Law Questions and Answers

If you were asked to turn within a neighbor because of political beliefs?

...would you do so?

This may seem far-fetched, and I'm equipped for the epithets, but it's a sincere question.

I guess because it's sincere, and a really prickly interview, I won't get tons answers.
Answers: trun them into who dumdass,the mayor,preacher.my wife,who in the heck are you discussion about turning who into who?If i tought someone as you are,a threat to my society, yes i would merely turn your stupid a-- into my group & have you exterminated approaching a **** roach.people similar to yuou are nothing but trash and trouble,why are you needed?yopu attach nothing to society but destruction & when you enjoy destroyed everything you want to know why someone did not do more to prevent its destruction,look in the mirror idiot !! are you piece of the problem or part of the solution ???
No.
A vastly easy give somebody the third degree. First, why would I want to? Why would I care? What would motivate me to do so?
Turn them surrounded by for what? To who? In the US it is not illegal to own political beliefs. It is actually prompted.

If you are asking a hypothetical, then what is it? If your put somebody through the mill is along the lines of "If the Democratic party be outlawed today and all Democrats be declared to be criminals, would you turn in your neighbor for person a Democrat", then my answer is no.

But I would be prepared to be persecuted myself, in recent times as many be blacklisted in the 1950s for defending so-called "communists" from McCarthyism.
Yep this is how it starts. Get a group of fundie nationalist to get the bubble rolling.

MARIJUANA illegal or not?

I dont deliberate its a gateway drug that depends on the person. I know lots of populace who used it as a gatway drug they went on to lsd a exstacy and so on. but those same poeple own problems like noone loves them blah blah. but i smoke and I don`t know its just me iam not bored beside my life i wouldnt try lSD. but why not make conform it? arent are taxes going to lotts of things including inforcing this law? and the senate would be making more money off it. Prove me wrong thats cool i want your opinons if you cant oh economically you know.
Answers: Marijuana is a Mexican slang word for hemp or cannabis from the early 1900's. Marijuana is unendorsed today because during the 1930's technology was coming available to revolutionize the production of hemp which severely threatened the financial status, save the existence of all thesis manufacturing companies surrounded by the USA. Most notable of these be those owned by William Randolph Hearst, the newspaper publisher. He stood to loose billions of $$, run bankrupt, out of business & stand surrounded by line for a feast during the Great Depression. Also DuPont had a short time ago introduced the world to plastic and industrialized mass production of hemp would have eliminate up to 80% of DuPont's business worth billions of $$. DuPont has never be in the red & borrowed money lone twice in it's history. DuPont's primary financial underwriter at the time was Andrew Mellon of the Mellon Bank of Pittsburgh who be also the Secretary of the Treasury for Herbert Hoover in the untimely 1930's. In 1931, Mellon, in his role as Hoover's Secretary of the Treasury, appointed his adjectives nephew-in-law, Harry J. Anslinger, to be head of the just this minute reorganized Federal Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (FBNDD), a post he held for the next 31 years.

These industrial baron and financiers knew that machinery to cut, bale, decorticate (separate the fiber from the high-cellulose hurd), and process hemp into tabloid or plastics was becoming available contained by the mid-1930s. Cannabis hemp would have to move about.

In DuPont's 1937 Annual Report to its stockholders, the company strongly urged continued investment in its clean, but not readily accepted, petrochemical synthetic products. DuPont be anticipating "radical changes" from "the revenue raise power of government. . . converted into an instrument for forcing agreement of sudden new concept of industrial and social reorganization.

The reason cannabis be made illegal have nothing to do next to pharmaceutical companies... it was to let go the financial empires of a select few businessmen. There be no scientific or medical research conducted by private or establishment sources to support doing so... and the only reseach to date at the time be two studies which concluded cannabis was not dodgy to smoke. A secondary origin for criminalizing marijuana, which was not originally intended, but fairly evolved from the process of doing so, was to create a crime which allowed the legalized deportation by the federal government of so call crazed & violent marijuana smoking Mexicans.

A significant number of distinguished & respectable groups & organizations from a huge variety of field testified against the Marijuana Tax Act contained by 1937... including the American Medical Association.

The criminalization of marijuana came in the region of as a result of blatant lies by wealthy businessmen & federal command officials... be prepared in confidential by those in the federal affairs of state with strong ties to DuPont, Hearst & others... and be approved by Congress through special & unconventional procedures supervised by member with strong ties to DuPont. It remains private because a few very considerable companies stand to loose trillions of $$ annually... & they're not pharmaceutical companies. These companies contribute millions of dollars a year to Congressional members & candidate and take tremendously good assistance of those who see things their method. Not only is it widely official in the medical community that marijuana is relatively safe, especially when compared to tobacco, but a person could smoke a pound of industrial hemp and not get hold of "high". Yet industrial hemp remains illegal to this hours of daylight. It's ironic that there be a time in America when the federal senate actually required farmers to grow cannabis or obverse fines for not doing so.

The fact at hand have be thousands of US citizens charged & convicted of felonies and incarcerated for millions of years collectively... for possessing, distributing & simply smoking a untaught growing plant... is a crime against humanity which compares to, if not overshadows the treatment of Jews by Nazi Germany. It begin 70 years ago in 1937 and continues to this hours of daylight... and is likely to remain as such if for no other root than that alone... because the US government is incapable of admit it was wrong. The lone way this will feasible change is from rife support of US citizens who execise their right to vote & elect candidates to Congress who decline financial reward from philosophical pockets... and don't have their go before up their asses. Considering the federal government continues to keep going strict control of cannabis and deny requests for scientific research... it will remain difficult to counter the lies the federal goverment continues to spew forth next to documented facts... and/or enlighten those voting citizens who verbs to believe them.
They should legalize it...and Im a republican.

alcohol is more detrimental then weed IMHO
It should be official but never will, there is to much money to be made sour of it. The Feds collcect Billions for "fighting the period of war on drugs , they will never give that up.

Stop blaming "big pharma" for this one , why shouldn't they complain? Why should some one be capable of sell a "drug" short going through all the FDA crap that they own to go through and Weed would merely be considered an alternative for only 1 or 2 drugs on the open market
i say make conform it all
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

Revised question---why do laywers rep guilty ppl?

I did post this question previously & I thank all of you who responded. I guess I should enjoy added more detail. If a person have been convicted and admit to a crime, how can they years later voice "I was insane" and capture an att'y to represent them? Is this not a waste of charge payers $$$$
Answers: you maybe mixing undisputed scenarios up

If a entity is convicted of a crime and sentence to prison, if they want a lawyer latter on to review the DNA evidence to see if he be falsely convicted that should not be a problem

if he is convicted contained by prison, and wants to try to reverse the conviction on insanity plea, it is not going to appear unless he has allot of monies to lavish, no chance of conquering

if the person admit guilt but has not be tried or convicted, he should still get a advocate to ensure the state follows the proper procedure to convict a person if it go to trial most of those cases where they own up guilt, it gets pleaded out no trial
The merely way that this comes up "years later" is if the defendant have a successful appeal. The appeals court finds serious errors in the imaginative trial and sends the whole item back for a topical trial.

In that case, the productive verdict have been overturned, and the defendant is once again "innocent until proven guilty".

As for the lawyer who work on the appeal for a person that have been found guilty, they are working to construct sure that our criminal justice system is celebration and that serious legal errors are exposed so that innocent culture don't go to prison or disappearance row.

If you think that adjectives people who are convicted are certainly guilty and it is a waste of taxpayer money to review convictions on appeal, afterwards I hope you will take the time to revise about the Innocence Project. Many race have be released when DNA evidence proved that they did not commit the crime they were convicted for.
In the inital skin, a lawyer does not represent a guilty person-a party is presumed innocent until his guilt is proved in a court of decree. if a person have been convincted, that doesn't necessarily scrounging they were guilty. DNA evidence have free'd a number of men on release row in a range of states, because it proved they did not commit the crime they were convicted of.
this is one grounds why a lawyer represents the guilty. A advocate may look at the justice of a sentence for an admit crime-is it consitent with the norm--variety of reason. And finally, in most cases it is not a throw away of the taxpayers money --a citizen is guaranteed representation if he can not afford it when charged with a crime. Once convicted of that crime--any appeals--typically do not come from the establishment. there is no constitutional guarantee of an attorney for a convicted personality.
I'm sorry, Asker, but this is a "straw" question. First things first: the insanity defense is CLAIMED surrounded by about 1% of criminal cases. Of the cases contained by which it is asserted, the defendant prevails on it in single about 10%. So, if my math is correct, with the sole purpose about 0.1% of adjectives criminal defenses are acquitted on the ground of insanity. So you see, the nouns of the insanity defense isn't the epidemic that Hollywood, John Grisham (pox be upon him), and junk report make it out to be.

As to why convicted criminals carry lawyers -- grasp, preliminarily, that courts have the power to ASSIGN an attorney to represent such being. As far as I know, legal practice is the with the sole purpose profession whose members are REQUIRED to work for free (or vastly close to free) when told to do so by the court, as a condition of maintaining their license. If a authority told you you are representing Mr. So-and-so, you can't do anything about it; and short of your client trying to butcher you, you have to provide him beside the best possible defense.

What taxpayers pay these lawyer is a fraction -- in frequent states a small one -- of what they make surrounded by private practice. In some states, like New Jersey, an attorney may be forced to represent a criminal defendant even in need this meager compensation, but completely for free. So trust me: money isn't the incentive here. Being forced to represent the person is the principal reason, but some others include an attorney's interest within the legal issues presented by the travel case.

A conviction does not necessarily foreclose the issue of guilt, and neither does a confession. People tend to confess to a lot of things given sufficient incentive -- close to a plunger shoved into their nether regions. Without you pointing to a specific -- and real -- defence, I cannot tell you more. But, enjoy you ever heard almost more than a dozen people who be on death row within Illinois and were completely exonerated of their crimes? If it hadn't be for their lawyers, the State would hold put all these innocent populace to death. I wouldn't call upon the vindication of an innocent person a lavish of taxpayers' $$ (two-dollar sign, not four).

Is it true that truth is an absolute defense against slander and libel?

what in the region of taking a voicemail and making it public?
Answers: It is not slander and libel if it is the truth. That being said you would hold to be able to prove it as truth, not merely "well I suspect it is so, as a result it is so".

Publishing someones voice mail may be a different misdemeanour as I know in some places you hold to have blessing to record..although one must be aware they are mortal recorded if they are departing voice mail.
Yes, truth is an real defense to slander and libel.

Making voicemail recording public may be a difference offense completely.
You can't dictation somebody's voice without first notify them that you are. Obviously a person going away a voice mail know they are being record so they couldn't claim that.
If they said it and you have it record, you can let associates hear it.
Yeap if it's true it's not slander or defamation or libel.

Las Vegas felony laws are watered down?

OJ is now facing 11 serious felony charges.
kidnap, robbery, and assault with a deathlike weapon
Two counts of first-degree kidnapping respectively term of 15 years
Two counts of robbery beside use of a deadly weapon, a felony, mandatory 2-15 years surrounded by prison, plus a possible additional 1-15 years for use of a weapon.
Burglary while surrounded by possession of a deadly weapon, felony, 2-15 years.
Coercion next to use of a deadly weapon, a felony, 2-12 years surrounded by prison
Two counts of assault with a mortal weapon, felony, 1-6 years.
Conspiracy to commit kidnapping, felony, 1-6 years.
Conspiracy to commit robbery, felony, 1-6 years.
Conspiracy to commit a crime, gross misdemeanor, 1 year surrounded by county jail

I conjecture that the $125,000 bail is pretty small for the charges he is up against.
And not only that - but he get to go rear legs to Florida?

Here we go again huh??? I bet he walk away with a fine.

He is facing - 41 - 105 years

http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-09-1...
Answers: We can one and only hope there is no see card played in the jury and that the Karma he deserves, he get like the piece of slime that he is
Ok is very well on his way to dying or a long put in prison sentense and dying,

because of his life style someone more insane than him will oh never mind.

He may pause it so he can be in the composition one last time.
The guys on the video will not verify the tape have not been tamper with. The guy that made the cassette called OJ and told him where on earth to find his stolen goods. The guys next to the goods that be stolen from OJ turned out to be guys he knew. Can you enunciate set-up? It is known OJ have a temper, I believe the adjectives thing be set up to take power of that temper.

Where will the jena six rally be held? Jena 6?

if anyone know a link or the exact location please permit me know!!! thank you
Answers: Jena's Courthouse.
It's being held surrounded by Jena It's pretty much a one road town so if you can find Jena you'll probably find the rally.

Does anyone know of any legitimate sites that I can look up conditions checks, and criminal background checks?

I've gotten on a few sites so far one: "direct screeing," and the other: "lattice detective." Both are rips offs! Nothing but a big scam to get your $12-$29! The solely information I received for my money was the SAME information I typed into them! To receive "more" you must money MORE, and than they want you to obligate yourself to a "monthly fee" to boot! (What a SCAM!) If there's a non-rip off and legit site out here where I could do for-real milieu /criminal checks, (for a one time fee,) I'd sure similar to to know! I'd really appreciate it if anybody out there could give support to me. Thank you in credit!
Answers: www.backgroundbureau.com

or

www.intellicorp.net
hello, i devise best people scour and background check website is http://www.peoplefind.network

Under what immunity statute can I sue a county contained by Texas?

I have be charged a late charge for a Dallas County property tax gift that was not in arrears. I am wanting to sue Dallas County to get reimbursed for this tardy payment but they are proverb they have imperviousness and I must site a statute athorizing my right to sue. Does Dallas County have imperviousness? Is there a statute I can use giving me the authority to sue? How does one step about contesting this delayed payment contained by a court of law?
Answers: You are going to sue over a delayed payment...resembling what is it? A half percent per month on the outstanding amount.

Do you enjoy proof that your payment wasn't delayed? If you do you should certainly obtain the fees back. If not, shame on you, you should preserve all bills and proof of stipend for at least a year.

EDIT: Wait...are you arguing that your compensation was never deferred..or your 8th Amendment right...you have to chose one or the other...to argue your 8th amendment right would be similar to conceeding your payment be late and you are guilty of the assessment but for the amount..
Yes, they have governmental imperviousness. You could try citing the Texas constitution, Article I, Section 17, which prohibits a "taking" without due process.

But in the past you run off to the courthouse, you entail to check into the whole due process entity. What steps did the county take formerly they assessed the late excise. What procedures are available to you at the county to have the belatedly fee reviewed?

It is usually quicker and cheaper to follow their rules than to struggle for a opening around governmental immunity.
You hold to file a claim against a public entity back you can sue them in court. Since you will never, ever grasp a lawyer to backbone you up on this and help you on sketch of your 8th Amendment thing, run to their website and file a claim.

Need an excuse to give my woman boss!?

My brother is down for a 2 days holidays and i want to take sour, what should i tell my boss? plus, it cannot be anything medical because i would necessitate an actual medical certificate from a hospital.what excuse should i detail to get 2 days rotten?
Answers: Tell her the truth. You're brother is coming and you'd like to lift 2 days off. You didn't right to be heard when your brother was coming. Most places ask for some catch sight of so they can properly prepare their schedules. However, if you are already programmed to work, see if you can get someone to switch schedule with you, or newly work for you on those days. But by all money, ask your boss. She might say OK, if she say no, well, that's her perogative. You won't lose your position for asking. You will for lying or just not coming contained by, it is a responsibility you have and the job have to attain done. At any rate, if you can arrange to have coverage or if the calendar has not be made yet for that time, and she still say no, you might want to work for someone else. Most supervisors are not that mean.
That you want two days stale to see your brother and you will take a cut contained by pay or will kind up the time otherwise.

Agreed...what does a woman have to do beside it? Except that she will be on to you if you try to say you enjoy menstrual cramps.
Um...how 'bout: "My brother is coming to town"?

Hell, I've gotten days off for even smaller number auspicious events.
I would just notify my boss the truth...but if you cant do that then here's a few:

A funeral of a close friend or home member out of town
Couldnt capture a babysitter
Car Broke down
Jury Duty

Thats all I can believe of
good luck
I'm a big devotee of the truth. You don't have to remember a bunch of lies that bearing.

What's up with Federal Law approaching the legality of the State Lotto?

I asked this interrogate before: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

and did some research. And Its seem that the government will "legalize" anything they can label money from. For example: Isn't the lottery a numbers racket, which is a federal offense? and a form of making a bet, also illegal? and is Pornography simply videographed prostitution, which is illegal?
Answers: Federal canon governs things that affect more than one state. For example, prostitution is legitimate in Nevada, but transporting women over state lines for the purpose of promoting prostitution is a defilement of the federal Mann act.

Same next to the lottery. Gambling is legal in some states, but promotion of a multi-state, private lottery will violate federal law. Federal imperative does not regulate the super lottos run by several states together, because the states themselves are sovereign and the federal government have no jurisdiction to stop this state-sanctioned activity.
Well to clarify.
Gambling is not unfair Federally , neither is Prostitution for that matter. They are bent in states with the sole purpose.

I guess the idea just about the lottery , is that its okay because the state makes sure its "fair"
No. To adjectives of your questions.
It is up to the State to determine if it is endorsed. For example, in some parts of Nevada, prostitution is allowed.
It is up to the States to make law that cover everything that is not specifically given to the Feds to variety laws on (which by the process is something that keeps getting chiseled away by those that want an adjectives powerful federal government).

More Questions and Answers:
[1842] - [1656] - [2546] - [113] - [142] - [2033] - [2502] - [1715] - [1097] - [1560] - [644] - [971] - [1888] - [2423] - [1161] - [2201] - [629] - [1668] - [2099] - [933]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: