Law Questions and Answers

I tried to cancel a free trial magazine subscription, but immediately have be billed an invoice...help!?

I suppose I might be okay on this one, but need opinion of people who may enjoy been within a similar situation.
I filled contained by a form on the internet to recieve a free trial of an international magazine which was Swedish (I live surrounded by UK) and after about 3 weeks I get the mag in the post. The note that came near it stated you had to inform them you didn't want to verbs with the subscription inside 14 days of receipt otherwise they will verbs to send you the monthy mag and bill you.
Now much to my stupidity I forgot to do this up until something like 17 days later, by which time I have recieved an invoice for the full subscription. (But how would they know when I recieved the mag in the post? As UK post can be pretty unpredictable due to recent postal strikes).
Anyway - I hear nothing rear from the email I sent to them requesting that they cancel my subscription, and freshly recently they sent another copy of the mag! They one and only have my given name and (temporary rented) address - no credit details at..
Answers: Keep copies of the emails that you have sent cancel the request. It could be that they shipped the magazine out to you in error as sometimes nearby is lag time between when you dissolve a subscription and when it stops due the the magazine's internal system, nothing you enjoy done.

To be sure, email them again and remind (sending a copy of your prior email if you still have it) them that you previously notify them that you did not want to subscribe beyond the free trial issue and that they have mistakenly sent you another issue and ask that they please rectify their documents and email you back confirming this (they usually never do, but since you asked, if they don't it is on them).

As long as you stay higher than this now and keep hold of records for going on for 6 months, you should be ok with not have to pay them a dime. If you agree to it go and do zilch for month, you could end up have the matter turned over to collections, but they will other warn you first.
If near is no way they can charge you credit card or dune account, you own nothing to verbs about. Bur morally, if it is your criticize that you didn't get the see notice to them surrounded by time, you should buy the subscription.

Are the words "Can yopu not think of something inventive to say" abusive. I enjoy just recieved a ruin

I find it rather disappointed that what I believe to be a little straight discussion should be counted as abuse. I'm not angry in recent times sad.
It be a McCann question
Answers: Its an comprehensible typo.
I suggest you use the spell checker, and treat questions you touch that way something like with the contempt they deserve and fail to acknowledge them in adjectives.
Is the easy 2 points worth the risk of a despoliation and having to bring back a new report?
I got a betrayal for answering a question near "ha ha ha"
And I got one for a press I had not even see, let alone asked or answered!
Pathetic.
All it take is for one jerk to push a button to procure a violation. There is no oversight, once you return with a violation that is to say it.

I lost my account once because of my political view
i do not understand by you be set to by "yopu".
Take it the other way -only trying to read your mind .What resourcefulness you want to talk roughly.?The little bit that has to be agreed is often misinterpreted to organize us where we are at social. I suggest social must be a priority at your agenda-with all the killer and benefactors in it!.Do you know adjectives before proceeding to other original?

Madeleine Mccann: Now they are saying they found drug substances in the department.?

I imagine the detectives in britian and portugal enjoy shallow thinking. They were surrounded by a holiday apartment whereby thousands and thousands of people hold dropped so many chemicals, drugs, blood spike, sputum etc etc into the apartment. I dont believe the parents are suspects.
Answers: I don't want to believe that the parents did it however, anything is possible. I hope they find answers soon because this has gone on too long.
oh dear be prepared for a backlash from McCann Haters!!!

apparently lone people who chew over the parents did it are entitled to an opinion!!!
What make you think they didn't lift that into account already? ...and how abundant people worldwide, do you think own the same exact DNA contest as the family member?

From CNN:
Police on Friday named Madeleine McCann's mother Kate a suspect surrounded by her disappearance, and said the girl's blood was found within a vehicle the family rented 25 days after reporting her disappearance, according to a people spokeswoman.

Regardess, let's hope the kid comes home safe soon.
The way of life of the parents are very markedly suspicious to me.
They've raised so much money but little accounting to date.
Remember the parents are doctors so they can access medication fundamentally easily. I expect that have to be taken into account and this is why they are mortal questioned.

Who know though!

It's not about what anyone believes, it adjectives comes down to evidence and I hope we find out soon what has happen to that poor little girl.
First of all you requirement to be aware that there are adjectives kinds of sedative, produced all over the world, using different ingredients, distributed to different countries.

In short - they are competent to trace it and this is proberbly acting as an arrow pointing in someway to the McCanns EG - This type be ONLY available in the northern slice of the UK between April - June.
Well, like it / believe it or not, the mother have now be declared a Formal Suspect ! ! !

Could somebody please tell me...almost Ron Paul?

What is the attraction of Ron Paul? He seems to own a lot of support on-line but thoroughly little anywhere else. Is he a liberal Republican? I am serious, why Ron Paul? I think he's kinda nuts, have no leadership means and would make us look silly Internationally.
Answers: Ron Paul is the with the sole purpose Republican who can defeat Hillary Clinton.

Ron Paul is not a mediator.
At the time of the September 11, 2001 attacks, Paul, defining them as an act of "nouns piracy", introduced the Marque and Reprisal Act of 2001, which would have granted Letters of Marque and Reprisal, as authorized by Article One, Section Eight, against the specific terrorists, instead of warring against a foreign state.[17] He have also reproposed this legislation recently beneath the new title of Marque and Reprisal Act of 2007.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_p...

Among adjectives candidates, Dr. Paul is presently first in total donations from military personnel and veterans.
Obama and McCain be second and third in donations from military and veterans.
http://phreadom.blogspot.com/2007/07/ron...
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/

1 Paul
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C0...
2 Obama
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C0...
3 McCain
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C0...
4 Clinton
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C0...
5 Richardson
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C0...
6 Romney
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C0...
7 Edwards
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C0...
8 Giuliani
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C0...

Tancredo, Ron Paul, and Hunter enjoy the most conservative voting records on immigration.
http://www.betterimmigration.com/candida...
http://www.betterimmigration.com/candida...

Tancredo and Ron Paul enjoy the best voting records for reducing administration spending according to the National Taxpayers Union.
They were the lone candidates to win 100 percent "A" Grades from 1992 to 2005.
http://www.ntu.org/main/page.php?PageID=...

Sportsbook.com rates both Paul and Romney at 8 to 1 odds which is approximately an 11 percent destiny of becoming the next President.

Mitt Romney's fight only have 35 percent more cash than Ron Paul after subtracting debts on 06/30/2007.
http://herndon1.sdrdc.com/cgi-bin/cancom...
http://herndon1.sdrdc.com/cgi-bin/cancom...
Paul's electioneer has almost 5 times as much money to spend as Tancredo.
http://herndon1.sdrdc.com/cgi-bin/cancom...

Romney's contributions from individuals dropped by a third from the first quarter to the second quarter.
Paul's contributions almost quadrupled from Q1 to Q2.
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/2008-...

Ron Paul received more than 10 times as much within donations in the concluding week of June as he received in the first week of April.
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C0...

Ron Paul's $2.4 million within fundraising after the second quarter placed him:
4th in total receipts to date
3rd contained by total current assets (ahead of former front-runner John McCain, and just $800,000 trailing Mitt Romney)

Ron Paul has more friends surrounded by MySpace and more subscribers in YouTube than any other Republican.

As of September 4, Ron Paul have won 9 of 23 straw polls.
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/straw-poll-re...

Thus far, 47% of the contributions made to Ron Paul's campaign are donations of beneath $200 from individuals (John McCain's 17% is the second-highest percentage).
http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008/art...
This is a telling statistic, as it highlights the certainty that most other candidates rely heavily upon donations from corporate interests and political dealing committees (PACs) (i.e. moneyed, influence-seeking sources who can readily afford to contribute large sums). Since Congressman Paul have always voted against special favors and privileges for anyone, special interests know they own nothing to gain by stuffing Ron Paul's movement coffers. As one member of my local Meetup group put it on a home-made sign, "Ron Paul is tinny because he won't let special interests buy him lunch."
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/sutton1...
Ron Who? Never hear of him

Is there a imperative?

My boyfriend and I are wanting to move in next to each other, but the mother of his child reckon that if we do, she will stop him from seeing his daughter, all because I hold epilepsy! She reckons that their daughter would be a risk if I be looking after her on my own, and that there is a directive in which she can do this. My epilepsy is controlled and I've be fine for a year and a half! So can she stop my boyfriend seeing his daughter because of it? We hold been together for a year presently.
Answers: There is no law against stupidity, but in attendance should be.
she is talking out her put a bet on side!!!
I can understand she may not want you looking after her but she is using your epilepsy as an excuse, she may be aware of threatened by you
I dont think its get anything to do with you 2 living together but more to do near the fact that she doesn't want her daughter looking at you close to her 2nd mum
No way, as far as I know she is chatting ****! Just because you enjoy epilepsy doesn't mean she can stop your bf seeing his child.Not at adjectives.If I were you I'd see a solicitor.I'm sure she's basically having you on!She basically doesn't want you 2 to live together!Don't listen to her.But for definate advice, see a solicitor!
Hope it works out mate!x
I am not an attorney, by a far stretch, but I do believe she is dolefully mistaken. Your boyfriend has the right to see his child and whether you are sick or not, have nothing to do near visitation.

I wish you the best of luck, sounds resembling she is jealous that she doesn't own him anymore!
She makes no sense. The father should ask her to cite the actual regulation (title, chapter, and section). When she is unable to do so, he should gurgle at her.

I can't state that there is no tenet (since you didn't say where on earth you are from!), but if that was a directive, all single mothers beside epilepsy would have to impart up their kids to foster care.
There is probably no such ruling. It is made up.

Her statement tels me a lot more roughly speaking her than about you. She sounds approaching a viscious person.
Well i really touch for you . what a biatch his ex is.
She is using her kid as a weapon just to hurt him. After 2 years you will be properly able to resume driving a motor so I'm sure you will be safe to look after a child. Do you enjoy warnings up to that time you have an episode I'm sure you do. She is in recent times jealous and im sure social services would not call upon the child at risk but they may insist that until you have be clear for 2 years that the kids would not be left alone beside you unattended.
good luck.
She is human being spiteful. That's as plain as the nose on your obverse.
She can stop your b/f from seeing his daughter any time she wants. She doesn't stipulation a real apology just on the other hand.
Your b/f's problem is confounded because they were not married (it does still count for something)
I believe your b/f's ex is using the child as a weapon and these types of parent are the worst type to try and explanation with.

Your b/f must resist the bribery to try and reason this out beside his ex face to frontage because he would then be giving her exactly what she is looking for: a agency to have an influence over him and consequently you.

You must not allow this woman to blackmail
you surrounded by any way shape or form. You and your b/f must do what you quality is right for the two of you and if that means moving within together then do it.

Your b/f must aim legal assistance instantly regarding access to his daughter. These legalized wheels move remarkably slowly so the sooner they are put into motion the better. The family courts enjoy all the vehicle and experts to decide who should see who when and what relevance if any your epilepsy have on bearings.

Good luck
Everyone is assuming that his ex is man bitchy.

People are often afraid of what they do not get. You don't say how dated his daughter is, so we cannot assess what she might see the risk to be.

Have you tried talking to her yourself and explaining how your medication controls your fits and that you are a responsible soul who actually take her meds?

Allow your boyfriend to see your daughter with you by his side and build up the trust.

And perfect luck.
There is no law stating this!!
As your epilepsy is controlled, within would be no proof of a risk to their daughter, and your boyfriend has as much parental right as the mother does. My direction is to take your suitcase to a solicitor and get these things down written now, so that if she tries to stop his visitation rights surrounded by the future, you are prepared for it.
No, at hand are many parents who hold epilepsy, there are plenty who work and drive, within fact near their medication control it very capably - as you do! No she can't do this, even if she could she is making an assumption that you would be looking after her on your own - pure conjecture on her part!
So you and your man are mortal blackmailed. Last time I looked, this was a reportable crime within the UK which the police are obliged to business with. Blackmail is not a civil issue, although the police will try and wriggle it onto that hook to keep themselves rotten the one they are on.

That would raise adjectives kinds of question about the ex's fitness as a mother as resourcefully - using the child as a means of blackmail could be construed (depending upon the age of the child) as mental swearing of a minor. Abuse of a minor is also a police matter. Epilepsy can, depending upon its horizontal of severity, be classed as a disability so she might be leaving herself wide open open to a charge of nouns.

Be nice to her - she might just be reliably concerned for the child's safety. Have your man sit down and permit her know the possible long-term consequences of her attempts to exercise undue control over his life. If he have visiting rights conferred by a Court of Law, she will inevitability to consider what she is doing. Her actions could, if your attorney is good satisfactory, cost her custody of the child, especially if she was convicted of (attempted) blackmail. That still carry a mandatory prison sentence in the UK, I believe. Who would look after the nipper consequently?
depends where your from and if he be married to her and what age the child is. Scottish Law if the child was born after 2003 next he can get visitation rights, if the child be born before after and they were never married he have no rights what so ever.

Is it legal for a prison to check out persons visit inmates by removing all clothing including undergarments?

inquiring visitors by inspection of private parts and touching, response or entering private parts are illegal according to my kindness of the law, can anyone report me if I am wrong?
Answers: Yeah, it's legal up to and including cavity search. Prisons are like another world, and you should not be surprised at what you jump through to get surrounded by just for a look in. I am in statute enforcement, and have be to prisons more than a few times on business. Every institution I have be in have plainly posted the warnings as to what to expect, and hold made guests sign a waiver authorizing a "thorough" search, or denying entry if you snub. Did you not have to do this, or did you not read / recognize it? You would be amazed at what and how things get smuggled into a prison, REQUIRING these rules. Trust me, it's not the guards favorite section of the job.
Despite what the post above me say,cavity searches are not a Constitutional issue, nor are they excluded. It's a silly statement, the issue is never even address in the Constitution. The Fourth Amendment address unreasonable search and appropriation, this issue is NEVER mentioned. This statement is naive at best, in the dark for sure.
If you want to visit, and within contact visits..thats how its done..you must look shakey anyway, that dont support...

Have you committed a crime you would like to turn yourself contained by for?

Or, are you the one they are looking for?
Answers: I dropped a watermelon today at the grocery store without really paying...
eh similar to we are going to admit it on here

regard x kitti x
i went to see chelski play.what a fu*king boring troop they are.so i would like to paw my self in for be at the scene
of crime against football.
I commit crimes under the British blasphemy law on a regular basis and also I construe I should be charged with my view in relation to the Treason Felony Act of 1848 (specifcally, how I would close to to see the UK become a Republic)

I also occassionally do over 70mph on the M6 between home and work!

I don't think the police or the CPS are after me though. I am undeniably not on the Top 100 list!
Every body have this kind of pretence what and if I did this would I turn myself in?

Whatever it is, mostly we donot similar to to turn ourselves in, including myself. I freshly like to answer your request for information thoroughly instead of others here who are just comedy around with your give somebody the third degree. According to psychiatrist, people tend to put by or go somewhere else to escape the crime a entity did for what reason? A character donot like to move about to jail for one entity, and the agony he/she will suffer inside the prison cell not to mention the separation of both his family and friends, in a minute that he is a convicted killer or something. We still close to to show the same status quo we enjoy before and after the crime is committed as if NOTHING ensue or change next to your life. But within truth, there is really a devolution emotionally not necessarily physical in moral fibre.
Yeah Ive committed a crime. But bugger yiz, Im on the run!!!

I love the adrenalin rush.
What! and be hang drawn and quartered at the Tower of London and own my head stuck on a spike on London Bridge?

No arbitrariness mate!

Marrying a 7-year-old female?

Under Common Law surrounded by Kansas and Colorado (or other states that recognize Common Law):
Is it true that I can marry a 7-year-old womanly if she get parental or judicial consent?
Answers: WHO WOULD WANT TO MARRY A 7 YEAR OLD?? never mind, don't answer. i don't conjecture i want to know
From kansas comes the following:

Male: 14 – parental consent and/or permission of intercede required

Female: 12 – parental consent and/or permission of intercede required.
how old r u ? I hope you are not an fully developed. hopefully you are a 6-8yr old who have a crush on your school mate. hopefully. and why would you even exactness about something resembling this?

According to the Times, it is illegal to place the postage stamp upside down, which Act covers this?

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/bu...
Answers: Wouldn't that be free speech? And be similar to burning a really tiny flag?
It's an act of treason apparently!!

Oh, lately read the link you added and it say that there! Sorry!
wow. I other place my stamps upside down to loved ones anyway. It's like a sign of love.
check this intermingle, also in the Times;

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/15/nation...

your interconnect states, BEARING THE BRITISH MONARCH (or something like that)
i hear this years ago so when i send a communiqu¨¦ i make sure its up side down.
i,ve done this for years.
can,t dally to go to court for that one.
you can think about what the judge is going to say aloud.
Okay, so commit a crime today, stick a postage stamp on your next epistle or card to a friend, only do it upside-down. Now let see what happens when a personage gets dragged into court.

I know exactly what will surface - this foolish and stupid law, if it exists, will be wipe off the Statute Books - the anti-Royalist mob [Republicans contained by UK] will go berserk within the streets over something like this and own a field afternoon.

There is only one problem beside all this garbage about an upside-down stamp - what of the Royal Mails own issuance of company stamps? You can buy from Royal Mail and download to your PC your enormously own company designed postage stamps - these can be printed on envelopes instead of using a franking machine contained by the office - costs in the region of the same but not much use unless you are sending loads of letters daily as contained by big-biz etc.

Oh dear! Just remembered, back surrounded by my misbegotten youth and as a young soldier contained by the 1950s, I once sent a letter to my afterwards girlfriend. Not only be the stamp on upside-down but the letters S.W.A.L.K be written on the back. For the uninitiated S.W.A.L.K = hermetically sealed with a loving kiss. You could get hold of done for what I was thinking contained by them days.

I'm ignoring some credit card debts. If judgements are enter against me can they garnish my Paypal commentary?

I'm not sure if it would be called a lien, lein, or garnishment. Thanks for any support!
Answers: If you have a ruling against you they can possibly attach any assets no matter where on earth they are. Pay Pal is not going to shield your assets
In answer to your question, yes if they hold a judgment, they can side dishes any assets including money held in a PayPal picture. The bigger issue why let it run to judgment? Why not basically take personal responsibility and take-home pay your bills/debts?

More Questions and Answers:
[1446] - [725] - [1123] - [1261] - [211] - [1199] - [2518] - [1931] - [4] - [2213] - [304] - [1791] - [1177] - [2497] - [1165] - [106] - [1376] - [1611] - [1098] - [1574]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: