Law Questions and Answers
Effects of murder?
what woul be the effect of murder on a country, people, on the house that was vanished behindAnswers: country = loss of a excise paying citizen
ppl = the ppl as a group may become outraged
family = no ending to this effect.. the pain and suffering have no end on own flesh and blood
Death of a loved one is never easy. And if you are a compassionate character all death are a terrible item. Murder,especially if it's unsolved is the worst. It makes populace feel unsafe and paranoid. The clan feels as if their loved one get no justice. It is a premonition of utter helplessness.
The family of 9/11 victims will not have closure until our country get rid of osama. Even then closure will not come. Nothing ever make it better when someone you love dies. Time just make it easier to handle.
Is poppers legal surrounded by Malaysia?
Where i can found poppers in KL?how much it flog?
will urine drug taste become positive if i taking poppers?
Answers: Yes poppers are permitted in Malaysia. Malaysia is strict on narcotics and considerable quantities solitary
Why should the legislation for the definition of marriage be changed at a federal smooth?
Answers: Problem is. A few unscrupulous people own been trying to re-define wedding ceremony. The fed wants to address this issue because the word marriage is very soon and has other been surrounded by this country a union between a man and a woman. They feed proved it when the mormons practiced having more than one wife the organization made it legal to enjoy only one wife. I bet they would be turning over within the grave to think a few perverts are trying to redefing it as a same sex entry. And yes, it is perverting the term "marriage" to apply it to something approaching gay partnerships.
it affects interstate commerce - and that lies inside the dominion of the Federal government.
I'm of the mindset that organization shouldn't be in the business of defining marital at all - vis-a-vis giving benefits to one group (married) and not to others (unmarried) and vice-versa.
It is not to transformation the definition, it is to maintain the definition, and it is so rogue magistrates do not grant someting contained by one state which must be accepted surrounded by other states.
Pagan...your ignorance proceeds you. Common law have recently be eliminated contained by most areas not added. It has be around for many years.
People now only want to rob the easy road out so why should it be changed at all.
People hurdle into marriage and later they blame the system because they didn't both didn't bother to try.
If people don't close to the system don't get married.
It is because the concept of nuptials has changed since the law came into effect. It be not too long ago that common-law marriages have no legal status. The system is better very soon, and more fair.
The unproved definition of marriage did not filch into account that wedding ceremony is a RELIGIOUS concept for those (including myself) who consider that to be important, and a CIVIL concept for the purpose of leadership of family property regulation.
We all want to prevent inequality to people, I dream up. That is why the government have to move on this issue.
It shouldn't. It is not an interstate issue. The federal role is predetermined to determining whether or not states have to honor respectively other's marriages.
The problem is that family on either side of the spectrum find it easier to lobby one Congress fairly than 50 legislatures.
Bill Clinton, surrounded by 1996, signed a law defining wedding between a man and a woman..
Some argue this makes no difference because states can clear their own laws, etc... but it does net a difference. It makes a difference towards things that one and only apply to federal rights.
Here is an example, say you married someone from x foreign country and required them to migrate here with you. You can do this and your spouse become a citizen. BUT because of Clinton's directive, that would not apply if your spouse was like peas in a pod sex.
Articles of the Constitution?
1 through 3...what are the main points roughly them?Answers: They collectively establish how the federal government is to work.
Type "US Constitution" into ANY rummage engine and read them yourself.
How lazy can you be?
Could this be classed as police harassment ?
police and community department came to our house motto that a neighbour had complained that we have cut down a wire obstruction and were very soon damaging his leylandi trees, they are going brown surrounded by places, it is all a feign, the neighbour has mental problems.if the police come again over this or any other made up problem can this be classed as police irritation /
Answers: Techincally, police are duty bound to respond to a call, when they show up purely keep a account of when and how many times the police come out because of this person and be nice but
explain you own not done anything wrong, look, here is how many times this being has call, could you please go converse to THIS person and explain I own done nothing, quit waasting the police officer's time, they enjoy more important things to do.
Maybe police should stop acting on adjectives investigations to avoid being accuse of harassment? yes that's the answer.
I probably enjoy sympathy with your situation but honestly, can you really describe the police following up on the complaint as irritation. Don't let the perception of police inquisitive you bother you so much.
No, police are just doing their mission. Its your neighbours complaint that brought them to your house.
Is it legal?
to scrutinize porn in india at 18 within home..?Answers: Yes
it's none of her business
hi dear,
sorry to say it is not permitted contained by india, b'coz of the strong religious ethics,
but the problem is more and more youth lower than 18 are doing free sex wihout notice of their parents,
admiration
ponnapula
How do I report a DISPENSING CHEMIST FOR MAL-PRACTISE ??
How would I go in the order of reporting a Chemist for mal-practice on several occations now I own been given the wrong pricscription tablets.This chemist have a notice surrounded by the shop that reads
IT IS THE RESPOSABILITY OF THE CUSTOMER TO CHECK THAT THEY HAVE THE RIGHT ITEMS WHEN COLLECTING THER PRISCRIPTION
How is the customer to know if he/she have the right drugs. After all ther a hundereds of trade mname drugs that do exactly one and the same thing.
Answers: There should be a Board for that.if you can't take through to the owners.
You will first need to write a complaint to the chemist executive
They will provide you with your option on following the complaint through from them if still unresolved
If they do not
Then your next port of ring is:
The Health Service Ombudsman
Millbank Tower
Millbank
SW1P 4QP
Depends which country you are in, if you are contained by the UK you could try the following, I'm sure they could put you on the right track:
National Patient Safety Agency (Corporate Office)
4-8 Maple Street, London W1T 5HD
Tel: 020 7927 9500
Fax: 020 792 79501
Email: enquiries@npsa.nhs.uk
A disclaimer does not relieve him of the legal responsibility.
You can contact your state. Look for a common telephone number since the agency term may be different from state to state.
You are correct to complain. An incorrect prescription will not only fall through to treat the condition for which it was intended but may end in damage and serious ailment.
It is actually The Royal Pharmaceutical Society that you would entail to complain to.
All pharmacists who practise in Great Britain enjoy to be registered with the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain and adjectives registered pharmacies are inspected by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. The RPSGB is responsible for ensuring that adjectives pharmacists and pharmacy owners act contained by accordance with the Code of Ethics and near the laws relating to medicine and poisons.
The Society can deal near:
* complaints about the professional service provided by a pharmacist/pharmacy at adjectives levels of healthcare, eg, a dispensing error, wrong labelling, or antediluvian medicine supplied
* complaints more or less the conduct of a pharmacist, eg, unprofessional behaviour
* complaints against owners of pharmacies including companies
Contact:
Fitness to Practise and Legal Affairs
Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain
1 Lambeth High Street, London SE1 7JN
Fax: 020 7572 2510
e-mail: complaintsaboutpharmacists@rpsgb.org
Also see their website, which give you more guidelines, etc.
Check the wording on the script
ensure it corresponds to the medication dispensed
It's not really rocket science...sometimes taking your own responsibility (with minute to disclaimer of fault by chemist) save a great deal of money for the average joe that cannot afford a lawsuit!
Mate.. at hand are larger things in life span to worry over!
You already enjoy a very suitable answer to your question that can't be enhanced upon, but just have to say that this probably happen more than most people realise. Two of my relatives own experienced the same article in times past and both went ahead and took the wrong medication, as they trusted both the doctor and the pharmacist. The first be only a child, she be given the correct medication but the wrong dosage on the label. It be an iron tonic in solution form, so her mother administered the dose for a couple of days, until it was evident that the child was within some distress; she was suffering from an overdose of iron! The second valise involved a relative, who's rarely sick but who'd be diagnosed as having a virus and be prescribed an antibiotic. She checked that her name be on the label, so presumed she have the correct medication. Some days later she be feeling even worse and her daughter asked to see what medication she be taking. She immediately recognised the moniker on the label as anyone an anti-depressent, of which her mother had be taking quite a large dose! It took her quite a long time to acquire over the effects of this medication! On leaving a pharmacy I simply check to ensure it's my pet name on the bag; if I know I'd been prescribed tablets, but have been given soft medication, then plainly I would query it. The nonspecific public, however, are not trained pharmacists and should not be expected to know the names of assorted drugs and their uses, unless it's something they regularly take. These types of mistakes could prove to be homicidal; at least script are now computer generate rather than hand-written, which SHOULD practically remove the errors.
New holiday entitlement?
if working a 5 day week, the unusual regs will make it 4.8 weeks, How heaps days is that?? What will it be for those working 6 days?Having a blonde moment!
Thanks
Answers: the same..
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Employment/E...
unless you are lucky to own good employer that give you more than the permitted minimum
You are entitled to 4 times your normal working week
eg 5 days x 4 = 20 days
plus
Bank holidays will be further to the 20 days. If you normal work on Mondays anyway later you will have ridge holidays as time in luie (in addendum to you 20)
24 days (But I think wall hols are extra)
I make it 33.7 if you work a 6 year week
I multiplied 5 by 52 to get the total number of days worked per year
next divided by 24 to get the entitlement per year as a decimal
then multiplied by 312 which is the number of days you work a year if you do a 6 morning week.
But it looks a bit high so possibly you need to run the first figure smaller amount the holiday entitlement .
I give up. Phone ACAS
What are the most random law you can think of?
There is a imperative in the uk very soon out dated that says that hackney carriage cabs should carry a bale of hay (dates vertebrae to when horses pulled the cabs) obviously these law are not enforced but i wondered if anyone know of any others similar to this.Answers: It is illegal for a hackney cab in the City of London to convey rabid dogs or corpses.
It is illegal to die within the Houses of Parliament.
It is an act of treason to place a postage stamp attitude the British monarch upside down.
In France, it is forbidden to call a pig Napoleon.
Under the UK’s Tax Avoidance Schemes Regulations 2006, it is unconstitutional not to tell the taxman anything you don’t want him to know, though you don’t own to tell him anything you don’t mind him knowing.
In Alabama, it is illegitimate for a driver to be blindfolded while driving a vehicle.
In Ohio, it is against state law to take a fish drunk.
Royal Navy ships that enter the Port of London must provide a barrel of rum to the Constable of the Tower of London.
In the UK, a pregnant woman can reasonably relieve herself anywhere she wants – even, if she so requests, contained by a policeman’s helmet.
In Lancashire, no person is permitted after mortal asked to stop by a constable on the seashore to incite a dog to yelp.
In Miami, Florida, it is illegal to skateboard within a police station.
In Indonesia, the penalty for masturbation is decapitation.
In England, adjectives men over the age of 14 must carry out two hours of longbow practice a afternoon.
In London, Freemen are allowed to take a flock of sheep across London Bridge in need being charged a toll; they are also allowed to drive geese down Cheapside.
In San Salvador, drunk drivers can be punished by departure before a firing squad.
In the UK, a man who feel compelled to urinate in public can do so singular if he aims for his rear controls and keeps his right appendage on his vehicle.
In Florida, unmarried women who parachute on Sundays can be jailed.
In Kentucky, it is illegal to transport a concealed weapon more than six-feet long.
In Chester, Welshmen are banned from entering the city since sunrise and from staying after sunset.
In the city of York, it is legal to murder a Scotsman inwardly the ancient city walls, but only if he is carrying a bow and arrow.
In Boulder, Colorado, it is wrong to kill a bird inwardly the city limits and also to “own” a pet – the town’s citizens, rightfully speaking, are merely “pet minders”.
In Vermont, women must obtain written go-ahead from their husbands to wear false teeth.
In London, it is illegal to flag down a minicab if you have the plague.
In Bahrain, a mannish doctor may legally examine a woman’s genitals but is forbidden from looking directly at them during the nouns; he may only see their weighing up in a mirror.
The principal of any dead whale found on the British coast is lawfully the property of the King; the tail, on the other hand, belongs to the Queen - within case she wants the bones for her corset.
In Thailand:
It is illegal to confer on your house if you are not wearing underwear.
You must wear a shirt while driving a car.
You must payment a fine of $600 in Thailand if you're caught throwing away chewed bubble gum on the sidewalk. If you do not settle up the fine, you are jailed.
No one may step on any of the nation's currency.
In Italy now, it regulates how big your gold ingots fish bowl should be by the amount of gold fish you enjoy.
I found that one very funny.
It is unlawful to leave belongings unattended.
We then hold this law:
Picking up forsaken baggage is an achievement of terrorism.
So...basicially if someone abandons luggage at an airport, it would be criminal for security to clear it. Damn, guess we should inform indemnity at the airports!
Oh man, a couple of years ago I came across some crazy New York Laws that tickled me:
1) A license must be purchased earlier hanging clothes on a clothesline.
2) Women may be in motion topless in public, providing it is not individual used as a business.
3) While riding in an elevator, one must cooperate to no one, and fold his hand while looking toward the door.
4) In Staten Island, New York, It is illegal for a father to telephone his son a '******' or 'queer' in an endeavour to curb 'girly behavior'.
Those are what I can remember ahaha.
Involuntary intoxication?
So I'm taking an administration of even-handedness class right now, and we are studying the miscellaneous defenses used in criminal cases. One of which is involuntary intoxication, which roughly states that if you become under the influence of drugs that you didnt niggardly to, (like say someone slipped you a roofie, or "spiked the punch") you arent held in charge for your actions. Now I can see how this is a sucessfull defese, what going on for this?:Say I (not really, I dont smoke weed.. but for the sake of the argument its me) am going to smoke weed because i like that it calm me down. Now bear within mind it is still an illegal drug... But say aloud the weed I happen to procure is laced beside PCP, and I go crazy because of that and pulsate the crap out of someone. Would that count as involuntary intoxication because I didnt mean to acquire high on PCP, or would it not because I be still using an illegal substance?
Answers: Not worth looking into since you allegedly do not smoke it, but I am nearly lasting that it has already happen in times past. If no statutes are on the books next try case directive.
Additional Details:
I do not know what part of the country advocate / former prosecutor David M is from, but my home state appears to play by another set of rules. In the case of People v. Gallego (1990) 52 Cal. 3d 115, while Gallego be voluntarily smoking illegal weed he took PCP that be secretly given to him. He proceeded to murder two associates, was convicted, and afforded an appeal. The highly developed court upheld the guilty verdict (page 184) “involuntary intoxication not established when defendant intentionally ingests unlawful substance not realizing it contains another, different unsanctioned drug”.
*/End of Line.
Hmmm...
All this hypothetical crap on this site is driving me nuts.
All your examples that involve an altered substance could be successful defenses. In some instances, they are complete defenses and would result in a pre-trial dismissal. In other instances, they would result within reducing the charges. Every case is fact-specific, so respectively would depend on whether (for example) the first drink was spiked or if it be your 3rd or 4th drink. The time period surrounded by which you consumed the alcohol and your body size would also be a factor. The marijuana argument is similiar. In my state, less than an ounce is a petty misdeamnor (equivalent to a speeding ticket), so the PCP factor is terribly important. We also allow medical marijuana, so that another point to be factored surrounded by. Anyway, if you add more facts in the region of the individual and the time of consumption, you have any a completely winning argument or an argument that lead to substantial mitigating factors. Your argument is weakest when you bring surrounded by drugs that may induce violent behavior lacking alteration, such as coke or meth.
More Questions and Answers:
[769] - [75] - [229] - [1928] - [2132] - [2412] - [590] - [1150] - [2310] - [85] - [63] - [680] - [507] - [582] - [1037] - [1175] - [1862] - [1214] - [1842] - [2070]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: