Law Questions and Answers

How come our roads are so dangerous when there're almost exotic?

We the people settle a lot of money for road repair and are not getting biddable value for our money. There must be standards that the interstates must conform to when contractors bid on a available job. Why are these standards not being met? Who are these inspectors and why are they not doing their post. Construction sites dangerous for motorists and workers alike.should the companies doing this work be responsible for the society they kill and hurt or should the government inspectors. Those roads be built to move troops and supplies quickly and if we ever stipulation to do that the troops would be injured more by our roads than almost any potential enemy.
Answers: What are you conversation about?

Roads surrounded by the US are not for troop movement, they are for the good of society. Unfortunately not adjectives roads are of high point or are not serviced as often as we would resembling.

Contractor should do quality work if they are hired by the state. State inspector should do their charge to insure that the road is built to the specifications of the civil engineer that designed it.
"Those roads be built to move troops and supplies quickly ."
Maybe the ALCAN.
Money is an issue.
And.if government(fed/state) undertake a major renovation/new of road system in the near future domain and forced eviction etc will be issues.
Can't just build a straight road near 8 lanes.
I don't know where on earth you live and what roads you drive on, but I can readily assure you that my dad and brother build straight level roads. Even though their boss woman is a moron (they don't have definite trucks yet, they use U-haul, U-haul construction is thier nickname) My dad does put pride contained by his work. They need to stop hiring idiots looking for a rushed buck. Some idiot almost killed my entire kinfolk last year. ll, my dad, brother, uncle al, uncle jimmy and uncle kenny. Just be glad youre not surrounded by Michigan right now, they've suspended adjectives gov't funding for this fiscal year. No cops, road construction, no permits, no liscenses, no child support person dist. NOTHING.

There are standards and if the road grade is not to spec, consequently the crew has to dismantle and recreate. A faulty status can be caused by something close to a ainstorm, or a genius driving on fresh laid concrete or ashphalt. Sites are unsafe, and that's why they're paid okay.
The person at the rear the wheel that kill a worker should be held at fault. And sent to me to business with. lol
Or roads up here aren't used for troops. Even though we hold one of the only adjectives military training bases surrounded by the US. Our roads are for citizens to drive on, not reserved for the forces. If they acquire hurt by a road, then conceivably they shouldn't be driving.

I am often harrassed by strangers. What trial options do I hold?

I am a teenager living contained by a retirement town. I am often yell at and threatened by the older residents of the town, even when I am not breaking any law. I have tried explaining to them that my appointments are not illegal, but the majority of them stereotype me as someone who exists singular to cause trouble. The subsequent time they threaten to call the cops/yell for no reason/etc. what movement should I take. What law apply? Can I press charges? Is this harassment? Disruption of the peace? I am clueless when it comes to United States regulation, but I am tired of taking their crap. Thanks.
Answers: Tell them to "go f*** themselves". That ought to do it. If they want to presume you are a trouble-maker, give them for a moment trouble. They will leave you alone if they are anxious.
WHOA! SLOW DOWN THERE!

I'm sure that there is a faultlessly good explanation as to why the elderly are yell at you and there are plenty of option before taking any trial action.

My first thought be that they are all slipping into senility. lol

Perhaps you should look at the possibility that you are within some way provoking these sort of reactions from the folks in your neighborhood.

Change your approach to the relations in your neighborhood. Not as an insult, but also look at how you present yourself and your attitude. There have to be a reason as to why the residents of your neighborhood enjoy a mistrust/disliking of you.
I don't think that you enjoy cause for legalized action. I attain the feeling at hand is something about your behavior towards the "elder residents" that you are not telling us.

Under Universal Healthcare, when you sue who would it be?

I am just checking my facts, I believed it to be the policy.
Answers: It would be the same as other countries that hold universal healthcare... it would NOT be the govt; but to some extent, the person that truly made the mistake, the doctor. I've seen this within other countries and agree with it 10000%. It in fact works out better... they are very vigilant when they know their livelihood is at stake.

Are internet terms of agreement officially recognized contracts?

If I made a terms of agreement page for my website, and made users click that they read and contained the terms of agreement up to that time entering my site, would that be a legal document? What can be done if the jargon are violated? If it is not a legal document, how can I construct it one?
Answers: As a general rule, click-wrap agreements are valid agreements. Whether an agreement is enforcible, i.e., a contract, is a further sound out that can't be answered in the abstract, but single in the context of seeing the agreement and its use.
No.

A question just about Worker's Comp law? My attorney is not person very accommodating because he isn't going to get compensated

that much due to me being out for over a year very soon. Ok, so everyone is telling me that once my doctor releases me vertebrae to work with no restrictions, that my employer have to find me a position at the same wage rate as before. (Even though my outmoded position was filled) but I call my employer and spoke with 2 individuals from human resources including the head of human resources and they adjectives told me that isn't true. They told me that once my doctor releases me back to work minus restrictions that I have to post my resume and apply for an approachable position within the company and move about through an interview process in which defence I may or may not get hired. I forgot to ask her roughly speaking the pay rate while I be on the phone with her. So how can I find out which story is true? This is New York state contained by case you call for to know for the answer. You can also email me if you have any further question surrounding my case if you stipulation more info. I am very confused and my attorney is not awfully helpful anymore.TY
Answers: Okay, I can't exactly answer your query for NY, but I'll give you a brief (general, not specific) explanation of w/c.
The w/c law were put into place because it used to be that employer would hire someone, work them to death until they get hurt, and then dump them resembling used garbage. After the member of staff had worked so sturdy for the employer, they were vanished with zilch, not even the money to pay for their medical treatment. So, w/c come into effect to protect the worker during times of injury, so that if you were injured contained by the line of employment, you could not be discarded because you couldn't work until you heal. W/C in nonspecific, only guarantees you reward while you are under a doctor's caution WITH restrictions. This guarantees that if you are injured at work then you can still earn something while soothing. Once you are released without restrictions, you are a short time ago another part of the workforce.

I am examiner of a temporary staffing agency serving mostly the construction industry. When a worker get injured on the job, they are offered night light duty work which meets the restrictions established by the doctor, until their injuries make well and they are released to full duty (no restrictions) by the doctor and can resume all mundane duties of employment. At that time, they are put back into the staffing cue and will receive a commonplace assignment when one comes available. They are not given any type of preference for assignment. Only while they are injured are they guaranteed modified (light) duty employment, because they can't merely go out and find another opportunity - they're hurt. Once they are no longer hurt, if they don't like waiting on an assignment, later they are perfectly competent to seek employment elsewhere base on their abilities.

Not knowing NY, I can't voice for sure, but is sounds like your company is following at lowest possible the general guidelines for w/c claims and release to full duty. You can check next to the w/c agency in your city or state, who can make available you specifics for NY and also answer any specific compliance questions roughly your employer.

Hope this helps!!
Good Luck!!!
I can't enlighten you about NY or even any other state, but I do know that Workman's Comp regulations are vastly specific. Your attorney seems to be particularly little use since a company that violates the regulations could find themselves sued for greatly more than the comp claim itself, providing the attorney with a tidy sum, too.

Like any profession, lawyer have their indolent ones, too, who don't want to actually work for their money. Find another one.
Don't know give or take a few N.Y state But I have fought and lost, lots W C cases in Calif Here they take 2/3 of their gross with NO taxes So masses are better off on W/C Also retraining if needed Here the attorney get a commission And it sounds like he/she have received it already so they are done with you and own moved on to the next and the subsequent and the next Sorry getting upset No here surrounded by Calif I didn't' have to hire you rear in most cases In my travel case WC cases was the root I closed up and put 25 people out of work I didn't stand a accident of ever winning one overnight case You doctor well do what he is told to do my the attorney He/she sent you to them Right!

Lawyers: do you think a layperson's giving officially recognized advice on YA constitutes the unauthorized practice of canon

And bonus round: when a lawyer weigh in near legal warning on YA, is an attorney-client relationship created? And is the attorney-client privilege waived?

Anyone else find this rather worrisome? In California, the unauthorized practice of law is undemocratic (Cal. Business & Professions Code, sec. 6125 & 6126). I'm guessing it's the same surrounded by the other 49 states.
Answers: My understanding of a endorsed contract, which is required to give legalized advice, is that even as little as a dollar exchanged is hiring, and any guidance after that is endorsed advice. Since not a soul on here asks for money/goods/services in exchange for their proposal, then they aren't practicing imperative, they are participating in an plain forum.

As far as attorney-client privilege goes, if near is more than just you and the attorney who can hear it (or see it), afterwards there is no privilege. In some cases, it even applies to their decriminalized staff, which is why support staff usually are only given the information that they have need of to research or prepare, they are not given the client's statements.
Its unpaid, not even a verbal contract. Lawyers don't dispense any advice in need money

You could always sue...
I don't suggest this is a formal enough setting to be considered "practicing law"

And for the bonus: I believe the attorney-client privilage is automatically waive as soon as you decide to nick your legal situation to Yahoo! Answers.
No. Opinions asked for & given on the internet does not constitute ANY munificent of relationship.

Penalty for Counterfeiting Money at Home? What is it?!?

What would a 25 year old go and get who has produced $500 worth of $20 bills on an inkjet printer at home and get caught distributing them to stores? This is a first time offender near no priors.
Answers: shred them and go obtain a job...
Manufacturing counterfeit United States currency or altering bona fide currency to increase its value is a ruin of Title 18, Section 471 of the United States Code and is punishable by a fine of up to $5,000, or 15 years imprisonment, or both.

Possession of counterfeit United States obligation with fraudulent intent is a vandalism of Title 18, Section 472 of the United States Code and is punishable by a fine of up to $15,000, or 15 years imprisonment, or both.

Anyone who manufacture a counterfeit U.S. coin in any denomination above five cents is subject to like peas in a pod penalties as adjectives other counterfeiters. Anyone who alters a genuine coin to increase its numismatic helpfulness is in defilement of Title 18, Section 331 of the United States Code, which is punishable by a fine of up to $2,000, or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both.

Forging, altering, or trafficking within United States Government checks, bonds, or other obligations is a infringement of Title 18, Section 510 of the United States Code and is punishable by a fine of up to $10,000, or ten years imprisonment, or both.

Printed reproductions, including photographs of serious newspaper currency, checks, bonds, postage stamps, revenue stamps, and securities of the United States and foreign governments (except lower than the conditions previously listed) are violations of Title 18, Section 474 of the United States Code. Violations are punishable by fines of up to $5,000, or 15 years detention, or both.
7 years in prison is the standard sentence, I expect, and a few years probation. $500 isn't even an amount of interest to customs, but even 1 counterfeit bill is an offense.

Keep in mind that the power to coin money is given the inner government, so it is a federal offense.

As resourcefully, your house was the place of invention. That's an extra bit of time in itself.
Manufacturing counterfeit United States currency or altering legal currency to increase its value is a ruin of Title 18, Section 471 of the United States Code and is punishable by a fine of up to $5,000, or 15 years imprisonment, or both.

Possession of counterfeit United States obligation with fraudulent intent is a despoliation of Title 18, Section 472 of the United States Code and is punishable by a fine of up to $15,000, or 15 years imprisonment, or both.

Anyone who manufacture a counterfeit U.S. coin in any denomination above five cents is subject to like peas in a pod penalties as adjectives other counterfeiters. Anyone who alters a genuine coin to increase its numismatic utility is in betrayal of Title 18, Section 331 of the United States Code, which is punishable by a fine of up to $2,000, or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both.

Forging, altering, or trafficking contained by United States Government checks, bonds, or other obligations is a vandalism of Title 18, Section 510 of the United States Code and is punishable by a fine of up to $10,000, or ten years imprisonment, or both.

**from what I get scanning a few articles, they usually stir for the higher running out on punishment.**

New Drinking Law?

This may seem slightly paranoid but I am 18 years out-of-date and my friends have be talking roughly a supposed new tenet coming in that raise the legal drinking age to 21. It's probably not true (I hope it isn't true, I wait 3 long years to be a legal drinker lol) Does anyone know if here is an element of truth to this? Many gratitude :D
Answers: English law answer: A few weeks put a bet on, after an alleged drink related crime in his Force's nouns, the Chief Constable of Cheshire , Mr. Peter Fahy spoke out about what he claimed be irresponsible parents and under age drink related issues. He said that he feel the age limits for UK alcohol consumption should be raise from its present 18yrs up to 21yrs.
( There are limited situations where on earth 16 & 17yr olds can drink with a buffet but not purchase alcohol themselves ). The Govt. promptly responded saying they have no intention of raising the ends and said the present law give plenty of opportunities to enforce irresponsible lifestyle. It is worth noting that here are strong voices in the Police, MP's etc. who think the drink regulation reforms introduced within Nov. 2005 with the Licensing Act 2003 are too hands-off and the Govt. will no doubt announce a review of the legislation but at the moment, no - immediately you are 18 you can purchase alcohol. Could I respectfully advise you however not to be tempt to buy alcohol for any of your under 18yr antediluvian friends, the penalties for you are a potential lb1000 ( one thousand )
There is a proposal to modify the legal age constrain to 21 to kerb binge drinking etc etc, raise the driving age etc.

Wont surface for a couple of years, but will stop under 21's person admitted to bar etc etc
I havent heard anything. It of late sounds like one of those classic rumers that are around when your that age.
Same as the driving age going up.
You own to be 21 years old to legitimately drink a beer already in the Unites States.

I devise it's absolute BS! An 18 year older kid, can go to Iraq, and become an amputee or worse as a result of the combat. He's allowed to go and die for his country, but can't relish a beer. That's the most absurd entry about the drinking age man 21.
There may be, but most laws passed are not retrospective, within other words if it is is brought in immediately, it will only affect society after that date...so you will be OK...cheers, mines a pint.

Edit
That is one reason it may not be brought within as everyone will have to bring a birth permit to show when they were born.
it's not going to appear though the the age to buy cigs is going up to 18

i am 19 and if the age went up to 21 holy **** i would stir absolute mental
another urban myth started by the tabloid press no law are at present in the pipeline that will allow the age curb to be raised to 21 or any other age

How much an hour does a qc charge?

i was at a trial yesterday of a man who kill a member of my loved ones and he got rotten with a 12month refusal and lb1000 fine even though he admitted it he hit her stationary vehicle at 55mph into a brick wall and because he had a qc and a posh own flesh and blood with money he walk free the justice system is so wrong
Answers: A jury trial can cost up lb100,000 a year and like you I see a risky driver as bad as a man beside a loaded gun and i think that carry 5 years min.
take contemplation
I can't comment on the case which you refer to because I didn't know adjectives the details. The sentence does seem particularly modest indeed, though. The attorney general can appeal it to the CA, if it is considered too low.

As to your press, criminal QC's or 'silks' charge substantially less than those within the commercial sector.
In terms of hourly rates a clothed criminal silk will be in the region of lb250 per hour.
For a trial he (or she) will charge a brief charge and thereafter daily refreshers. the size of the brief charge depends on the size of the trial and the amount of preparation required.

By comparison, a good commercial silk will charge lb750 an hour or thereabouts.

If you could punish people who dispatch out viruses vindictively what would the punishment be>?

Answers: The standard: 5-10 years jail time (optional) and they would not be allowed to use a computer or touch tone phone for 10 years (mandatory). Non-use of computer and phone begin when any prison sentences end. The individual would also be responsible for paying back any damages he cause, including overtime pay for companies artificial by a virus.
Unending listening to Rosie O'Donnell singing the National Anthem...

More Questions and Answers:
[2158] - [1209] - [738] - [2151] - [438] - [2238] - [2251] - [1182] - [479] - [1219] - [1380] - [367] - [19] - [637] - [1571] - [421] - [1406] - [2513] - [2100] - [766]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: