Law Questions and Answers
Can i revoke a bail bond Indiana?
I live in indiana and i help a friend out by posting their bail. but as their court date gets closer, they are getting more anxious and talking roughly running. is it possible to revoke the bond so i won't get stuck next to paying if they doAnswers: Yes contact the bail bondsman and they will walk you through process
What measures can be taken to stop minors from viewing sites that are not appropriate(world wide web)?
Please support near URL with the different methods available. thankfulness.Answers: It's pretty simple. There are filters and nearby are also programs that only allow a computer to be used at unquestionable times. Say only between 3 PM and 8PM. so within is no late hours of darkness surfing or when nobodies home.
Some will use a keylogger so that what is see and said online is sent to their email. Then they can decide when and if to net an issue of it. Or take harsher methods.
You can check the history and adjectives of that but it can be wiped... though within ways to combat that. One is setting certain things to account in your antivirus software or firewall. Or simply at a moments mind when your child is playing on the computer simply say step aside until that time anything can be wiped. You can set and lock surety settings so many copious sites will be locked out.
An important point is to set up a seperate account within Windows for them that does not allow them to make change to what you have set up.
A lot of parents will put the computer contained by a higher traffic nouns than a bedroom or office. Say the kitchen or dining room so anybody could bearing by at anytime and see what site is being access.
Proper parenting is the right thing to do.
I am sure if you google "How to be a right parent" you will find lots of styles suggested, pick what you like best, and stick to it for a couple of decades.
Working illegally contained by the UK?
who shall i report to if i know someone who is working illegally surrounded by the UK. Also if i do i wish to remain anonomus, is this possible?Answers: You should know how to just report this to your local police station. Of course anonymity wouldn't be possible here near regards to how the police would know who you are, but you should know how to request that your name not be used contained by public records and that you shouldn't be asked to testify contained by court.
Alternatively, you could report the issue to a local news agency that would love the karma to uncover doomed to failure business in a breaking word story. Here anonymity would probably be easier to secure since the report agency wouldn't have any permitted quandries about your responsibility to testify. Besides, you could use anonymity as leverage as to whether or not you provide them with information within the first place.
Who are the clowns in congress we want to fire so we can have electric cars?
Oil companies invest within car companies and vice versa-isn't that a conflict of interest, whereas it is to respectively others benefit for cars to get poor gas milage for closing one hundred years while all the rest of technology improve? Congressmen invest in grease and therefore national deposit at risk because they enact laws that cowtown to mideast grease monopoly. Electric cars fix the war, fix the enviornment and fix our dependance on foreign loop around our necks. Does anyone agree this is a no brainer?Answers: I agree...you enjoy no brain.
The Republicans.
You have to take to mean that the purpose of the Republican party is to finance the interests of large corporations and the weathly special who control them. Oil companies dont want electric cars!
And the oil companies enjoy one of their guys, a former Texas oil man, within the whitehouse. Condi has an Exxon grease tanker named after her.
Americans sure do elect lousey leaders.
You can fire them adjectives if you want but that's not the governments undertaking. (10th Amendment to the constitution)
Also having electric cars will not stop war in country's beside oil.
we are not in attendance to take the grease we are there because leaders of country's near oil can trade the oil for ordnance and power.
If the mid east didn't have grease, they would still be using sticks to kill respectively other, and we would not care.
Supreme court case, plz give a hand?
This is a fake suitcase, it’s an assignment for my government class and I be wondering if someone with better comprehension on the topic.Here’s the case
“Lisa McKinley call her child’s school and informs them that her daughter, a sixteen year frail sophomore, will not be attending school for the subsequent couple of weeks as she has a exceedingly serious medical condition. In the course of the conversation with the conservatory secretary, Ms.McKinley is asked if a doctor’s note could be sent to the college. Ms.McKinley states that the family, including the minor child, does not believe contained by doctors and that their religion advocates prayer for health-giving. She states that she will not seek medical attention to detail for her daughter and asks the secretary to pray for her daughter’s recovery, as it is a terribly serious medical condition. Alarmed, the secretary confers with the principal who afterwards decides to contact the states department of Child Services (DCS). The DCS subsequently investigates and take the child from the home. Ms.McKinley is outraged that the state of Colorado is intervening in the family’s religious practices and sues. She claims that her rights, as very well as her daughter’s rights, to freedom of religion have be violated. The case make its way to the Supreme Court after the 11th Court of Appeals and a lower court sides beside DCS. The case is agreed as where it is certain as McKinley (p) v. Colorado DCS (R) (Mr.Gionet)”.
For this case we are the (R) Respondent within this case, which is the (DCS). And I be wondering if anyone could point out a few things that we could bring up in our grip.
Did the (DCS) have the right to thieve the child?
Also, I am looking for a similar case that involves religion and a minor. I haven’t be able to find one and call for help. If you kno of 1 plz depart from a link
Answers: Hope this help, there are some links inwardly this case that might relieve you in your research.
I might be put a bet on to help you more after I look into it myself.
WISCONSIN v. YODER, 406 U.S. 205 (1972)
http://supreme.justia.com/us/406/205/cas...
"However read, the Court's holding within Pierce stands as a charter of the rights of parents to direct the religious up-bringing of their children. And, when the interests of parenthood are combined near a free exercise claim of the nature revealed by this account, more than merely a "reasonable relation to some purpose in the competency of the State" is required to sustain the validity of the State's requirement lower than the First Amendment. To be sure, the power of the parent, even when linked to a free exercise claim, may be subject to reduction under Prince
if it appears that parental decision will jeopardize the health or safekeeping of the child, or have a potential for significant social burdens."
How a bill becomes a imperative?
Can someone summarize the steps of how a bill becomes a directive? ThanksAnswers: School House Rock had something on that once, "I'm purely a bill on Capitol Hill".
I did a project on this...
Basically, a member of congress comes up beside a bill
then the bill go to Speaker of the house & House commitees..
Then it goes to the house floor to be voted on...
Then if it is voted for, it go to the senate for a vote.
If both houses approve the bill, it goes to the president.
The president must later sign the bill, making it a law.
If he refuse to sign it, congress can "override" his veto, by voting in 2/3 favor contained by both houses to override the veto...
Hope that helps
First it have to be approved in both the Senate, and the House. after they come together to address add-ons. Then it is passed on to the President for final signature.
Now it is law.
Does any one know the legal age contained by NC you can move out without your parents consent?
I am 17 and i be wondering how old you own to beAnswers: Same as every other state 18. Unless you are emancipated (not all states hold statutes) then you live where on earth your parents say
You own to be 18 to move out without your parents' consent. However, if your parents consent, you are antediluvian enough to move out.
As a University student employee, if I take injured while working can I hold the University liable?
I work at a Public University at the student center. Yesterday a customer was irate because I could not dispense him recreation materials. He go to the 3rd floor and threw a stinkbomb directly at me and sulfuric acid get in my eye. I flushed my out for 1.5 hours and I am getting headache. I will be seeing a doctor in my hometown to see what is wrong. Chemicals, driftwood etc has be thrown down at the workers many times past. My employers did nought to stop it from happening again. I believe the University, as my employer is liable. Do I own a claim? What should i do?Answers: You should seek officially recognized counsil right away and you need to consent to anyone that see's you know how and where it happen. This is very serious, and if you dont step up and do something who will be subsequent. Pull up your pants and go and get ready to rumble. Hope they swot up from this and you get your bills compensated and something for your pain and time lost ect...Good Luck !!
Sue the character who threw it at you, not the university.
For the record, have anyone held the university liable before, or requested that something be done almost the situation? If not then near probably isn't a case/
It does not matter what the contract is. As your employer, they hold the obligation to furnish a secure working environment, especially if they know people throw things from the third floor onto member of staff. They could have assigned more collateral to patrol the area or install a sanctuary net to take in for questioning falling objects.
There is worker's compensation (at the state level) that your university has to contribute to and you should try to claim that. Beyond that, you might also hold a claim with the disregard of general public throwing objects. Call legal aid and see what they can bring up to date you. Consult a lawyer if needed. Also, I wonder if here is some sort of OSHA regulations that the school violated, but you want to consult a professional for sure. My advice is not trial advice, remember.
The above be speaking in good opinion to what you can claim against the university in a civil baggage. As to the student, he should be prosecuted criminally and you will have to press charges against him.
The posters above AND below are wrong that your college IS liable to someone commiting a criminal act becuase it happen WHEN YOU ARE AT WORK. But for the employment, you would not be there. The criminal accomplishment committed against you arises directly out of an earlier conflict beside this individual while you are are working for the school and the college knows of the exposure that disgruntled students routinely throw objects off the third floor, but did nil to protect its employee (i.e. YOU) so yes, your college is probably liable.
Again, these people giving you false direction is your very drive you need to consult next to legal aid or a advocate and not get you suggestion here!
I would press assault charges on the student
3 year old bill? Is it still relevant?
Around 3 and a partially years ago my girlfriend stayed at some temporary flat at University. No tenancy agreement be signed, or in reality any contract or agreement as such. For whatever common sense, she was never billed, until only just when they began chasing the money.Not person able to remember how long she in reality stayed there for or even how much the weekly rent be, my girlfriend asked to see what documentation they had nearly the stay. They sent all they have in the post, which consisted of the following:
- An 'application' for place to stay - this is essentially a list of people's name registering an interest in terrace on a piece of plain paper
- An acknowledgment that key were collected - this be signed not by her, but me - I am officially zilch to do with the possession. Again, this is just a enumerate of names next to MY signature by the side
Putting moral obligations aside could she lawfully be forced to pay this bill of around lb800.
Answers: Hmmmmm, this is difficult. i wouldn't speak either mode, my first advice would be travel and speak to someone professional such as the CAB as they know the law much better than me.
What I can voice is that a verbal agreement is as officially binding as a written one and if the landlord have any witnesses then you're boned.
On the other mitt, if you're sure that no other documents were given i.e things stating rent etc (even a letter) after the landlord would own a hard time within a court case.
The tenant may also have difficulties given the time involved, however they are still allowed to chase this debt even after 3 years and I would create in your mind that their filing is probably better than your memory.
Also, I cannot see how you could basically live there and will after x months without anyone mentioning or asking for rent,
Unless as expected you just upped and moved out and posted the keys vertebrae... which of course would be unendorsed and land you a BIG black smudge at court.
Either way, one entity is certain, It WILL completion up in a court baggage if no payment is made...
Sounds more close to you could be...
I'd encourage her to pay packet up... or else you'll probably interweave up paying.
Not unless they have written proof of length of stay etc. . No.
And if it take them that long to realise she was within, I wouldn't worry just about it.
It is very unlikely they would be capable of take legitimate action against you or your girlfreind unless they have a signed tenants agreement. Check on the document which be signed when the keys be handed over. If here is no mention of rent or any other charge then I would not settle.
You are within your right to display any documentation they may have on the subject of rent/tennancy. They should also have have your girlfreind sign an agreement stating how much she was to discharge.
If I was you I would propose to pay if they can provide such documentation. Make sure you do it surrounded by writing and keep a account.
The SoL on a non-written debt obligation contained by the UK is 6 years, so the bill is still valid.
If they sue her for it, they would have to prove to the court by "a preponderance of the evidence" that she did live in that. That means they solitary have to convince the find by 50.00001% that they're telling the truth. Papers that show that a) she asked for a room, and b) you picked up the key for her would *almost certainly* do it.
She might want to try asking if they'll take a reduced amount after so long, to some extent than go to court and sue her, or failing that, ask if they'll rob payments.
Richard
Your Girlfriend would still have to retribution the bill as companies have 6 years to claim outstanding monies. Further to this, if she doesn't remuneration it they may incur administration fees-which as long as they are adequate are perfectly lawful. Inevitably if she does not pay this bill and the claimant take her to the civil courts and win ( which is a high possibility given the evidence they have)it is outstandingly likely that damages may be awarded within the form of legal fee's and this would result within a much larger bill than lb800.
My advice to you is no thing how much she doesn't want to pay, bite the bullet and wage before it costs her a small fortune.
PS-Not solely could she have to recompense the companies legal fee's but she would for sure have to repay her own for her defence troop.
Is pranking dominos illegal lol?
is it unendorsed to prank call dominos?cuz me & my friends
call them & had a FUNNY articulation and asked for some food. and then at the back we were close to oh no can u cut price in 1/2 and they said no. & we be like oh u consent to me down and were resembling ill phone up u back when i obtain the proper money or w/e.
i know this isnt nice but we were really bored and we really considered necessary to do it so dnt tell me similar to yur so bad and everything. i only wanna know if wht i did was against the statute. kay? cool :)
Answers: Just making a single prank call isn't wicked. If you do it repeatedly then it could become harrasment, which is dubious.
If you order food and consequently don't go draw from it, or order it to be deliver to a bogus address, though, that IS illegal and would confer Dominos grounds to sue you succesfully. (And yes, they CAN track that number down)
Richard
With caller ID it is a pretty dumb entity to make prank call.
More Questions and Answers:
[495] - [1788] - [1945] - [477] - [831] - [1280] - [1598] - [156] - [2087] - [1635] - [1570] - [69] - [956] - [1410] - [1213] - [1271] - [488] - [2420] - [238] - [474]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: