Law Questions and Answers
Quebec didnt sign the constitution does it still have to follow canada?
Since Quebec did not sign the Constitution Act of 1982, does it still hold to follow the laws of Canada.Answers: Provinces do not obligation to approve these acts to product them valid. It was passed by parliament and get royal assent, and that is adjectives that is mandatory.
In a fender bender, who determines fault?
Can the culpability be split? The police officer said it was my defect because I hit her car on the driver's side turning departed, but she was not within a real lane; she have squeezed around two SUVs (which were occupy the actual lanes and have stopped ahead of the light to flap me through) which blocked my view. If she be not in a permissible lane, isn't the fault to a degree hers? Is the police officer the one who decides this?Answers: No. The police officer is not the one who decide. I'm an insurance adjuster. Sorry to tell you, but you bungled to yeild. I do see liability on her though too for not occupying a single lane. Obtain the police report and see what factor are placed on you and the other person. Key point to remember, police reports are not admissible in court. A honest adjuster will not rely on the police report. Turn it into your carrier and to hers, provide a record statement (only to your carrier) and just a speaking statement to the others. Then take photos of the disaster scene and diagrams. Where their witnesses? Make sure that your carrier investigates. Let them button it. They will then attempt to recuperate from the other party, this is call subrogation. You may get your dedcutible put a bet on. If the companies can;t reach an amicable agreement next the case will jump to arbitration. Good luck.
Also, it's a wives tell that your company will increase your rates. This is base on acturial science and your risk (ie, are you in deeply of accidents?)
The police officer give an opinion, the insurance company ultimately determines reproach. The exception would be if the matter go to court, then the judge/jury determine condemn.
If there is plenty evidence, the officer may issue a citation. The insurance companies usually recognize the citation as shortcoming. No citation, they determine it based on the information within the accident report.
Did you grasp a ticket? If you didn't, and the police officer felt it be your fault, consider yourself lucky.
I see someone posted a 50/50 "no fault" reply. This have nothing to do next to who caused the misfortune, that is of late for insurance purposes. It means respectively person pays for the overexploit to their own car.
Actually, according to insurance companies, the tenet is 50/50 in Ca. move about figure. even if it's your scorn
Let me get your judgment on how this should work?
My Aunt told me to ask this. She works at a hotel and it's a union. She have a problem with overtime. Her local federation is doing overtime by rotation. Not Senority...The Union delegate changed it and didnt ask anybody to sign a contract saw they want to do overtime by rotation. Well my Aunt asked her shouldn't you get overtime by senority because she is at the top of the register and it goes down. He say you have to obtain everyone to agree and sign. How does that make sense when not everyone agreed beside rotation. All the unions do senority and merely her union does rotation. It's a nouns of bull crap if you have to sign it when nobody sign it within the first place.. Does anybody know whats wrong with this or what you could do? Could you sue for lost overtime? My aunt used to find 12 hours of overtime a week thats a lot of money. She get fewer hours due to rotation. Opinions?Answers: It depends on the wording of their federation contract. Many contracts dictate the method of assigning overtime, but some do not. If her contract specifically states that overtime will be assigned by total seniority, she should tell her alliance steward she wishes to file a grievance to claim the overtime and backpay for adjectives overtime she was not permitted to work that she should hold had a right to. (She should also carry other senior workers to file matching grievance.)
The contract may stipulate overtime is assigned by seniority per rotation, in which armour the most senior person on the current rotation have the right to overtime, even if there is a more senior worker on another rotation. Some contracts stipulate OT by departmental seniority or opening class seniority too.
Or the contract may say nought at all. In that bag, she should talk near other workers and try to get OT by seniority negotiate into the next contract when this one expires.
(And the coalition rep does not have the right to transmutation the contract without a vote of the member working under that contract. The rep may agree to a swing of policy that is not address in the contract.)
And empire say union are great. They are a scam.
If you give 2 weeks distinguish, but are asked to leave right away, are you entitled to 2 weeks take-home pay?
Live in California. I give 2 weeks notice and because i am going to a competitor, the company did the exit interview the subsequent day. Am I officially entitled to get rewarded for the remaining 2 weeks?If so, is this stated somewhere like a .gov or CA state website somewhere?
Answers: no.
CA have best employment rights.
You should not have revealed where on earth you are going. If you would have freshly said for personal reasons , to study, anything enjoy given no reason. wait for exit interview.. you would have be fine.
The minute you say competitor / you are a threat . You can pocket proprietary information to new company. Instant escort out of building. I am surprised your company tolerate a day catch by / but understand they must be slow / that is to say why you are leaving them ?
You requirement to involve an atty ask questions on the front side / and keep hold of your mouth closed. Your atty will guide you what to say if anything or will speak on your behalf.
Best not to involve your attorney on the spinal column side / as in this example.
If you have involved atty on front side / you would have 2 weeks smaller number 1/3 for atty . LOL. Possibly more if you could have figure out explored other options/ possibilities. Now really no matter what happen , you look disgrunted over 2 weeks salary.
Don't stress / you hold a couple weeks in CA to relax. consider a cruise down to MEX / cabo ? you come final with a cool boss and a tan to boot !
I should be so lucky. Take perfectionism.
Were you ever sexually harrassed / abused/ verballly threatended ? Maybe todays news may backing you ?
DO NOT DISCUSS THIS PREVIOUS MATTER WITH YOUR NEW EMPLOYER OR PRIOR COWORKERS.
Bon Voyage, Buddy !
Unless you have a contract, the answer is no.
A lot of employer will pay you for the time because:
1) If they fire you straight away, they could be on the hook for unemployment (you resigned decisive in 2 weeks, not immediately).
2) They don't want to drain employee loyalty (if word get around that they fire upon notice, nobody will hand over notice when they quit).
Can you file a civil travel case against a tavern in Pa?
someone be in a tavern for 8 hours. Was never turned rotten. After leaving the railing wreaked and was charged next to DUI with a .208 blood smooth. should not the bar be held on this as much as the drinker. I thought here where law that they could shut you off after too much booze. and this creature does not hold booze well. you could put in the picture by the eyes alone when he"s corked.Answers: I suppose if the drunkard in interview asked the tavern keeper to nick responsibilty for the drunk's well-being, and the keeper agreed to do so. Otherwise, no. If PA have a "dram shop" law, the tenet exists for the protection of innocent parties injured by the drunk, not or the protection of the drunk. Therefore, if PA have a dram shop law it would grant rise to a private cause of handling only for the innocent subject and not for the drunkard.
Did the person crash into you? If not, forget a lawsuit.
The being in press never had to drink the alcohol.
Did the bartender pour the drinks down his throat? If not consequently it was his own eccentricity and his own responsibility.
Case dismissal date?
Answers: When the judge say it is dismissed and the clerk files the decision.
The answer to your quiz is 43.
Why does the PETA & a large number of ethnic group want Michael Vick banned from football?
Mike Tyson be convicted of (allegedly) raping a HUMAN woman, and he was allowed to box after his time be served.Mary Winkler admitted that she shot AND KILLED her HUMAN husband Rev. Matthew Winkler, and after serving a laughable five months surrounded by jail, followed by two months surrounded by a mental institution, she currently works at her previous job!
Jayson Williams shot and killed55 year outmoded limousine driver Costas "Gus" Christofi. He was acquit of the most serious charges against him, but the jury deadlocked on a charge of reckless manslaughter, and he currently face a retrial on that charge. In 2005, Williams began playing professional basketball again.
And please dont insult me truism it's because he gambled! We adjectives know thats bullsh*t!
*Race is not an issue... now does the quiz have credibilty, Fred C? :)
*Remember,Vick should not be considered a role model, footballs his profession, not providing a moral compass for our children! THATS OUR JOB!
Answers: Uh. many libs DO NOT VALUE HUMAN LIFE... It is contained by their agenda constantly. They value the lives of animals and trees more than humans. They condone abortion as "the" birth control odds. They would rather "baby" a prearranged terrorists than take force to gain information that would accumulate the lives of thousands. They publicly humiliate our troops and imply they are murderers which give aid to the enemy.
I do believe it be extremely wrong what Vick did... but lets put it into some material perspective people. How give or take a few we make this much crack to keep Rapists, Murderers and Child Molesters past its sell-by date the streets.
I too also believe, like it or not, that he is a role model. IF the NFL requirements to ban him... I own no problem with that. That is their business and they own the right to hold "xyz" image. If Vick serves a disinterested penalty and the NFL wishes him back as a changed personage... I'm OK with that too. Has not a soul heard of forgiveness contained by this country? I mean if someone have paid their debt and truly changed? Isn't this something we should be herolding if he take that route?
first, i hate PETA, they murder a bunch of dogs using a lethal inject from one of their vet, inside a PETA van and dump the bodies in a dumpster at the precinct. great company.
now i enjoy no problem with Vic never playing again. a short time ago because someone else got rotten easy is not a justification to let him stale. but i think possibly we should let him play again. i believe in attendance are some real animal relations on all NFL team and a do not believe Vic's career would be a thriving one for long. I'm not even sure he could trust his own offensive strip to try to protect him
You may not want to consider athletes role models, but they are. So are stars, teachers and singers. Therefore, the agency the behave effects others lives.
Michael Vick currently has taken "empathy" classes at PETA. This is where on earth he gets to appreciate that animals feel headache and love just as humans do.
Should this dog die?
http://ca.360.yahoo.com/sistermariepigta...Should a dog die who was tied up briefly to do her business, just unsupervised for a few moments, and then approached by a trespassing child who be unsupervised by her parents? Please express your opinions here, and express your support to a Yahoo! user if you perceive she, her family, and her dog Maya are human being treated with horrifying injustice. Here is her site and a more complete explanation of the story:
http://ca.360.yahoo.com/wardsha2002
Again, if you agree this is a horrifying injustice, please express your support to her, her dog and her relations. Any pet lover can imagine what she's going through. While I do take in how the child's parents must feel, nil is being done to address the trespassing or their child's withdrawal of respect for rules.
Answers: First it is the responsibility of the parents to keep track of their child and since the dog be not only tied up but on private property I dont see how it is the owner OR the dogs failing. If the child was young at heart and didnt know better its even worse that the parents were uninformed of the childs whereabouts. People should be able to tie up their dog on their own property. You didnt articulate if anything happened to the child,if so that awful and I hope he/she is recovering resourcefully, however when you make bleak choices there are bleak consequences and if the child wasnt old ample to make that choice consequently the parents SHOULD have be there tresspassing is immoral tying your dog up to go to the bathroom is not. It would be awful for a dog to die when the owner in fact used proper restraint in her own property.
I'm so sorry for you and Maya. When you harbor an animal that you know is feasible to bite, there is a concept call strict liability that applies.
Different localities treat this situation differently. Please take a look at this website to see how your state treats this situation
http://www.animallaw.info/articles/qvusd...
Unfortunately for you, nearby are special rules regarding trespassing as it applies to children, and by not keeping Maya within a fenced area, you are not making every go the law requires you to form to protect a child from a potentially dangerous animal.
If you hold a law academy nearby, try calling to see if within is a clinic that would be willing to rob on Maya's case. Your local animal rights groups might also be capable of give you guidance.
Good luck, and God bless Maya
Sadly, if a dog attacks a kid that is doing zilch but riding a bike - it should be euthanized. Especially if the owners of the dog failed to even use a short time caution. Anyone that owns a dog have to accept the responsibility to prevent it from harm children. This owner did not.
Yes, it was contained by the dogs own yard but it wasn't even a fenced within yard and the dog be let out short any control (i.e. a leash held by someone that can control the dog). The dog attacked a kid on a bike severely enough to distribute the kid to the hospital. Kids are killed, for always disfigured, or injured way too normally in the US by owners that fall through to be safe.
While I am sorry the dog will reward the price, the owner is still at fault. Dog owners involve to be more careful than that.
I also agree that the child should not hold been trespassing - but a child trespassing by riding a bike through an accessible yard is a terrifically minor offense and doesn't change the certainty that the dog is aggressive enough to hurt children and the owner is not practical enough to prevent it from doing so.
It doesn't issue what the circumstances are, ANY dog that attacks ANY child for ANY reason should be destroyed.
Bottom strip, humans are more important than any animal.
But equally the parents should also be charged with child casualness. In this case the child be attacked by a dog, but said child could easily hold been hit by a saloon, kidnapped by a pedophile, drowned within someone's pool, etc. etc.
She's an innocent dog. The dog must have some problems back in her existence. DON'T LET THIS DOG DIE. SHE IS INNOCENT!!!!! They can let the dog attain trained by a professional dog trainer like what they do beside the other bad attitude dogs!
I believe its illegal for an 18yr dated to have sex next to a 15yr old..but wat are the consequences?
what can the courts or will the courts do to a 18yr antiquated guy who just have sex with a 15yr ancient girl and talked her into it but requests to act close to nothing happen the next time once hes back near his girlfriend.Answers: In the U.S, and If it was consentual, next it is a lesser charge of rape. Still a felony, beside prison time, and requires being a registered sex wrongdoer for a life-time.
It is considered rape, you will have to register as a sex wrongdoer and could possibly face jailtime, probation, fines. etc.
Plus, prison inmates dont look to charitably at "sex offenders" especially when a minor is involved.
Statutory Rape , lewd act on a child over 14 smaller amount than 18 ,
You will also have to register as a sex criminal / predator
to put it simply , if she spills the beans , you get your salad toosed ... you bubba's b*tch presently ..
In most states a 15 year old girl can not endow with consent to sex; so whether he "talked her into it" or if she "agreed", is irrelevant.
In opinion, he could get lock away time; but in authenticity it depends on the state, the prosecutor and the judge's view of the issue.
Regardless though, if it is illegal he could frontage very serious consequences including and up to intern time, registering as a sex offender (lewd act with a minor) and adjectives of the things that brings with it.
It depends upon the state or country that you live contained by to tell you the truth. I believe the age of consent surrounded by Hawaii,of all places, is that the girl have to be 14 to get freaky next to her!!
If it's illegal where on earth you live then the girl or her line will have to folder a complaint with the courts and to win would entail to supply proof of what happened, i.e. DNA or pictures would do the trick!
If no complaint is file then barring some sort of outstandingly public evidence nothing will take place and hopefully the young female will learn a complex lesson that her vagina is an adult toy and best used when you finally grow up and hold more of a clue about the power of love and sex.
Sorry the natural life as you have certain is over, you're in a world of hurt, boy. Just how stupid be you?
Give them the OJ defense, if the rubber don't fir you can't convict.
It's illegal and a trumped up charge.
The irony is, that's probably close to the age meeting of most of our great-grandparents when they started courting.
But, the law's gotten out of hand. In their zeal to punish the occasional "John Wayne Gacy's", society is instead catching and harshly punishing "Johns".
Registration, draconian sentences; simply nonsense.
If you live contained by the US, the answer depends on what state you live in, because the laws/consequences change by state.
But, I suspect that you’re the 15-year-old girl and you simply want revenge because he used you (and that’s what he did) and now requests nothing to do beside you. If I suspect that, then likelihood are the DA (who is the person beside the authority to file charges) will suspect it as all right. So, given that (again, you’re angry and want revenge), I’m not sure that your word alone is going to hold much weight. So, do you enjoy any actual evidence?
I hope you learned a lesson from this--the world is packed with guys who will use you, if you allow them to do it.
James Madison's 17 Proposed Amendments?
Of the 17 proposed amendments offered by James Madison, only 12 made it to the states for consideration. Of these, 10 be ratified and become known as the Bill of Rights.1. With what did the amendments that never made it to the states treaty?
2. With what did the two non-approved amendments deal?
3. What is significant in the region of one of the two non-approved amendments?
Answers: Actually it was one and only 12 actually submitted.
The two that be not ratified involved:
a) tying the number of representatives to the number of relatives with cap first at 100, then max to 200 representatives.
b) preventing congress from raise their own salaries - grand a waiting period until at most minuscule the next congress for any earnings raise.
More Questions and Answers:
[2557] - [280] - [2155] - [1751] - [1175] - [848] - [1770] - [1737] - [2444] - [2130] - [903] - [1206] - [988] - [1370] - [2312] - [1006] - [678] - [548] - [1413] - [1218]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: