Law Questions and Answers
Any Ideas Why a High School District in California Would Do This?
I own 50 /50 shared custody of my daughter with my ex-wife. While trying to compile the number of college absences my daughter have while living with her mother compared to while she be living with me, I come across an interesting situation.On my daughters report card, it shows the accurate number of excused absences final year, 42 days absent. When I have the school jump back into their computer and verbs up their IAA (ADA Activity inquiry) to get the specific date which she was away from home, it shows she was lone absent 8 days. All absence were excused.
I thought the conservatory was defraud the State by underreporting the absences but when I appointment the admin office they told me that the college gets rewarded if the absences are excused.
I checked my daughters absence 2 years ago and it was also different, 10 days compared to 25 days.
I construe the school may possibly be defraud the State of CA but I can't figure out how. They didn't want me to enjoy the IAA report.
Any Ideas???
Answers: It is likely going on across the board throughout the US.
Money is the key to most things, esp where on earth there is management money to be had.
Am interested to know what you find out.
There could be profoundly of reaasons. The money isn't n issue--they are telling the truth in attendance. but schools are rate on a number of factors--and one of them is absenteeism. So underreproting absence or othe rnagative items increases a schools ranking--which does affect funding at budgent time.
This is probably a problem near many students--but unless you are surrounded by a position to get toghether plenty parents to file a class-action suit and see it through, you should probably drop it. I know of plentiful cases in which academy officials retaliate--via suspensions, etc. agaisst students whose parents kind waves.
I'm not say-so ing "don't do anything." Just make sure its a clash you have the resources to fight--and if you do--go for it. If not, don't cut your knose bad to spite your face.
Once i file a lawsuit surrounded by wisconsin, how long must i wait previously i can request/serve subpoenas on witnesses?
Answers: As soon as the judge signs the subpoena motion
Depends on the purpose of the subpoena.
Need someone to answer question going on for an illegal adoption and how to manipulate it.?
Answers: You should be contacting a lawyer surrounded by your state. A lot of them have free consultations, and will answer your question during that consultation. Good luck!
Do NOT wait! Do NOT chew over about it! Call a advocate now!
Do u think mull over did is right?
Should convicts be given credit for being worthy in incarcerate?Support ur thots
Answers: Yes, they should. Just like near children, they must be incentivized to do the things you want them to do.
I think that ancestors who try to get their homework question answered on Yahoo answers should be given false information and invalid sources so that when they return to school the subsequent day their mentor will realize they didn't actually do the work.
Source: Actually DID my homework surrounded by high academy and college.
Is it normal for someone who claims they are wrongfully caged to bring his case against the steward?
For example, in Sheppard vs Maxwell (1966), Maxwell be the warden of the prison where on earth Sam Sheppard was detained. What is the permitted reason for the charges self brought against the warden fairly than the State of Ohio, which had sentenced him to prison?Answers: yes it is because the specific accomplishment called a "writ of habeas corpus" is a civil conduct
Criminal actions involve the state whereas habeas corpus activities involve two people.
Habeas corpus travels challenge the authority of the detainment and are brought against the warden or within some cases the attorney general. The achievement says "Warden, you holding me is illegal" to some extent than "US state, why you convicted me was irroneous". The state involvement completed with the trial and the steward took over from there.
It is really a relic of olden times. It doesn't make much sense why it is not considered a criminal tenet action, but i.e. the way it go. It confuses the heck out of law students every year
Because it be a habeas corpus proceeding which requires there be a human self to whom the court can direct its writ.
In Gideon v. Wainright, also a habeas corpus action, Louis Wainright be the Director of Florida's state prison system. Miranda v. Arizona was an appeal from an Arizona criminal decision. Criminal csases are brought by the state so the state itself was a deputation.
How long does it take for "not guilty" charge to erase from a history?
I was found not guilty of a mistemeanor charge at age 20 and am presently 23. I was told contained by court that it would be completely off my story eventually, but they didn't tell me how long that would clutch. How long does it take for it to shift off of your transcript of the charges were dropped, but the wrongdoer was an full-grown at the time?Answers: An arrest remains on your arrest record forever. If you were found not guilty, you do not own a conviction record.
Charges weren't dropped - you be found not guilty. You will always own the arrest record, but it will not imitate a conviction.
Charges dropped and not guilty are two different legal animals.
If you be found not guilty, then there's nought to be taken off. You be acquitted.
Can my human resource personnel do an investigation and tell me shes documenting our conversation at the fall?
The incident did not directly involve me. It happen over 5 months ago and to be honest i don't remember exactly what happened. she would not bear that for an answer. i thought if she was going to document our conversation she needed to hold my consent before anything be said and not throw it in at the shutting down of the conversation. Isn't there any law that prohibit that? i never gave her my consent.Answers: No, she does not enjoy to inform you that she is going to document your conversation. Beside, what did you expect? Her to just rely on memory? You should other assume HR is going to document anything you say to them.
yes.she can. she didn't stipulation your consent.
With a list of 75 breeds, and growing, human being restricted or out right banned how can ancestors beleive it is all?
going on for just pit bulls. ANd how can they not see it is an outright attack on our rights to own dogs?Answers: It's not adjectives about pit bulls and I don't chew over the view is that pit bulls are the one and only ones who attack.
I am a victim of a dog attack, I be attacked by my own dog which I owned for 3 years before the attack and in that was no previous sign or alarm that the dog may attack. The question that is to say asked most often when I discuss my attack is, "what generous of dog was it?"
Statistically Pitbulls are the most adjectives breed in lingo of fatal attacks on humans. Followed distantly by Rottweilers and German Shepherds. Dogs of any breed can attack, though the attacks appear to be much more prevelant in finicky breeds and pitbulls top the list. Especially when you seperate the attacks by severity.
I don't know.
I can`t stand people who don't realize dogs molded more by their owners, not the dogs themself.
pit bulls can be treacherous if bred and trained irresponsibly. It's the same for copious other breeds, however, pit bulls are the most notorious for human attacks.
what are the breeds? I hold a Dobby , a Great Dane and a Golden- Chow mix. I bet they are all on near aren't they. Yeah blame the dogs and not the lousy owners.
Insurance companies don't like them . . . they are other a liability
An attack on personal rights, for sure. That is how it's done. They restrict the rights on an unpopular activity and that will extend to others but they never see the nouns.
I don't think that breeds should be outlawed. But, in attendance are people out nearby who breed dogs to be attack dogs. The breeding is done deliberately, and the training is done clearly. These dogs are lethal military capability, and people are putting anyone practical their house at risk of being injured or kill by them. With the right to own dogs comes the responsibility to own dogs. Too many inhabitants are abusing their right.
What enumerate? That sounds fishy,
,
I don't care what you say aloud their should be restrictions on Pit Bull's..I have see in personage how a very loving Pit Bull(my uncle have one) can turn in a second and attack a small child!!! I be stunned and sickened !!
I have a boxer I have 2 they wanted to spar, I now own one, the thing is I hold a dog park we use in WV and the solitary dogs that generally start fight are the pit bulls. In fact My dog be bitten 4 times in a year, 2 of those bites be pit bulls.
P.S. if you go to a dog park it is rather possible to have a dog face-off because many culture have dogs they hold not socialized and will try to be dominate, which means do argue.
I don't think there's any right research one way or the other to suggest whether or not the dogs are the problem or the relations who own them.
However, in frequent of the attack cases, the dogs have have a history of violence which the owners chose to cut. So ultimately, the question become one of making sure that owners are going to be responsible BEFORE the dogs become problems. Maybe we ought to make sure that inhabitants have to pinch classes before owning a potentially harmful breed of dog.
It is not an attack on what you call "rights to own dogs". It is a response to the coarse care and control of these animals. As far as I know, not a soul has the right to own a dog. It is a privilege if you can afford to own a dog.
We have adjectives heard or witnessed attacks by dogs that where on earth otherwise normal lovable dogs. I can't muse over an instance when a dog attacked while the owner was present. It is when these animals win out, that is the risk. So if you want a pit bull (or any other animal) you should be required to protect the community. My neighbor have 5 dogs 2 pits, 2 rots and a german shep. He thought it was without a flaw fine to keep adjectives 5 in the support yard. The problem I have was the paling was singular 38" high. Those dogs be out everyday. One attacked the next door neighbor.
Your "right" to own a animal that could be unsafe is exceeded by the rights of the community to be safe within their own back courtyard from unprovoked attack.
I want to copy 60 pages out of a 600 page book and next bind those 60 pages .does this breaking the copyright?
Answers: Do not expect a commercial printer or copyshop to do it for. If you be to copy it yourself and then enjoy someone bind it for you and use it for personal use you should not have any copyright problems, especially if you own the book that you plan to copy. Publishers don't verbs so much about single sets for personal use they will however step after the Kinko's of the world if they were to copy it. Print and copy shops would a bit be safe than sorry.
This would depend on your purpose for copying those 60 page.
"One of the rights accorded to the owner of copyright is the right to reproduce or to authorize others to reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords. This right is subject to spot on limitations found in section 107 through 118 of the Copyright Act (title 17, U. S. Code). One of the more important limitations is the doctrine of “fair use.” Although generous use was indefinite in the previous copyright ruling, the doctrine has developed through a substantial number of court decision over the years. This doctrine has be codified in booth 107 of the copyright law.
Section 107 contains a roll of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a one work may be considered “fair,” such as criticism, comment, news reporting, instruction, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factor to be considered in determining whether or not a demanding use is fair:
1. the purpose and behaviour of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit helpful purposes;
2. the nature of the copyrighted work;
3. amount and substantiality of the portion used contained by relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
4. the effect of the use upon the potential bazaar for or value of the copyrighted work."
If i was charged next to 3 drug felonies can i be suspended from work next court hearring?
Answers: Boy I hope so...
ya
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/index;_ylt=...
If your company has a strict drug policy or have contracts with the parliament then yes you can.
If you worked for me you would definately be suspended for a long time.
Yes, you can. If you're working within an employment-at-will state, you can even be fired.
Ummmm I think so Cause my friend be and i was charged for my first one. XD that be a wild fte... Ya know untill the cops showed up but it was fun while it last. Plus If you are charged then capture to know the judge become friends im already friends near the first judge i met ^^o
It really depends on the policy of your employer but yes you can be suspended or even fired for individual charged with a drug felony.
yes sucks for you and by the means of access be careful next to the drugs take a long leave and do them then so the drugs resign from your system before you are tested i grain for you too about anyone caught. i was caught twice party.
Normally every company has surrounded by their policy the action they clutch if you're facing criminal charges, if it's in nearby then yes.
If you matter with any type of affairs of state work, you're toast.
Yes, they have no must to keep you on imminent any situation legal or otherwise. They (your employer) are free to dismiss you at anytime and minus a reason.UNLESS. you are lower than some written agreement or contract. (probably not...huh?). The thing you should do is narrate your supervisor or the owner of the company that you are in litigation over this stuff and that you enjoy retained legal counsel and are war the charges with everything at your disposal. Dont claim to be guilty or innocent...newly tell them you are working tough to put the matter to rest. Give them a star studded assurance that this will within no way affect your errand or performance at work. When you speak I am completey innocent.It sounds like you are aphorism "I am guilty as crap". I wish you luck.your going to want it.
More Questions and Answers:
[998] - [1143] - [2541] - [440] - [1843] - [1478] - [1335] - [354] - [650] - [1319] - [1678] - [1929] - [403] - [69] - [526] - [2405] - [131] - [1993] - [2089] - [793]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: