Law Questions and Answers
Help?!?! legal guidance!!?
my boyfriend got sentenced to boot military camp for controlled substance. he has impossible to tell apart charge in another state! what will ensue when he gets out? will it oblige or hurt him that he completed boot camp!Answers: It depends on the status of the offense surrounded by the other state. For instance, it it is a felony in the other state, and within is an active warrant for his arrest, after they may very ably transport him to that other state once he has completed the boot military camp.
He needs to consult next to an attorney who is licensed in the other state. For a referral, contact that state's slab association for the name and mobile number of an attorney who practices criminal defense law. If the state contained by which he's charged is an adjoining state, its relatively probable that several of the attorneys in your state are also admit to practice in the other state.
Successfully completing boot military camp won't hurt matters much, but the certainty is, he was convicted of a possession charge and he is in a minute facing another in the other state. The courts can and commonly do take that into narrative when sentencing, but those are questions for his attorney to answer after a thorough review of the covering.
You can get free trial advice on websites similar to LawGuru, FindLaw. Check this out for more info http://www.uelp.org/freelegal.html
Should children be implanted with an electronic stub so they can be found when missing?
Answers: Thats a good request for information ?
I dont think it would hurt to fruitless if they had a
scensor scan on here foot I wouldnt really
know how that would work if it was a non raw
object and they could own it removed when there
18 that would be tidy !
If it kept our children safe I would read aloud Yeah
but if it hurt them I would have to say aloud no!
I would have to reflect
about it ,
I guess yes.
The benefits will far outweigh any other minus-point, if any. This question should be posed to thousands of parents whose children hold disappeared.
If you want to be tracked by the government for the rest of our time, go for it.
individually, no thanks.
this is a greatly sensitive thing this is especially close to be seen as the foundation of the "mark" in religious permanent status when people speech about the finale times and that satans mark be on their hands or foreheads this is something that could confidently be turned into something very discouraging, I agree that every parent should have an self kit near their childs fingerprints, recent photo of a clear head shot ect however I surmise implanting children is going to far.
No, but an electronic device that give them a few hundred volts now and afterwards would be a bit of a laugh.
simply dont cut the cord
No..it's all evil!
Just surrounded by today's News those for Human Use Tags(implants) are said to cause Cancer tumors.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/articl...
So NO.
No, but stupid individuals should be tagged so Yahoo answers can find them when they're short of mindless question. Obviously you're part of the trial group.
When paid a month within arrears, can an employer withold that when you leave beside less than agreed awareness?
Answers: Not unless you signed a contract with them specifically describing these details. They might glitch them, but they would eventually have to repay you for the work/hours that you actually perform for them.
Varies among states, but in none of them is an employer permitted to withhold pay cheque except under a court writ. An employer is not even permitted to delay issuance of pay packet beyond the established (by law) period
I recommend the USDOL.gov website for the federal Fair Wage Act. In it, you'll find links to your state beside the requirements of the employers within that state. You will easily find the information requisite to remind your ex-employer of his legal obligation under the statute, under bulky penalties of fines for downfall to observe those obligation.
If that doesn't wake them up, lose no time to directory a complaint with the local employment commission of your state. Remember that not a soul must be blameless in instruct to collect damages. Any dispute about the lawful clauses of your employement are a separate matter to be approved in civil court if your employer so chooses to pursue them.
You want permission from your employer to cut back the notice time of year. Your contract of employment will state the minimum notice extent you must give. You could check if you are owed holiday entitlement and use this to count towards your 'catch sight of period'.
Otherwise, it is not unreasonable for your employer to deduct your 'concentration period' pay. If you do not work out your thought you are therefore unable to the additional renumeration.
Try to head off on amicable terms - do not forget you may obligation a reference from your employer surrounded by the near adjectives!
Why does the jury only attain to hear "parts" of the Flight 93 tape?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070912/ap_o...Families of the victims get to hear the whole article, why not the jury?
Answers: It amazes me how much evidence is withheld from trials in common, like the Duke lacrosse bag for example. It would seem that our sprite system has forgotten what “Justice” in truth means.
Because some of the tape material might be more prejudicial than probative.
In other words, some of the stuff could be purely heated and not relevant to the crime itself.
Edit: No, the job of the jury is to settle on the legal issue, i.e. "guity" or "not guilty." It is unmerited to the accused to present things that are emotionally charged that fetch no legal pro. For example, if someone was on trial for murder because they kill someone, it would be prejudicial to show pictures of the victim's children and stuff that had nil to do with the crime; the jury might get the impression even worse about it and desire differently. It's a very strict allowed rule of evidence to exclude evidence that carries more prejudicial worth than probative value. It's FRE 403.
I've hear the extra part and it go something like this:
(heavy Middle Eastern accent)
"We. Will. Crash. The Plane. Unless 7-11 convenience stores. Agree. To wages our brothers. More. Than. Minimum Wage."
somethings rotten in denmark
Anyone have this crop up while they were individual robbed?
About 25 years ago I was a dark clerk at a gas station. A guy came surrounded by to rob me at gun point and suddenly, right in the middle of the robbery, turned and run away! He didn't wait for the money or anything. There be no one within but me. I have never unspoken this. I was single 25, a woman and he was a childish guy who was stronger than me and larger. I of late don't understand why he run and neither did the police but we had it on cartridge? Any ideas??? He be wearing mask and they never caught him.Answers: Ms Crone, That happen a lot more commonly than you even realize. ALL too often robberies are begin by folks who are just going through rock-hard times and when it comes right down to it, they discover that THEY have a conxcience and realize that they couldn't live near thte guilt of actually ROBBING someone and renovate their minds and take bad. Sometimes that's the ONLY time that they ever try it. Sometimes, they decide that it IS worth the risk and try and complete it again.
You be fortunate, it was probably his first and ONLY time doing something dumb and stupid close to that. It IS obvious that he wasn't a occupation criminal, they rarely permit people past its sell-by date without completeing the crime.
BB,
Raji the Green Witch
I've hear of aborted robberies up to that time, but usually when something unexpected happen.
It sounds like he have last second regrets. Maybe terror of getting caught or realisation of doing something very wrong.
He probably thought you trippped a silent alarm
Do you think suicide should be court?
ive seen this cross-examine in polls and such alot lately, and peoples responses terrify the **** out of me really...but what do you think?should suicide be trial with a doctors lend a hand?
or just flat out court?
Answers: it should be completely legal. what business is it of anyone else what i do near my body or mind? just contained by case you're unsure, i'll answer it for you. NONE of your business.
that's the bottomline.
and how do we know that doctors aren't assisting contained by suicide now. i've know my grandmother asked our doctor so "relieve her on her way", a morphine injection she never came out of. she be the most devout catholic ever. was it wrong for her to want to die at 95 beside a broken hip that could never heal and would evacuate her bedbound and miserable? of course it wasn't.
legalise assisted suicide and conceivably rather than stigmatising mental robustness issues, people will be quicker to aim help and in actual fact reduce the illustrious incidence of suicide and prehaps flag people who involve help previously it becomes to postponed.
The "anti" side of any argument always focus on the gloomy aspects of any debate, i suppose that is why they are anti, but this attitude with the sole purpose frustrates progress and stymies the problem.
Real suicide is beyond legal remedy or deterrence, for an plain as the nose on your face reason - the wrongdoer is dead so cannot be tried within court or jailed.
Attempting suicide was dishonest in UK for lots years, on the grounds that the threat of jail would deter depressed population from wasting everyone's time and emotion by harm themselves.
Assisting a suffering person to annihilate themselves is either an ethical burden, or an pique against God, depending on your religion.
In law, in that is the practical problem of whether an assisted suicide might have changed their mind following and lived (especially if they have only just left adjectives their money in a tentative will to the doctor who helps them die).
To sum up, no-one can stop you, but don't do it (unless you are Lord Horatio Nelson)
First of adjectives if a person is assisted within killing themselves it is Euthanasia not suicide. Second suicide should not be lawful by the definitions of society for two reason; one, it does not support society, so many nation contemplate suicide that if they actually go through with it it would be complicated to keep society together. And two, because western ruling and society is based on the bible and since Christianity say it is wrong to commit suicide it is against the law.
Personally I consider attempted suicide should be punishable by death since if a party is stupid enough to want to lapse their own life (remember if a individual is in great discomfort or in a coma or something and they inevitability someone else to do it its Euthanasia so I am only chitchat about at least possible semi-healthy depressed people) they deserve to die since life is agency too precious to just throw away. This course the person get to die or will learn to appreciate duration (I would set up a system so the people convicted could repent the daytime before their sentence be carried out and be released. It may seem pointless but some those love to threaten suicide for attention and only coming frontage to face beside certain loss might make them concede to themselves that they don't actually want to die.)
I guess the questioin should have be, "Should ATTEMPTED Suicide be legalised".
If someone commits suicide they couldn't care smaller quantity and there couldn't be a court skin. Could there?.
I don't infer that it should be legal at adjectives because first of all we are given this vivacity and to just give somebody a lift it because you are scared that something is going to transpire or because you are depressed it just vehicle you are afraid to try something to help yourself and to focus that the only article that you can do is to do suicide well its merely plain stupid. We all own our problems and when you kill yourself it emotionally scar people and they will never capture over it so if we do us all a favor and hold on to it to were it is bent then it will do adjectives of us some good.
Whats the legal age within california when you can live by yourself without your parents?
So im 14 and im living surrounded by nevada right now but my hometown is fremont, ca so i would approaching to move back because i own abosolutly no family here contained by nevada and i want to go support to california and i told my dad that i was gonna move about back when i turned 16. Wats the lawful age when u can live by yourself,have ur own place and stuff..?Answers: 18 contained by California (used to be 21).
This law is base on the capacity to sign a contract. There are rentals on smudge that sometimes rent out places based on made-up IDs issued to minors. These contracts are nullified on the spot when discovered.
Child stars have be able to work around this legislation by asking the court for a special lay down based on their occupation.
does your household in Fremont know where on earth u are? i hope ?if there is a fitting reason for u wanting to give up your job then phone 1800 999 9999 they can help you near that .
Does anyone dislike John Edwards more than me?
This guy is a train wreck.Answers: I do not like anything more or less him. His entire platform for running is to divide America even more.
I cannot stand the pr*&^
Yeah.I can't stand his way of trying to bring up to date me how we should do things.who the hell is he anyway...nothing but a damn ambulance chasing attorney.
.
I dislike him but probably for severely different reasons to most inhabitants.
I am a Democrat but would put him at the bottom of my list.
First, I dislike his protectionist agenda. This will distribute America and the rest of the world back to the nineteenth century.
Second, I find his pro-Israel stance unacceptable. Worse even than the other presidential candidates.
Do lego people enjoy their own laws?
i just this minute found a lego porn site and was wondering do they enjoy to be ova 16 to participate?Answers: Yes, but to enforce the law you need the Lego Police Department set, the Lego Courthouse set - and if anyone get convicted you need the Lego Jail set... really its not worth worrying almost.
Ive been a police officer contained by Lego-Land (LLPD) for a few years and i can tell you the age for performing is 18.
This is an extrememely serious misdemeanour, and the lego prosecutor will need to enjoy a statement from you.
Please come into the lego station and speak to us.
PC Brick
Hmmmm, I wonder if that is where on earth the term 'getting a lego over' come from.
How do florida insurance companies determine fault surrounded by an accident?
I be found 60 percent at fault, but my ticket be dismissed and I have other evidence that proves I be not at fault. What law apply and how do I dispute this?Answers: # 1 In any accident within is supposed to be a police report.
The insurance companies rely heavily on this.
You need to achieve your hands on a copy of the public servant police report from the accident, and later dispute that, using evidence you should have collected at the time of the stroke of luck, when it was conveninet to do so, such as who witnessed it, any cameras whose picture gets destroyed unless you own a lawyer arrange to enjoy it copied.
# 2 After police report, insurance companies use statements from insured ... and they may lean in the direction of paying out the least possible money, unless someone disputes their findings.
You may need support from a lawyer, but take on in mind that surrounded by any settlement with the abet of a lawyer, the attorney collects big fees.
if you done it = you're at fault
if you didn't do it = you're not at imperfection
i don't think you can 60% hold done something =P
What happens near law enforcement and what happen with the insurance company are two different things.
I hold worked accidents where on earth one person is clearly at imperfection and I decided not to issue a citation base on the circumstances, other times I have worked accident and everyone gets a ticket.
I look for a vandalism of the law and issue a citation base on that. The insurance companies look at the circumstances and try and decide who really is at failing. It is between them and who got a ticket and who didn't have no bearing at adjectives with them. It might help out to highlight some facts of the grip and can be used against you down the road. But basically, it doesn't situation.
You can present your evidence to your insurance company, if they decide you are at slate, you can generally appeal it.
More Questions and Answers:
[2419] - [2463] - [54] - [1435] - [2299] - [187] - [1978] - [141] - [500] - [805] - [2344] - [1954] - [1917] - [1594] - [5] - [210] - [48] - [1212] - [2223] - [1013]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: