Law Questions and Answers
Why are new inmates at a prison call "fish"?
ive seen this pet name being used within a couple of films "how high" and the "animal factory"Answers: Here's your answer : -
prisonslangT he following is an alphabetized list of adjectives everyday PRISON SLANG. ... Fish : A new arrival, a first-timer, a bumpkin, not astute to prison life. ...
http://www.geocities.com/waytoofunny_200...
Hope the above help clear up any misunderstandings.
because there is a prison inititiation ritual that involves the showers a piece of soap carved into a fish and your assho-
dawdle no im just making this up yeah thats it none of this ever happen
break a serious law, agree to yourself get caught, and find out
Would Ron Paul abolish the death cost?
Answers: If he did, it would only be for federal and military offenses. I predict he'd leave it up to the states for the rest.
ill-fatedly it is the states decisions, although I would support him if he used the federal organization to do so.
What is the difference between illegal weed and legalized weed?
Answers: you are presumed innocent until proven guilty. if you smoke up and don't get caught it is permitted. buttweed is legal. if you carry caught and go to detain and in young offenders` institution you smoke bu tweed it is legal. buttweed is when a dude swallowed a baggie of pot and s-hit it out.
The Buttheads surrounded by government
Is it legall to beat inhabitants up with baseball bat?
Answers: No, that's considered assault with a fatal weapon, or the defendant may be charged with attempted murder, depending on the character and severity of the injuries to the victim.
A conviction would attain you up to 25 years in prison.
No. But, it should be.
Really, it should be. We entail to unite and bring together to make it legitimate. We need to do it right immediately before it's too postponed.
No its not that assault. But then again i would consider doing that to somebody who hurt my child, or partaker of my family.
Neighbor holds generator for randsome?
i babysat 2 babies of his which he said they would only be gone a couple of hours for 6 different days #1 from 7pm-2am#2 8PM-3am#3 8pm-2AM#48pm-1am #57PM-3am #6 7pm-5:45 am afterwards i told them i would not babysit anymore because they told me the sixth day we will lone be gone a couple of hours the smaller baby be teething and i was have a migraine these babysitting sessions were drop offs not planned ..i am still waiting on settlement...my son worked for this person 6 days he told him he would administer him $100 a day to serve paint a house then we didnt own the money for electric bill he came to our house beside money $350 we thought he was paying our son member of what he owed him (they had borrowed our generator faster in summer to walk camping) now he is holding our generator hostage at someone elses house if he hasn't sold it what do i do?Answers: Call the police and report a breaking and entering of your generator. Then file a claim within small claims court for the babysitting charges and the work your son did for them.
These neighbors are just crooks. Cut your losses and don't hold anything more to do with them.
You could bring back the police involved as the generator is essentially theft but I doubt you'd procure it back.
Usually you would suggest you would only hold something hostage if someone owed you money. But he owes you so I don't carry it.
Call him up and tell him that if he does not show rapidly with it and the money owed you will enjoy him charged with thieving. Or you could take him to small claims court for a contemporary one.
What's the problem Southwest Airlines?
Please tell me what's wrong beside this girls outfit.http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a99/ros...
She was escorted stale of her plane and told that her outfit was rude. She asked "what part of the outfit?" and the man told her "Everything." He did tolerate her back on the plane, but it dismayed her tremendously. The top is fine and I dont see anything wrong with it at adjectives. The only piece about the skirt is that it's short, but most skirts are immediately days. It was 106 degree where she be, what do you honestly expect her to wear, sweats? Anyways, what do you all have a sneaking suspicion that about this incident? Where they within the wrong for doing that to her or did they have a legal reason?
Answers: 1) Southwest airlines does not own a dress code therefore in that is no dress code to enforce except for the decency law in the state the plane happen to be sitting in at the time.
2) Because she be not breaking a dress code southwest was style out of line for attempting to enforce an arbitrary standard on one customer on one selective flight despite a suppossed customer complaint.
3) The correct southwest response should have be to offer the sensitive customer accomodations on the next flight if this being was so seriously impacted. In other words they should enjoy nicely told the complainer to mind their own business or pocket the next plane out.
4) How dare southwest try to invade the morale views and whim standards held dear by one customer on another. They had the duty to put in the picture the complainer that they live in a diverse world and the other passenger be doing no wrong and has a right and privledge to dress as they please as long as it is legitimate. I hope she sues to make a point here
Well sombrely since the woman herself had no self respect or dignity SW imposed theirs.
Her outfit be fine for a streetwalker.that's where she should hold left it. It doesn't issue if it's 106, you shouldn't dress like a tramp.
SW have remained the ONLY profitable airline. You should appreciate the fact that they are still flying in need the government's handout.
she was dressed approaching a nasty streetwalker (from the waist down). i am assuming you saw her flash her underwear to the entire country on TV this morning? at least she have on underwear on the today show, who's to say she wasn't going commando on the plane???? i hope her making a complete fool out of herself on national TV will negate any lawsuit she may try to bring against the airline. what a total MORON.
Dna database?
to all those who infer this is a bad impression, why suddenly become so protective over something which you leave everywhere? approaching the majority of ppl said, if you've nothing to stockpile then you should be fine next to it. court cases dont just walk on dna, there have to be evidence to back it up, and im sure if your mum/sister/daughter get raped, you'd be thankful of adjectives the dna on the database.Answers: I totally agree with you.I construe all unknown borns should have it taken,next every one else,I got nought to hide.
I'm of the belief that everyone's DNA should be stored on the National Data Base - why not? It would gross elimination from a crime so much easier for the fuzz.
The style guru who suggested that we all jump on the DNA db is a man after my own heart - a thinking liberal, who is tired of just kids have their DNA kept forever, what about the rest of us?
As to whether have everyone's DNA on a db will help trim down crime, well, I'm not foolhardy adequate to believe that. Scotland Yard said exactly the same entity about finger prints surrounded by the 19th century - didn't stop crime though, did it?
What stops crime or at least reduce it, is locking up as many criminals as possible and if a DNA db will assist within achieving something approaching Utopia, so-be-it!
Look, the rapists will a moment ago hop on a plane from France and rape your mum/sister/daughter and fly back. Criminals will find a path around this.
I hate the theory of being on a police index of suspects from the moment I'm born till the moment I die. That's what a DNA database is.
The criminals will get around it.
You don't depart from DNA everywhere as you assert. I have get nothing to squirrel away, but they will have to forcibly pinch my DNA if they want it.
And using one of the most emotive crimes possible as a reason to lug DNA is just bone fallow and shows how little you actually know on the subject. Not adjectives rapists or those who commit sexual assault leave DNA. In certainty, it is a very small minority who head off DNA, as the vast majority of those who commit the offence are not stupid enough to do so short thinking first.
People have to seize over this idea that DNA is some panacea to solving crime. It isn't! In solitary a very incredibly small number of crimes is DNA relevant.
It's not really that though is it.It is just starting to surface like that book "1984"... And that book be based on stalins russia (we adjectives know how that isn't a good thing). It's adjectives well and dutiful being competent to trace people for crimes but it freshly feels similar to they are pushing to see how far they can have control over us. We're already the most watch country in the world because of our cctv surveilance...The entity with the rule having more control over our lives is that surrounded by return the population will become more paranoid and discontented with the "big brother" establishment and eventually there will be a breaking point...
We're supposed to be free relatives but we seem smaller amount and less free next to every new move the system make. And ultimately, they're only trying to cover up the mistakes they have made. If they hadn't gone for spur-of-the-moment fix solutions in the 80's, we wouldn't hold such poverty (and crime) in positive areas of this country. This is a problem that they have get themselves into and until they sort out their mentality and understand that they can't gross promises that they can't keep, why should we trust them?
rant over :)
It is because DNA is so readily transmissible that it should NOT be used as evidence supporting a prosecution, but to some extent to exclude suspects.
This is DNA database will be for the sole purpose of implementing Soviet style control of the population and also will head to wrongful imprisonment of state dissidents.
If the Government carry on with these type of policies I verbs the Tiber foaming with much blood
I backfire to see how the possession of a DNA database would cause me to be grateful that my sister/mother/daughter be raped
This sort of argument was used to try and instil us to accept ID cards.
Some things are best kept private - the system will use both to snoop on us all.
I be always beneath the impression that we be innocent until proven guilty, and not the other way around. Such a database will assume that we are adjectives guilty.
All databases can be mis-used, and those in control of the DNA database might be trust worthy and ethical in a minute but that might change.
Consider that the UK is ordered by the EU to mitt over the details of the entire data edge, which is then used to aim out a particular type of general public and imprison and murder them. Too far fetch? Genocide is not that uncommon...even surrounded by Europe, only the technology have changed.
Who besides me thinks that these parents who quit their children in hot cars should be prosecuted?
How does someone forget their child? I don't support how busy they are. It is careless. Not to mention that the woman within the most recent case is an assistant principal. She is not singular in charge of her children but surrounded by charge of countless others. This woman has no place surrounded by charge of any child if she is careless plenty to forget her own and allow her child to die in a hot vehicle after sitting there for 8 hours because she be busy inside the school.Answers: YES! She should be prosecuted. Negligent homicide is a crime also. This child died a horrible disappearance. The temperature inside the vehicle was 140 degree!
Children and Animals should not be left contained by hot cars.I have gone and found nation that have vanished dogs in a vehicle.They say" I was one and only in here for a minute" articulate "well so far i've timed it and it's be 16 minutes".I call the cops first so they can't start out.
People that do that should be subjected to sitting in a sports car in the warmth for 1 hour.See if they like it.
They don't forget them, and yes they should ALL be prosecuted!
One within Washington left the child contained by the car while she cleaned houses. The kid died!
One vanished their child in a saloon during a Patriots game and it be below zero. Thankfully a State Trooper found the child!
Too masses kids die being departed in a vehicle and I can count the accidental ones I know roughly on 1 finger, and I have question about that one as ably!
Parents need to realize that a child's acid/base stability is quickly compromised and they die by their brains frying or their heart going into an arrhythmia! And it doesn't take long.
I love Chinese's tenet, death cost for most of the crime.
which protect a person's right.
If you caused loss to another person, slapdash or intend, death cost.
You have no right to rape another human being. death cost.
Recently, there is one individual who take bribe and passed medication which kill others, extermination penalty.
This mum will sooner or later be so busy and cause mar to the whole institution
In most states there are special vehicle and penal codes for disappearing a child unattended in a vehicle, whether it is hot or not.
Not one and only are the parents or person responsible for the child prosecuted, DCS usually steps within and the child may be placed in a foster home while the parent is investigated for child endangerment.
Amen. If it weren't against the 8th amendment, I would suggest making them sit surrounded by a hot car. Don't forget almost the woman who left her son contained by the car while she and her dog go shopping. How could anyone do that?
Is Maddies Mum guilty...?
I for one think that they are both hiding something...Answers: oh yeah... those two are categorically hiding something... the way they hammed it up for the cameras be sickening... I'm sure the truth will come out eventually...
We will find out over time.
In light of the Bush administration "cooking the books" regarding death in Iraq, do they hold any?
credibility at all anymore?Answers: approaching they had much at the start.or any after a few months of the period of war
I don't even think we should be surrounded by Iraq however I do think that when it is really nessesary to turn our military loose on someone, that we should do freshly that. No collar no leach and heaven relieve them because they shouldn't have done doesn`t matter what it was that motivation the US military to be on them in the first place.
At like time I also think that our forgein policy should be revamped to hold us out of most scuffles. Or as Will Smiff said, "Don't start nutin', won't be nutin'"
Exactly how are they "cooking the books"?
every pres within every war have cooked the books. surrounded by every country. this is they way it is.
no the USA's credibility have gone out he window. as have its world respect. and fear onl;y go so far. one day the USA will backbone to many into the perverbial coner and after it will be the end for the usa as the toughest guy on the block.
once not a soul fears then you are a target forever untill within is nothing moved out to laugh at. this is a scarey thought . it can and will take place
More Questions and Answers:
[2374] - [1617] - [217] - [267] - [2551] - [1697] - [1615] - [1178] - [947] - [106] - [835] - [946] - [2044] - [490] - [2364] - [18] - [1565] - [283] - [1017] - [2231]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: