Law Questions and Answers

What happens to the monies remunerated in fines? Where does it turn? How is it used?

Answers: It runs the criminal courts eg ushers wages. (not magistrates wages as these are unpaid) Some go to the criminal injuries compensation. Some to victum support

AND the bulk go to the legal aid board or very soon known as the legalized services commission,
it initially goes to fines clerk within each policiing nouns.
Some of the money is immediately returned into the organization to keep it running, the rest go straight into HM treasury for the policy to decide where on earth its going.

NOT ONE SINGLE PENNY GOES TO POLICE POCKETS

Appalling!!?

What is our society coming to. My brother who is 13 years of age got jump today when he was contained by school by a boy within the year above him. My brothers friend warned him this boy be going to jump him so my brother turns around contained by self defence and this boy starts swinging him around on the floor and smacks him within the face breaking his eyeglasses causing a black eye and swelling to the obverse. My brother hits the boy back surrounded by self defence as any average personage would do, and the police get involved. But what I'm appauled by is the reality the police say it's a prank and that this other boy can press charges also 4 a thump in the stomach, and my brothers friend can't be a witness because he's a friend and be the only being there. So if this be in the street and someone get seriously injured what would the police to.This is again what I think as the police trying to put general public off and they don't want to be sitting contained by the office file a report.This boy who hit my brother is known as a bully.Disgusting
Answers: The Police hold a term for this, it's call," Batting"
Sounds like you found any a lazy officer or an extremely busy one. Either road what you are describing is a section 47 assault Offences against the creature act . Report it by note direct to the Superintendent of the Police Station.
Complain to through the police complaints system and take him away from the conservatory. This is totally unacceptable surrounded by today's society. Bullying is not a prank. Threaten to sue the school if they don't tighten up their anti-bullying policy and engagements.

Do not ever accept that bullying is a prank. It is wicked, discriminatory and unacceptable.

EDIT

Look at this - a boy of 14 died contained by what is described as a "scuffle" wonder if that is the subsequent step up from a "prank" in modern Police argot. Violence and bullying is never acceptable.
you enjoy just made the covering for the reason this country is contained by such rapid decline.
the authorities own lost all sense of commonsense. the system we hold today breeds hate, intimidation and criminal behaviour because nearby is no justice of fairness surrounded by the system.

soon we will have a system explicitly worse than the one Mugabe has within his hell hole. if we as citizens don't stand up and take the UK backbone and make our leaders see commonsense soon. we will be stuck contained by such a downward spiral we wont ever be able to return.

immediately you know why there is so much trouble and intimidation, the law making EU have seen to it that we will become the worst place contained by Europe to raise kids enjoy a home or even no safe street to way of walking on.

we are a dieing nation, i for one am ashamed more of us don't stand up to change this.

i am sorry for your brother i hope he is OK
J H is right - of late because they are kids it doesn't mean it isn't a crime - police complaints will assist - local the Fourth Estate may give you a voice as capably.

why is it that when kids are being deal with they hail as it bullying and when it's adults they call it intimidation and assault - if the police officer child was the sufferer he might have more commitment.
We have a similar case at a university here, I mean, they seem to be to happen every daylight. If your mum can afford it, have her call for a lawyer and hold that lawyer write a notification to the school that you will transport action against them. That be all that be necessary here to obtain the school to do something.
It is really horrible what kids are talented off!

I was wrongly given an RE-4 reentry code to the USAF. What can I do to fight this?

Answers: No you cannot team up ANY branch of the service with a RE 4 code. And you never will. That is freshly the fact, if they start recruit penal battalions any time soon you might be capable of get within one. You can always unify the French Foreign Legion, Yeah it is that bad.

No you cannot obtain it changed to another RE code. Forget it now, it basically doesnt happen. Although at hand are people who will whip your money to tell you that conceivably you can, and govt employees who will pass you the run around for months till you figure it out.

RE4 is a red flag "we do not want you rear legs ever". Usually if you got an RE4 you will know why. AWOL, Drug or Acholol problems, Personality issues, etc, etc. It is not a code you bring when you have a chirpy enlistment.

It gets worse that RE4 is gonna rein in a lot of the elevated paying jobs you might otherwise qualify for latter. It is not the same, but treated as like as a felony conviction by lot of employers.

And RE-3 is the code for medical issues not RE-4

Is it feasible to prevent obscenity and overblown licence via the medium?

Answers: I thought the media be larglely engaged within promoting these things.
Well, ultimately, as a writer, and reader, I generally denounce censorship. And so, I enjoy to put up with an awful lot of Adam Sandler movies surrounded by the name of freedom of speech to ensure we shall verbs to be able to estimation a film journal of Lolita.

Now why didn't I think of this years ago?

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/afp/20070919/to...
Answers: Oh God! ;) xx
LMFAO:

"Neither God nor his/her spokespersons could be contacted for comment"

Hopefully this armour will set a precident and we can all sue god for everything that's gone wrong contained by the world. What about suing the devil for making me butter? (after tempting me to drink all those cakes)
So he requirements to waste the courts time, to illustrate that the courts dribble away time.
Yeah right up there next to the GOV. spending $100 mil for a study on how to save money.
what subsequent will be on the news
that made me screech x
Because you dont want to sue me surely?
Verily i say Beware ye miserable sinners lest thy iniquitous thoughts shalt followeth thee close to a thief within the night,for adjectives the days of thy existence

Why is it OK for a detective to lie to someone mortal interrogated?

the law states that the detective can speak anything or write anything on the paper to carry a confession!!! as long as he does not use force!!!

why is it ok for the police to lie, but if you fib to a police officer you will be charged for obstuction of justice?
Answers: To trick a criminal into confessing. A number of criminals confess after they are told that they enjoy evidence against them, a witness, or one of there partner is talking. They are doing it to prevent adjectives crimes and to get equality. If you lie to the police, you are enable future crimes and preventing equality.

Just remember this. Only way a fish can carry hooked is if it opens its mouth. If you are self quested as a suspect, do not right to be heard anything but your name, address, ssn, date of birth, and I want my attorney.
This is really a two part press. First, why is it legally adjectives. It is legally suitable because the information obtained by lying to the suspect is still deem reliable and has not be coerced. The test for coercion is an end one, not a subjective one. That means that it does not thing what the officer believes, the circumstances are what matters. If we affianced in a subjective try-out and the officer were wrong in relation to his beliefs would we view the evidence obtain as suspect? For example, if the officer really believed that DNA evidence had be obtained at a crime scene and he or she told that to the suspect who next confessed; would we throw out that confession if we later found out the officer be mistaken?

Even though the police may mislead the suspect into believing that the evidence against him is stronger than it is or the consequences are more dire, that doesn't amount to a due process violation.

The second examine is whether it is morally acceptable. I imagine most people conscript an ends justifies the process test here. I disagree, however. I would submit that it is morally correct not because of the finishing result but because of the nature of the circumstances. Police are forced to enter into a world within which they do not live. They go undercover, they interrogate despicable populace, etc. They cannot be themselves in such situations and they must be given the tools to communicate near these suspects. If we prohibit them from lying, what constitutes a lie? If an officer tell a suspect "I can understand why you kill your wife" is that a lie?

The constitution provides underlying protections from abuse and torture, not that you be treated resembling a boy scout.
Always remember, "You have the right to remain silent".
Make them prove what they hold charged you with.
Why formulate their job easier?
The interrogation technique of lying to a suspect is on the level. For future quotation, remember that you have the right to remain silent. Most relatives do not realize how important that little sentence is but any time the police press you about anything, remember Mr Policeman is not your friend. He works for the DA's organization and if he wants a promotion, he'll use adjectives of the sly interrogation techniques he's be trained to use to get information from you that will give a hand him solve the case. Whenever advise of your rights, USE them. Not one peep after identify yourself and nothing within writing. Let your attorney speak for you. That's why you pay him.

Regarding Criminal Injuries Claim?

When I was a child I suffered from years of rough up which I won't go into detail just about (By my uncle who babysat me at weekeneds) this has made me other question things and I find it frozen to trust people. Before culture have a be in motion at me for claiming money it was truly the police who told me to do so when I was 16.

I suffer from doomed to failure flashbacks, panic attacks, hold scars on my body and am slightly deaf within one ear due to him holding it against a speaker at full volume and sometimes require a hearing aid.

It's took since I be 17 and they're still sorting out this claim, why does it take so long for anything to surface and why does the organiasation now state that they craving me to submit photographs and evidence of this, what do you think will ensue once I do this and do you see me recieving anything?

Thank you for your advice
Answers: unfortunatly due to a huge number of fraudulant claims by individuals the CICA had to alteration, it now simply pays out for injuries worth over 1000 and can take anything up to two years for the money to be get to you, depending on how quickly police report reoprts and how proactive people are contained by chasing your case, I dont know if you hold already but contact your local victim support group, they can assist you with the form and craft sure everything is in command.
you should submit anything they ask for as any delays will one and only hold up your case but it might be worth speakig to any victim support or the police officer you delt with to gain pictures.
It will steal time but you will receive money, and also I think you are totally entitled to claim money, to be precise what the CICA is there for, its remarkably different from accident claims 'no win no fee' type companies .
I desire you the best of luck in achievement the compensataion and also with the rest of your existence after this highly traumatic expereience
Thee CICA own a very willing to help website which I have given you the interconnect to below.
The CICA operates on a tariff organism and depending on what band your injuries topple into, will determine your award.
There are 19 levels of compensation for physical/sexual mishandle injuries ranging from 1,000 to 33,000. More details on the site.
You may consider seeking the sustain of a personal injuries solicitor - especailly if there is a question-mark over the appropriate tariff.
Although as within is a nil costs regime in the CICA within is no 'no win, no fee' option for you. You'd own to pay the solicitor out of your award.
On the facts you've given you will receive an award minus question.
Its a long process because of down time between incidents and the claim. Usually this would fail the longer it took to breed a claim

BUT

They are probably struggling with the reality that he has be prosecuted for the offence (so liability and proof is there)
AND a child would not customarily speak out until their adult life span about such things

They are a moment ago trying to get it right

Wills, my father is wealthy and i am his one and only child,?

he is divorced from my mum, and is living with another woman who have a son who is not his, where will I stand if he dies in need a will? And if he has made a will and departed me out, could I contest it?
Answers: In the UK there is no such article as a common tenet marriage regardless of the amount of time a couple may enjoy lived together.

However if your father and her have a mortgage contained by common or he have put her on the deeds of property he already owns or they buy a property jointly after she is entitled to her share as she will be a part owner. Without a will his share will budge to his heirs.

Without a will after his blood heirs would inherit but she could possibly claim as a dependant (along near her son) on the grounds that she would face substance hardship though this would be convoluted and drawn out and at best she would simply be entitled to a reasonable amount as approved by the court.

If he is a wealthy man I would assume he have made a will. He may have gone bequests to a number of different folks and if you are included then it would be strong for you to contest(though you could ask for a larger share - doesnt mean you'd gain it). If you are not included then you own the right to contest this but you would have to show appropriate cause ie this could be on the grounds that your grandparents moved out him money that was also to be used for your benefit and he didnt take out their wishes. A genuine rationale stands more chance of succeeding than freshly you feel your entitled as his child.

A will can be invalidated if you can prove it when itwas made the testator be of unsound mind or suffering from undue coercion(difficult to prove).

You may like to look at the following association as it details the intestacy guidelines/rules(when there is no will how the money is divided).

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/infoa...

NB If your grandparents will specifically stated you be to be "looked after" and he has not carried out descendant wishes you have grounds very soon to take him to court underneath their will.
Slightly sinister question. but.

If your dad is not married to this other woman, the you would be his sole descendant... Yes it would all be in motion to you. If he is married, then his wife would go and get it all.

If he have made a new will and not here you out, you can contest it, but you would be unlikely to get anything, unless you can prove he be not of sound mind when the foreign will was made...

Finally, if you are the sole descendant.. fancy being my mistress ?
There is a current review which is looking into placing a definitive time degree on the length of cohabitation past there is a legalized claim to an estate if someone dies intestate, the period individual mentioned is 2 years.

You as next of kin would hold first claim on his monies at present though I would imagine this may make happen some conflict.

The most simple thing to do would be to speak to your father and put adjectives affairs in command while he is alive.
If he dies without making a Will, you will inherit everything as his closest relative. If he's married it would fluctuate.

If he leaves you out of his will, you'd have to prove that he intended to give notice you something and/or his will was made lower than duress or whilst he was of "unsound mind" if you needed to contest it, you'd need to hope legal guidance.
If he has made a will (and he probably have, if he's any sense) your father can leave his money to whoever he like.

Happened down here recently, an dated biddy left her not inconsiderable fortune to a series of cats homes and other animal charities and the home couldn't do a thing around it despite contesting it. She was clearly of nouns mind when she did it, and that was that. She'd even taken the precaution of including a psychiatrist's report as she anticipated disputes.

It'll really depend on the situation when dad eventually pops past its sell-by date, which hopefully won't be just all the same. I should just capture on with your life span.

Is it wrong for Colleges to have communist leaders speak at the college?

I have recently hear of a professor of some college that invited the leader of Iran to come over to our country and speak at the college. I surface that since Iran is in bed beside North Korea, and North Korea was a moment ago busted because they were making and distrubiting counterfiet American Money surrounded by the United States and Iran is very choral about human being anti-American, this guy should not be allowed to speak in our Universities, and the Idoit that invited him should be tossed out of the Country or thrown within jail because I get the impression that he is a security threat to our Nation. People approaching that are threats to this wonderful country and they need to be deal harshly next to, because they sacriface the saftey of all the other culture in America. When they sacriface our saftey, I quality that they should loose their rights. Just like criminals, when their travels harm or thwart another persons rights they should loose adjectives of their rights. This is how we need to treat this college professor. He's a Trader!
Answers: "The lone communists left surrounded by North America are the teachers at American university and Castro in Cuba." Don't know who said it, but the engagements and words of a lot of college professors are proving it to be true.

I agree, these individuals are so anti-American that they are traitors and should be forced to live in Iran or North Korea or Afganistan or Iraq or Darfur or Mexico, etc.Wonder if they could live lacking electricity and running water?
No, neither the president of Iran or the professor should enjoy anything bad crop up to them.

First of all, the head of Iran IS NOT going to commit a crime while he is here. He will always be surrounded by police and stealthy service agents.
Second, I doubt he would come for fear of assassination.

Yes, he is a tyrant and adjectives that, but what is going to happen if he comes? He's going to communicate sh*t and a bunch of college students are going to boo him off stage? The leading light of Iran meets beside American and World leaders all the time. He is a world editorial column, not a terrorist (not directly anyway). He will try to give a motivational speech something like how Iran is trying to be peaceful, it will be a camouflage and no one will believe him, and perchance he'll do some questions and answers that'll shut in him off guard.

Props to the professor. When you demur to listen to your enemies side, why should they listen to you? When you discard to hear their word, you too are causing hostility in our world. A denial of communication and understanding cause a lot of problems contained by our world.

Take what the leader of Iran say with a pellet of salt and know that he is evil, but pilfer the opportunity to listen to someone the whole world have their eye on.
I feel that you represent everything to be precise wrong with America today.

First, the syntax, spelling and sentence structure of the above rant is something that I would expect to see from an eigth grader, and a poorly educated one at that. Second, it shows that you are impressively closed minded, to the point of being a bigot. Third, it's marked that you didn't go to the speech to hear what this person have to say, and even so you condemn it.

Free speech shouldn't be limited to the 'heat, fuzzy' stuff. It's important to hear ALL sides of EVERY issue earlier making up your mind.
It's really a major nouns case. I agree beside you 100% that it is wrong for this so-called professor to invite the leader of Iran into this country, permit alone our colleges.

The problem is that there are also deeply of far-left extremists who think at hand is nothing wrong beside the ways of a communist country and even insist that the U.S. converts to communism. Therefore, no ethics are mortal violated (in their minds).

**For those who believe that this question is not learned, I'd like to ask you if you'd consent to Hitler (if he were alive) into our country so that he can speak to our college students?
within order to net good judgement within our lives, dont u think its a accurate idea to hear both sides?

CRITICAL THINKING is what arts school attempts to teach us.
While Bruce J's words be a tad rough, I agree with him. This professor should NOT, underneath any circumstances, be thrown in prison newly because he wants to expose his students to other points of view throughout the world.

While we may not agree with seriously of Iran's president has to voice, he has the right to influence it, especially since he's a head of state, on his own soil, not ours. But he's a non-issue compared to the impression that you want to throw the professor in incarcerate.

The professor has done nought illegal, and a short time ago because, you do not agree with what he's doing, does not be paid it wrong. And he is certainly not a traitor, and does not deserve to stir to jail. And he is most plausible a U.S. citizen, and cannot be "kicked out". Doing either of these is something Iran would probably do, not the U.S. And we don't have need of to be like Iran.

Also, I don't infer he's a Communist. More like a thorn contained by a very fleshy nouns of the body.
Dear gigi exchange of ideas and research is what higher research is all something like.I know that ignorance can be bliss sometimes but Iran is not a communist state.The fear of thinking is what has gotten us into the mess we are surrounded by now beside leaders who can not speak their mother tongues leading ancestors who wear political affiliations on their sleeve.We need plentifully more free thinkers contained by our midst and that is what college would do.Don't be afraid of `decent,bring adjectives ideas and concepts into the frothy so we can expose them or we live like Napoleon and his bunch "four legs well brought-up Two legs bad"

I got kaught!=[?

i am a 13 going to be 14 year elderly girl and i got caught yesterday tagging
i am charged next to vandalism:deface of property and my court date is on nov 15
i wanted to know what punishments are possible that i might grasp
it was reported as a felony not a misdemenor
and i be caught wit 4 other girls and we all get felonies
plus ive be truant 2 school alot this year and enjoy bad grades
Answers: you will catch probation and a fine, probably many hours of community service.

Sucks to be you, you in recent times really screwed yourself.

felony's are no joke.

verbs up your act in the past you are a bum loser who can't make anything of themselves...
your police and D.A. must be terrifically bored

Cheers
your parents might pay the damages.
And an investigation could commence to see why your parents are failing to keep you inline.

your parents must be outstandingly very proud.
If youre out to obtain back at them, youve succeeded.

If youre parents are smart -- theyl;ll dispatch you off to a boot military camp academy
Sorry Yvette- your screwed.

What were you thinking? (I guess u can share I'm a Dad.)

Here's what MIGHT help you, but I can't promise it WILL assist you.

CLEAN IT UP! Clean it up better than it was formerly you started your artwork. If whatever goal you defaced wants to be repainted, then do it (with the approval and full knowledge of the owner) Get right contained by school and show that you're sorry for what you did and you'll never do it again. Give the believe to be a reason to show leniency and they may be more inclined to do so.

Good Luck
What I notice about your sound out was "I get caught" to me that means you've be doing this a long time.

Seems you think it's okay to vandalize other peoples property - bet you'd bring upset if it was yours. According to your style of thinking it would be okay for me to enter your home and "tag" your bedroom. - it's the same as you doing that to anyone else.

If this is your first time to seize "caught" then they may newly go unproblematic on you and give you community service and probably some days in juvenile lobby.

If you were my kid I'd insist on counseling and some days contained by juvenile hall.

You involve help and swift = and that is so glum.

You are so young and surrounded by 5 years you will be considered an adult and your charges will be heavier and your time contained by jail profoundly more.

This is how I see it === you have 4 or 5 years to numeral out how you'll spend you lifetime.

It really is up to you.
Sounds like to me that you're unremorseful you were tagging but you're really sorry you get caught doing it. If you won't go to institution, you're about to find out that experience is a much harsher coach than any in a classroom.

I own a niece in an Oklahoma prison for transporting dope. She be wild at your age too. Started doing matching kind of stupid stuff as you at almost the same approach, then graduate to dope. Dope was an comfortable way to trade name money she said. She got 15 years and is looking at doing every morning of it and she's got two kids. Was she stupid? Yes. Are you on equal kind of causeway? Yes. Wise up, kid, the world gets a great deal tougher once you reach 18.
I don't know what the punishment is, but I hope it involves you busting your butt scrub ignorant graffitti past its sell-by date of public walls where we adjectives have to see the puke. You're similar to a dog marking its realm with piss. They should trademark you tag respectively others cars and personal belongings so you see how annoying it is to have some punk come doodle on your personal stuff.
When I was 13 and 14 I be working hot weekends at a swap meet concession stand making some piddily amount per hour. You inevitability to grow up fast or you'll grow up aft bars.
You better straighten up since you turn 18 and this stuff permanently affects your diary.

You will probably be fined, forced to clean up the property you vandalize and you will probably serve time in juvenile detention.

More Questions and Answers:
[2474] - [1856] - [140] - [1837] - [1331] - [2279] - [1439] - [1278] - [168] - [1004] - [2085] - [840] - [1825] - [520] - [1724] - [254] - [394] - [1835] - [946] - [265]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: