Law Questions and Answers
Can you put a homeless person lower than house arrest?
Answers: What? I'm sure a homeless person would love to be below house arrest! They'd finally have a wearing clothes place to keep melt, food to eat, and a place to sleep.. The directive is the one that turns them out on the street from psychiatric hosptials etc. Unless they commit a terrible offense which would require detain, the poor souls will continue to stroll our streets.
What?
Are you serious?
sure you can but the question should be can you enforce it?
That's call "under cardboard box arrest", I believe.
yes..reformatory
I don't thing i.e. a good view, as far they do not brake the law within one or another way. If they are breaking them, consequently they should be put under a house arrest. Usually they are dirty and not verbs people which can catch sickness them self, and spread to another healthy one living around. That's my view.
Yes but they would have to be within tent on pursuing the matter
Suicide or Murder???
A man leaps from the 18th floor of a luxury elevated rise.at the exact same moment a woman catches her husband surrounded by bed with another woman on the 6th floor and try's to shoot her beside a shotgun. The blast goes though the sliding chalice doors and hits the man that jumped from the 18th floor on the road down. what is his death ruled as, and does the woman take charged in the passing?Answers: Hmm, I'll take a crack at it.. I would say-so, the man who jumped and be hit with the bullet as he be passing by her skylight, died as a result of suicide. The bullet may have simply grazed him or not have be fatal. But that leap from 18 stories would butcher King Kong! As for the woman, if she missed her husband or shot him but he didn't die, then she should attain charged with attempted murder for the husband, and for the pullover, probably would depend on the autopsy and if the bullet would have be fatal. If not, consequently most likely negligent endangerment with a weapon. If a deadly wound, then possibly manslaughter. This is a tricky one.. What class are you taking?
What a tricky cross-examine. Sounds like homework, so I can't offer you the correct answer, not having taken the class, and knowing correct procedures.
I would GUESS, that involuntary death, or a combined suicide/homicide for the man, and manslaughter for the woman. Let us know what the correct answer is, I'd be interested to see.
The autopsy report and the incentive of death reports hold room to put in the explanations, so those are my best guesses, above.
I may not be right, but this is what I dream up.
I think it would be ruled as murder. Although the man committed a suicide attempt, that's exactly what it be - an ATTEMPT. There's no way to know if it in actuality would have be successful or not; for all we know, something could own been below him at the exact right moment to keep him from dying. While falling from the building, he be still alive - the actual falling wouldn't have kill him, landing on the ground would have. Because he be still alive when he was shot, and because there's that remote arbitrariness he could have survived the drip, I think it would be considered murder - if he even died from the shot, which isn't specified contained by your question.
If he did die, whether or not the woman is charged would probably depend on what cause the death, the trip up or the bullet, which can be determined in an autopsy. If the demise was a result of the shot, I believe she would be charged.
This may be completely wrong, this is freshly a 16-year-old's point of view, but it seem like this is what it would be.
i that i enjoy to say is that if you try to execute yourself and cant even get that right you have need of to give up anyhow
Licenses regarding renting DVDs within the UK?
Can someone give me details as to the copyright law regarding renting DVDs to other nation in the UK (preferably next to links to more information),Also if there are specific law, can someone give an hypothesis as to the licenses required to rent DVDs to other relatives in the UK (once again, preferably beside links to more information)
Thanks.
Answers: Have a look at the FACT website - the federation against copyright theft - they should enjoy more info. Otherwise look up the new legislation on DVD renting. Hope the links below are of assistance.
http://www.fact-uk.org.uk/
http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/e-strategies/e-...
when u want to rent a dvd it should be from a distrubutor say
The simpsons movie costs lb9.99 contained by woolworths from a distrubutor your would pay eg lb40 that is to say to include the rental you can do with it
Why the govenment of eritria is not ok with every body?
Answers: What command is OK with everybody?
Is it still perjury if the person be never sworn in?
Hypothetically, contained by a court proceeding for which the defendant was never sworn within and had plead guilty, is it still considered an deed of perjury for the defendant to lie during nouns?Answers: Matt, if you testify, you are sworn in.
TV is not concrete life...
If the defendant have plead guilty to a crime, what reason would the defendant own to lie? The inference anyone that there would be no nouns other than the referee asking why the crime was committed by the defendant. The defendant have freely admitted to the crime in need being sworn.
That human being the case, next there would be no baggage of perjury.
If the defendant admitted to the the crime in need having committed the crime to protect a guilty entertainment; that individual could possibly be charged with hinder prosecution and/or be charged as an accomplice, but not perjury.
If a defendant signed a confession stating that they be guilty of a crime and the document states something to the effect of, "the testimony given here is the truth to the best of my understanding." Then the defendant may be charged with perjury at a next time.
When you sign a statement, you are testifying that what is written is the truth, so it is still purjury. However within court, you are always sworn contained by , before you bequeath testimony.
Driving in Virginia.?
I hear that Virginia has super strict law when it comes to cars and driving..I have tints that are court here in florida but not surrounded by viriginia and i heard u cant hold those radar detectors but u cant in florida..are u exempt from their law simply if your driving through the state...what other ridiculous laws do you know in the region of..?Answers: I don't think you are exempt from the Radar Detectors they own signs posted on the state lines regarding them not person legal. The tinted window law is not something you'll catch pulled over for but if you come across a really dicky cop they may tag that on to a speeding ticket or something.
You also cannot enjoy any blue lights visable on the vehicle and license plates cannot have covers that travel completely over the plates. Other than that, theres no other wacky wierd laws that I know of.
Virginia is strict on what they allow on vehicle. Ignorance is no excuse for the law. They usually don't verbs you over for window tints, if they capture you speeding they will mention your windows and I don`t know write you a ticket for them as well. When you enter the Commonwealth near are signs saying "Radar detectors illegal" so if you are caught near one you will be in trouble. Just be glad you aren't a resident, we enjoy to pay hefty fines for persuaded offenses that out of staters don't.
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.
Check them out.
You can have one within your vehicle since you're from another state, you just can't own it in the fanlight. Just put it away you don't have to throw it out the windowpane.
Having lived in VA, they are pretty strict almost their driving laws. However, basically because you are driving through their state doesn't mean you're exempt from their law.
You're best bet is just not use your radar detector within VA. However, if you don't speed you don't need to verbs about using a radar detector. When you speed, you solely use more gas, and don't really save plenty time to really make it worth it.
Righhhht... don't verbs about the tinted window in Virginia. That is what everybody say until they get a ticket for it and anything else the cop can think of.
Does a Minor have the right of "Freedom of Religion"?
Answers: Freedom of Religion cannot be predetermined by anyone. Even when a certain religion is persecuted the empire who believe in that reliance will stick with it because it's what they believe (Martin Luther etc..). Religion is what you believe- the elected representatives can't restrict what you believe- you are the only one who can.
In protest to the federal government, yes.
In ill feeling to his parents, likely no. You would own to outlaw baptism - the sacrament where on earth the parents covenant to raise the child within the faith. Also, recurrently as part of divorce decree one parent gets the right to lift up the child in their principle tradition.
In the US, the 1st Amendment to the Constitution reads: Congress shall bring in no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
This prohibits the Government from interfering within religion. It does NOT protect you from your parents. Does that answer your question?
Growing up I used to wonder what correct it was living surrounded by a free country if my parents took away my rights.
Yes, you have freedom of religion according to the senate, but your parents have control over you and can put together your life miserable if you don't abide by their rules. The more fixatedly religious parents deny their children this freedom.
Children are powerless since they have no money and own trouble getting standing in civil court. Suing parents so that you can practice freedom of religion, would result contained by a civil case involving constitutional directive. It would be hell living in your house. These kind of cases involve huge sums of money unless your attorney works pro bono. Then you just salary a filing excise. Your attorney and you would probably attempt to negotiate a settlement. If your parents were unwilling to settle, the travel case would go to court.
The results would be interesting. You would probably not be forced to attend their church, but they might not be court ordered to deliver you to yours. You could own to hitch a ride with another kith and kin which wouldn't be all that easier said than done to do especially with the publicity your shield would garner.
I'm an grown and when my mother visited I looked-for her to visit our church. She have pressured me to expose my children to religion and when I did, she wasn't happy beside my choice. Every year she refuses to call round our church and forces us to attend hers. My poor children know that we do this because she spends a lot of money on us during the stop by!
What I remember of her church is that three of four ministers cheated on their wives and one of those embezzled church money which my father get him to return. I see discrimination surrounded by regard to the treatment of gay ministers and I send regrets to expose my children to discrimination as I know for sure that Jesus didn't discriminate and would never be a subdivision of that. I wasn't happy near this church because I think religious nation should be spending their spiritual time helping people a bit than placing their fanny on a pew seat. Doing both is fine by me, but helping relatives comes first and these people weren't doing that. So when I be a child, I dragged myself to church every week, but as soon I was out of the house, I stopped going for several years. Not giving children their freedom of religion can own very refusal long-term consequences.
They should speak upon reconition of the crap their preacher get away next to. All that imature censoring to sexism and racism.
Daughter broke arm at school?
she broke it at 11:00am & college nurse put ice on it for 10 min. & grasp my girls arm said it was ok. wife picked her up at 3:15 awareness big dip in arm, daughter be crying holding it against her wife took her to doctors was broken it 2 places. Do i hold the right to sue for scholl not contaction us??Answers: yes. that is negligence. win onto it right away. your poor daughter had to suffer contained by agony the entire day. it have nothing to do beside the fact she have it agaisnt her, holding it, or no further damage be done. the fact is that she be in serious medical backing and not to mention agonising pain ( i know, because my daughter broke her arm at arts school and they contacted me right away and called an ambulance).
sue them, or at lowest possible get an appointment beside a soliciter, the school neglected to inform you and/or the hospital that she have a SERIOUS injury and this is called NEGLIGENCE and is against the canon. so yea, i think you hold a strong case. she suffered more than she have too because the school inferior to report it. get onto it right away. angelic luck
At this point, probably not. It is possible the dip in the arm be not noticable at the time the nurse examined her. I don't see why a nurse would intentionally ignore a broken arm.
I don't conjecture it is reasonable to hail as a parent every time someone is hurt, kids would be faking injuries adjectives the time just to skip arts school.
I would certainly phone the school and complain, they should do an investigation into the incident and bring back to you. If not, notify the college board.
You wouldn't want to sue too soon, in baggage your daughter has complications. Wait until she get better. If she doesn't get better, you will want the doctors evaluation if the delay within reporting contributed to the injury.
Once you have the results of the investigation, and the arm heal, you can determine if the nurse was inattentive or not.
Contaction? Are you in one and the same grade as your daughter?
Does the doctor expect your daughter to rest? I hope so. I doubt further damage be done between 11 am and 3:15 pm., as your daughter probably held her arm against her all light of day. My point is, how will money make this situation any better?
Perhaps a better solution would be to address the problem of an inept nurse. Now THAT would sustain things.
Sorry to hear about your daughter's broken arm. However, previously you sue, is it a public or private school? Public school usually can't be sued based on the notion of sovereign immunity since the conservatory is a part of the affairs of state. Public schools can still be sued if something really really desperate happens though.
Chkka Jam is OK ! Tamilnadu Bandh not OK!?
Time and again the Apex court has shown it's color. it's impossible for the aborogines of this great country, we must respect the view's of the majority in a democracy or else--Answers: The ancestors are not supreme, it is the law which is above everyone, including the individuals. We live in a democracy which is govern by Rule of Law not poll numbers or popular opinion. The extremely right to life is granted by Art. 21 of the constitution and it can be taken away by due process of decree.
If the Supreme Court has held that strikes are against the law, then it is the canon of the land, everbody including political party are bound by this if they dont obey they own to face contempt of court proceedings. I believe the S.C have warned the tamil nadu govt. up to that time hand to act in accordance with or face the consequences. time and again karunanidhi have courted trouble and i think this time by defy the supreme court, the apex organ of the judiciary and the third arm of govt. he has have taken on more then he can chew.
I am not sure if these politicians are literary or if they just dont have a handle on law or if they estimate they are above law ?
Time and again Apex court and illustrious courts and lower courts have be approached, when it suits, like file defamation.
why grudge very soon? public interest is larger;
if you are seriously
ill today, by getting medical attention tomorrow due to bandh, will you die tomorrow!
if you will voice death is honourable than living, even that you cannot palm off.
in this rig democracy, sticking notice on public transport to state , 'no bus tomorrow', whether you close to it not, is contempt of court.
law is made by the rich to protect themselves from poor
how several rich have be languishing surrounded by bihar jails , look at the strength of those prisoners who are in send down for 5 years , still look fresh
rules are passed to protect mighty from massive and weak poors
VERY RIGHTLY SAID DUDE ..
HATS OFF 2 U
VALGA TAMIL VALARGA TAMILNADU
PROUD 2 BE AN INDIAN
Is black market human organs a problem here surrounded by the US?
Answers: There have be legal organization that have stooped to unauthorized harvest. The most infamous was surrounded by NJ where Mortuary workers be bribed to allow harvesting from cadaver prior to embalming. This creates a bypass getting tissue into the system that could be contaminated.
I own not heard of any "beneath the counter" activity. I own contact with a group that provides tendons and bone and hold asked when I hear things on the news. The industry is self regulated at a difficult level than lawful oversight does from my experience. Having delivered organs copious times to OR's I have also asked nursing staff. I enjoy found none that even knew a medical pro that have been duped.
not as much as surrounded by poorer countries and the bigger problem is a lack of organ donors
More Questions and Answers:
[1606] - [642] - [2041] - [1871] - [1276] - [405] - [27] - [1401] - [960] - [1748] - [509] - [167] - [2176] - [1850] - [783] - [2286] - [330] - [959] - [2066] - [1667]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: