Law Questions and Answers

What are the legal requirements for educator in texas?


Answers: Legal requirements for what aspect of them?

Do you think they should bring in it law if someone neglect there pets they should stir to jail?

But what if they starved them to passing or were found to do animal cruelty should they next have to run to jail? I have a sneaking suspicion that it's very cruel and inhuman item to do to an animal and I think they we should inforce harsher law on people who do this to their animals. What are your view?
Answers: u r right
Yes, animal cruelty laws do requirement to come with harsher penalty to set an example and to take sickos bad the streets before they hurt a individual. Studies have shown that a dignified proportion of serial killers and other gruesome abusers have histories of animal torture. Those that discount pets so that they starve, suffer and die couldn't be trusted with children any. If someone doesn't have the original human sense or morals to relinquish their pets to the RSPCA when they won't care for them later it should be regarded as criminal negligence, only as it would be if a parent went overseas and departed a child alone to fend for itself.

Edit - MIA's idea above is honest. As a form of community service in some cases that could be constructive, but you'd own to keep a close eye on them contained by case they "forgot" to do the feed rounds :)
it already is a law. it is call cruelty to animals
----retired texas deputy sheriff----

Jena Six Incident?

Who thinks that it wasn't fair-minded the the white students didn't have duplicate treatment as the black ones when they were the one that started everything. Also when the guy be at trial, it also wasn't fair because the jury be all white.

So who else think that the event at Jena is not fair and more citizens should support those black students not having equal rights.

Forgive me if any entity I said confused you because its hard when the Jena Six are those black students, because it would nouns wrong if I said the Jena Six is bad... I reflect that's right...
Answers: it is hard for you dear, because you, resembling others are only repeating hear say aloud. the all white jury be due to no blacks showing up for jury duty, twice. the whites that so called started it be robbed and his gun was stolen from him. oh yeah, justin barker, the white boy that be attacked at school have no dealings beside that crime. the white boy they keep mentioning at both incidences where on earth adults not in conservatory. justin barker had nought to do with neither grip, nor the noose baggy.

justin barker was attacked at his academy by several more than six blacks that formed a human barricade so others could not assist. they lick him until he was knocked out. the principal thought he was comatose.
heard plenty?
get your full story, not a moment ago one sided.
I must admit I don't know plenty about this skin to argue a point of Innocent or guilt.
But I was going to post a query about attempted murder charges. Some stories classify this as a "conservatory yard" fight.
This suitcase must be base lone on the merits of this case. Six individuals beating one creature could, in my judgment, could rise to th level of attempted murder.
I other had to turn by " the amount of force that you know, or should know will cause death"
So if I hit you beside a pipe in the lead, that should be attempted murder because it COULD have kill you. Just because you moved at the last second, declining the blow, should not nullify the attempt.
I also don't know the criteria to rise to the level to be charged as an mature


While there nouns like some outstandingly serious problems in this city, how does an injustice contained by this case right wrongs those cases.

I do hope they refile the defence.
it is so not fair!
why wouldn't they lock justin barker up for flaccid those nooses?
oh...that's right, that is because he have nothing to do beside the nooses.

your first run on sentence mention white people starting it first. so, it is ok to whip the next white guy you see for it?
very well, i guess i'll let you run. i'm going home and locking up my things. batten down the hatches, getting primed for the hurricane that is coming.
Who really know the facts of the story? Let's start off beside this (coming from SC not LA) there are two sides to every story but contained by this case, it seem there's the white side, black side, and the media's side...I know one of the faculty members to enjoy broken up the six on one incident...and since then have received several very bleak emails threathening his life and his family's time...For starters, being from LaSalle parish my complete life, I hold a huge problem believing that a black kid had to ask sanction to sit under a tree where on earth white kids sit at break...C'mon media gimme a break, that second-hand goods played out way support in the latter 60's early 70's for that nouns...Now granted, Jena, demographically, is 3000 with merely 12% black, I'm sure it has its share of racially biased folks, but, will right to be heard, is for the most part a friendly, calmness, everyone knows everyone mode of town...Was the white kid's prank with the nooses wrong? Absolutely!!! But still simply a stupid redneck prank! Should 6 black kids jump one white kid? I regard as not...2 wrongs don't make a right! Should the black kids be punished for what they did? Absolutely! That severely? C'mon folks...2007 is upon us...They are a moment ago what I said...KIDS!!! Granted, they shouldn't go free but jeez...attempted murder? WOW!!! My final assessment here is no one win...White kid: WAY WRONG ANSWER HOTSHOT!!! Black kids: WAY WRONG ANSWER HOTSHOTS!!! Media: Quit digging where in that is no dirt to start with...you're ruining a terrifically peaceful little town...

PS) Please maintain the outside people artificial by this in your thoughts and prayers...similar to the above mentioned faculty member...folks resembling that are the real victims.
WOW...it's amazing that everyone here is a moment ago talking nearly Justin Barker!!

Well let's look at the REAL facts!! The Jena six didn't just wake up up and decide to see a white boy's ***!!! Basically Justin Barker was a t a carnival a night or two in the past talking wacky trash to a group of black students after a black boy was pace down to the ground!!!

That's right folks before poor little Justin Barker get tail whupped!!! A black student was tap severely at a party attended by mostly whites (including Justin Barker) So spare me please.

If Justin can't posterior up his words, perhaps he should've minded his business!!! A come to blows is a fight.

And for whom ever claimed that the jackass who pulled his gun out...get it stolen Pleeeeease!!!! Yall killing me over here!!! Stop it!!!

He pulled his gun out, and be still defeated. Ain't nothing hurt on him but his pride.

Shame on adjectives of you who don't have your facts straight!!

Who have ever heard of 22 years for a academy fight!!!

By the track.for those that care, I've spoken to Mychal Bell via phone and epistle and he's remaining strong and staying positive!
ALL OF YA'LL ARE IGNORANT FOOLS BECAUSE KIDS WILL BE KIDS AND IT WAS A FIGHT NOT A MURDER. NO WEAPON INVOLVED AND NO ONE SHOULD BE PUNISHED THAT FRIKKING SEVERE BUT OF COURSE AMERICA WILL NEVER GIVE A BLACK AMERICAN A FAIR CHANCE AT ANYTHING BUT A BIG PRISON SENTENCE!
BY THE WAY VOTE 4 OBAMA OR HILLARY.

Can we sue the doctor/hospital?

my grandmother died 10 moths ago.R.I.P. we took her to the hospital to get a hernia removed..we signed papers of how they be going to cut open the nouns of the hernia...but instead they did it the opposite agency..then said that they have found a cancer tummor??? anyways...they said that they coudln't completet the opperation because of that...why would they tell us that they are going to cut overt vertically and cut it horizontally...or viceversive... then they kept her contained by the hospital for 2 months for no reason they give her so much morphene over a that period that she could just about stay awake..and she forgot how to move her feet to tramp and one of the nurses asked us if she was competent to walk back..(yes she walked all right for her age).. we wre so fed up near their carpp they gave every single daylight we were nearby we decided to verbs her out of the hospital ..and the main Doc be insisting on keeping her at the same hospital. presently we have the exray and papers from year one till the end of
Answers: If they found an inoperable cancer, they did nought wrong. Unfortunately, it seems contained by most cases that the open nouns on a cancerous growth that cannot be removed surgically causes it to start growing even faster. Whether the surgeon chose to net a vertical or horizontal incision would not have changed anything. Surgeons commonly make adjustment once the patient is in truth on the table.
As far as morphine goes, they would not own given it to her unless she was within pain.
Antibiotics are for infection, they do not enjoy any effect on cancer cells.
I am really sorry for your loss, but cancer is insidious, the death rate is relatively illustrious, and many associates do not know they have it until too much injure is done for recovery.
I believe your relations should concentrate on healing together instead of looking for show disapproval.
Good luck and God bless.
Yep, you did not give them consent to do it another approach, so they were doing something they weren't allowed.

In court they may brave you with "Assumed Consent" though, if you signed a broadsheet stating yes you can cut her open, and they thought the other course would be better at time of surgery, then it would be assumed consent. They should own asked first, though.

Edit:If you do sue, sue the hospital, they have more money and might only just pay you sour to avoid a negative carve.
If you completely understand what heppens near elderly people, finding bad cancer in someone you weren't expecting to, and knowing how to diagnose and treat her, next by all process.

But, you sound approaching you need a bit of a fresher-upper.

Planning for surgery and doing it are related, but that doesn't show it's set in stone. When you stir in at hand and something's amiss that is unpromising, you do things differently. Maybe odd vasculature, I don`t know they found the cancerous mass. Things can change.

If they found a disagreeable tumor, it could be bad to cut it near. they have no theory if it is a metastisis (which means that the seeder tumor would enjoy gotten her later), or if they could seed her tummy when they took it out. Some tumors are quite wicked.

Perhaps she asked for the pain meds. Maybe the surgery have complications. Medical practice isn't 100%, don't expect them to be perfect. You go in in that knowing the risks.
Its people resembling you who are helping to destroy the vigour care system, I work contained by a hospital and know the procedures. If they had her contained by the hospital for 2months, it was for a appropriate reason, hospitals would prefer to find patients in and out not own them stay there for 2 months, it take up beds. If they found cancer afterwards they have to stop because they dont know anything going on for it, many complications can arise if they touch it without first getting intel on it. I am sorry for your loss, but its life span and it sucks sometimes but you have to win over it. Hospitals try to save populace not kill them, thats bleak for business

California Minor In Possession - what are the penalties?

My daughter be at a house party. She be delivering 2 unopened beers to friends. She be in the driveway when approached by 2 police officer. She was issued a citation for MIP. She is 18, she be not drunk, however, it was a carnival where family were drinking. Apparently, other beneath age people be not cited because, according to her, they were astern a fence? The query is, how serious is this? Is she likely to receive a maximum fine (I believe it's $250) and lose her CDL? She be not driving and doesn't even have a sports car. Should she get a advocate? She is a good kid within her first year at college - tough break. Any help is appreciated.
Answers: A character under 21 can serve (but not surrounded by a bar) or deliver alcohol if it is part of her employment, but this does not look resembling it was a profession. She can also deliver alchohol upon the direction of her parent or guardian or other responsible adult relative, but that doesn't look approaching it was the valise, either. So it looks close to she committed this offense, which is a misdemeanor. (Business and Professions Code sections 25663, 25662.) The maximum punishment is a $250 fine (but near assessments that can be up to around $800), OR 24 to 32 hours of community service.

Since it is a misdemeanor, if she cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for her, and she should have one. Not because she is looking at any substantial punishment, but because near is a mandatory one year drivers license suspension. (Vehicle Code section 13202.5.) An attorney could serve arrange for a plea to a different charge or some other disposition which would not have such an effect upon her license.
I would parley to lawyer, but I wouldn't hire one. The peacemaker will decide in connection with the penalty, but I can't see it mortal the max with this situation. I also doubt she'll lose her CDL.
On a personal facts, tell her not to walk to anymore parties resembling that. There are plenty of things she can do to have fun near people who remain coherent throughout the dark. This is a surefire way to rumple her career formerly she's even come close to having one. At this point she could probably still capture into politics, though :)

What is the defenition of sanity? including supreme court and decriminalized issues?


Answers: when2y4 = insanity.
FOUND IN THE RULES OF THE COURT AS TO CRIMINAL TRIALS

RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULE 11

RULE 11.1 CITES INCOMPETENCY--DUSKY V US 362 US 402, 402-403, 80 S CT 788 4 LED 2D 824 (1960)

MENTAL DISEASE OR DEFECT--INSANITY DETERMINED BY THE CASE OF LYLES V US 254 F 2D 725 (DC CIR 1957)

ALSO ABA STANDARDS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE--AND MENTAL HEALTH STANDARDS 7-4.1 (A) (B) AND (C) (1981)
It is almost easier to understand or demonstrate insanity.

Insanity is the inability to function contained by society, as in job, marriage, entertainment. A disconnect next to 'reality' as compared with those that are functioning. A distortion of thinking such as audible range radio signals in the teeth, audible range God talking to you( like mad of the time), seeing things that are not there to anyone else, hiccup of any of the senses, as well as perceiving things or imagine things that are absurd or impossible.
Fantasizing that animals own 'rights', or that an embryo is a human being a bit than accepting the fact that it is an obligate parasite next to no ability to live on its own out of the uterus are both evidence of a disconnect near reality. The Supreme Court have joined contained by this fantasy as a process of increasing the punishment of criminals harming the Mother.
Rabid pro-life culture appear to be insane, even to the extent that they will kill for their daydream.
Group insanity such as the Germans in WWll, appeared to become insane and become murderous and were determined to kill in cold blood all their neighbors.

Do you the names of the Tuskegee, Air, ie, Otis Milton Smith, born, 1922, Memphis, Tenn, Justice Mich.Supr/Ct.

Do you enjoy the names of the WWII Tuskegee Airmen?
Specifically, Otis Milton Smith, Born 1922, Memphis, Tenn.,
Justice Michigan Supreme Court, and head Gen. Motors,
Legal Dept., 1960 thru 1975, approximately. Pls. Advise.
Answers: WHO???
Try following some of the links at www.tuskegeeairmen.org/
They don't list the member but you can contact them.

Is it actually permitted to throw all of your litter on the ground at the movie theatres?

Everyone does it and no one ever say anything about it, but are we supposed to?
Answers: It may not be the courteous entity to do but, if no one threw their trash on the floor a ltot of movie attendants would be out of a opportunity. Go ahead and do it. It keeps those guys employeed.
You can't litter inside, and its private property, who will arrest you?

It is rude and workshy though.
Supposed to? No. But they do sweep the theaters between showings. Just think of the smooth of respect someone must have to move off their crap on the floor like that.

Who care if it's legal or not, the conception that people don't protection that much is more appalling to me.
My parents brought me up to take my trash to the bucket outside the screeing room I be in to see my movie; your's didn't? ~ Gross.
Littering is for pigs.
Don't travel there, show some class.
Most movie houses enjoy special equipment that gets adjectives the trash on the floor down to the front row. Then they have a big hose vacuum that sucks it up.

In the state of TN how long after my tennant in my home leaves do I draw from to claim the property he has departed behi


Answers: There are legal proceeses you must jump through first. Check with a advocate.

What is required for a will to be legal within US? Can it be transmitted by e-mail?


Answers: I am sure that FAXED papers would be considered legal. A faxed signature is suffice and as if you are right in that.
I BEING OF SOUND MIND AND BODY DO DECLARE THE FOLLOWING AS MY LAST WILL AND TESTIMENT:------SIGNATURE, WITNESS, DATE TIME ETC--BEST DONE IN FRONT OF A NOTARY AS THIS MAKES IT A LEGAL DOCUMENT ADVERSE TO A DOCUMENT.

26 USC 1738 ALLOWS FOR A DOCUMENT IN ONE STATE TO BE RECOGNIZED AND THEN TRANSMITTED AS A VERIFIED DOCUMENT TO ANOTHER STATES COURT--

CONSULT THE RULES OF EVIDENCE CONCERNING DOCUMENTS / THIS SHOULD BE READ FIRST
It varies from state to state, but within most instances the will, at a minimum, must be dated, signed by the testator (the person making the will), and signed by at least possible two witnesses who physically witnessed the testator's signing of the document.

A handful of states allow unwitnessed wills, as long as the will is written entirely in the testator's handwriting, dated, and signed by the testator.

A will to be exact simply signed by the testator and notarized would be INVALID in most instances, because the notary is with the sole purpose ONE witness.

An e-mail is not valid because an e-mail cannot be signed.

More Questions and Answers:
[298] - [414] - [1570] - [208] - [1914] - [1088] - [1428] - [1722] - [1948] - [1470] - [227] - [616] - [929] - [524] - [55] - [1784] - [1160] - [1012] - [1873] - [2178]


The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: