Law Questions and Answers
Is it possible to recieve child support after it has be emacipated?
The child is in enrol in a college. 20 yrs. feeble. and wants to wish child support from a parent that previously paid child support to him. I hold a court date approaching and I want to know do I have a upright chance of leading. For expenses that I can not afford due to the fact that i am a college student.Answers: If *IT* is the 20 year antediluvian child that wants to collect child support the answer is NO.
Children are not awarded child support.
It is for the parent to have custodial care or custodial parent.
I don't assume so -- emancipation, by its terribly nature, sort of bar one from receiving child support.
What is the supreme law of the U.S.?
Answers: The supreme statute is that lawyers will run the three branches of governing body to enhance their wealth and power, no business what the Constitution says. The elected leaders are figureheads for the biggest criminal syndicate within history.
republicans views are stand your ground and protect the pale and helpless
democrats say bend over and consent to the bad guys hold thier way and screw the helpless as long as they vote to hang on to them in organization
Technically, the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law . . .
literally, the ethnic group are the supreme law -- because the race retain the right to modify the constitution.
In theory, the U.S.Constitution is the supreme directive of the land and any statute i.e. contrary to the Constitution is null and void and in need any force or effect. Some will also incorrectly tell you that the U.S. Supreme Court is responsible for interpreting the Constitution. That is usually stated by those who own not actually read the Constitution. The Court have no such power via the Constitution. It gives the court "untested jurisdiction over all cases arising under" the constitution. Further, this jurisdiction is restricted by the 11th Amendment to the Constitution as well as the reality that Congress has, according to the Constitution, the power to further contain the jurisdiction of the court. The notion, that the Supreme Court has the responsibility for interpreting the Constitution and for decide whether or not laws comply beside the Constitution or do not comply, comes from a decision hand down in 1803 call: Marbury :vs: Madison. This happened rash in the tenure of Thomas Jefferson's supervision and was devised by Justice John Marshall, who be a bitter political opponent of Thomas Jefferson. In this covering, Marshall cleverly put forth the concept of judicial review and was the first time that the supreme court have ever declared an act of Congress to be unconstitutional. Jefferson's side be allowed to win the case, but within order to do it, Marshall forced him to swallow the concept that, from that moment on, solely the U.S. Supreme Court would be able to utter what the law be.
By the immigration laws of USA OJ Simpson is innocent if he kill his wife because Jews and Arabs kill they?
wife's if they commit adultery and the Indians from India burn they wife's alive if they commit adultery too , in good health , and why all of those relatives can come to USA and get they status as Americans and in attendance is such much noise nearly OJ Simpson killing his wife surrounded by case he did it when adjectives the others are allowed to do in they countries ?OJ Simpson proved to be innocent any process and in this travel case he was freshly wanting his property back that those pople stole from him , and that it's the bad in this satchel , yes , they are the ones who committed a crime and not OJ in any baggage !
Answers: So if I decide to dance out and kill a rapist it is really his criticize for being a criminal and not mine for acting outside the ruling????
yep. it's called moral relativism.
happen often where on earth a murderer is set free or given lesser sentence due to cultural "seeeeeeeeeeensitivities".
That's why we own laws simply for our country. And they have theirs. There isn't a "global" decree. That's why we have so much trouble when we seize too multi-cultural and people preserve wanting to hang on to their aged culture when they move to a new one.
That's why when those cry about the wonders of mulit-culturalism..they necessitate to look at the other side. You take the collection when you go to another country and you can't expect another culture to totally transform to yours.
OJ was found criminally "not guilty" (as dead set against innocent) and civilly guilty in a court of statute for the murder of Nicole Smith and Ron Goldman. If a killing take place in a country where on earth it is illegal, it is private. Period.
Is that history why this case is getting so much obnoxious press? Yes. Is Las Vegas going after him harder than they would another defendant because of his history? Very possibly. But your argument roughly how other countries work is specious.
Recovery of legal property is an affirmative defense -- and one he's already raise. If it is show that his actions be solely to recover his property (maybe), and that his arrangements were acceptably (unlikely) -- he may prevail.
As far as murder -- whatever the customs are surrounded by other countries, that doesn't change the bearing US laws work. And immigration law just determine who comes into the US -- it have no effect on other laws that regulate other criminal conduct.
In skin you hadn't noticed, near is more and more uprising about discourteous treatment of women over there. Jews do not capture to kill their wives for adultery - they be (not are) tried in a court as they be (not are) here. A religious court, which is why we have separation of church and state.
Having products of another person does not scrounging you stole them and that person does not own the right to invade your place with guns and slap you around. He should own filed a claim beside the court and taken policemen to block the sale and collect the products. Just as Ron Goldman did to keep O.J. from getting his hand on the memorabilia
Were you on drugs when you posted this ... or are you normally a vegetable ?
Who care WHAT they`re allowed or not allowed to do within other countries . especially in "nutcase" countries where on earth entire populations are retarded !
BTW , O.J. did NOT "prove to be innocent" Orville ! It was simply because of his "dream team`s" specially stacked jury that he was found not guilty because the "glove didn`t fit " !
What a cowardly joke !
Who say the useless trinkets on memorabilia he tried to steal were stolen from him ? O.J. ?? Everyone know by now he`s a con artist and a has-been ! Everyone also knows that O.J. himself is zilch more than a .. pathetic JOKE !
If you could choose bin ladens punishment, what would it be?
Answers: Burn him alive.
I know the Constitution says that cruel and unusual punishment is unofficial, but he certainly doesn't hug to that rule.
Odd as it may sound - I believe he have chosen his own and it will be meted out - sooner or later.
If you hold seen his second video (I have simply seen clips of it) he looks half-starved and sickly - possibly suffering physically.
Yes- I believe he has chosen his own punishment - and it appears that it will be long and arduous.
A merciful breakneck humane death. We aren't evil sadistic barbarians similar to he is.
Then a huge party. fireworks and dance in the streets
everyday,pork ribs,pork roast and ham beside collard greens and sweet potato for the 30 days before he is beheaded!
How many supreme court justices are at hand?
Answers: It depends on which supreme court you are referring to.
In the US, there are 51 supreme courts -- one federal US Supreme Court, and one supreme court for respectively state.
In the US, there are 9 Justices on the US federal Supreme Court.
The organization of the other state supreme courts vary, as do the organization of the supreme courts of other countries.
NONE that know how to interpret the constitutionality of our laws.
Does www.beattheticket.net Traffic Court Strategy Work?
Has Anyone used this site? Did it work for you? Are near potential problems with using this strategy contained by court to get your valise dismissed?Answers: I think that anything that guarantees a 100% nouns rate in the decriminalized system is a fraud -- there's no way to guarantee 100% nouns . . . if the judge have cramps that day -- you lose.
I sure hope it doesn't work. It's 1 entry for a non-guilty driver to attest speeding charges, but it's another to try to fight a speeding ticket when you know you are guilty. This site promotes and make money off of speeding.
The pros and cons of the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001?
Please help I am doing a weekly and need optional input other then my own fellings on the topic.Answers: One of the cons is that anyone who refuse to offer their allegeince to the country or to the chief officer, can be labeled a terrorist. Some religions refuse to salute a flag, because they quality that saluting is a form of worship or idolatry, which the bible condemns. So will these associates be considered terrorists? What happened when associates wouldn't salute Hitler? It's a little to similar for me.
The Patriot Act does frequent different things -- far more than most people concord with -- and doesn't certainly do many of the things society think it does.
The best road to get an overview is to read the table of contents for the exploit (linked below). Most of the provisions are fairly beneficial, or at lowest innocuous.
Some are intrusive, but not unconstitutional -- with the exception of the one partition that was found (twice) to be unconstitutional -- dealing near the way National Security Letters are used.
The bottom dash is that it's a massive collection of only distractedly related provisions -- which reflects the certainty that it was put together within just a few hours contained by the middle of the night back it was signed -- ignore most of the substantive changes that have been reviewed by committees contained by the weeks before that.
Pro-no more attacks surrounded by America since the Patriot Act was signed.
Con(servatives) support the patriot Act which save American lives and liberals support terrorists "right" to secretly plan attacks.
What does plea to the Fifth mean?
Answers: It scheme that someone can't talk in the order of something without implicate themselves in a crime.
surrounded by a court of law you do not enjoy to testify to anything
that would incriminate yourself.
as in the 5th amendment. something that you influence in writ to tell someone you are not going to answer a ask.
Did you go to academy?
Invoking the 5th Amendment privilege against being required to testify against yourself surrounded by an incriminating manner.
The phrase is usually "taking the 5th" or "pleading the 5th" -- but "invoking the 5th" is the most accurate.
The 5th amendment protects one against self incrimination... it mechanism that you can't be compelled to testify against your self. It's what Miranda was adjectives about.
You vote something to the effect "I refuse to answer that put somebody through the mill on the grounds that it may incriminate me" to plead protection under the 5th amendment
It manner that the person chooses to exercise their right to deny to answer questions that may incriminate them. Or within more simple terms, they are exercising their right to remain silent.
The residence comes from the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution which guarantees that no person may be compelled to answer question which may tend to incriminate them.
To "take the fifth" relates to the privilege from self-incrimination.
That process -- if something could potentially implicate you within a crime, of any sort, you can "plea the fifth" and refrain from axiom anything, at all.
When you lie giving nouns in a court of imperative it's called perjury . . . . . . .?
What is the possession used when you lie to a police officer during a criminal investigation ?Answers: There are multiple charges they could use depending on how creative they wanna be. If you are sure near is not a stenographer present taking notes because if so they are usually court appointed and would swear you surrounded by which would take you hindmost to perjury. If it's you and the officer only consequently it's falsifying information, file a false police report, tampering beside evidence and on and on and on. They all continuum from misdemeanors to felonies.
You are beneath no obligation to explain to the truth to cops during their investigation. Perjury only comes into effect during a trial or a regal jury summons, or other judicial hearing. If you directory a false report next to the police, or present a false ID to them, or illegally shackle their investigation by destroying evidence/hiding suspects, that's one thing.
But in that is no general legalized duty to be truthful with police outside of a judicial proceeding.
anything you read out can be held against you in a court of directive.
obstruction of an within investigation, filing a rumour,
obstruction of sprite, hiding, helping deceiving a law enforcement officer within the commission of their duties.
heck, the list could turn on... if you want to keep your tail-end out of the incarcerate house, tell the f-ing truth,time of year.
It would depend on if it was a undeclared omission or an affirmative material misrepresentation. If it be an affirmative lie, afterwards you could be charged with something along the lines of hold-up of justice, or you could even be charged as an associate after the fact. Depending upon the specifics, you may even be charged next to fraud.
If it was lately a tacit ommision, you probably will not be within trouble for anything. You are usually not responsible for revealing information that was in some way solicited. But you cannot tell an affirmative fake without self vulnerable to criminal prosecution.
it is call giving falso information to a police officer----retired texas deputy sheriff----
Dog bite case?
ok sick start off next to how it went first. I live within a duplex the people nedt door put up a fend to divide our yard, the people subsequent door was dog sitting somewhat dog it got into My side of the paling and My dogs were chasing it trying to play beside it.. My mom heard the girl subsequent door yelling she go outside to get My dogs, like peas in a pod time My roommates mother pulled up and she grabed My youngest dog the girl next door grabed her rat dog and it BIT her.. so she call the police and told them My dog bit her they called animal controll and they took My puppy..I own 3 wittness saying it be her dog that bit her not mine!!
so My dog is in the shelter (lack of shots) I hold to pay 100 on the 25th, 15 for licance, 30 for rabby shots.
do you regard I could take them to small claims court to go and get My 100 back and justis?
Answers: Actually, your dog - whether it be the biter or not - was contained by violation of the statute, and you got caught because of this incident.
A responsible pet owner is required by Michigan ruling to license their dog, AND keep it up to date on vaccination -- this isn't your neighbors fault that you didn't do this. The witness will support prove that your dog may not have be the biter, but the other is all on your for human being irresponsible.
Why should anyone else pay for the license and shots that you neglected to acquire for YOUR dog?
More Questions and Answers:
[907] - [2189] - [1110] - [1835] - [401] - [958] - [899] - [2188] - [513] - [1391] - [180] - [456] - [1716] - [2261] - [2343] - [1468] - [444] - [1704] - [216] - [1926]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: