Law Questions and Answers

Has there ever be a documented case where on earth a woman wound up enjoying sex during a rape?

Or own you ever heard of it? I'm not trying to be sick, nor trying to crush women. It's a serious question. I realize you can't soak up things during a physical attack, but I've heard of some strange people do and quality weird things.
This be a tough one to categorize!
Answers: I enjoy heard of situations contained by which a woman has have an orgasm while she was human being raped (seriously). Your body can still react to stimuli regardless of what is in fact occurring (I don't know if that makes any sense). Basically, if a woman is with ease able to orgasm from access alone (some women aren't), then she may be more inclined to hold an orgasm from the sexual/penetration aspect, not from the actual "rape" aspect. Orgasms are more physical than mental, even though your mindframe has closely to do with whether or not you in actuality climax during "normal" sexual activity.
my answer would hold to be NO.
the sheer physical attack/shock is enough to drown any sense of pleasure.
I would ponder any woman who found enjoyment out of human being attacked has deep-seated issues. I doubt you'd find any "documented" skin of that, since any woman that did would probably never say she enjoy it.

I for one can't see it happening.
I've have someone tell me his friend get raped but she didn't want to report the guy 'cause she enjoy it. But she did appear to be in a daze. I'm not sure to believe that or not since this party isn't a close friend of mine.

I suppose someone who is a masochist who has rape fantasies might, merely might, secretly relish it. Rape is about power, after adjectives. Even if it did happen, I conjecture most women wouldn't voice it out too since it goes against social norm, and people aren't feasible to understand or even believe it. Instead of population treating her as a victim, she'd be shamed. There are unacquainted people out near who blame the women for getting raped as well (e.g. "She must've lead him on", "Served her right for dressing like a ****", etc.), so individually, I would rather they not speak out too.

That man said, I still think similar to the majority, that rape is usually traumatic so chances of that stirring is close to zilch.

Anyway, no, I don't think there's ever be a documented case.

Should Gay Republicans be allowed to marry women?

Since gay marriage is unofficial in the US shouldn't it be unlawful for Republicans to marry anyone including women? Gay people can't be married beneath US law, right?
Answers: That should be up to the woman as long as she know about it!
Yes, they are the beard that conceal our guys.

Stand By Your Man, guys.
LMAO!!


That is soo funny.

You do have a point!!
Gay conjugal is illegal because of the intensely seeded beliefs and prejudices of the lawmaker in the US. Just because gay bridal is illegal, it doesn't plan gays can't marry. Gays simply can't marry the same sex.

Gay mannish Republicans are allowed to marry women.
incorrect.

The state US constitiution sasy nothing more or less gay marriages.

The conclusion of whether or not to allow gay marriages is up to the state. Its a state canon, not federal.

If there is a mistake on a contract and i dont initial it, does that craft it void?

I am paying towards a reception lecture hall and they are calling me and bugging me to pay them within full, but the contract states clearly that the balance must be payed 30 days previously the event. She states she needs the money to put towards another event that is to say coming up. Now my contract is was showing that my nuptial is in July 2008 but it is really on June 2008, so she streaked it out with a red pen but i never initialed it. Does that label the contract void?I don't want to buy and sell with this woman anymore because she newly seems so crooked and what if she doesn't hold the money when my wedding comes up! is here any way i can catch what i have invested rear legs and cancel the event beside her, i am just so confused. Should I trust her. please give a hand!!!
Answers: The fact that she changed the date to emulate the actual agreed upon date has no trial significance at all. You should forget roughly even bringing that up.

Your chances of getting the money you own already given her back are slim to none, not because the statute would not allow it, but because she probably doesn't have it anymore.

When you sign a contract near someone, you have to know how to prove that they breached before you can break the contract. The creature who breaches first is liable for damages usually up to the amount the other person put forward surrounded by performance of their constituent of the contract terms. You would not be liable for the full amount.


THE FOLLOWING IS HOW YOU GET OUT OF THE CONTRACT:
The reality that she is attempting to violate the terms of the 30 afternoon payment arrangement could be considered a bits and pieces breach of the contract (Notice I said COULD), and therefore be a channel of escape for you. Also, your knowledge of the UNDERCAPITALIZATION of the catering service could serve as a viable excuse if you move about ahead and breach the agreement. (By undercapitalization, I mean the business does not enjoy enough money to operate on a daylight to day basis). This undercapitalization, if artfully put forward could serve as a viable origin for you to feel INSECURE within the arrangment you have near the caterer in that it give you a reason to believe that SHE WILL NOT PERFORM HER PART OF THE ARRANGEMENT ONCE SHE IS PAID.

I deduce that you have a enormously good destiny of being competent to wash your hand of this person, and if I be your Attorney, I would advise you to run ahead and refuse to pay cheque her ever. I would advise you to dispatch a letter certified letters. (As a matter of certainty I would write, sign, and send the epistle on my office letterhead), setting forth that you are hereby breaking the vocabulary of your agreement with her, and that you will not be paying her another cent. I would next wait on her to respond. Chances are she will in recent times go away.

The problem is that if you do what I am dictum, I am not going to be able to protect you from any doings she may take because I am not your advocate. So, my advice to you is that you jump find an attorney, unless you think you can fiddle with the backlash yourself. I could get you out of this, lately about any competent attorney could, but the sound out is whether you can get yourself out of this?
No, it does not. You don't enjoy to have initialed the translate. That is just a formality and does NOT obligation to be followed. Because you both agree that June 2008 is correct, and it has be noted as such & corresponded as such between you, there is no problem near it.
If you wish to invalidate the contract, there is usually a liquidate damages provision contained therein that will tell you exactly how to do it & what $ you will be out. If not, travel see an attorney. Also, if you have question about this contract, nick the entire contract to an attorney who is licensed to practice in your state.

Law advice for compensation after a promotion?

(2005) After 1 year of submitting to personnel that I have been doing the duties of Administrative Associate since 2003 instead of my hired position as Administrative Assistant, the personnel dept admit in writing that I be in reality doing the duties of the Administrative Associate so I was promoted (2006). The promotion included a $1200 a year tilt that would put me just slightly over the minimum take-home pay of an Administrative Associate.

But I had received 4 years of state cost of living raise and merit increase raised (offered to adjectives employees near a "Very Good" on their annual evaluation). The personnel dept did not decipher the money that included these hand wide raise and just added onto my every twelve months salary to put me into the minimum net bracket.

What is this called, and how can I sue for retro money (back to 2002 when hired until today still employed), and have my remains salary changed to copy ?

Thanks
Answers: Based on what you've written, I'm not sure you actually enjoy any cause of accomplishment. They raised your stipend to put you within the stipend structure for the job you are doing, but they aren't required to dispense raises and bonuses etc. unless it's specifically set out surrounded by their employment documents. If you are a government hand or part of a league, you may have some generous of guidelines they must follow and which they may or may not have violated.

If you are an "at will" member of staff, they don't have to do anything more than they've already done. If that's the grip, I would suggest you talk to them in the region of what you feel you should be reception versus what you're getting and ask for a raise beyond the $1200 they've given you. Suing them doesn't nouns like the path to go.
On the controlled facts you state, you have no overnight case.

Performing your own job ably got you the merit increase for that career, not for a different job.

Performing at an excellent "above and beyond" horizontal got you a promotion.

Continuing to complain more or less it could get you fired.

Congratulations on your promotion.

Questions about that quiz on a job application?

If the crime have been expunged you can check the no box that you never be convicted of a crime, right?
Answers: If your crime has be been properly "expunged," then YES you can check that box and attest that you enjoy never been convicted of a crime.

This answer is predicated on the certainty, however, that the crime with which you be charged was in actuality "expunged." (And that you live in the US)

If to be exact the case, next all documentation pertaining to that crime have be sealed and cannot, below the penalty of canon, be disclosed to anyone but law enforcement for purposes of a criminal investigation, or those name in a court establish authorizing such disclosure.

The expunged files in my department have be literally sealed and distinct "DO NOT OPEN WITHOUT COURT ORDER."
Follow cyanne2ak's advice, suppose you seize to really like the potential post and are able to credit, then it is found that you should hold answered yes. Bye, Bye job I don`t know..
You served your time, check with an attorney, for your peace of mind. ultimately, the employer have the power to do what they want even if you answer yes.

Received a Courtesy Notice that an Arrest Warrant has be issued?

I took out a loan with a nouns company, part of the jargon of the loan was to submit a check as collateral. Well I made 3 payments, refinanced the loan and afterwards I fell behind on payments. Shortly after that, my checking statement went into overdraft status for 2 months and subsequently, the checking explanation was closed. Well today I catch this letter concerning warrant for arrest, so I assumed that the finance company submitted the check for contribution and it was returned as "closed account". How do I rectify this situation as like lightning and painlessly as possible. I do not have the funds to clear the loan right off, nor any optional fees, Nor do I have ample to post bond. Will the court work with me. In total I owe $250. The amount of the inspired loan. Help..
Answers: Turn yourself into your local PD or courthouse. They may let you PR bond out, and it'll look better than you getting picked up, which we eventually crop up away.

In future try to stay away from these nifty cash/ check into cash etc loan places. They'll squeeze every drop out of you that they can.
Get an attorney if you can find one. This is a both a civil and criminal concern. In some states it's a felony to pass a check on a closed side!! Plus, there be likely an acceleration clause surrounded by your loan documentation so you owe all that money very soon.

Get an attorney and see what he or she advises contained by your jurisdiction. They may say you should turn yourself surrounded by ASAP to avoid having to bond out, or they may not. Hint: don't commit any traffic violation when you are on your way to see the attorney because you'll attain picked up on the warrant.

Good luck!

Why do persons who build hateful or horrible jokes emergency that the persons who they are insulting.?

Why do those who make mean or offensive joke demand that the folks whom they are insulting should not be so sensitive and get a sense of humour? instead of admit that they themselves are wrong for having a sadistic sense of humour?
Answers: The culture that do this are just asses. A friend of a friend that I know like to crack Polish and German jokes, ones base around Stupidity and Nazis. This particular party tells the joke at our gatherings even though I inform him that I am both polish and German and repugnance the jokes.

I am told to remove the colour up, its just a kid. Personally, I don't see the need to degarade an entire residency for a cheap laugh. It's sad if you have to interest yourself by making fun of others, but some people are so shallow that any they enjoy it or are too dumb to infer that it is truly offensive and not as feathery hearted as they think. I told this friend once that his joke were crude and to stop as that I be getting aggravated. He thought it was amusing that I took offense to it and continued. To illustrate my point, I mentioned since he be black, his racist Polish and German jokes would be similar to me telling N***** joke. He finally saw my point of view and cut put money on on the jokes. I ponder this case turned out that he be so stupid that he didn't understand he be actually offending folks.

To summarize, these people recounting jokes approaching this are either dumb or a moment ago enjoy offending others.


-Update. So, Doc Manhattan, judge by your avatar I would say you are of African wearing clothes. So If I were to tolerate off a string of anti-black joke, you know the kind; you aim to say you wouldn't pinch the time to get upset. I notably doubt that.

-Kazuma, your reply is a bit naive. Anyone who hasn't lived underneath a rock their whole life span has have to have hear "treat others as you wish to be treated". To utter that this is the only channel they know how to act is a crock of bull. They know how to achievement better, they just choose not to.

-Michelle, I resembling your answer. You give the individual the CHOICE to hear the joke. This is a luxury that not everyone give. My remarks were going on for the variety of empire that do not give the choice and verbs the racist jokes after self told to stop.

By the way, we are humans, humans hold emotions. It is within our nature to respond whether it be to a physical or non-physical stimulus. Even a kid is capable of cause an emotional response, some populace may shrug it off while others may obtain upset. It's just how we agreement with things.
Because some citizens realize that one day, we are going to die; and it is a totally petty thing to achieve angry about when at hand are so much more serious things to get adjectives worked up over.

It's when people resembling that can dish it and not take it that I hold a problem... otherwise, whatever. Get a thicker skin.
Because it's not that serious. They should blanch up and quit taking every politically incorrect remark to heart.

When did this world become a bunch of "Nancy pants cry babies" anyway?
stupid examine.
1)being an asshole is not inherrently "wrong." it's just a suitable way to go and get people to not close to you.
2)humor is completely subjective
3)who the hell has the time to squander being annoyed by the insensitive jerks of the world?
I see that the ethnic group who agreed with you get a thumbs up and the ones who disagreed got a thumbs down. Wonder what I will attain?

I like to communicate jokes. I am a blonde (natural) and I love blonde joke. I will always ask first if you would approaching to hear a polish or black or whatever jape. If you don't want to hear it, I won't tell you. But if you want to hear it, don't grasp offended!

I usually don't detail the really nasty national jokes and I never use the N word. Nasty sex joke are my personal favorite.

Yes, I agree. People should be more careful what they read out around other people.

I live in OR. If I bring back sued and I sell my house in the past a judgment, is that fraudulent conveyance?

I might be a knees-up in what I believe is a frivolous claim. Thanks.
Answers: If it is frivolious, later you wouldnt be required to pay. Just because someone sues you doesnt miserable they win, they have to prove that they are worn out a certain amount. As far as selling your house, It take a lot to achieve a lien placed on someones house to collect money from. If you are ordered to pay and you dont, they will sieze your hill accounts (and whatever money you hold made from your house sale) or place a lien on your wages, where they give somebody a lift a certain amount out respectively month. But you can do whatever you want until that time a case. it is really unyielding to collect money from people who try not to money. I recently sued a girl who scammed my boyfriend, and she have done everything from perjuring herself to not getting a job to falsifing financial files to extortion to try and get out of paying.
There are so various technicalities in the imperative and since lawyers sometimes push for over the phone and offer the first partly or full hour free it makes sense to check, probably beside as many as you have a feeling necessary. Even the DA's bureau, attorney or the day can comfort after you get adjectives the information you can elsewhere. Sometimes passing an inheritance on as a endowment is an option, but it have a lot to do next to timing also. If it's too close to the action it may be not pious. A good legal representative knows adjectives the exceptions and what categories you tip out into. It is so technical as to which category and how it's viewed by the state, mediate or other relevant persons and actual practices. It doesn't hurt to try to protect your assets from predators. Successful those have no qualms roughly speaking those things and some lawyers enjoy much more practical and realistic expectations and a sense of fairness. They know that an unreasonable technicality and misuse of the directive can bring you down while a technicality can be there specificaly to minister to correct those wrongs. I would also recommend studying emotional intelligence so you can be cool through it all and also look at the situation surrounded by an unbiased attitude, as the courts often do, to draw from a real grasp on the situation and hang on to a clear head. Emotions verbs good sentence.

How can i find a job beside a theft conviction?

The offense be committed in 2003. I be fine $1,000 in year 2005. However my travel case was not really pilfering. But due to stress and anger make me to commit the crime. However the subject was at slate too to cause me to do this to him. My is not a break-in intention. I only did it once contained by a folly. I wouldn't commit it again in the adjectives. But i think its too unpaid . How will i expect to explain to the companies for them to accept me. Sigh.
Answers: The IRS may see you as in good health qualified. Be honest and tell the employer that you made a childish mistake and intellectual well from it. Many job have no existing opportunity for one to become enticed into stealing so there are job out there. Just dont agree to them find out anything contrary to your own disclosure. If they dont ask, dont tell them.
If it comes up, explain that you hold changed since that time, you are sorry that you did it, and would not make duplicate mistake if the same situation ever come up again.
Many employers will thank you for your time but never appointment you after that, but there are some organization out there who are inclined to give relations the benefit of the doubt. Just keep trying.
consider going into business for yourself.not copious, hire thieves..
for any basis.

What do the real british public touch about the no smoking prevention in UK?

Answers: It could own been introduced more quite by leaving it up to publicans (as one example) which type establishment they wish to operate.

As it is, all hold been compelled to adopt the smoke-free rule. I utter give it a year and later ask if the law should be amended to pilfer account of smokers' rights as ably by offering landlords etc the choice mentioned above. I think with the sole purpose a few would opt to change pay for.

Many would ask about member of staff rights. fair grill, but I suggest that, if someone is applying for a job surrounded by a pub they should be aware of which type of pub it would be. Accepting a job within a smoking-permitted establishment should be seen as accepting the type of environment they would be working within. No claims for damages allowed or justified.

Having said that, I believe that anywhere serving food should be smoke-free by evasion.

I smoke.
I would rather see Brown and his cronies dealing near other issues first.
How about a make illegal on suicide bombers or illegal immigrant first.
Deal with the core problems and then they can start buggering roughly with political correctness.
After I give up smoking 5 years ago, I have detested the smell of smoke.
So, for that reason alone, I'm beside the smoking ban.
My husband and I eventually stopped going to one of our fondness restaurants as they used to let populace smoke all through the restaurant - for smokers i.e. great, but if you don't smoke, or are with kids, it's awful choking on someone else's cigarette smoke wile you are trying to chomp through and taste apposite food you are paying a fortune for!

I think it is a well-mannered thing, and since the embargo I know two people who own given up smoking altogether. So can't be bad.
Well, it sucked here for the first year (Ireland) but society got used to it after a while. It is permitted now and it seem as if we have have it for ages!
It hit us when it came to pubs the hardest, but so frequent pubs here have erected lovely little extensions, tents for smoking so its not too unpromising.
Plus heart disease has fall by 10% and they are convinced it is because of the smoking ban.
Give it time.
I'm living surrounded by London UK - the smoking ban for me have been a God-send. Prior to the introduction of the All-England smoke exclusion, I had great difficulty giving up the dreaded weed. Every time I have managed a week lacking a smoke and then go down to the pub to be with friends, the place be full of smoke and before long I'd be put money on on the weed.

So far, touch wood several times, I have manage this time to stay off the weed for nearly seven weeks. Looks similar to I will finally make it to week 12 when I should be smoke free at second.

I am not a Zealot and would prefer it if pubs bars and restaurants be allowed to have a smoke portion, but the powers that be voted against this idea and instead imposed a total order.

During the summer here in London a unknown culture has risen up. Folk turn up outside the pub, smoke cigarettes beside friends. They even bring their own booze and do not actually budge into the pub at all.

Wait until winter. My guess is that most bar and restaurants and pubs will be pretty empty. I've hear that this is very much the bag in NYC and Eire both of which hold had a smoke ruling for some time.

Wait and see. Main thing is, I'm in reality getting unhooked and it's all due to the smoke make illegal.

No complaints from me.

More Questions and Answers:
[1633] - [1797] - [213] - [1791] - [1118] - [1016] - [2382] - [771] - [1145] - [94] - [2508] - [1203] - [395] - [1566] - [977] - [1010] - [2008] - [1721] - [2561] - [1969]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: