Law Questions and Answers
Are there any support groups 4 parents who enjoy lost a child 2 imprisonment because of D.U.I. related charge?
I'm looking for any support group or institute that understands and have compassion for parents who have a child within prison because of any D.U.I. related charges. I'm also interested in any group or running that is concerned near the heartless, unchecked, financialy ruiness, and overly punitive D.U.I. laws that are driven by the M.A.D.D. lobby contained by congress and that have become more strict and extreme near every passing year.Answers: You could try Al-Anon, who can be a source of significant strength and hope for the friends and relatives of alcoholics.
So...did your caged child injure or kill anyone?
contained by prison because of a DUI
another baby contract killer off the streets
yours is within jail my friends is motionless but don't worry it wasn't early his 10 yr old daughter get to suffer for 3 days before she passed due to a drunk driver
received your email
yes I will stir this far on a first offense maybe 15 days in recent times to get the point across
because in attendance was intent and a sober finding made when they chose to start drinking knowing they had to drive.
second offense I still enunciate attempted murder
yes I do know there are extenuating circumstances and different reason for each overnight case. But that's where the Judge requirements to use common sense. (which yes particularly few of them have) its hard to hold to look to the justice system for protection when I ponder they are just a group of organized crime. But it is adjectives we have.
and I would approaching to start a D.A.M.M. group because M.A.D.D. are extremists and I'm not for that either
D = dads
A = against
M = batty
M = mothers
just for a moment humor because yes I was a bit crappy with my first answer
I am afraid that you enjoy wondered into a world of precious little sympathy for anyone who consumes alcohol, to the point of being legitimately drunk, and then proceeds to operate a motor vehicle. If your child have been put into prison for DUI, later you may gather some estimate of solace from the fact that within are people contained by the world who are a little more out of danger due to your child's forced confinement.
Whats the statue of limatations in missouri for satatory rape?
a moment ago wanting to knowAnswers: I believe the limitation for statuatory rape is 7 years...but I am not sure...GOOGLE it!
limatations? satatory rape?
must be a unusual law or offense!
the intermingle may help you.
science geek...
In UK property/housing laws what is the difference between a lodger and a licencee?
How does the directive apply in respectively circumstances?Answers: A lodger may have rights as a tenant below law whereas you might agree to a part of your property to someone 'lower than licence' whereby no such rights will accrue.
There isn't - it works like this:
Assuming you don't own it, you any occupy a house as a tenant or a licencee. If I come to your house to put up some wallpaper, then I'm a licencee. You give me permission as part of the pack of our contract to come into your house. The licence can have rules (you'd best be out by five o'clock, I've friends coming round, you'd best wear those tight overalls that show your bum past its sell-by date, etc etc).
A tenant on the other hand have been told:
- he can stay contained by the house for a particular length of time;
- he have the house (or the part of the house) exclusively;
- and some other test.
They have more rights than a licencee.
For this pretext you want a lodger to be a licencee - and it's a good model if you have a lodger to own a written agreement, entitled "Licence" which sets down all the rules, eg:
- This is not a use;
- You can have room x, plus access to the communal areas;
- You own to pay me lbx per month;
- You own to give me lbx as a deposit;
- You must take-home pay half the electricity bills;
- If I supply you one month's notice, you enjoy to leave.
Interestingly, if your lodger shares one and the same accommodation as his innkeeper lives in, later he's exempted from the Protection of Eviction Act. This means that if you give him the one month notice above (or doesn`t matter what notice you'd agreed), and he still didn't clear out, you'd be impeccably within your rights to transport your burliest friends round to put him out on the street by (reasonable) force.
Would a minor (13) have to testify within an aggravated sexual assault case?
Answers: Yes. Courts do authorize the need to protect the privacy of minors however, contained by the American Judicial System, a defendant has the right to obverse his/her accuser in court. If the minor elect not to testify, one of two things will happen. #1 the defense will petition for a subpoena which may issued by the Judge within which case, the minor would enjoy to appear in court, or #2 The minor's unreality as a witness may provide for reason to dismiss the satchel based on reason similar to lack of evidence.
The answer to the EXACT give somebody the third degree asked is no, they do NOT HAVE to testify.
TO CLARIFY:
the first answer you received was correct. They CAN testify. Even if they are the object however, they cannot be COMPELLED to testify. And THAT was the exact sound out you asked.
US have no standard sprite system so even if its a minor 6 to 13, can too testify in court.Its cruel to consent to a minor go thru cross nouns but that's the way US works.Many of my friends within US really thinks Its double standard.
To what extent do the states of the US govern themselves?
Can a state have it's own law, etc.,? Thanks!Answers: Each state has it's own law. And each city or county can create it's own "codes" too which are law that aren't criminal.
The Federal government have gained more power during the ending century and has created national law which some people believe infringe on state's rights. They create Federal Mandates resembling the NO Child Left Behind act or the GFSZ achievement on top of what the states enjoy created.
All states have extradition rights next to each other, so crossing the state-line doesn't tolerate anyone go free.
The US constitution lays out the powers of the federal policy, and says any power not given to the federal govt is reserved for the states. The federal govt have the right to declare time of war, to control inter-state commerce, to sign treaties with other countries. Also, any ruling passed by the federal govt supercedes any law passed by a state. So, when the Federal govt said women hold the right to vote, no state can deny women the right to vote.
But the federal govt can coerce states to perform guaranteed acts. The federal govt within the 70s decided that the speed cut-off date in adjectives states should be 55 miles per hour. They could not force the states to make 55 miles per hour the speed demarcate... but they could say any state which have a higher speed stricture would not receive any federal money for highway maintenance. So, adjectives the states made 55 mph their speed limit.
The extent that they govern themselves is defined within the U.S. Constitution. Even so, the Federal Government can greatly influence a state to comply with things that are inwardly the State's jurisdiction, such as the legal drinking age. All states hold the age set at 21, not because they want it that way, but because the Federal Government required it that way. The Federal Government said that any state that does not hold 21 as the minimum drinking age would loose their Federal highway funds.
As for making it to the other state line, don't try it. The other state will transport you back and you will also be charged next to evasion.
The US is a federal republic. The federal government have limited, enumerated powers. All powers not conveyed to the federal management are reserved to the states and/or the people.
Typical state powers include regulation of intrastate commerce, the professions (law, tablets, architecture, engineering, etc.), motor vehicle and financial responsibility laws, and the police power collectively. The general consensus of political scientists studying the USA is that state decree has ten times more impact on our day-to-day lives than federal imperative.
I want to know where i stand next to my employer if i have quit and they are beside holding my final pay?
Answers: that's off the record, i would write a certifies message to them stating what day you give notice, your concluding day of work and state that you enjoy not received your check, also state you will take proper movements if you don't receive your check and you would like to resolve this issue smoothly, leave a contact number and that should be plenty to scare them, construct a copy of your signed letter also i be the boss at my old charge and sometimes it took a long time to get my workers thier final check due to payroll reasons and newspaper work you might want toask them if this is the issue and if so when you can expect it hope this helps
it depends on why they are holding your salary. If you need to return uniform or equipment they are within their rights; if you hold borrowed money and still owe them; they are within their rights but should be giving you some type of statement close to your pay stub.
If you know of no root and they aren't giving you one, you need to telephone the dept of labor for your area and/or contact a advocate
Only person that can answer that is to say your boss! Have anything you need to turn contained by? Anything related to your work performance your boss wants to check before your compensated? Give him/her a call and other ask what the problem is. Did you give 2 week spy? Thats pretty customary in the states.
Also, they aren't going to write you a check until your conventional payday.
you are standing outside of the door.
Don't you have a state labor relation's board you can complain to? If you aren't sure, phone call one of your local state representatives who will be able to direct you to the correct place to product a complaint against the establishment.
They can hold it till you return everything that belongs to them.
Any shirts uniforms that you still hold need to be returned.
cant do it. you wait til what would have be your normal payday, you should be rewarded. hes offered no reason, cant do it, extent.
Rendition flights through Britain to the USA?
Our governent allowed the immoral verbs of people kidnap and sent to torture in the USA. (Of course I dont be a sign of the USA I mean that bit of house they have so they can rightfully torture people outside the USA, so that is to say OK). So how can they expect us to follow laws they set on us to stop loose behaviour?Answers: Simple, law do not have to be moral.
There is a big difference between allowed and moral. It is legal for a personality to have an affair for example, but it does not form it moral.
If you break the law however, you are subject to it and can be punished as a result. That is how OUR command enforces it. We do not want to follow the law, but if we choose not to, we must expect the society we live contained by to act properly.
What we can do though, which many can not, is adaptation our government when it comes to elections. Tell that to general public in Saudi Arabia which is subject to frequent more 'questionable' laws than we own.
The British Government doesn't work on morals, it works on expediency.
They couldn't really care for any of us. We should only just pay our taxes to fund their lavish lifestyles and shut-up.
If we really considered necessary to torture them, we'd put them in a room and brand name them watch the BBC for 8 hours a afternoon. In no time, they'd willingly confess to anything.
Will raised tobacco court age stop young individuals smoking?
Now that the legal minimum age for purchasing tobacco have been raise from 16 to 18, will less youthful people rob up smoking? Should the responsibility fall to retailers, or should it be unconstitutional to smoke at 16?Answers: No, I doubt it. It just manner that the kids hanging around outside newsagents asking adults to buy them cigarettes will be bigger very soon, and possibly more aggressive given that they could have bought their own fags solitary a couple of days ago and can't now.
In the US, 18 have been the age for purchasing tobacco surrounded by all 50 states since April 1998. No, it will not stop teen smoking anymore than advocate abstinence will stop teen sex. If state and federal government keep raise taxes on tobacco, we'll soon see a blackmarket develop and organized crime getting involved, to make the situation worse. Organized crime doesn't prudence a damn about the permissible smoking age either.
I'm confused about the anti trust decree?
can someone just briefly recount me what it is? I read a lot of articles but i still don't capture it. sorry if i sound dumb but i a moment ago want a simple explanationAnswers: xxkimi-in as simple terms as possible, I'll try. It is a imperative intended to protect consumers by encouraging competition among sellers of merchandise and services. If all the the media and media stations be owned by one company, could you exercise any freedom of choice? What if all the restaurants be McDonald's? All the stores Sears? What if one company was the individual TV station available? Do you see the unfairness this would effect to us, the buyers? Some nations charter such practices, which are known as monopolies. It is a complicated topic, but I hope this simple explanation will help out you understand the articles you own read. Come back and gag this question if you inevitability more details. I'll try to check later today.
aw, you dont nouns dumb you are dumb. see the difference. just kid. i dont know what that is any. im twelve years old.
If a summons is issued for me but it is delivered to my employer to deliver to me, be it delivered properly?
Answers: No. Because of the relationship in the 1st answer, I don't devise you need seriously more detail, but I thought a direct answer might be useful. As a attorney, I've had cases dismissed for deliver summons to an employer instead of the individual. The fact you received it is not the issue.
Was it merely a civil court crust or a criminal court case? If it be civil then yes, criminal after no. My husband use to manage restaurants rear in the 70s. Lots of the workers (low income) be sued over car loans, hospital bills, etc. The police would simply deliver the summons to the manager of the restaurant to provide to the employee that be being sued a bit than try to track down the employee.
I'm sure if it be a criminal case, the summons would enjoy to handled appropriately.
I disagree near David simple because we do not know in what state/country you are located and as a consequence, NO ONE can answer your question.
As stated above, some states allow for service of process to 'a entity in apparant authority' to receive such communications such as a receptionist or secretary and others do not.
Therefore, a yes or no answer at this time is not valid for your picky situation.
Most states allow service on a "person of suitable age and discretion" to substitute in-person service.
Look at it this opening: you have be notified of the lawsuit. That's partly the battle. If you will to preserve the question whether they should enjoy tried harder to serve you in personage, then include this defense within your answer:
AS AND FOR A FIRST, AFFIRMATIVE AND COMPLETE DEFENSE:
The Court lacks jurisdiction of the person of this answering defendant by foundation of insufficient service of process.
======================================...
If the service was proper, you lose nil by pleading this defense. If it was tasteless, this defense could result in the defence being dismissed, but this is meaningless unless the statute of limitations is just about to expire.
Beyond this, if the lawsuit relates to consumer credit, then the directive firm violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by serving you at work. If this is the case, you enjoy a seriously valuable counterclaim, and you should hie thyself unto a lawyer's department right away to start planning the countersuit, which is worth serious bucks.certainly a couple of splendid at a minimum, and several tens of thousands if your employer is looking at you "funny" because he thinks you are a deadbeat who can't be trusted.
no, but effectively yes. you be not properly served. but to prove it you must show up in court and explain it to the find. the judge will right now rule you have not be served. then, in 2 minutes while in court you will be properly served.
More Questions and Answers:
[2023] - [353] - [136] - [2007] - [599] - [1133] - [76] - [1189] - [1220] - [552] - [343] - [1432] - [1048] - [410] - [877] - [2279] - [2184] - [1135] - [2441] - [1625]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: