Law Questions and Answers
How would a defence attorney bring a C.I. to cross-examination?
In oklahoma, where it is prearranged that the claim by the affiant that "C.I. has worked near them for a year and has provided info that have lead to 10 or more arrests" is false, a required qualification within okla, for a no knock search to be endorsed when acting on hear say info. But to find this out , how would one get beyond the imunity issues of a C.I.?Answers: Since we are almost neighbors, I'll clue you contained by. This state knows nil on your rights and care even less. As far as uncovering a snitch, it's VERY EASY! All you own to do is think nearly the persons you be involved with and the things the cops asked around. Since most of this takes place around 1-2 ppl. it is nought to peg their source!!! Now as for your atty. I would never rely on them to care any! You can almost bet you will be fined bc this system could care smaller quantity. I had a dig out and seizure (ARMED ROBBERY BY BADGE), near no warrant ever found and am still fighting these bit#hes. I hold hauled 2 pu loads of my property put a bet on from the PD to date and there is still more nearby. I have have a cop offer to loan me something that in reality belonged to me. These punks use the evidence room like a free shopping shopping precinct. You'll be damned lucky if you get a tangible decent atty. You'll be even luckier if you draw from one to do anything about it. BTW, my worthless atty. have a running tab that has overrun my finances by roughly 15,000 to date!!!!
no knock warrents very seldom hold up in court
did they find anything?
be the items they found on the warrent?
were you on parole probation etc at the time?
it would give somebody a lift a grand jury indictment or appeal to the court to win past that issue
CHEERS
Have a look at this website:
http://barker.phpnet.us/hotlegaltopics/
It's full of information roughly speaking attorney and law suits.
Collective Labour Law?
Hi. Can anyone please explain to me what each of the following Acts does? I've be searching the internet since Friday, and I can't find anything that clearly states what respectively Act does... Even the official websites.The Acts are:
- Employment Act 1990
- Trade Union Act 1984
- Trade Union Reform and Employment Rights Act 1993
- Minimum Wage Act 1998
- Employment Relations Act 2000
I infer I've got the years right, but I may be mistaken. I don't presume I am though. Also, it may be possible that these Acts have be merged with other Acts, or repealed... If i.e. the case, could you detail me what the Act used to do. Thank you very much.
Some links to adjectives websites would be appreciated too.
Answers: Office of Public Sector - has the relevant Acts of Parliament which I believe you are looking for. The Office of Public Sector (OPSi) covers a few different net sites which are all scheduled, so google OPSi and choose.
The best place to get this information is probably a library and I am sure you don't live to far away from one where on earth you live. For more understandable reading write rotten or phone a 'Trade Union' head station. My trade Union is or was AMICUS but I haven't get the details at hand, conceivably some others on this site might give you the address or phone number of their association. You would be surprised how educating the Union's idiot guides are.
All the best Red
Destruction of fingerprints photographs how can you get them destroyed?
i considered necessary to know if fingerprints and photos are allowed to be destroyed if taken by the police when charged. and if so under what circumstances? conditional discharge?just after a pardon? if your found guilty? and what is the process of doing this. what are the timelines. and if you manufacture one application , will it destroy adjectives prints and photos (if youve been printed and photoed more than once) or do you necessitate to seperatley apply.Answers: I don't think this can be done. It stays on your story forever.
I'm not a lawyer, but as far as I've ever certain, once "they" have your fingerprints and a photo to contest, they're there contained by their databanks forever.No matter what.
How will you apply ethics contained by violence and poverty?
Answers: You should do no hostility not required to counter violence.
You should try to oblige those in entail, but not in ways that reward any doomed to failure decisions that made them within need.
Pro: schools should distribute condoms... how will you keep it!?
Answers: You can't defend it school have no business distributing condoms. The school are there to coach not control diseases and the population. They have plenty problems teaching contained by case you haven't see the national test score. Its high time individuals and FAMILIES took responsibility!
most students will wallow in the water bombs
a few will try them out
some one might not carry born
You give my kid a condom, I'll bring it stern and make you wear it on your manager for all to see!! Parents are responsible for the control of their kids. School is to tutor them. Not to give them an opportunity to try these condoms. There are too masses consequences involved that aren't talked in the region of when they give these things away!
I am, now I am not, Maybe Yes, No. I am the Prime Minister and can manufacture my own rules.?
John Howard said He would serve part of his permanent status and hand over to Pete. Now explicitly a Fib and He will serve out the 3 years (IF ELECTED) and Pete can weep. Can You believe this Man?Answers: No! You cannot believe ANYTHING Howard or any of his cronies utter!
I mean, let face it, politicians are not considered to be the most honest empire around and they all utter things they either don't propose or that they change their mind going on for.
But really?? Howard has made a art out of reinventing the truth in almost every aspect of his political existence. There has be so many spinal column flips, omissions and out and out porkys from this man - how could anyone believe a entity he says.
Alen, Alen, Alen,
He said he would serve out his permanent status as a BACKBENCHER after he steps down from the PM position. A noble and noble act, since it avoids the cost and inconvenience of a by see in his form. You don't have a apposite grasp of how this country is run do you? Let me guess, you vote labour.
sounds fundamentally political
choose the lesser of the two evils
Well they don't christen him Honest John for nothing.
I bet he get a good super payout should be adequate to visit George on his smallholding when they are both has-been leaders reminiscing about the doomed to failure old days and how much they contributed to them.
Wait, I thought I be the Prime Minister of Canada.:(
Yes believe him... lets be a sucker approaching the majority of bennelong voters. be that sucker that johnny needs, this country requests more suckers, lets hurdle on board and be as dumb as his supporters!
John first statement be to the effect of: he would hand the PM living over to Costello some time in the subsequent 3 years, and then retire. Effectively cause a byelection in Bennelong. When the medium got a hold of it and run with it for a bit he put money on peddalled to say that he would stay representing Bennelong for the full possession even after handing over to Costello.
What this man have not said is when he will hand over, contained by 3 months, 1 year or another 2 1/2 years, just past the next see, when?????
Anyway, will it be a good view to have Costello surrounded by the top job, this man said he would close to to go further beside worchoices, completely removing unfair dissmissal law. No thanks Johnny, no appreciation Peter.
NO liberal party representative will catch my vote!
I think that Howard's movement song should be "Should I stay or should I go?"
If marijuanna is illegal, later how come its being advertise in medium?
Bands like "kottonmouth kings" and "afroman" communicate about smoking pot and other stuff. I also saw pictures on KmK's myspace next to pictures of them smoking pot. How come the police don't arrest them for smoking marijuanna? But its illegal for someone who isn't eminent?Answers: 1) Because of freedom of speach, you can talk roughly speaking that.
2) They can't prove it's marijuana
3) Marijuana isn't bad for you
4) Kotton mouth kings suck.
If you show a cop a picture of someone smoking marijuana, the first problem will be that the marijuana is no longer available for chemical carrying out tests to see if it is indeed marijuana. Furthermore, a confession to a crime, without other evidence that the crime be committed, is not enough. That is particular as the corpus delicti rule.
Can you use wittnesses to defend?
my friend requirements to know can you use wittnesses to defend yourself surrounded by a statutory rape case and could you not take charge if they tell the cops you didnt and its lately your word against hers what can happened if your innocentAnswers: Yes, you can phone call witnesses. As a matter of certainty I would strongly reccomend it.
The more pertinent question is whether the alleged victim's nouns alone is enough to sustain the charge. The answer to that request for information is that it depends on what state you are in. In my state it is. In others, nearby must be some other type of corroborating evidence. If you edit your ask and tell me which state you are surrounded by, I will try to help you out further.
The well brought-up news for your friend is that if in that is as you say, "no evidence" save for the alleged victim's testimony, later even if just her nouns is enough to sustain the charge, the state have a very bland case, and most of the time, if you hold out long satisfactory, they will drop the charges.
Remember though, this is not a forcible rape charge, it is statutory rape charge, so if there be sex at all, even if the alleged casualty consented whole heartedly, your friend is guilty of statutory rape. It have nothing to do beside force.
Your friend needs to consult near a lawyer. The problem near witnesses in a covering like this is credibility. The prosecutor will try to clear all defense witnesses look similar to liars. Prosecutors are good at this.
You do know that staturoy rape technique that the female be willing but underage?
The answer to your put somebody through the mill is YES definitely you can use witnesses to preserve yourself inside the court. Didn't your lawyer told you this however? But there is a stop, only credible witnesses, but if you will bribe being to stand up for your own witnesses in this skin called statutory rape, within order for you to escape responsibility next it would be the juror's case to prove if your witnesses are unfolding the truth.
You cannot be charge of course, if the witnesses make clear to the police that you didn't do it in the first place that you be somewhere else. If the person is found innocent by the court,consequently he is set free naturally. WHY PLANNING SOMETHING SINISTER? Don't. The regulation is smarter than you think.
Becoming a Phlebotony Technician in Nevada?
What do I have need of to draw blood in the state of Nevada?Answers: One can get hold of a certificate by applying and man a high-school graduate. Then, one generally catch on-the-job-training. It is not a highly skilled or well-paying position.
Can a person who have a successfully completed deferred sentence on a class 6 felony be admitted to the tavern?
Answers: If you have not be convicted then near is no automitic disqualification. However, all states require that you be "of moral moral character" and just the reality of the arrest could lead to the requirement that you own a personal interview with a inn examiner to see if you are of good moral qualities. As a practical matter, if the non-conviction is the merely thing on the debit side of the ledger, you will not be disqualified. However, if the diversion is combined near bankruptcy and civil judgment for fraud or such things, then you will not take licensed.
More Questions and Answers:
[396] - [1981] - [1639] - [2016] - [686] - [2417] - [2074] - [2342] - [151] - [1700] - [33] - [627] - [40] - [1591] - [650] - [114] - [777] - [1235] - [759] - [372]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: