Law Questions and Answers

Workmans comp abuse?

I know a despicable creature that gets workman's comp benefits nonetheless works a full time job , does anyone know where on earth I would report this too ?

Answers: Call this person's employer. You can remain anonymous. Report your suspicion. Workers comp claims affects the bottom line of employer. They will definitely be calling their adjuster to engineer sure this gets investigated.

Search the Labor and Industry (L&I) department surrounded by your state, usually they're the ones dealing with work comp. They're state runned.

How does someone become a judge?

WHAT IS THE PROCESS.. DO YOU FIRST HAVE TO FIRST WORK AS A LAWYER OR YOU GO TO JUDGE SCHOOL???
WHAT IS THE PROCESS..

THANKS

Answers: In CA, you must be a attorney admitted to the CBAR first. You can after seek an appointment by the governor, or go and get elected.

You can also be a Court Commissioner. These are lawyers appointed by the Superior Court panel of magistrates to hear mostly traffic and small claims cases as well as criminal preliminary hearing.

First, you have to draw from your bachelor's degree from an official college.

Next, you go to directive school and ratify.

Next, you have to give somebody a lift the state bar exam and acquire admitted to the practice of ruling.

Next, in most cases, folks go to work as lawyer. Now, some judges take elected (this happens alot beside local judges)while others are appointed (all federal judges are appointed as are most state circuit judges). In any case, if you work for the state attorney's department or public defenders bureau, those folks tend to get on hastily track to a judgship given their trial experience and the fact that they achieve their names certain. quickly.

Generally (and this may differ from state to state) an orifice for a judge is announced and applicants respond. In Wyoming the requirements (for a supreme court justice) are that the applicant must enjoy been within practice for 9 years, be at least 30 years ancient, a citizen of the US, and have be a Wyoming resident for at least 3 years. For substandard judges the requirements are smaller quantity.

A judicial nomination committee selects from the applicants (In Wyoming 3 are preferred for supreme court justices).

Then the governor selects one of the remaining 3.

So surrounded by Wyoming (for a supreme court justice) you must have worked as a advocate in some trend for at least 9 years.

And within is no "judge school".

Remember that states differ as to this process, so your state may be fairly different.

You have to be a attorney first. Cbar is probably Calif. state bar association. Judge conservatory comes later surrounded by the form of training.

How do you get a misery liscence in Texas? I necessitate it to drive to school since my mom cant drop me rotten anymor

I'm turning sixteen in 2 days but I don't own time to wait resembling 6 months after a permit. Can i get hold of a hardship? is in attendance qualificatons?

Answers: here are some more details on who qualifies for a difficulty in texas

http://info.sos.state.tx.us/pls/pub/read...

look underneath # 2 A-H

you and a million other teens who can hardly dally for their lisence. Life has its rules and you'll purely have to continue like everyone else. How going on for the bus, or walking or a bike. Perhaps another friend or friends parents.

Do you agree with the censorship of Kathy Griffin's "Jesus" comments?

She said that most performer thank Jesus for their win, she said no one have less to do near her win than Jesus. The censors are adjectives that comment out of the broadcast to avoid offending people. Do you agree near the censorship?

Answers: i like kathy griffin, and i don't agree beside the censorship of that comment, if it offends you don't listen to it! to me it's not resembling she's really putting down Jesus, it's more like she's making fun of relatives who most likely backstabbed or screwed someone else over to get hold of where they are, and immediately all the sudden they want to thank Jesus! lol! that's only crazy!!

It's their show and they can do what they want. However, she is known for saw outrageous things and this is no different. I think they should enjoy shown it.

And just motto you "can't stand her" really doesn't answer the question..does it.

You moved out out the rest of the quote which was,

"Suck it, Jesus. This award is my god very soon."

I think that be what put it over the edge. I agree beside the Catholic guy (also in the article) that responded by dictum that if she said "Suck it, Muhammed," it would have a much different repercussion.

it is my opinion, that she is entitled to her evaluation.

however, neither of us has the RIGHT to be hear.

I'm sure she told the truth that it wasn't Jesus, but Satan that helped her. At tiniest she told the truth, because many contained by Hollywood are involved in cults of Satan, but to hold on to their popularity they claim to be Christian or an ungodly religion. They say anything except to say-so that I worship the devil and follow his way.

Christians entail to see the demonic in the world. We still own free speech and she can promote hate speech as she did, but I pity her soul. Rejecting Jesus is the route to hell. I pray that she will repent and surrender her life to Christ. When the Lord returns every knees will bow and every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord.

At least she is not a fraudster. She serves the devil and she speaks it with her right to free speech which our forefathers bled and died for. The devil have come out of the closet along with masses others of his wicked demons and I am not conversation about homosexuality even though it is an abomination to God.

Among us today are fall angels and they are making themselves known through humans. Jesus said within the latter days it would be as it was surrounded by the days of Noah and in the days of Noah the fall angels and demonic influenced and possessed humans.

No I don't agree. I hate Kathy Griffin, but she have a right to say what she requirements. The fu***ing church is demanding an apology from the network & Kathy, which is bullcrap. I gain really tired of how our country in the closing 10 years has become an apologetic, wussed out edition of it's former self. It always seem that the smallest group has the loudest voice. & instead of aphorism "Well that's your opinion. Sorry we're not going to conversion this country just for you few. You involve to learn to adapt" We utter "OH GOD!!! We're sorry, Please don't sue us, just because you don't believe contained by the FREEDOM OF SPEECH!"

It's all crap. & society wonder why we're being targetted by the smaller number powerful countries right now. it doesn't business if we're the strongest damn country on the planet earth or not. If we sit in attendance & let population in our country bully us & see us all around we will be a country divided. & that's when we are attacked.

I dont believe she's the end-all be-all of comedy, but I thought the Jesus comment was awfully insightful and comedically poignant. Im so tired of everyone thanking Jesus for everything including Superbowls, basehits, not getting voted out of realty tv competitions etc...
The comment she made be hysterical to me and right on the money. If you are offended by it, afterwards you can bite me. Everyone thanking Jesus for everything offend me. Dont shove your religion down my throat.

and to "Jeancom.." above, I hope you are being spiteful, because you appear to need psychiatric assistance.

What has happen to the poor little irish catholic girl ? Looks like the jesuits get 'er.

Why death cost is immoral and cruel?

explain why do you construe death cost is immoral.

Answers: You could voice two wrongs don't make a right, that unfolding somebody the date that they'll die amounts to torture, etc. I'm not sure about the moral/ethical issues, but I do focus there are means of access too many PRACTICAL problems next to capital punishment. I be pro-death penalty for a long time, but I enjoy changed my stance over the years, for several reasons:

1. By far the most compelling is this: Sometimes the legitimate system gets it wrong. Look at adjectives the people who own been released after years of internment because they were exonerated by DNA evidence. Unfortunately, DNA evidence is not available contained by most cases. No matter how singular it is, the government should not risk executing one single innocent character.

Really, that should be reason plenty for most people. If you want more, read on:

2. Because of the extra expense of prosecuting a DP case and the appeals process (which is essential - see reason #1), it costs taxpayers MUCH more to execute prisoners than to put in prison them for life.

3. The deterrent effect is questionable at best. Violent crime rates are if truth be told HIGHER in demise penalty states. This may appear counterintuitive, and there are lots theories about why this is (Ted Bundy saw it as a flout, so he chose Florida – the most active execution state at the time – to take out his final murder spree). Personally, I think it have to do with the hypocrisy of taking a stand against murder…by slaughter people. The governing body becomes the desperate parent who says, ‘do as I vote, not as I do.’

4. There’s also an argument to be made that death is too apposite for the worst of our criminals. Let them wake up and move about to bed every day of their lives within a prison cell, and think something like the freedom they DON’T have, until they rot of matured age. When Ted Bundy was finally arrested within 1978, he told the police officer, “I wish you have killed me.”

5. The U.S. establishment is supposed to be secular, but for those who invoke Christian law contained by this debate, you can find arguments both for AND against the death cost in the Bible. For example, Matthew 5:38-39 insists that belligerence shall not beget violence. James 4:12 say that God is the only one who can give somebody a lift a life within the name of even-handedness. Leviticus 19:18 warns against retribution (which, really, is what the death cost amounts to). In John 8:7, Jesus himself says, "tolerate he who is without sin stereotype the first stone."

It is not immoral. It is not cruel. But those are not the reason it should be abolished. It should be abolish because it is not applied equally under the decree and is a violation of the equal protection clause of the constitution.

If every first amount murder not resulting frominsanity was required to head to execution, and that execution was carried out surrounded by 90 days no matter the see, sex, religion, or handicap of the guilty, then it would be fine. Since to be exact not the state of affairs now, it shoud be terminated.

The problem with a extermination penalty is that it allows society to annihilate people base on a law.

Crossing that row can lead to a society increasing the number of law that can lead to departure penalties. While most populace would agree to execute murders, what happens when the decree says that human being the member of an "illegal" group is a departure penalty baggage or maybe failing to vote.

The explanation places like North Korea enjoy 100% voter turn out is because of freedom, it's because any mistake can lead to destruction.

there are better solutions.

labor, medical and/or proven experimentation.

boy, if we put our heads together, what could we come up beside?

It is not immoral or cruel, it is even-handedness.
If you steal $5, then you owe exactly $5, not a penny smaller quantity. If you take a life span, then you owe a duration, it is the only entity of equal value. Not implement the death cost is an insult to the victim and an insult to equality.

I think its application is normally immoral and cruel, especially where on earth the Law of Parties is applied (i.e., convicting all within a group for the crime of one).

However, for the most heinous crimes and worst criminals, I think it is appropriate.

We of late hand out the disappearance penalty too frequently, at lowest possible in my state (Texas).

Killing another human human being is wrong in civilized society, except within deirect defense of one's life or home. whether you are an everyday citizen or under "Official sanction' from the State or affairs of state. It has also become more unconcealed with the increased use of DNA, that we hold convicted and sentenced to death innocent population. Who wil be held accountable for them? Should the jury, prosecutor, settle, etc be executed now as economically? I'm not religious at all, but even I believe with the sole purpose God has the right to claim a human beings life span. What is the worst is that its the so called "Pro-Lifers', thsoe who influence abortion is wrong are the one's who most vocally support the passing penalty. WTF? by the agency I don't support abortion except in cases of rape, incest or impair to the mother. SO I am truly pro-life.

How are people screaming for the blood of another human human being any more morally just than the party who killed surrounded by the first place? It is crazy, all the general public saying they should put associates to death for crule things to other general public and they are screaming for cruel things and death to be done to other those,. Do you not see the hypocracy in that?

Edit - ok tolerate say wmcritter get convicted of killing lundstrom-2004 because he thought lundstrom stole $5, so Firefighter _joe have wmcritter killed. But presently we find out dadio was newly performing a scientific experiment on lundstrom when it go terribly wrong. So wmcriter be innocent, but he's already dead and firefighter_joe have him killed for it, so Should firefighter_joe immediately be killed?

Firstly...The passing penalty is dissipated because the legal system that impose it is biased against the poor, minorities and foreigners. In America, the rich, well connected, (usually white) murderer seldom if ever receive the death cost. Money is able to buy slightly a different form of justice. Immoral? Yes, and cruel too.

Secondly... When in that is a miscarriage of justice and the state executes an innocent personage. It is irreversible. The legal system is too fallible to be allowed to be in somebody`s space the death cost. Again, the victims of such miscarriages of justice are the poor, minorities and foreigners and the race making and enforcing the law have no source to care for this constituency. Can you visualize the hell an innocent person endure in this situation. Again, Immoral and Cruel.

Thirdly... In instruct for the state to carry out the sentence of release, it must hire people to in fact do the killing. These population are usually emotionally and psychologically scarred for existence by these acts. More Immorality and Cruelty.

How can a system of dubious worth in preventing or reducing crime while risking the execution of innocent relatives be moral?

BTW- Many people who say-so "eye for an eye" misunderstand that it meant that punishments should be no more severe than the crime, not at most minuscule as severe,

Public defender wva satchel?

You know it upsets me to think this man who have just be arrested for cruel treatment to the lady within wva.Has had tons of arrests over 100 charges and our due dollars pay for his public supporter?how is this fair?I have a sneaking suspicion that they should have public ally two times thats it and then they own to come up wiht the money...
I know a guy who was given a public ally and was making 12,000 a month selling drugs and living within 1,500 a month apartment and driving a BMW.(he has a chronicle of warrants presently i cant get his butt within jail daughters bf i beckon the law constantly and they never obtain there contained by time *eye roll*)..excuse me but i had to retribution lawer for custody and i got no facilitate from state.
How is this fair????????????????????????????????

Answers: Unfortunatly because every one is innocent until proven guilty and entitled to a impartial trial meaning they enjoy to be represented by a competent attorney no matter the charge.

Custody is not a criminal thing. It is a private matter. In criminal cases, the state proposes to deprive someone of their enthusiasm liberty or property and the canon requires the appointment of counsel. Now the fella who had a biddable but illegal income may not own been entitled to appointed counsel, but get one anyway, but that one case out of the abundant (20,000 per year in my county) does not tight that the system is broken. It is just finances that sometimes people are competent to exploit the weaknesses. In that suitcase, the weakness is that the court does not hold the time or resources to fully explore the question of whether one is really indigent.

Can anyone tell me just about arrest warrants surrounded by Wisconsin?

Can anyone tell me something like arrest warrants? How are they issued and whatnot? Do they come to your home to arrest you once one is issued? If anyone who know about this can break it down for me, it would be appreciated. Thanks!

Answers: ARREST WITH WARRANT

An arrest occur when a suspect is taken into custody for the purpose of booking that suspect on a criminal charge.
Arrest Warrant vs. Search Warrant

A search warrant provides a canon enforcement officer with the authority required by tenet to gain access to a premise, conduct a search, and requisition property. An arrest warrant permits a tenet enforcement officer to make a correct arrest of a specific person. Arrest warrant and search warrant are only available to regulation enforcement agents (including the FBI and the DEA), but neither are available to private citizens. And both are issued by a judge.
Arrest Warrant Issuance

An arrest warrant is obtain by a law enforcement agent (typically, by a federal agent, state police, county sheriff, or local police officer) after have appeared before a believe to be (usually a magistrate) and presenting evidence that substantiates cause for an arrest. The evidence presented to the pass judgment to obtain the warrant may become a trial technicality in a criminal bag, but generally speaking, the evidence involve only lead to a reasonable entity to conclude that a crime be committed. The evidence need not prove a crime beyond a plausible doubt, nor even be clear and convincing. Arrest warrants are drastically similar to search warrant in this bearing; both require evidence that causes a adequate person to believe that a crime have been committed.

Knock & Announce & Don't Destroy

An officer beside an arrest warrant is required by law to knock and announce his presence back entering the premise of another even if the officer positively identifies, beyond doubt knows, or have a reasonable belief that the suspect is inwardly the premise. That's the law. And it is possible that the procedures employed to land a warrant or to exercise a warrant will become a legal give somebody the third degree in a valise based on various technicalities, so these are just broad guidelines.

Now, generally speaking, here are some of the exceptions to the rule. The amount of time between "knock and announcing" and "entering and arresting" can be slight. The officer need not knock or announce if he have a reasonable belief that by doing so, he may place himself or others into a chancy situation, evidence may be moved or destroyed, or even if he believes that some other event might occur that would prohibit the arrest. Under Wisconsin law, the "knock and announce" rule have been challenge many times.

An officer should not verbs property unnecessarily during an arrest, but he may "break in" thus destroying windows and doors to gain access.
WARRANT FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR (BENCH WARRANT)

If a personage (or sometimes a witness) fails to appear within court as directed by the citation or summons served on them, the court may issue a bench warrant for the person's arrest. The "bench warrant" is sent to the local, state, or national authorities, as the case may require. A “bench warrant” effectively tell the authorities to bring the person name in the warrant to the courtroom of the peacemaker issuing the warrant.

In a job application when it ask "IF I EVER BEEN CONVICTED OF A FELONY" is here a statute of limitation

i want to know if its true that if a individual has a felony conviction from similar to 10 years past, can that creature say no for an answer to the felony cross-question??

Answers: No, you need to look up the connotation of the word "ever" .
If you lie, & they find out, you will be worse bad anyway.
Come clean, relate the truth, if it is for less than an ax murderer, you may be surprised, they might be impressed next to your honesty.

That's why they use that word "ever".

You should know, listing a long-gone felony conviction really doesn't mean they won't hire you.

BUT, if you DON'T document it and they find out, they will definitely can you!

jace, when the application say "ever convicted," they mean ever, not purely in the final X number of years.

So answer the question truthfully. If you flop and are later detected, you'll be fired. If there's a place to explain or put in anymore beyond yes or no, note the year first and write a brief, honest explanation.

Also prepare exactly what you'll vote when they notice that positive answer. "I be young and incredibly stupid ten years ago. Since consequently, I've grown up."

A felony conviction will stay on your record for the rest of your existence.
If you answer NO to the question, afterwards a criminal history is done and the conviction is seen, afterwards you will be fired for lying on your application.
My advice: Answer truthfully. If they ask you something like your conviction during an interview, explain the circumstances and your record since afterwards.
(Note the word "ever" in the query.)

As far as I know there is no statute of curbing on the word "ever".

Usually if a company only wishes history back 5,10 or 20 years they will stipulate that time frame within the question.

If it will show up on a framework check you have to recognize to it.
So unless you have manage to get a felony expunged from your history it would be best to put a little check indicate in the yes box.

It depends on the how it is worded on the applications. MOST charge and housing applications ask if the individual has be convicted of a felony in times gone by 7 years, but not all.

If it asks if you own EVER been convicted of a Felony, a human being is strongly encouraged to answer honestly. If they find out that you lied when they do a environment check, you run the risk of not getting the job, or obtain fired if you were already hired.

What was rachel elleene cooks crime within florida?

she is in prison within florida for attempted murder and conspiracy. she was convicted out of escambia county. closing address was surrounded by walnut hill florida.

Answers: In her own words:

I am 25 years feeble and have be incarcerated since I was 17 years behind the times. To tell you briefly … I be sentenced in 1999, at 18 years weak, for conspiracy to commit murder and principal to commit murder, both on the First degree … the subject was – is – my father, who testify on my behalf and was approved contained by 1999 to visit me by Jeb Bush. I be sentenced to 30 years in prison.

Do i have the right to know who is complaining nearly me to city goverment?

i am in norway, michigan. these complaints are normaly zoning issues

Answers: If you are committing a crime by violate zoning regulations then you own no right. If you are being slandered or libeled and this is cause the city to come after you then you can pocket legal bustle to find out who it is.

NO you have no rights to know who file a complaint.

More Questions and Answers:
[1826] - [2346] - [1131] - [2312] - [1336] - [1071] - [1580] - [1175] - [327] - [1333] - [1077] - [1308] - [1754] - [348] - [2027] - [460] - [982] - [265] - [119] - [1936]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: