Law Questions and Answers
Is a butter butterfly knife concidered unsanctioned in california? It's not a physical knife but it is conceiled.?
I enjoy a butterfly knife thats not a material knife inside, it is a completely dull butter knife near no point. Since his is not a real wound, I was wondering if it still considered off the record. Part of me says it wouldn't be, but it is conceiled. I live contained by California (knife laws are probably different.) (Also I know its not wrong to collect, but I mean if I be to walk around near it. Thanks :)Answers: I would not carry a butterfly wound or a butter knife contained by my pocket regardless.
Why have I not see this longer than the palm law even so, sources please? Does the law specify your appendage or the Officer's? Sounds like an ambiguity. If it is a local rule or ordinance after please so specify.
The law make no mention of the sharpness per se, but the law does mention, “a cut or other instrument with or minus a handguard that is efficient of ready use as a stabbing weapon that may inflict great bodily injury or destruction.”
My gut is telling me that your butterfly butter spear is considered illegal within California under Penal Code section 12020 and 653k.
*/End of Line.
It would still be illegal. The cops (if found) would formulate it out to be a terrible crime and yes, you would take into trouble for it. I had a "dull" pocket spear about 6 years ago, but since it be longer than the officer's palm, he considered it a "deadly weapon" and call it illegal.
Point mortal, everyone has different criteria, but I wouldn't kismet it if I were you!
The statute makes no mention of the
sharpness of the cut.
Technically it's illegal to transport.
Cops have no sense of humor where on earth
weapons law are concerned.
Yes. Butterfly knives and switchblades are unsanctioned in CA. Also the blade cannot be longer than the palm of your paw. If you're walking around with a wound like that within your pocket, it is considered a concealed weapon.
Am I a theif?? I can't shake this feeling of guiltiness stale of me...?
Today during lunchtime, I was being silly around with my friends and accidentally dropped a watermelon. Of course, I go to pay for it, but my friend told me it be a bit spoiled inside. I saw a bit a mold, too. But it wasn't serious mold.So then I go and got a settlement for it...
But after all I DID drop the watermelon...
Is this discouraging..?
Answers: Do you work in a supermarket? Your query is a bit confusing. If you were a customer you don't hold to pay for things you break typically. If you compensated for it and it was mouldy you should acquire your money back any way.
Not sure why you quality guilty for it - is this some ploy to get us adjectives to vote for Ron Paul?
You should be suspended for bad spelling and self such a boring bastard.
Sorry I missed a bit out from my original posting - You are stupid boring bastard.
If black people.?
are 5 times more predictable to be stopped by the police, if a serious crime hapened and a black person witnessed it, right to be heard for example the shooting of an 11 year old white boy within liverpool, do you think they would facilitate or be suspected of it themselves. Just an example mind, just resembling that maddie kidnapping satchel.Answers: im not really sure what your getting at? but there are moral and bad within everyone, cop, blacks, whites, rich, poor. you just entail to live your life the best you can and hold on to yourself out of the line of fire.
It wouldn't surprise me.
I found a man lying knocked out at a bus stop, there be a black guy standing near him.
The black guy said he have called an ambulance but hadn't touched him within case someone thought he have knocked him out or be stealing off him.
How depressed is that?
Everyone knows that crime doesn't depend on colour or creed and that a white man is purely as capable as a black man of shooting someone.
The ill-fated thing is that racism still exists within the uk, and it always will while in attendance are englishman, irishman and scotsmen jokes to be told!!!
I guess it would depend on the nouns they live because there are still towns importantly racist that would charge a black (or minority) over a white man any day.
BUT I would hope that anyone who witnessed a crime against a child would enjoy the courage to come forward and tell the police what they saw.
I wouldn't put it that path. It'll so unfair if some black family commited crime, and the whole black see suddenly become criminals. That's horrible. That's communist.
Why isn't it the same when some white men do crime, but their see isn't affected?
In areas where on earth street crime is common, and in attendance are a high proportion of Black citizens then it is plain as the nose on your face that more black than white will be stopped.
Also where gang are active they own now so terrorised the local population that they are afraid to afford evidence to the police. This is terrorism on our streets, let us recognise it as such. It must be rooted out and not tolerated.
The police are not helping as they surrounded by many areas, especially within London, have adopt an agressive and ill mannered attitude. They are no longer smartly dressed and commonly do not even look like policemen.
Let us properly call upon them Constables or Sergeants,
police officers are Inspectors and above.
How do you know she be kidnapped?
Did you give somebody a lift your summer holiday in Portugal?
Where is she, you unsympathetic bastard?!
Here in UK black inhabitants commit fewer crimes than us white folks! Why? Because in attendance are more whites in UK than blacks.
I miserable, of the UK pop about 85% are white Anglo Saxons, make a payment to this the Celts in UK of Cornwall, Wales, Scotland and Eire; it just about leaves any room for anyone else.
Where I live we have smaller quantity than .5% of black folk in the local population. This could transform over time.
Hey! Here's a really scare statistic for your collection. The UK receive about 100,000,000 people a year - thats our own pop plus 40,000,000 approx.
Be afraid, very afraid.
What are the aspects of human rights declaretion in detail?
the human rights testimonial states that `every one has a right to be born free beside dignity and rights`Answers: There are many declations on human rights which are mostly international conventions and provisions surrounded by the constitution. There are some statutory provisions also.
The important declaration on human rights are, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, International Convention on Civil and Political Rights, International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
The Fundamental Rights in the Constitution etc.
I don't really get the message your question but I freshly did a paper on that picky article so I'll try and help you.
'Everyone have a right to be born free with dignity and rights'
It process that each and every personality is equal regardless of what kind of situations they are born into. Everyone must be respected and given dignity and must be awarded next to each human right (which are adjectives in the claim of rights).
Following aspects in India since 1947
Individuals to be muslims
If hindu from SC ST or OBC
Other cast no rights as they are not united as vote bank for example kashmiri hindus
My husband was sprayed surrounded by error with CS gas...plz read on?
And this have caused permenant scarring...My husband have an appointment today with The Top guy surrounded by the police force to discuss compensation due to him for the permenant scarring ( WE DIDNT APPLY FOR ANY COMPO)They also mentioned something about prohibition CS gas because of my husbands severe scarring.
What is likely to be the outcome of this compensation homily?
Thanks x
Answers: I guess the outcome will be that he'll get some compensation money, at lowest I hope so for you.
I am all for exclusion CS gas but only if they are allowed to take magnum 44 guns so that they can defend themselves from the thugs since they are everywhere.
Btw why did they spray him ? What does he look approaching for them to mistake him for a dangerous thug?
why conceivably i should sue the military for the cs burns i received
ok i playing i know i can't sue the military.
but seriously i would at least try to acquire any medical bills paid for. and after go from at hand.
and why was your husband around cs surrounded by the first place? i know police usually don't just play next to the stuff for fun
First, an apology. You should get compensation for this. However, do not tender up your right to a civil law suite, as this can acquire you more. Do not be put off by family thinking you are after money, you deserve and will need it!
Take a honest lawyer beside you. Do not tackle this alone, you will be overwhelmed. But look at adjectives the circumstances prior to publicly humiliating the Police...or we'll get another madeleine luggage!
Facial disfigurement should be worth a few million.
Get a solicitor fast...Don't consent to him go within on his own. He will need to be represented. Permanent scarring will never turn away and this will be there for go are there going to be any medical bills for the adjectives, plastic surgery, loss of wages etc. Please get legalized advice to give support to with this claim.
In response to Crikeymon.Compo will not be millions as it will not work this road in Britain..
I thought the guy who be badly scar by the CS gas was interfering next to the police questioning of a friend which be why he was sprayed! Also it's his inherited who are trying to get CS gas not permitted - certainly not the police!!
But he will return with some monetary compensation because thats the kind of world we live surrounded by now!!
They will not rejection cs spary outright. Probably just contained by all situations where on earth there is no on the spot threat to life.
What I would claim is loss of earings, both since and contained by the future, compensation for the twinge caused (that individual you can decide you mull over is appropiate.)
I would also demand ALL officer are retrained in the use of the spray and that they should be retested regularly.
I would also expect those officer to face some sort of disciplinary achievement, the type of which depends on how negligent they be.
I would also get the officer in put somebody through the mill to be made to make a full apology to your husband.
Be tough but be reasonable. The chief constable sounds like he is really taking responsability abou this. Try to create an effort.
Listen to what he have to say and be all right.
As long as you dont ask for the crown jewels after you should get what you want.
He can shift speak with the top guy but I bet by bottom dollar he will own an attorney with him as okay. So maybe your husband should difficulty this until he speaks to one as well.
With Tesco within your name I'm thinking that you are contained by the UK. Yes there is free medical but if the scarring is severe ample you might have to turn outside of the system eventually and this will cost much. So an attorney would be a good process to go.
I would firstly consider the effects the injuries your husband have suffered and to what affect these injuries will affect him in the adjectives.
But on top of agreeing a adequate compensation claim, I would suggest that your husband get involved next to discussions to what they are going to do about CS spray surrounded by the future.
Even if it finances that the police will retrain staff on the use of it, then here is some good that have come out of the discussions.
by the fact it be mistaken i.d. you will have Case for an investigation .pcc will fiddle with it as neutral body.bring in sure you have a brief and quality newspaper work up to date.you are suing the force not the copper.
What are the consequences of changing the design of my registered trademark?
I own a my company logo registered as a trademark in several countries. In some countries it is still imminent.If I wanted to exchange the logo design, what are the consequences for my trademark filing?
Some family have said that it will restart the process, so registered trademarks will again be near-term. And trademarks that were future will be reset, so it's like file a new application. Can anyone offer a clear answer on this?
Answers: You will be well advise to restart the paperwork, along with the repayment of fees, for registering your trademark. Of course, you will enjoy to resubmit the necessary sample of your trademark.
You have begin the copyright process for a specific design. If you change it (even slightly), it is no longer the untested design.
You can continue the process for the unproved design if you wish, but the modern one is a new one.
Your not varying it, your creating a new one, and its posterior to square one.
Don't you think it's just fair?
That if our Military have to abide by the Rules of Engagement then the opponent has to also?And if the rival refuses to later our Military shouldn't have to any?
Does it make any sense for our Military to own to fight beside one arm tied behind their backbone while the enemy take full advantage of it by not have any rules at all?
Can we win the time of war the way we're going nearly it?
Would we have won World War 2 if we have fought this way against Hitler?
What would Gen.Patton enjoy said if he was forced to encounter this way?
Answers: We are not supposed to win dear, can't you see that?We are individual set up to fail and allienate our ancient allies as we fall, so when they come contained by to take us over near the military weakened and the illegals adjectives over in our country we lose past it starts then the rest of the countries will fold lacking even putting up a fight. Then the globalization take over, we will be slaves and live in camp I wish it wasn't true but bush have done his job ably and we let him do it. I am an well-read woman and not easily frightened ,,,,,,,,but I am frightened presently.
Unfortunately, our enemies don't reckon as we do!! They are a totally different culture. Every war we enjoy been involved next to has be different, and against different countries and cultures, so you can't say that what we are involved within now is alike as say, WWII. I am have trouble thinking that this (being in Iraq) the right point to do anymore. We have too little troops, and they are tired and overworked. Iraqis want to get their own perform together so we can get out of nearby, and deal next to the terrorism that is everywhere else, esp at home here.
I pray for our troops adjectives the time. I hope everyone does, no matter what they surmise of the war!
(BTW--JMO--Gen Patton would not hold dug this Iraq business.)
Let me ask you this: what is your EXACT plan for our troops to fight beside both arms freed? What would this specific solution look like to you?
If you expect the US gov't should truly fight fire next to fire, I'm afraid you'll need to strap yourself beside explosives and blow yourself up, along with any suspicious Arab citizens who may or may not turn out to be "the enemy". And I don't recommend that.
Problem is, this never really qualified as a period of war: not in the channel that WW2 was. And nuking entire populations, including innocent citizens (like John suggests), will receive desparately violent society even more violent and ready to collectively tear the US past its sell-by date the map. We're not as popular as we were during WW2, and pulling a stunt close to Hiroshima will not earn us anything but a global release warrant issued against us.
Even with adjectives of this we have protesters calling our youthful men "baby killers" for protecting the totally babies that they are accused of bloodshed.
Guilty OR Innocent?
what should it be Innocent till proven guilty?OR
Guilty till proven innocent?
and why
Answers: The State is stronger than the individual and this makes the notion of innocence until guilt is proven, the civilising appliance in a officially recognized test.
It differs from crime to crime, depending on the severity..
I truely dont focus theres a right answer...
I want to sway from the obvious overnight case in which you are chitchat..
Think about adjectives those mothers who lost babies and were inprisoned for bloodbath them (Sally Clark...Trupti patel.. Many more..sorry names escape me) Their lives be destroyed because of wrong evidence..They were found guilty, but be not... Sally clark later died after relsease from priosn, thought to be a direct result of her depression following the trauma and witch hunt...
However, Ian Huntley.. The nation know once he was arrested he be guilty and so hated him (rightly)
I conjecture its that we so badly want a character to be responsible that generally the population blame whoever the medium has made a scapegoat.. Sometimes we're right, sometimes we're wrong...
Should be innocent 'till proven guilty. Why? Once the character is caught for interrogation process he will be question for his/her association in the armour at hand. Let us endow with an example, homicide or murder, both are considered heinous crimes depending on the law of the country explicitly being asked.
As a suspect you are treated as innocent firstly for the commensuration of the travel case in court. The prosecutor/lawyer standing for the target will present their witnesses/documents/evidence to the court that you are the person they pin point as the principal suspect or here are still others with you when the crime is consummated. It will be your word against theirs. So the sprite system will assume that the person standing within trial is perfectly innocent of the charges even so until all the evidence and other pertinent document is presented and studied by the negotiator. It will be weight down by the juror firstly and next by the judge until the innocent as presented by court would turn out to be guilty surrounded by the first degree. Not the other path around, because if the person is already guilty until proven innocent next it will defeat the principle of the ruling in prosecuting individual, next as they say the LADY holding the sword and the weighting degree is not blindfolded anymore but with starring eyes that could see every human being standing in court and donot requirement a judge nor jury to sentence him. If everyone is guilty, after we donot need a go-between, a court, or a jury would we?
The fact that the police can arrest "on suspicion" contained by the UK means that they enjoy to consider a person may be guilty of doesn`t matter what the arrest was made for, and the onus is as a result automatically placed upon the arrested individual to prove his/her innocence.
In order to clear such an arrest, the arresting officer must experience the thought "I believe that person might enjoy committed a/the crime", or similar. Therefore his/her view is inherently biased towards the "guilty" conclude of the consideration process. If he thought "I believe that person did not commit a/the crime" the arrest "on suspicion" could not be logically necessary.
This extends to "stop and search" powers. In order to hold reason to stop and rummage, the police must consider an individual as suspicious. This implies that the individual is see as possibly having be guilty of some misdemeanour even without directly connected evidence of a crime man or having be committed.
"Walking in a built-up hamlet wearing a loud shirt" - anyone remember Not The Nine O'Clock News when they tore strips of the SPG? It's a perfect illustration of how, lacking controls in place, it would be trouble-free for the police to take the scenery, for example, of "He's <insert race/religion>, so he must be guilty of something.".
It *should* be iupg; it is, in genuineness gupi.
Here in England, the decree of a jury is either 'guilty' or 'not guilty'.
In English Law the presumption of innocence is the point at which a trial starts. That is to say-so, the accused is presumed innocent until proved guilty beyond adjectives shadow of doubt. The trial must be held before a settle and jury where the accuse elects for such a trial.
In Scotland [Scottish Law], I estimate the outcome of a trial there may enjoy a different verdict, which I suggest is either 'guilty' or 'not proven'.
Presumption of innocence - Wikipedia, In frequent countries belonging to the Anglo-Saxon legal tradition, the Principle of Presumption of Innocence is phrased such that "the accuse is presumed to ...
http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presump...
Legal Definition of 'Innocence, Presumption Of'The Legal Term * Innocence, Presumption Of * Defined & Explained.
http://www.lectlaw.com/def/i047.htm
Liberty - Protecting Civil Liberties Promoting Human Rights ...This proposal is an attack on the fundamental presumption of innocence. ... These proposals undermine the presumption of innocence, and will create a system ...
http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/n...
BBC NEWS | Magazine | A brief history of habeas corpusHabeas corpus is lower than attack, say critics of the government's anti-terror bill. But what is it and why is it so cherished?
http://www.news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/...
Habeas Corpus Act 1679 That whensoever any individual or persons shall bring any habeas corpus directed unto any sheriff or sheriffs, gaoler, minister or other human being whatsoever, ...
http://www.constitution.org/eng/habcorpa...
Note that the English Habeas Corpus Act of 1679 was written into the Constitution of the United States. In 2006 George W Bush withdraw the Habeas Corpus Act from the US Statute books. The fight to reinstate Habeas Corpus is still ongoing [or may own been done] surrounded by Congress.
Here in UK your fundamental citizen's rights are under attack by an adjectives powerful and dictatorial government.
Be constantly on your guard.
Generations who go before us fought and died contained by wars and civil war so that we shall be free.
WE WILL REMEMBER THEM.
You left out how the second come to be.one word, railroad.
I need two tenet case to brief the topic is Business and bill of rights?
I involve two law valise to brief the topic is1. Business and bill of rights
2. Administrative Agency
can someone give me an example or a covering
Thank you
Answers: 1. Kaske v. Nike, Inc., 45 P.3d 243 (Cal. 2007).
2. Red Lion Broadcasting v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367 (1969).
Does the government inevitability to take tougher bustle against crime?
Do sentences need to be lenghened?Should within be more reabilitation support?
Should prisoners have more rights etc?
More programmes to prevent immature children getting into crime.
Answers: Yes, tougher action is needed by antediluvian Gordy
Yes, sentences should be longer for all crimes, if you get 5 years for shoplifting, would you still do it?!
Yes, near should be more rehabilitation support to help populace NOT re-offend.
No, prison is a punishment - you should have no rights at adjectives
Yes, there should be more for youngsters to do!
That's the world put to rights, immediately, what's for breakfast.?!
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
There are no deterrents
"Do sentences need to be lenghened?"
Yes, for example, "life" should tight-fisted "natural lifespan"
"Should within be more reabilitation support?"
For those not committed to life as defined above, yes.
"Should prisoners enjoy more rights etc?"
No, they should forfeit all rights. I would love to see the introduction of offshore prison communities for adjectives "lifers", patrolled by the RN and/or Coastguard to prevent swimmers going beyond 500 yard from the beaches. These convicts would be murderers, rapists and child molesters/abusers - adjectives transported and forced to share the same space. The final group would likely become the vastly quick foundation of either a strange "underground" population, or "smokers". Literally. Pedo problem solved, either buried or cremated... who care?
"More programmes to prevent young children getting into crime."
No. Parental responsibilities should be made the subject of court definitions. The problem near today's society is that certain harmonic minorities seem to be constantly trying to reinvent the joystick, whether for financial gain or simply as a result of misguided morals. There have be disciplinary measures available to parents for centuries which have worked very well. Those measures are being removed by legislation.
The Thirtysomethings who are currently intent upon eroding parental control have need of, perhaps, to ask what nice of world they will have made for themselves to live within as septagenarians. If they were to lift a close look at what is happening very soon, I think they would reaslise that it's not going to be a really pleasant world for them to live in. It won't be cocktail sausages individual chucked at them by that time; it will in adjectives probability be far worse because they are removing the very controls that would serve to ensure their safekeeping.
I bet they'll be right at the front of the "whinge and moan queue" when it happen too!
More Questions and Answers:
[781] - [1855] - [1230] - [2557] - [2019] - [352] - [331] - [2038] - [938] - [90] - [1972] - [220] - [652] - [2073] - [1826] - [1852] - [1188] - [1512] - [361] - [1303]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: