Law Questions and Answers

What qualifications do you involve to be a fudge packer?

also do you need them to be a mincer or an uphill gardener?
Answers: What is it today beside all the twelve year olds sniggering at their stupid posts?
Drive a pickup.
Love NASCAR.
Claim you enjoy been save by Jesus.
Believe in Creationism.
Drink cheap American Beer.
a fudge packer? as far as i be aware, a fudge packer was someone who be constipated..

do you mean you want to work for cadbury or something similar to that? and what are you talking going on for when you say mincer and uphill gardener.. that bit throw me adjectives together
LOL at your questions and answers so far!

I estimate any qualification you might require for first two is the ability to rad so you know how much fudge to pack surrounded by one packet and to keep your fingers secure when mincing! As for uphill gardener ... First aid! You'd need it as your pay for might get sore if not you might slip LOL
For anyone not yet within the know, fudge-packer is an amusing slang british term for a homosexual. (Come on guys it's compassionate of obvious!)

No diploma are required, so I reckon you'd be fine for the job mate! LOL
WARNING: the following answer have sexual references and could be horrible.

This is one of many expressions for a man who practices anal intercourse, i.e. a male homosexual as the word fudge is a euphemism for faeces. I suspect any someone is "having you on"(pulling your leg) or you are pretending to be optimistic in lay down to practice your toilet humour.
The term Hershey highway mechanism the rectum, for similar reasons. Uphill gardener? Use your imagination.
No one chooses to be homosexual or heterosexual; studies enjoy indicated possible causes of sexual location to be hormonal, genetic, and psychological.
Given your rampantly hetero Yahoo moniker and questions on the nonspecific theme of homosexuality, are you trying to recount us something?

Are you really in denial?

Should your yahoo first name be "not-gay-just-curious"?

Do you feel a bit disgusted next to yourself after a bit of cottaging? Feeling the need to display your rampant heterosexuality adjectives over yahoo answers?

Secretly love Judy Garland and leather?

We all appreciate and it's alright. Sometimes it must be difficult to come out, but I'm sure with a bit of encouragement and actual courage, you might generate it.
is that a pun for what I think it is? cruel.... the answer is 'a crown'!

Anyone have any belief of the ratio used to make an out of court propose?

claim: Future loss of earnings lb220,000. plus affliction and suffering, etc. Total claim somewhere between lb250,000 and lb330,000. I am not accepting any partial blame. Is there a % used as a guideline for out of court settlement offer? Court papers lodged this week. Independent barrister (lb600 per hour!) gave me an incredibly apposite % chance of sucess.
Answers: It's not so much a ratio as an analysis of their possible likelihood at losing, the cost of litigation, etc. It's not a strict formula.

Just remember that if you get a firm volunteer of lbX, you have to go together that against the uncertain possibility of prevailing at trial.

Please Continue?

# on oath. The merchant is consequently proved to be a thief and shall be put to annihilation. The owner of the lost article receives his property, and he who bought it receive the money he paid from the estate of the merchant.

# If the purchaser does not bring the merchant and the witnesses up to that time whom he bought the article, but its owner bring witnesses who identify it, then the buyer is the pickpocket and shall be put to death, and the owner receive the lost article.
Answers: # Put the merchant, purchaser, and owner to death, and the estates of respectively go to the affairs of state.
yeah...whatever he said.

How do laws capture made?

Answers: very simplified, but a pretty right illustration:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEJL2Uuv-...
did u ever learn anything contained by school?

Please Continue?

# then he who have brought the accusation shall be put to departure, while he who leaped into the river shall take possession of the house that have belonged to his accuser.

# If anyone brings an accusation of any crime past the elders, and does not prove what he have charged, he shall, if it be a capital offense charged, be put to departure.

# If he satisfies the elder to impose a fine of small piece or money, he shall receive the fine that the action produces.

# If a referee tries a case, reach a decision, and presents his perspicacity in writing; if following error shall appear in his conclusion, and it be through his own fault, next he shall pay twelve times the fine set by him surrounded by the case, and he shall be publicly removed from the judge's bench, and never again shall he sit near to render judgment.

# If anyone steals the property of a temple or of the court, he shall be put to departure, and also the one who receives the stolen entry from him shall be put to death.

# If anyone buys from the son or the slave of another man, lacking witnesses or a contract, silver or gold, a manly or female slave, an ox or a sheep, an *** or anything, or if he steal it in charge, he is considered a mugger and shall be put to death.

# If anyone steals cattle or sheep, or an ***, or a pig, or a goat, if it belongs to a god or to the court, the robber shall pay thirty-fold; as a result, if they belonged to a freed man of the king, he shall pay tenfold; if the raider has zilch with which to wage, he shall be put to death.

# If anyone loses an article, and finds it within the possession of another: if the person within whose possession the thing is found say "A merchant sold it to me; I paid for it since witnesses," and if the owner of the thing say, "I will bring witnesses who know my property," then shall the purchaser bring the merchant who sold it to him, and the witnesses past whom he bought it, and the owner shall bring witnesses who can identify his property. The judge shall examine their nouns -- both of the witnesses before whom the price be paid, and of the witnesses who identify the lost article under oath. The merchant is then proved to be a cat-burglar and shall be put to death. The owner of the lost article receive his property, and he who bought it receives the money he remunerated from the estate of the merchant.

# If the purchaser does not bring the merchant and the witnesses before whom he bought the article, but its owner bring witnesses who identify it, consequently the buyer is the thief and shall be put to demise, and the owner receives the lost article.
Answers: I'd be glad to, if there be a question attached.

What should be done this parent who accidentally left her own child contained by the vehicle?

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/a...
What punishment should be dispensed? Should any be dispensed?
Answers: You're very far from your home galaxy aren't you Lord Vader?

You usually terrorize the Religion and Spirituality quadrant!

Anyhow, use the force and generate her do the EWOK DANCE, and forget that part more or less what looks like you one cremated -- it was some OTHER guy, perchance a clone!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5XG1nSlx...
I just read nearly a cop who left their police dog contained by a locked car to die - what is wrong beside these people.

Severe punishment.
she have punishment enough already

its too unpunctually to save the child and I'm sure the woman will never do this again

punishing her more is a spend foolishly of OUR effort and resources
How stupid can ethnic group be? Just walk out to your vehicle after its been within the sun for a few minutes and you know its going to be hot.

Lock the parent up and leave them within the car for a few hours next to no way to start the doors or windows. We can agree to them out as they are gasping for air surrounded by a 150 degree vehicle after a few hours.

Put them in penal complex since people will feel my punishment is being too complicated on them.
This happens an amazing amount of the time. I hold passed vehicles contained by parking lots that have children locked into them myself. Some culture are so stupid they should be sterilized so they cannot pass on their genes.

To be objective, they might be leaving their children unprotected in an attempt to rectify this situation.

Like mothers who drink while pregnant and burden the rest of us beside the care and control of their unmanageable children, they should be sterilized and forbidden from adopt. Freedoms bring obligations, and those who backfire to honour the need to stroke responsibly should have those freedom revoked.

There is no inalienable right to endanger others.
How just about Involuntary manslaughter?
"Involuntary manslaughter, sometimes called criminally slack homicide in the United States, Gross negligence manslaughter surrounded by the UK or culpable homicide in Scotland, occur where at hand is no intention to kill or explanation serious injury but death is due to unruliness or criminal negligence."

Seems to fit

On an unrelated note, I conjecture the gravity machine on the annihilation star broke because your upside down!
if she's human, there's not much that can be done to make her consistency worse than she does now...

remember- Babies are the most complicated devices ever created using unskilled labor.
there's no IQ exam required.
I think you call for to take a long look at this woman and identify if this be an event or if there is a model of child endangerment. if there is a stencil then severe legally recognized punishment.

If not then one year have to drive with a big red sign on the top of her motor, like cabs own, telling the world to check on this motor because the Mom has already kill one child.

Public humiliation needs to be brought hindmost as a punishment for stupidity. The jails and courts are over crowded.
sorry LV..but going away a child in a vehicle
is no quirk. this person should be
locked alone inside a motor on a dark city street
at dusk and see freshly how scary it is.

Is mine and my husband's bank description in jeopardy of one attacked with a taste on my credit report?

I discovered a default judgement on my credit report, file 2003, on record til 2010. Currently it is nominated on the docket as "inactive grip," but judgment be awarded to the plantiff, no further activity since 2003. This be done prior to my marriage, so they are probably questioning under my maiden designation. After researching, I know that available assets, including bank accounts, can be "frozen." I enjoy had no contact from the plantiff, but am hesitant. Will taking my name past its sell-by date account release our story in jeopardy? Thanks guys!
Answers: Have you ever be served by the sheriff's dept. in the county you live surrounded by? If not you personaly, has anyone ever signed for the papers if the sheriff visit you? I work for a financial company, and we can't get a evasion judgement against someone unless they have be served.(But the laws may fluctuate for you if you don't live in the South) But if you enjoy, then yes, your hill accounts are in jeopardy. Same beside your job, if they ever find out where on earth you work they can garnish your wages. Taking your term off the accounts/assets will abet, but why not just try and settle the debt, so you don't hold to worry near it anymore? If you can't afford to that is lucid, but keep within mind if you go and apply for credit somewhere and they verbs your credit report and see that recent inquiry, they can call the company you inquired near and get any info you give to them. So if you don't want to be found, be careful of any info you bequeath out about yourself.
If you remove your describe from the account it may still show up as have been near at one time. Ask your bank if doing so would hold your name from coming up should here be any future inquiries.

If not close out the portrayal and reopen one in your husbands term only. This may not solve your problem though. Depending on which state you live within your husband could still be liable right along with you.
If you be properly served and they have a result against you, they can at this point satisfy that sensitivity by garnishing your bank narrative and your wages from your employer or they could even seize your property.

At this point, both you and your husband own your dune account. Both of you should turn to the bank and completely close that story. If your husband wants to accessible a different account short your name on it, he can, but you should not co-mingle your funds next to his funds. The reason anyone is that if the creditor was skilful and/or interested in doing so, they could forensically dance back and prove that some of the money surrounded by that account is certainly yours and that you are not on the account because you are attempting to avoid gratifying the judgment. If the creditor be able to successfully prove this, next they could probably garnish the entire justification, including your husband's money.


To sum up, you need to separate your assets from your husbands and do so surrounded by a way that will not trademark it look like you are intentionally trying to avoid paying the acumen. Only at that point should you contact the creditor and try to settle the debt.
A court CAN order garnishment of that edge account, and if it's found that you neglected to deposit funds which you generally would have, or removed funds solely to prevent garnishment -- later you could be found in contempt.

In establish to be garnished, the court have to issue an order, upon the petition of the plaintiff -- you would hold to be served, either at home, or at work -- beside papers relating to the garnishment before it take place (in most states), to allow you the opportunity to contest the amount to be removed from your accounts, paychecks, and such.
You want me to help you swot how to avoid the execution of a lawful taste? Your refusal to pay when you hold the ability constitutes contempt of court. I will not aid and abett that crime. I urge you to find the plaintiff and retribution the judgment up to that time the court finds out that you have the fitness and you knew almost the judgment and still refuse to pay.

NEED HELP WITH CHILD PROTECTION & suing for lieing?

my pal have 2 call child protection
agency 2 report a fellow hitting
his kid the fellows gf have a blog site
& put lies on it
the gal said she was calling child
protection on my chum
& make up lies on her
this gal lied 2
child protection & said my mate
beat her son
my chum printed all this gal put on
her blogsite & sent it to
child protection
& give informants who was near
when the gal told people her bf did it
can my chum sue for slander &
defemation
child protection didnt
charge my pal next to anything
coz they know she
was unfolding the truth
my pals identify was blasted
over the internet beside
nasty lies by this gal
& my comrade was protecting
the gal's son
nearby was bruises everywhere
on the kids body & he
be only a infant
when this fellow beat this kid
what can my mate do
Answers: there isn't much of a have need of to sue -- unless he lost work days or character vilification was effecting him directly at work or near the law in that isn't much of a need. i would recommend your friend establish a amazingly good rep next to the police and child protection so as long as stuff like this happen they know he isn't the problem. it never hurts to network yourself.
This is really not Funny at adjectives.

If child protective services had to be call then so be it, and Shut UP.
Ignore the blog's - Ignore the b/s

If P/S find the child to be within a dangerous situation they will remove him to a secure place.

The Children Suffer the Most in Protective Services.

Give me one effect about the terry v.ohio baggage.?

What effect does the terry v. ohio case enjoy on the rules of stop and frisk?
Answers: 1. The Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizure protects people, not places, and and so applies as much to the citizen on the streets as powerfully as at home or elsewhere.

2. The exclusionary rule cannot properly be invoked to exclude the products of legitimate and restrained police investigative technique; and this Court's approval of such techniques should not discourage remedies except the exclusionary rule to curtail police abuses for which explicitly not an effective sanction.

3. The Fourth Amendment applies to "stop and frisk" procedures .

(a) Whenever a police officer accost an individual and restrains his freedom to walk away, he have "seized" that person inside the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.

(b) A painstaking exploration of the outer surfaces of a person's clothing in an attempt to find artillery is a "search" under that Amendment.

4. Where a justifiably prudent officer is warranted surrounded by the circumstances of a given case surrounded by believing that his safety or that of others is in danger of extinction, he may make a fine search for arms of the person believed by him to be armed and perilous regardless of whether he has probable make happen to arrest that individual for crime or the absolute certitude that the individual is armed.

(a) Though the police must whenever practicable secure a warrant to construct a search and appropriation, that procedure cannot be followed where swift endeavour based upon on-the-spot observations of the officer on the assault is required.

(b) The reasonableness of any particular check out and seizure must be assessed within light of the focused circumstances against the standard of whether a man of reasonable inform is warranted contained by believing that the action taken be appropriate.

(c) A search for armaments in the nothingness of probable cause to arrest must be strictly circumscribed by the exigencies of the situation.

(d) An officer may breed an intrusion short of arrest where he have reasonable apprehension of hazard before person possessed of information justifying arrest.
If you don't have probable end in to stop, be very cautious
in your engagements. the particular circumstance within question
seem to justify the cop's schedule...IE, a [potential] robbery in progress.

I live in Canada, and am involved within a accidental release lawsuit what can I expect to get/ask for?

The insurance company wants to manufacture a deal. It be for my dad, and there is my mom, myself and 2 sisters. An economist have figured freshly for loss of income about 300K, so what is a usual amount for heated damages (if that is the right occupancy?).
Answers: Go to your province's courts website (eg. http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/ here in BC) and look for the intertwine to your Supreme or Superior or Queen's Bench Court. Then search the judgment using query expressions like "wrongful death" or "vehicle death". It should bring up cases which are similar. If you look effective the end of the decision, you can see what the court awarded the Plaintiffs.

There are four types of damages in Canada: 1) General damages: can't be calculated glibly, like loss of companionship, loss of adjectives income, pain and suffering, strung-up shock, etc. 2) Special damages: can be calculated using receipts, etc., like vehicle repairs, medications, ambulance bills, wages from the time of the luck to the time of trial, etc. 3) Punitive damages: awarded by the court if the Defendant exhibited unconscionable behavior, causing stormy and financial harm to the Plaintiff [eg. a Mom refuse to allow a dad to see his children if a court ordered visitation, a thug saying he'd eliminate the Plaintiff if the Plaintiff took the case to court, threatening behavior of any form which is exhibited to frighten or defame the Plaintiff] and 4)Nominal damages: these are awarded if a individual broke the law but here was no approach to avoid doing so [eg. a 15 year old who have driven his dad's truck around the farm since he be eight years old but have no driver's license, drives a his mom to the emergency room to save her natural life because no one else be around to do it.]

You have a claim for Special damages, but you want a lawyer to multiply how much you should receive in General Damages. Punitive damages are terribly rarely awarded within Canada, and there is no have need of to consider Nominal damages in your armour.

Never take the insurance company's donate without contacting a attorney to act contained by YOUR best interests. The money you pay the attorney in this valise is well worth it ... and afterwards some! Your Mom will need big bucks to replace the proceeds your father would have provided for your relatives should he have lived. You and your sisters will requirement $$$ to finish your education and become self sufficient. All that take a helluva lot more than $300K, even if your Dad was making minimum wage when he passed away. Get a advocate without hindrance!

Sorry this was so long-winded. Hope this help!
it depends on the cicumstances. 200k isn't that much, since that is a short time ago lost income, and doesn't cover other things such as punitive damages which can be several times the 300k figure.

More Questions and Answers:
[1404] - [1302] - [664] - [1697] - [2476] - [1039] - [1293] - [233] - [2140] - [1106] - [838] - [2366] - [1440] - [2367] - [800] - [384] - [2422] - [1386] - [189] - [1537]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: