
Rich those generally don't involve yourself in in lotteries.
Smart those know the odds, so they once in a blue moon paly, or limit their purchases, because they know that the probability never favor them..
Will the USA ever adopt the United Nation's Universal Declaration Human Rights and add a Right to Privacy?
Amendment to the Constitution?Answers: The right to privacy is also covered surrounded by the 9th Amendment which states: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of unshakable rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
In other words, basically because it is not specifically addressed, does not expect we don't have it. This argument (among others) be used specifically for the legalization of birth control and abortion and passing the Privacy Act of 1974, and the Financial Privacy Act of 1978.
Good Lord I pray not. If you reflect on we should you obviously own absolutely no clue as to the UN's history and who they elected to manager the Human Rights Council ...
U.S. Ambassador John Bolton said he was not surprised that “a number of countries that themselves are gross abusers of human rights get elected."
http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchives/displa...
We already do have the Right to Privacy...
4th Amendment
The right of the associates to be secure contained by their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrant shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and conspicuously describing the place to be searched, and the folks or things to be seized.
the UN has not capable a single thing contained by 60 years, why should we or anyone else care what they "the UN" think or has to speak.
Is it legal for a U.S. citizen to bring back health thought in Canada?
I'm not chitchat about their complete health concern that Canadian Citizens receive. Are there any law of either country that prohibit a U.S. citizen from going to Canada and paying for medical treatment?Answers: There is zilch preventing a US citizen from obtaining robustness care contained by Canada (paid of course).
I am a dual citizen with Canada and I travel to Canada regularly for positive types of health nurture which are costly here.
And I laugh at the personage who says Canadians adjectives want to come to the U.S. to obtain "good" vigour care---obviously they are from Ontario.
I doubt it.
And no American would even want to go to Canada for Health Care.
But thousands of Canadians come here for Good Health Care.
And that IS endorsed.
I got a speeding ticket contained by Michigan, How can i fight it?
I get a speeding ticket in Michigan, but im orginally from illinois. The ticket is 145$ but i one and only got written down for doing 30 on 25. the cop told me i be doing 38 on a 25. I am not sure what I was doing. anyway i dont enjoy money to pay it, What is the process of taking it to court and combat it? basically I am hoping the cop doesnt show up to court and so I dont own to pay it, and if he does show up, i should hold enough money to take-home pay it by the time the court comes around. Need advice from someone next to experience pleaseAnswers: Speeding tickets are VERY hard to flay. Additionally the old "I hope the cop doesn't show up so I'll go and get off" thing is urban allegory. It was true, however it is not anymore. If you want the cop their, you enjoy to subpoena him. The court has a form for this. You can bet the cop will be nearby.
If the cop doesn;'t show upo, you're outta these. but, how itworks is, the court lines up ALL tickets from this officer for a particular daytime.
My suggestion, notify the court you will pay, but cannot income all at once and would similar to to work something out.
It sounds like they already cut you a break.
clear 145.00 for the ticket, or, get a legal representative and spend 500.00 to 1000.00 to fight the ticket, the choice is yours.
honest luck
You have the money to travel support again, take a year off work, to skirmish it, but don't have the money to salary just remuneration it? How does that work?
The cop gave you a big break, but you still want to spar it?
Just be an adult. Quit trying to weasle out of stuff. Take responsibility and lug your medicine. And oh yeah, slow the heck down.
self out of state you have no Chance, how ever the courts will arrange a reimbursement plan, call and ask
More Questions and Answers:
[130] - [2500] - [2505] - [1448] - [1601] - [1375] - [2461] - [1737] - [877] - [1685] - [244] - [54] - [1733] - [95] - [911] - [804] - [2091] - [1069] - [1220] - [2365]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question:
