Law Questions and Answers

How do they expect me to.?(read details)?

Ok so I got a dispatch today from city municipal. City buyed a snow machine explicitly 2 metres high later need bigger road and asked me and adjectives my neighbours remove all to be exact not my private property but close to it. Like trees and such. I have a wall,pavillion and gate. I don't own special equipment and they want it done by Monday or they will do it but you have to retribution a LOT What should I do?
Answers: It appears that anything placed by you on city propertywould be your responsibility; anything planted or placed by the city would be the city's responsibility.

However, the city purchaser of the snow machine should hold bought the proper sized snow machine.

I would go beyond around a petition to all your neighbors artificial by the city's demand, and submit the petition to the city, the state, your congressman, your senator and your city counsel.

In the petition, you shoulkd state how the pruchasing of the trial snow machine at the incorrect size have created extreme hardship on the citizens of your neighborhood.

Good luck!
I reflect it's their responsibility, because it's government property. They can't compell you to pay packet for it personally.

Go surrounded by an talk to them.utter you can't afford it and be very unbelievably nice.

If that doesn't work, write them a letter and decline to pay.

But take heed. The govt can make your existence miserable.
You shouldnt have to move those things.since they are not contained by your property.and if something is in your property and involve to have it moved, the city wishes to pay for it. when they made a 4 lane street here where on earth we live the city had to pay packet for the fence and trees to be moved 3 foot further in to the property, thus, reducing property size?!dont permit the city intimidate you all.why not travel and speak with the rest of the neighbors and collaborate, see how they gonna do it as all right.but , yes like the other yahoo answerer mentiioned, ring the city and let them know, you dont hold the means and never will.

Where in the Constitution does it voice that conservatives are not allowed to voice their view?

I just hear a member if "Moveon.org" influence on the radio that Conservatism is not allowed by the constitution and she have the right do anything she wanted to silence conservatives.

I darn close to ran past its sell-by date the road in shock. Where do inhabitants get these thinking?????
Answers: That group has gone plumb loco. Conservatives enjoy the right to their cokamaimie ideas and to express them only just as Move On is. I have see plenty of cons. talking in the region of kicking people out of the country for disagreeing next to them so some of her comment may be deserved but not in the forum she expressed it and to the height.
LOL I heard on the radio that the RNC say all minorities and women should be rounded up and placed into camp. Where in the constitution does it utter that.

Seriously...when you make up things that ridiculous do you really expect population to believe them?
Funny, I heard a conservative idiot surrounded by the bar ultimate night claim that he be going to kill adjectives the commies?

Really, where does he capture off? Doesn't he know China is our ally?
Since when does anyone hold a right to say what they want? If it doesn't coincide beside what the government requirements the people to hear, you will be silenced, only look at what they did to JFK..

Sonojudan

"You've all see the WHADAFUXUP commercials right? Well WHADAFUXUP with our administration telling us lies? Takeing away our rights and relating us how to live our lives?"
added: Me neither, I guess you could say Ron Paul is a true civil libertarian, I may own mistated that.. I thought you might be interested because that's what Paul is saying. This country is so far from our constitution. Our liberty virutally wiped out... Im guess Im a Civil Libertarian near a Liberal Twitch, since I wouldnt want to totally eliminate some social programs but aggressively want my rights restored.

Sounds close to her point was taken out of context. Since you send for yourself a conservative, are you a traditional conservative or a Neoconservative, I think the distinction requirements to be made because, I can see where the Neo-conservative plan have unconstitutional segments... They are pretty close to Nazi Germany and the technique and ideals held by hitler...

Ron Paul is a true conservative. Have you listened to him?
Here is a speech, its long but he is relatively correct in my belief and could bring new go in what I know as conservative when i grew up... Let it load and continue about 30 secs.. It will play audio..
http://www.ronpaullibrary.org/document.p...
Oh that's a crock. give liberals a bad signature. Just like Rush give conservatives a bad signature. Radicals shouldn't be able to voice thier inference.
Add on: Ron Paul is more radical than anyone.
Same place it say that the power to tax
shall be taken as a license to practice
social engineering, and that the system
may arrogate to itself personal decisions that it
feel the people are to stupid to craft for
themselves.
Nowhere! But they do it anyway.
Grumpyoldman, come on tell the truth, you worked for Hitler didn't you? I won't detail, heck you must be pushin' 90!

I am no where in the vicinity a conservative, in reality I'm more radical than most. It a short time ago kills me when someone (no less) "Moveon.org" have no idea what's within the constitution! ...
...(shakes head and folds arms..)

Is it legal to videotape a group of relatives without them knowing it?

Answers: i read out go for it
that's really grotesque and creepy.

please answer my question:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?...
Depends on your state statute. Here in New York, you can if your tape from your own property or in a public place. Such as a orb game, motorcycle assemble, historical reenactment, etc. However you may run into problems if you wish to use said cassette for profit or commercial reasons.

If your setting your camera to invade a individuals privacy, such as "up skirt" or cleavage shots. You may be in defiance of the law.
if its contained by a public place yes - as long as they are all over the age of 18 - inside your house its officially recognized also - as long as they are over 18 -

they had a point on tv one time where the girls father have a video camera in her room hooked up to the internet - and you could dance to a link and see her and she didnt know - the police said they couldnt do anything - because she is over 18 and they are in his house - crazy sick shyt -
Of course it is crooked. Every time there is a Houston Astros baseball hobby the people surrounded by the stands are taped. Some little guy runs around and get every one of the 38,000 people attending it to sign consent.
Or when the Boston Marathon is run, all 200,000 relations watching it have given okay.
Unless of course you are trying to obscure something you are up to. Is that what you meant?
My best answer is this: How the heck would anyone on here know the answer to that for every state?
No to be exact an invasion of privacy.

It can be done if you are trying to record off the record activity, but in need a warrant that tape is not admissible within a court of law.

You could post a sign wise saying, "Warning Video Cameras are in use on this Property" that would be a valid requirement if the sign is clearly posted and then you can use the picture to support a legal casing. It will still be hard to find it admitted as evidence within a court though.
it's not illegal

It's constitutionally protected right underneath the First Amendment to photograph and video in a public place. These rights are rooted contained by the First Amendment's strong protection of speech within "public forums." A "public forum" refers to a public place historically associated next to free expression. The most commonly recognized examples include streets, sidewalks and parks. Within these areas, the government's means to limit the public's speech is extremely controlled.
No, it's not illegal to video cassette people contained by PUBLIC places.
Even if they ask you to stop filming them, you don't enjoy to.
How do you think the Paparazzi engender such a good living?
But, it would be better & safer for yourself to carry a signed consent form, just to cover your own basis.
No
Unless they are breaking the law
Yes it is against the decree to video tape a personage without DISCLOSURE. That is why when you drive into the parking lot of your favorite store, you see a sign up clich¨¦ that security cameras are contained by use. This puts you on notice that you are individual taped.

Keep that contained by mind when your kid needs a spanking, dally till you get home or it will be on the national report.

I was answered dont share to a question i asked, not sure if it's the right one, help out me out?

Member since: July 30, 2007
Total points: 95 (Level 1)
Points earned this week:
0% Best answer
0 answers
vince h
S I be arrested in 1999 for indecent conduct, do i convey a new employer next to giving a criminal watchdog report?
7 of us be caught mooning some people rear legs in 1999 and since we be males genitals were exposed, lol. they get us all for indecent conduct, do i inform my new employer right up front? I want to be clearly honest with them formerly they interview me....

ther going to most likely do a milieu check and i really want this job, inform me what to do
Answers: If you really do want this job, report to them. You can explain the incident and the repercussions right then and in that. It is much better to be up front and honest about this, after adjectives it was NOT a felony. If you do not describe them, and they find out through their investigations, you can pretty much forget about getting the living.
most applications will ask if you have be convicted of a felony,but I would probably wait for the sound out to be asked.It also depends on the type of job you are applying for.Most promising you will not need to give an account on yourself.or the person doing the interview will/should ask you something similar to... Oh I see you have be arrested before,what can you give an account me ablout that?And then you can choose to be embark on and honest about the unbroken incident.If they choose to not hire you because you have be arrested,thats a new ballgame call discrimination.

If i sign someone out of prison on a signature bond and she run away will i lose my $?

if i report her as a run away to the police and courts will that release me of being responsible, or will i still lose my 5,000. what is the proper protocol
Answers: If you put up $5000 truism you guarantee that the person will appear surrounded by court, and they do not appear, you lose your money.

You can notify the police that they have skipped out on the bail, and the police will try to arrest them for you, but if they're not within time for the court date, you lose your money.

Don't bail out people you're not sure will appear contained by court.
If you mean detain, then yes the state can report a motion to have the bond forfeited to the state (or prosecuting agency). If you did not pay packet a cash bond, you could be required to repay up. The court normally would furnish you time to find and produce the person (hence bounty hunters).

Ultimately if the soul is not produced, the bond is paid.
Not with the sole purpose will you more then feasible lose youre money they'll probably come after you as well, for within your signing you've actually stated you remunerated for that persons freedom on a promise that, that human being will show up for a future court date.

Is it legal to sort up a name for one's self and use it properly without varying your mame?

Hi, hope I can get some back with this. I enjoy the standard three names, i.e. 'Jim' and 'Bob' and surname such as 'Redneck'. I use my second autograph, 'Bob', causes a LOT of problems as on most things, checks, driver's license, etc, it shows my first signature, 'Jim'. Can I just leave out the first name and sign 'Bob Redneck' and state I enjoy no first name officially? Thnxs, Signed 'My Name Is Bob' :-)
Answers: No it is not legal, dummy mcdoofus. Feel free to use that identify, though.
You can use an alias. Many people do. However you can not use this to impersonate another personality.

I have set people that step by a middle name. You could be J. Bob Redneck. That is an alias.

If you want to be known by another nickname, you can petition the court for your name to be changed. Laws on this swing from state to state. An attorney would be advisable. There are things you have to do contained by addition file some papers.
Only in a literary or thespian sense. You can write books under another mark. You can act within another name.

Am I legally bound to endow with a 2 week notice?

I am currently working at a sandbank of america as a teller, and I reallly detestation it. I've told my manager that I want to quit, and that I requirement to cut back my hours, and simply work one week. She has told me that I am properly bound to work for the next 2 weeks, and at the agenda they've already given me. Isn't it just a courtesy to give up a 2 week notice? If in that are any Bank of america workers out there, can you give an account me where I can find this info? I really only want out, and could they force me to work there? Any answers would be much appreciated
Answers: You are NOT rightfully bound to work a 2 week notice. Unless you hold a employment contract that requires you to work a 2 week notice surrounded by order to qualify for unquestionable benefits, you can quit anytime you want and not suffer any negative consequences. I wouldn't ask them for a quotation, but that is up to you.
I walk out the door of my last opportunity with no mind at all. I walk out on Friday and started a new livelihood on Monday. They had to wages me my vacation time too. Good luck.
She doesn't know what she's conversation about. You're not "legally" required to verbs working there for any amount of time unless you have a contract. Most jobs are "hire at will" which way you can quit without distinguish and they can fire you without consideration.

You might not want to burn your bridges, though. If you quit without see, don't count on using them as future reference.
Unless you have a contract here is no recourse for an employer if you quit. It is a courtesy to leave any sort of notice. If you haven't worked near long, you probably wouldn't want them on an application anyway, because then you look unreliable. And presently days there are law about giving doomed to failure references. Most states singular allow an employer to verify the dates of employment, commission description and pay rate.

No one can force you to jump to work. You can just not show up.what are they going to do, drag you out of your home and put you within front of the window at the dune? You should contact the state employment agency, or job service they would enjoy a for sure answer and may be interested in the threat or lye you received from your employer. ***Also, why don't you beckon the HR department? Most corporations like that enjoy a confidential hot-line.
Most states have employment-at-will. This medium either the employer or hand can terminate the employment at any time for any basis.

You can quit any time you want. You don't even have to pass notice at adjectives if you don't want to. It doesn't matter what is stated within the employee visitors` guide as long as your state is at-will. However, if you signed a contract, that would be a different matter.
not justifiably.
It just looks better on you, when you get to get another position.
they lied to you. there is zilch legal or undemocratic about a two week consideration.what usually happens when you present a two week notice is that they fire you like peas in a pod day.they are purely trying to get two more weeks of work from you.be prepaired that if you make a contribution them this notice they can fire you on the spot.
----retired texas deputy sheriff----
You can quit whenever you consistency like it. They can't force you to work. But,previously you leave would you please acquire me a mortgage and credit card without have to use my SS#?

Am i able to sue my employer for false accusation?

Answers: If you sue an employer, plan on going into business for yourself. Who will hire a lawsuit lotto loser ever again?
It depends on a few things. For starters, I'm assuming that they are indeed false. That assumed, the accusations own to have be conveyed to a third party. If they be only said to you, and nobody else within the world knows or can gain ahold of the comments, then you can't sue.
Also, you have to have suffered a loss. If it be just a non-hazardous comment, and nobody cared, the employer's also secure. There are exceptions to that, and those exceptions are if you were accuse of having AIDs or a disease that made you unfit to work, if the comments made someone believe that you are incompetent at your trade, or if it cause someone to believe you are a 'promiscuous woman'.
Also, the accusations must be specific. If the employer said, for example, "All construction workers are thieves", and you're a construction worker, you can't sue, because it wasn't specific.
Finally, it depends on whether the comments be spoken or permanent. (written, record, broadcasted, etc) You'll have more luck if it be permanent. If it wasn't irredeemable, then you'll own to prove all the above conditions.

That's almost it.
You can sue for almost anything. Whether it will survive a motion to dismiss is something entirely different. It helps if you can prove that you be actually, calculably, shabby by the accusations.

Help with a request for information about decree?

This is an assignment that i need back with. A preson go to a restaurant and hands his parody fur coat to the hat check female. He is handed a ticket next to his name and a description of the coat. On the reverse of the ticket it say "We will not be held responsible for any loss or damage of doesn`t matter what nature or however cause". The restaurnat say they will not pay him anything and they are not liable.

What could the coat owner do properly.
Answers: The exclusion clause is vague plenty to possibly exclude the restaurant from liability (see the Canada SS lines case). However tickets are generally deem to not be contractual in character. For instance, if something is so important to exclude someone from liability, it is unlikely that a ticket, which most culture would only partial view at, would be deemed sufficient catch sight of. Unless the attendent actually drew the plaintiff's concentration to the contractual terms on the ticket, or if here were also signs, the restaurant would most probable be liable. Cases to support this are the Thornton Shoe-Lane Parking (I think that's what its call - it's got a great quote by Lord Denning within it) and the Wedding Dress case (where a woman go to a drycleaner to wash the wedding ceremony dress, signs the receipt which contained an exclusion clause, however she succesfully sued).

Sorry I can't remember the travel case names from the top of my lead, but assuming you're a law student, these cases probably come up in class - they're technically high profile.
He could sue the restaraunt.

Claims approaching, "We are not liable," or, "We cannot be held responsible, please return carts here,"

are call "in terroram" statements -- and are sometimes not reasonably enforceable -- they are just near to scare folks out of trying to make an issue out of the issue.

He could specifically sue. . . I don't know that he'd definitely win (was in that REALLY a contract, if so, was within unilateral or bilateral. . . what was breached). . . ?
There is a undisputed amount of liability any business owner has. He have a responsibility to do "everything possible" to prevent theft or mess up to a customers property. If they accepted the coat, they also official a certain amount of responsibility for it.

How Can The Office Of Child Support Enforcement Break The Law To Enforce The Law?

Once they serve the order of support on my employer, the employer have to start garnishing my wages because if they don't my employer can

A) Be fined and possibly be forced to pay the amount of the lay down as deemed by the courts

B) Have their business license suspended

This is if you look below the word "BLACKMAIL" or EXTORTION" in a dictionary these are both one and indistinguishable, but yet they can efficiently get away near it, but let me try and extort or blackmail someone and I will carry a free stay at the Crossbar Hotel.

Maybe this is wrong but them using someone's social security number in need their consent is a crime too? I mean if they can make a purchase of your social security number and freely use it shows your social guarantee number is really a way for the system to track you for their advantage and make it really worthless!
Answers: Please explain to me where a tenet is being broken. It's not extortion, it's decree.Your employer is legally obligated to follow the court demand. If he doesn't , he is liable for the consequences.
Yes, the SS # is indeed a way for the organization to keep track of you. Using someone else's SS # is against the directive. It is called identity pocketing.
I don't know about "making your employer discharge it" but you are obligated to support you kid. After all you made the kid you can support your kid.."IT'S YOUR KID!" Maybe you should of put the loved ones jewels on rime or cut the string!

Your worried about a Social Security number, dally till everyone has an computer chip and is punched into the GPS systems. (bar code anyone?)
A. You're beneath a court order to pay cheque child support.
B. You failed to recompense.
C. The Court ordered your wages to be garnished, which the Court does NOT do unless you've be given multiple opportunities and multiple reprimands... contained by order to provide for your children's on a daily basis needs, close to clothing, shelter, utilities, school clothes, food, etc.

And you want to discuss the authenticity of wage garnishment? Pony up. If you won't pay for your own children, out of a sense of moral must, then the Court will force you to do so, as a LEGAL condition.

Loser.

No sympathy from me..
One could look at fines as being extortion .. follow their instructions or you own to pay. It's a concern of perspective, sometimes.

To answer your question:
Welcome to the Child Support Enforcement system. The entire system is corrupt. The feds remuneration states to enforce child support in a graduate scale, the more owed, the sophisticated the percentage of funds the states collect. It has be documented that states have kept ancestors on the child support rolls after their obligation is done, and even if they've died, because it raise the payment from the feds.

There is a video from a psychologist who worked for Michigan's CSE department for 20 years and be a manager. You and everyone should see it. Go to www.dadsofflorida.org, later to ISSUES, CHILD SUPPORT, and select CHILD SUPPORT CORRUPTION EXPOSED. Check out other information on the site.

The use of SS numbers isn't the only problem, it's lately another example of how the government twists its rules to serve its purposes.

More Questions and Answers:
[2162] - [2505] - [2120] - [407] - [1810] - [471] - [193] - [1464] - [2399] - [1694] - [197] - [1832] - [999] - [404] - [168] - [757] - [1389] - [612] - [688] - [2272]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: