Law Questions and Answers

I broke up with my fiance a couple of months ago and I want to know if I own any legal right to obtain the ring.

Do I have any legally recognized protection for the engagement ring I gave her? Or, do I a moment ago have to bite the bullet?
Answers: be in motion here, nolo is a good source of imperative:
http://www.nolo.com/article.cfm/catId/F8...
You gave the ring to her. There be no written contract concerning the gift for the present or the adjectives.

Bite the bullet! Be thankful you didn't catch married before breaking up. You could enjoy lost your A**.
This will vary from state to state, however, it will imagined depend on the circumstances you gave it to her. If it be on her birthday, Christmas, or anniversary, it will be considered a gift, and it is hers. If you give it to her strictly as an engagement promise, and she accepted it as such, you should be entitled to it.

I would mull over about your motive to want it subsidise. Used jewelry is only worth a fraction of what you remunerated, and do you really want to give it to someone else? If your lone motive is so she can't have it, I really don't have an idea that it is worth your trouble. The best revenge is being delighted without her.
this is a upright question. let's look at what the ring represents. the ring represents a contract (a promise) for respectively other to marry and spend the rest of each others lives together. also to be constant to one another (no cheating)

now if one party breaks that promise by telling the other i dont want to marry you solely for the principle that you have changed your mind next, the person who broke the promise have to give the ring pay for.(the women) or get's to get the ring rear legs (the man).

however, if the person who call off the engagement did so because the other caught the other cheating, basically not being devoted then, the ring have to be given back to the man or the women get to keep it what ever the baggage maybe.

contained by other word's if you broke of the engagement because you found him cheating then you bring back to keep the ring. because you didnt break the agreement he did by cheating.

if you broke bad the engagement because you have simply changed your mind you must afford the ring back because you broke of the engagement for your own personal reason.

hope this was helplful

PS i didnt realize you (the man) broke the engagement but, what i said still holds true. and will hold true within the court of law. if she be cheating you get the ring fund that's the only method.
Depends on your location and did you ask for it to be returned.

This website should help if you are contained by the US.

http://marriage.going on for.com/od/rings/a/rin...

Constitutional Violation! Alleging ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to angle Constitutional Viola

I am asking for a relative. Forgive me if the terms are not correct. He would close to to raise his s2255 alleging ineffective assistance of counsel for his downfall to raise his constitutional defiance and failure to suppress his statements. He wishes to know if he can raise 18u.s.c 350(c) within which police kept holding him instead of bringing him to court to obtain a confession and denied him his personal court counsel even when his counsel was trying to contact him. He requirements to know can he raise these surrounded by his s2255 and NOTE: he did not file a direct appeal because the Public Defender whom they made him use said the Judge didn't be in motion over the plea so there be nothing to appeal. Thanks for any help out I can get on this situation!
Answers: It is unadvisable for anyone to actually draw from formal legal insist on online. I would say that the ending sentence in your cross-question tells a notify of incompetence on the part of the public ally. Your relative took a plea bargain short understanding the need of what the act of that agreement be and now change his mind. How can he change his mind immediately after realizing what he have done while not understanding what he is in truth deciding. In other words, what is it that he contained and literally made a decision on his permitted situation. In any event, he has to find court council that will take the covering on the merits, without knowing the intimate details of that, no attorney is going to lay claims to it or obligate themselves to argue it. NO ONE should EVER put their endorsed stuff online, as a few words miscontrued or misdirected can be fatal justifiably. I don't pretend to be an attorney, so It's easy for me to slap a trainee opinion on it. If you are forced by monetary exclusions for credible defense, you should complain about it too, if that be the/part of your relatives situation. Confessions are other situational,it's the explanation thats the crux of understanding and resultant horizontal of guilt...

How is your local police department organized?

How is your local police department organized?
What are the various ranks and job within the department? What are some of the profession opportunities in the police department?
What are the requirements for becoming a policeman?
Answers: http://www.nyc.gov/html/nypd/html/home/h...

http://www.nypd2.org/html/recruit/requir...

Why is marijuana illegal if the bible say it's ok to heat it up for relaxation?

"The Lord said unto me, 'I will clutch my rest and I will consider in my dwelling place close to a clear heat upon herb.' " -- Isaiah 18:4-5

Herb (marijuana) is a Godly creation from the beginning of the world. It is specified as the weed of wisdom, angel's food, the tree of time and even the "Wicked Old Ganja Tree". Its purpose in creation is as a fiery sacrifice to be offered to our Redeemer during obligation. The political worldwide organizations own framed mischief on it and called it drugs.

I don't smoke marijuana, but If I be to get caught next to Marijuana and I was arrested.. i reckon I would sue the Police department for "Discrimination of Religion."
Answers: We know that Christianity teaches us not to be drunk beside wine. By extension, any kind of intoxication make us less intelligent, smaller quantity able to love our neighbors, and smaller quantity able to discern the Holy Spirit.

Wine can to be sure be a blessing, and Jesus clearly enjoyed drinking wine surrounded by moderation. Marijuana is a sedative-hypnotic, and it creates a very different type of intoxication. Marijuana induces a hypnotic state, making the user adjectives to suggestions. Anyone who has be with a marijuana-using group of friends know how easy it is to find "bummed out" by negative suggestions, e.g., that someone is a "narc." This is because our critical thinking ability are turned off underneath the influence of marijuana. In a dreamlike trance, you are unable to sort out the truth from the false. Sometimes hazardous decisions are made within trancelike states, and sometimes powerful and irrational emotions can emerge then as flashbacks. Christians should also recognize the peril of hypnotic states for receiving demonic influences.

The punishments for possessing marijuana tend to be too deep. However, given the dangers of marijuana intoxication, it is high-status for our laws to intrude penalties to deter those who would enter uncritical hypnotic states, endanger themselves and others.

Cheers,
Bruce
Yes you are correct. God made everything in this mud good. Its up to us man whether to use them cleverly or abuse them.

However, please remember also that the directive of man is very different from the regulation of God.
Unfortunately, you can't "sue the police department" for enforcing a discouraging law, and you can't sue the federal administration for passing it.

The powers of Congress are spelled out contained by the Constitution (see Article I section 8), and here is no such power to forbid people from smoking or drinking anything they want. However, the Congress go right ahead and made an illegal directive, the police enforce it, and courts do nothing to stop them.

When alcohol prohibition be imposed, it took a Constitutional Amendment (the 18th) to give Congress that power. Later, it become obvious that the "cure" be even worse than the "problem" and the amendment was repealed.

Drug prohibition be imposed by Congress without any Constitutional power to do it, but they did it anyhow. And the "War on Drugs" have done more damage to America than prohibition or than any other period of war in history. For example, more than partially of our jail cell are filled beside nonviolent "drug offenders" while murderers and rapists are routinely released early due to "prison overcrowding". Most of the border violation and drive-by shootings are due to turf wars by druglords and gang. By contrast, when was the end time you saw a shootout between competing liquor stores or a beer smugglers.

For more background information (and some philosophy on how to change things), travel to http://www.leap.cc/
I live in Canada so if you are a US citizen than these law do not apply. It is a well agreed fact that although marijuana is dishonest in Canada, it is largly tolorated. My argument behind the reluctancy to legallize pot is simply because we currently do not own the technololy to detect if you are under the influance of pot voice if you get pulled over by the police. Don't seize me wrong or misinterpret me, they can detect THC in your human being at any time but cannot tell if you a short time ago finished smoking a J or if you smoked one 2 days ago. Where if you where pulled over beneath the suspison of drunk driving the cops could simply make you blow into a breathalyzer and judge the exact amount of alchol in your blood. At this point of time we do not posses the technology do detect if you are elevated right now besides the obviouse share tale signs of self baked. Red eyes, dry mouth, paranoia etc. But if you are like me and are a regular user, most will not win these symptoms anymore.

Theroy 2. Again this is Canada specific. As said above, marijuana use is illegal contained by Canada but is tolorated to the point of letting marijuana smoking cafe's similar to those found in Amsterdam to fly. Canada be on it way to the "Decriminalization" of Cannibis while the Liberal deputation was surrounded by office. In certainty, at one point not many moons ago, marijuana be decriminalized for a short period of time import if you where caught near less after a specified amount of marijuana than you couldn't be charged for drug possesion. The worst case sinario be that the officer would confinscate your sticky-icky (and keep it) and tolerate you go beside a slap on the rist and no criminal charges. It wasn't untill you got caught beside enough bud to and have the intent to traffic. For example, if you had a quarter pound adjectives individualy devided in dime plenty and quarter ounces than you would be busted for trafficing. C'mon now, who carry a QP of dimes for personal use?!?!?

Back to politics, since Conservative was voted into department, these new bills where on earth dismissed in no time at adjectives. In fact I believe this is one of the first matter taken care of. What a bearing to piss off individuals who just get your @$$ into office eh?

However, cannibis use within Canada is still very tolorated by autorities. Like I mentioned since, if you head out to Toronto Ontario you'll find dozens of Pot cafe's, freshly like surrounded by Amsterdam. The only differance is you must bring your own smokeables. Marijuana is not provided, however in that are rooms where you can sit down contained by front of a Giant Vapourizer Hooka with your best MJ and smoke till you can't see anymore. Most places don't charge extra for using in that equiptment but do have a cover charge for entrance.

In fact, Young St within down town Toronto is commonly known as Youngsterdam presently from all the cafe's popping up.

So fellow Cannibis smokers, if you really want to see Canada's law chage to favour the use of marijuana than please vote Liberal. It be actually quoted by the Conservative parliament to implement a tough on drugs policy system similar to the US. This would mean no more buying pipes, bongs, seed and the list go on.

I know a lot of you Canadian's are thinking... Why vote Liberal for marijuana leaniency when the "Green Party" is adjectives for it.

The answer, although the Green Parties main focus is to decriminallize pot. Do you really expect in a million years that they would bring voted in? I guess not. This would just be a squandered vote if you ask me.

The Liberals are already seeing the light and are actively moving towards more freedom near Cannibis. It would not even suprise me to see promotion of this topic during campaignes.

So just suspend in here. Our day is comming. Marijuana will be lawful one day. Once the infant boomers all die past its sell-by date and a new classmates of politicians hit the voters booth. Its just a concern of time.

P.S
I'm sure there are various more determining factors surrounded by the illegallization of marijuana than what I have specified above. Whether the reason are fact of fiction. This is basically things that I have taken see in.

The bottom procession is, if you want to see the law exchange for the greater good than its simply up to us as citizens of humanity to put a foot down and turn the table. Everyone must take a stand and fracas back. One route to show your enthusiasim for the decriminalization is to Visit Toronto during Cannibis week. I went this summer and it be the greatest thing I own ever experienced. In fact, I smoked a 3 daily J right beside a cop on a horse and conversed with him give or take a few Marijuana laws. I march the streets of Toronto with a 5 foot, 6 front hooka! This is a place and time for us to take our stand and show the affairs of state what a bunch of stoners are really like.

Did you know: The Marijuana March during Cannibis week have been around for 9 years. During this in one piece time nobody has every be hurt do to violance. There has never be any arrests made or charges laid to date. This basically what I am trying to seize across is simply this. 25,000 stoners all together surrounded by one park have never cause a problem whether it be fights, robbery or any other reason.

Now, let turn the tables and replace 25,000 stoners near drunks instead. What will the out come be? Hummmmm. I wonder.

So lets adjectives get together and cause this dream a reallity! Come on out to Toronto next May to show your support. Its fun, free and a blast. Lots of live music, obedient weed, guest speakers of political significance take the stand and inform our Government the Facts of Cannibis. The fact that you attend merely proves how safe marijuana use really is. If you can be surrounded by this masses stoned people and consistency safe than nearby must be a reason why.

I do appologize for this answer person off topic from your sound out about the religion at the rear it, but I think that religion have little to do with the illegallization of pot. It's no shock that pot is safer than alcohol. Yet we are audible range everyday about citizens being scraped sour the road due to drunk driving.
Well I'm guessing anything of harm to you is forbidden

ruminate about it ur harm ur body and also other s around you

that is why adultary is not permitted, because of STD's and pregnancy even next to a condom, how do u know the condom isn't going to break

yes herb is a godly creation, but u can't smoke every herb can u, u use it for medicine or food,

it kill thousands of brain cells everytime u smoke it
What translation are you reading?
"This is what the LORD say to me:
'I will remain quiet and will look on from my dwelling place, resembling shimmering heat surrounded by the sunshine, like a cloud of dew within the heat of the gather.
"For, before the pick, when the blossom is gone and the flower becomes a ripening grape, he will cut sour the shoots with pruning knife, and cut down and take away the spreading branches."
--Isaiah 18:4-5
I disagree next to your translation of the passage.

Isaiah 18:4-5

4 For thus the Lord have said to me: I will be still and I will look on from My dwelling place, like clear and shimmering heat surrounded by sunshine, like a fine cloud of mist surrounded by the heat of bring in.

5 For before the pick, when the blossom is over and the flower becomes a ripening grape, He will cut sour the sprigs with pruning hooks, and the spreading branches He will remove and cut away.

So I have be with equal company for 3 years and I have fixed?

to take a situation with a competitor factor time.I am also cutting pay for on my own hours with current employer.There are sveral other organization that have cut put a bet on on there own hours and worked for a competitor.The morning after I told my current employer my plans( and they werent happy) I was told it be time for my review and also told that I have have a sexual harrasment complaint.They will not give me any details and with the sole purpose want me to sign a statement that places me on probation.It would seem to me they are trying to carry rid of me.any advice?
Answers: Don't sign anything and speak to an employment attorney.
If you deciede to work for a competitor I wud enjoy fined you $100.000.000 . oh wait thats F1!

I wud own just fired you!
You should own the right to details of the harassment charges. If they won't dispense them to you, they can't punish you for it (legally).

For New York State people, if you hold no death cost, why is there still a guy on demise row?

Caught this this morning on the news, seem there is still 1 guy on departure row and he is appealing to get his sentence changed. How can within even be a death row, if you did away next to the death cost?
Answers: They are waiting for him to hang himself.
To allow victims of stern crime the chance to live contained by hope?.Of Justice?

If money changed hand for sex and she get pregnant, is there a parental responsibility and running claim?

A girl advertised for providing sex within return for fanancial rewards. She then get pregnant after this arrangement goes on for a while. She is very soon claiming maintenance and parental responsibility. This is not a moral give somebody the third degree.
Answers: If she advertised sex, after no, there should be no responsibility to the father. An trailer of sex assumes that the seller will be responsible for adjectives of the dangers that come beside it. Most prostitutes require a man to wear a condom, for instance. This is mainly for protection of STD's. Pregnancy is a risk surrounded by such a profession. This prostitute should have be on the pill to ensure that there be no 'slips'.
Yes, if she can prove who the father is, she is entitled to continuing financial support usually until the child is 18.

This will happen because she will vote that she always wore a diaphragm expect near this particular lover and they have discussed having a child prior to adjectives in sex.

Since its a business of he said, she said, she will win because the welfare of the child is at stake.
Yes. Why wouldn't it be? The male contained by question should own been wearing a condom. This applies whether or not the woman he is have sex with does not want to use one (That is rare). If a man is paying a woman for sex, next common sense dictates that he would want to protect his body from any possible infections first and foremost.

Regardless of whether or not a woman requirements to have unprotected sex, a man can other either (a) insist on a condom or (b) influence "no".

Hopefully, this man has studious the obvious lesson - that he have some responsibility when it comes to sexual relations.

In future this man may want to (a) avoid have sex in exchange for money and (b) other use a condom in any non-monogamous relationship.

Live and swot up, live and learn.
So this prostitute sleeps next to men without using a condom and a man slleps next to her without using a condom?!?!?!

They both deserve to obtain HIV not Childrens allowance!
In the UK a verbal agreement technique very little.
And regardless of the morale of the 'gentleman' in cross-examine, or the agreement with the human being providing the service. he is still under responsibility to prevent the pregnancy not the female.

She would obviously have to provide positive proof he is the father.
But as long as this can be done... she is still entitled to claim from the manly partner.

What is the difference between appealing to Mental Health Act Review Tribunal and Hospital Managers?

What is the difference between the two ? which one would be more benificial for a patient and why ?
Answers: MHRT can revoke the partition as far as I know. Hospital managers cannot
Because the Review Tribunal are similar to a court and therefor over ride anything a hospital representative decides and their finding is final.

Plus the tribunial will be impartial and independent

The run of the mill procedure for having a result changed is the manager first...if happy next the tribunal.or cut out the manager (not recommended if you havent tried first) and run straight for the tribunal

Where would i find out where the official right of way is through my property boundries to adjoing houses?

I live in an end terrace and have a right of way through the boundries for access to the other houses back doors. At present we let the neighbours use our front gate and through our courtyard to their houses. I do however know this is no the 'official' right of way. i vaguely know where it is but where would i find out for certain, i have looked through all the documentation i got when i bought the house and i have no pictures just a sentance about the 'OFFICIAL COPIES ENTRIES'? where do i find this e.t.c.??
Answers: I know in Ireland the local county councils have copies of the site plans and should be able to provide you with copies. The plans should show any official right of way or point of access.

If they do not show anything official you are not obliged to allow access through your property but it can cause problems with neighbours if there has been a long standing verbal agreement to allow people cross your property to access their own.

Hope this helps.
You should be able to speak to your local council and get details or you might have to get a lawyer to get them for you. when i bought my house we got a set of drawings showing where our boundaries are etc and also routes for other houses along with details of drains and roads.
my friend had a house where people had to walk through her garden to get to their front door so its not unheard of.
good luck
Sounds like you live in a multi-residence property (condo, townhouse, etc.) Normally I'd say to check your property survey, but you probably don't have one. There should be something in the HOA covenants. If not, then I would simply lock my gates and not let the others pass through my property. Let them prove that it is a legal right-of-way. Do it now, because if someone fell down or something while passing through your property, they could sue you.

Good luck!
The Land Registry should have a note of any rights of way on properties in the UK. They have an online search database through which you can order a copy of the title plan or register for £3 per property: http://www.landregisteronline.gov.uk/lro...

This article from the Telegraph's property pages may be useful as well: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/property/main...

Enquire Librarian service
http://www.peoplesnetwork.gov.uk
Ask the land registry. They can supply a view of your boundaries.And mark out any rights by surrounding properties The title deeds also will have it documented dependent on when and if the property has been registered.

It is not necessarily titled as a "right of ".legally it is known as an 'easement'. or/and a 'interest'
Try looking on your deeds or Land Registry Certificate.

How do i apply for a shared residency order, where on earth do i get the forms e.t.c for 2 children?

i hold a civil partner and we want to apply for a shared residency order for our 2 girls so she have some rights over them. where do i find the forms and how much does it cos e.t.c anyone know the procedure?
one is 3yrs old and one is 4 months prehistoric. we have be together 7 yrs and the children ahve lived wih us both, all the time, will this minister to?
Answers: A residency order is as a rule applied for at the county court. The purpose of such an order is when parents/guardians are powerless to agree which of them the children should live with following separation the court desire themselves and make the direct.


The way i am reading your press is that you and your partner are both in agreement to share the custody should a separation arise>? If i am reading it correctly afterwards you do not really need a court to intervene and resolve a dispute.

You are competent to draw up an agreement between you both, in writing and set out the expressions you are both happy next to. Both of you sign .and for added security ask one or two witnesses to sign also.
you.ll hold to see a solicitor and then turn to court and get it approved by the consider

More Questions and Answers:
[99] - [3] - [2386] - [1502] - [1578] - [1989] - [437] - [2440] - [1658] - [611] - [109] - [2514] - [93] - [982] - [1757] - [325] - [800] - [1798] - [1121] - [821]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: