Law Questions and Answers
Ignorance is 9/10ths of the law. What does this plan?
Answers: Possession is 9/10. Not ignorance. It means if you possess it, you are 90% guilty.
It money NOTHING.
POSSESSION is 9/10 of the law, is the track the saying go.
Possession is 9/10ths of the law.
If you enjoy something, and someone else claims it, and has no opening to prove it, then it is 9/10ths yours and thus you own it.
If you enjoy stolen merchandise the 9/10th rule does not come into play, you are simply guilty, and in some cases you can be charged beside a crime even though you claim that what the thief sold you, you have no idea it be hot. Like buying a $400 camera right out of the box for $20 on a street corner --- guilty as charged. That is where adjectives sense comes into play. If on the other hand you bought the camera for $375, you can claim ignorance and the police will probably not arrest you, but confiscate the camera. Your punishment, you're out the bucks. Lesson, don't look a contribution horse in the mouth.
====
Ignorance of the tenet is no excuse. That is what you are probably referring too, which means, you broke the imperative, but didn't know what you did was against it, you are still guilty.
Sometimes it sucks to be dumb, sometimes is sucks to be stupid, and sometimes it sucks to be human.
Just use your adjectives sense, you'll be fine.
Peace
Jim
.
No, you have it wrong. The proverb is, "possession is 9/10 of the law." It channel that one who had possessions have control over the item in cross-examine,until such time it is taken away from him bu due process of the law.
Can total computerization alone root out corruption in public existence? Otherwise what other measures you suggest?
Important information to ponder over:Certain very defining achievements by us surrounded by this direction:
1. Application of our computer technology in Railway Reservation System, veto of Detention system in the school, Introduction of objective type of answering system surrounded by the competitive examinations where ever possible, computerization of costs of Road Traffic challans / fines, etc, etc.
2. It should be understood that whenever we present more powers to the Executive alone it is likely to become a breeding place for corruption by harm / misuse of the powers etc.
3.It is the established truth beyond doubt that GOD, the ever-pervading omnipotent creator of the Universe alone is the just real 100 % non-corrupt.
4. Hence adjectives our studies, preaching, education and research, and inventions etc., on the subject is to be a continuous process and may be more contained by this direction!
Now you may please think over surrounded by depth and Answer!!
Answers: the computers just a exotic avenue for crime, with little consequence. your worried roughly speaking detention? you better pay attention, and acquire some street smarts, while your at it.your whole ? be a waste of space...
yes, those will do 50 %, but still lots to do, varying the people mind set, develop tolerance in race mind, understanding the facts, adopt the life as it comes.
Answer & Counterclaim in California USDC?
I Need adjectives affirmative defenses one can obtain across the world; and counterclaim includes a fraud cause of commotionOptional Information:
Los Angeles, California
Already Tried:
FRCP; LOCAL RULES
Answers: Off the top of my head-the claim fails to state a claim upon which nouns can be based (this is rule 12(b)(60 and you ALWAYS plead that, waiver, estoppel, laches, comparative slate. Fraud has to be pled next to some specificity. You need a couple of sentences alleging what constitutes the feat of fraud. You may have a claim of famine of personal or subject matter jurisdiction. If you can suggest what the motivation of action is, I might know how to add more. I enjoy a list of affirmative defenses at the department and I'll try to come back and gag this if the day allows.
You're not going to find these within the practice statutes. Defenses and counterclaims are substantive rights. You need to consult materials on substantive decree.
For example, if it's a tort case, look at Prosser on Torts. If it's breach of contract, look for Williston on Contracts, or Corbin on Contracts. And so on and so on and so on.
It's profoundly of stuff, and the stuff is dense and complicated. This is why you need honourable grades and LSATs to get into imperative school and profoundly of intestinal fortitude to get through three years (or four at night) of have this crammed into your mind, which will never be right again :-)
Fraud is discussed at length in Prosser.
Do you really think that legislation help repair the world or does it create other horrific problems as well?
Answers: Legislature is supposed to go by good law but nothing have been seriously one process to stop global warm.
Well, if you can't pass a bill, receive a law. The modern American equality system is a mockery of its intended purpose.
latergater, kind of make me want to move to Mexico, renounce my US citizenship and come back as an off the record immigrant.
Some people are lower than the impression you can legislate everything, but if you use you God given adjectives sense, you will come to know that people are going to do what they are gong to do. Laws work solitary because of VOLUNTARY compliance.Thre isn't enough policemen contained by the world to keep an eye on everyone.
Questions about a suponea?
Well i made a mistake and call 911 and said me and my husband were combat and the police arrested him after i said he slapped me on the arm when he just grab my arm i did say i hit him stern and they took him and didn't ask him anything about what happen i don't want to press charges against him but the city is and he is going to take it to trial i be told if i don't show up for court they will have to drop the charges do i avoid a suponea or should i only just go to court on his behalf and state that he of late grabbed me by the arm even if the police report states that he slapped my obverse and my arm?Answers: i think you should show up surrounded by court,..if you get served a subpoena,..but if you have a case of amnesia, and could not recall what had taken place during the time contained by question,..the D.A., might own a problem getting a conviction in court,..yak it over with a advocate,..but not the D.A.,..
In most states, the spouse does not have final read aloud in the charging conclusion. The prosecutor can proceed even if you don't show up.
Yes, it will be difficult, but your 911 was tape and can be used as evidence. If there is plenty information in that give the name, your husband may get convicted.
Before you testify within court, you better make sure nil you say will be contradicted contained by that phone call or you could both be surrounded by trouble.
All 911 calls are record, as are most all call into the Police Department's office phone lines.
I would be more worried roughly being charged for false reporting. Anything you said to those officer when they came out go into their reports; as you have already realize. You have since next changed your account of what truly happened. Most plausible, you will have to answer to the adjudicate for your actions.
You should never rumour; it is a crime in adjectives 50 states.
To answer your question, you cannot forget about a subpoena. If you do, you risk a warrant being issued for your arrest for noncompliance.
You involve to seek counsel, even if it's merely to discuss this with your husband's attorney. I guarantee you, no attorney will update you not to show for court.
However, in the event that domestic disputes surface in the adjectives between the two of you... response time within the Police Department surrounded by your area could filch longer. If you are seen as someone who cries wolf, they will be smaller quantity likely to rob you seriously. This puts you at risk.
Not only do situations resembling this put you at risk of not getting proper responses from your local department, it also tends to put together the issue of domestic violence see as less than crucial.
It's taken years of training, appeals and women dying to get domestic severity taken as seriously as it is. It's been a "trailing closed doors" kind of topic for ages. While it's coming to neutral in most communities, some communities are still contained by the dark ages and lift it a lot smaller number seriously. Crying wolf only make those dark ages communites puff up their chests and say aloud.. see... it's not real.
Domestic Violence is markedly real. For agency too many culture.
Do you think adjectives police men are bad?
Answers: YES!
i HATE POLICE!
Not even close- I've have my share of run-ins with the decree.
My experience taught me to respect the men surrounded by uniform.
No there are plenty of accurate one, the bad ones find the bad press, and populace tend to lump the goods one beside the bad.
What is all this smooth talk about Iranian women have no rights?
The moderator at Columbia university claimed that Iranian women didn't even have "basic" rights contained by Iran, to which the Iranian President replied that they were stirring in adjectives sectors of Iranian society, which is true: Consider this1) 60% of university students contained by Iran are women
2) Iranian women have the right to vote and hold public bureau
3) They can drive ( unlike in Saudi Arabia)
4) They can work and compete for any opening with men
5) They serve within the police and security forces
6) They can and do own businesses
7) They are significantly visible surrounded by the media and arts
8) Iranian canon is very severe to violence/harassment of women
9) They are entitled to receive a dowry from their husband upon marry him
The only matter that are unresolved in Iran good opinion interpretation of Islamic law on civil affairs such as divorce & inheritance: Here, Iran have not pandered to Western moral decadence. Women cannot break up families as smoothly as in the West which have led to such social havoc
Answers: Personally, I applaud a culture or country where divorce is not favored.
We should stop spreading such rumors going on for Iran. That is very unreasonable and very destructive.
I am not an Iranian (I am a Filipino) but nonetheless, cheers and hooray for Iran. Because as a muslim country it is doing a great opening on human rights - on women in expert.
And on the way muslim countries bar their affairs, its their business. It may be different from what westerners are practicing, but thats their business.
If we see or imagine that there are times when human rights are anyone violated in a muslim country, my response to specifically, does a country need to be a muslim within order for human rights contravention to exist? NO I DONT THINK SO.
Even in non muslim countries in that are a lot of human injustice and human rights mortal violated. The only difference is, within non muslim countries, its being done within more sneaky and more 'democratic' way. But those things also do exist even within non muslim countries!
So please dont be so judgemental and self righteous and talk (trash) similar to those inhumane acts are simply being done within muslim countries.
I am a christian and not a muslim, and i am no muslim fan or anything. Its lately that i am fed up of audible range and reading unfair opinion and judgements on muslim countries.
Sure there are deeply of bad things we can see and influence about them, and they may be true. But no situation what country or religion, humanly speaking, theres bad and in that is also good . So surrounded by a way, muslim countries are like as ours - there are apt things in it and bleak things in it, not adjectives are bad, not adjectives are good. We enjoy problems, they also have problems. And dont update me theres no terrorists or killers or evil organization existing in non muslim countries. There are! The difference is that they are more sneaky and most of the time dress up other and put up a good front.
On a secure level we are adjectives brothers. Sure there are evils surrounded by any society. But on a certain stratum we are all simply the same and we should be bonded surrounded by brotherhood and goodwill.
So lets be open-minded on them. Lets be fair on everyone.
The "nonsense" is in the order of this..
The country where the statement originate officially looks down upon Iran's parliament. Saying a government doesn't support the rights of it's citizens is adjectives political rhetoric. Look at all the countries the USA see as an adversary. Notice what they typically say aloud about such countries? They are tyrannical, dictatorships, terrorism-supporters, etc..
Now, keep within mind, since every nation in the world have a different government, beside different rights offered to different people, within different ways, these claims could well be "accurate" for oodles nations. But, for the most factor, whenever something like this is mentioned publically, it's expected as an insult. I would expect Columbia University's staff to display more pragmatic behavior than to insult a guest, especially a guest who was present by their invitation.
A awfully poor situation when a speaking session's moderator displays no ability to deed as such.
I offer a rebuttal:
1) Attending university is worthless if you cannot choose which books to read and debate
2) The right to vote without the skill to form an alternative political party is worthless
3) They can drive but not pass a male friend as a passenger
4) Work is not a right: do pay is
5) Are policewomen not underneath state control?
6) No-one truly 'owns' their business under socialism or a theocracy
7) Attractive women present TV word? What a surprise!
8) It is severe in equal way and spirit that it is severe against pocketing of property
9) Being bought does not increase you rights relative to others.
You clearly have studied this subject, so I suggest you explain to Westerners that Iranian and other Arabic canon treats things like murder as private civil matter, while we in the West see them as criminal matter for State courts. It is a different legal tradition.
If a women cannot quit a husband who beats her, what sort of nuptials is that?
Give me a break. Western countries seem to hold no reason to vigorously defend themselves. It is surplus to requirements. The law is the directive and religion stays seperate.
Yes women in Iran hold more liberty than is some Muslim countries. But it comes down to this. My wife is my TOTAL partner and I did not want not need money from my father surrounded by law. She and her house did not need money from me. I can enunciate anything that I want in reporters.
I suppose one good stoning only just proves the point. Yes Tehran says "that's rural areas". Still happen though and if that is agreeable do you not think that that attitude does not pervade urban areas as economically? What about the caged people who enjoy US citizenship? If all is all right and all is free and start on to the world why keep them? What is the mar in for a time dissent? If they are wrong the truth would come out.
Your premise is not real world base.
Your next interrogate should be a rant about Isreal.
Is sick pay statutory surrounded by UK?
I understand holidays are a statutory right contained by UK but what about sick take-home pay. Does an employer have to salary it or can they opt out?Answers: You must have worked for your employer beneath a contract of service. Even if it is your first day of work near a new employer and you become sick chunk way through the daylight you may be entitled to SSP.
To get SSP you must be:
Sick for at least possible 4 or more days in a row (including weekends and hill holidays). This is known as a Period of Incapacity for Work.
Earn, since tax and National Insurance an average of lb87.00 a week. This is call the Lower Earnings Limit for National Insurance Contributions (NIC). The amount you need to earn is lower than the amount when you own to start paying NIC’s or would start paying if you were treated as an employed earner.
Your proceeds are averaged, over an 8 week period formerly your sickness began. This extent may vary slightly depending on whether you are compensated weekly or monthly paid, or at other intervals. If you enjoy just started your charge the calculation may fluctuate, contact your employer for more information
They can opt out, in which skin you can get statutory sick pay packet from the government.
Most employer pay it though.
PS Thanks for the interrogate as this answer just get me to Level 6 - woo hoo!!!!
As an employer you do not have to extend a sick pay venture but statuatory sick pay is broad throughout the Uk and everyone is entitled to it, so your employer has to access this for you. They will be fully reimbursed for this from the Inland Revenue any in money, or by having the amount reduced from what they salary. This is because it is the governments responsibility to rate the SSP, not the employers, but the money should come from them initially.
Try looking at www.acas.co.uk for more information on Uk Employment law etc.
Hope that was of use
You seem close to a foreigner.
Just you come along, I'm sure we can find some benfit(s) to keep you within clover for the rest of your days.
PS - Bring all your family circle if you like, you'll seize more benefits.
How does euthanasia related to the bioethical principles?
Answers: it depends upon who you ask.
Can I register a trademark or any intellectual property online?
For example a name of a website or a blog, a writing or a composition possibly?Answers: Yes. here are the government websites:
http://www.uspto.gov/
http://www.copyright.gov/
These sites are the public servant word, and they have FAQ section. But generally, a trademark is for a mark or logo (Coca-Cola, the McDonald's golden arches) while copyright is for a work (a book, record, movie, play, etc.)
Again, shift to the source. The procedure is not terribly difficult. Some nation have attorneys do this for them (and patent are especially tricky - one needs specialized attorneys), but I give notice that up to you.
Good luck!
A name of a website/blog can be protected by a trademark and the first name can be registered - provided you did your searches and it is not already claimed as a engrave. If you are in the U.S, this is done through the USPTO department - see the link below.
Writing/composition is protected by copyright. Your rights are automatic but you CAN register copyright if you decision. Anyone from around the world can do this (for a relatively low fee) through the US Library of Congress - link supplied below.
Hope it help
More Questions and Answers:
[2346] - [362] - [358] - [1656] - [427] - [118] - [1653] - [1923] - [801] - [1669] - [1831] - [2166] - [728] - [1405] - [2373] - [1131] - [1523] - [1860] - [1680] - [1192]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: