Law Questions and Answers
Did you know this about the Jena 6 shield?
The jury was adjectives white because out of the 350 black summons for jurors in LaSalle Parish 0 showed up.Mike Bell have been convicted of 1 disorderly crime in the and arrested within 3 others.
At least one witness to the attack said that they jena 6 shouted cultural slurs at the white student they attacked.
This is a hate crime and could increase the sentence by almost 25% - 45%.
Bells current bail is 90k.
Not one of the several civil rights fighters has gather 90k to bail this person they assume innocent out of penal complex.
Prosecutore was stupid.
School super be stupid.
Noose hangers be stupid
5 kids attacking one kid was stupid
Mike Bell is a crimminal.
Give the 5 anything is normal for assault within the state, and throw Bell the book at Bell before he kill someone.
Answers: Yep a very big difference between a rope within a tree and a boy beaten till he be unconscious and beyond for what a word if that.
The boy have blindness and a swollen head and still have headaches which as expected a doctor can't determine the cause and nonetheless grown people can't figure out why they want these poor innocent jena 6 locked up.
If it were me or my kid I'd lock them up and everyone here know they would too.
Nope I'm not a racist just confused as to why they a white boy getting worsted means nought while a rope in a tree which hurt not a soul physically is more imprtant.
It's all enormously complicated, it's not just some messy beating of kids. It be blown to porportions by the law system. While the kids be wrong for attacking the man, the kids were acting for a purpose that they feel they had be wronged. The incident was still on conservatory grounds. The kids should have be suspended or expelled as any other "student" would, not sentanced to 5-15 years in prison for acting against a cultural slant done by this man.
You say that the men be wrong but if a black man went up to your house and put KKK hat on your front lawn, would you not be sensitive. You say the black men should be convicted but what more or less the white individual that was agree to off minus any consequence. Don't you think that our officially recognized system should do something about that or is it freshly fine? Ignorance should have consequences only as acting bluntly. That's the purpose of the Jena 6 march. If this have been 5 white men do you construe they would have gotten such lofty sentances? Do I need to show examples of when they havn't? I'll agree to you think in the order of that.
When I read about the valise my first thought was that nearby will be a lot of presumptuous white relations posting ignorant, arrogant question and answers in Y!A politics.
I wonder when our country will frontage the undeniable fact that blacks and latinos receive harsher sentences than whites for committing like peas in a pod crime.
"Not only is in that almost no media coverage of the Black lawless hate crimes against Whites, but within high profile cases when Blacks are prosecuted for heinous crimes against innocent Whites, the White victims are without being seen and the Black criminals are turned into “real victims” by the media.
Nothing more clearly illustrate this point than what has occur over the past year surrounded by Jena, Louisiana and the orgy of hatred that Jena have suffered. today, September 20, the town has be invaded by thousands of thugs like Al Sharpton who wish to make destructive Black hate criminals such as Michael Bell and the rest of the so-called “Jena Six” into hero. Even worse the entire White population of the town is facing a media lynching by individual labeled racists who are incorrectly persecuting Black childlike men.
Michael Bell, who has be convicted of four previous violent crimes, (a certainty scarcely revealed by the media), led a group of six Black students to attack and unmercifully pulsate a White Student at Jena High School in what can lone be described as a vicious hate crime. Motivated by tribal hatred, the six Blacks attacked one lone White student, Justin Barker. They stomped and kicked him to blackout and continued to kick him and stomp him as he lay helpless. The attack could hold easily hold taken his life if others have not intervened. Only by the grace of God did he survive.
To show the insane bias of this whole suitcase, just predict if the facts were reversed.
If a gang of six Whites motivated by cultural hatred and lead by a White with four previous violent-crime convictions have attacked a lone Black student, kicking and stomping him into unconsciousness, would here any concern that the leader and the other White gang member could be charged with aggravated assault? Would not within be national demands to charge the White attackers with the most serious of federal civil rights violation and hate crimes? White leaders from adjectives over the country, even the leaders of the local town of Jena, would not be defending the White attackers, they would be condemning the attacks and calling for the harshest of punishments allowed by the law.
As far as the Media are concerned, oh yes the supposedly impartial media, they would be interviewing the Black martyr on every TV talk show across the home, discussing his fear, his throbbing, his suffering. They would be interviewing his crying relatives and friends. They would not be voicing any fear that the White attackers would be treated too coarsely. No, they would be demanding the harshest of penalties.
Federal official from the President on down would be calling for additional serious charges of federal civil rights violation. But you see, in the America of 2007 Whites are no longer deem to have any “civil rights.”
When a lone White kid is defeated savagely by a gang of six hate criminals, the medium is only concerned in the order of how the Black attackers are being treated too brutally. And if you are waiting for civil rights charges to be filed against the Black attackers who violated the civil rights of the boy they almost time to death, don’t hold your breath.
The entire Jena scenario and the coverage of it by the medium show once again that it is not the people of Jena who are racist. By voting for me and by demanding justice surrounded by this case, they enjoy shown rightly that they believe in fairness to adjectives and that White people are very soon the real victims of racism within America. Once again it is shown that we must have advocate for our rights and heritage just as any other group is permitted to do so.
May the District Attorney and the nation of Jena stay strong and never give contained by to those who seek appropriate away their rights of life and autonomy as guaranteed by the United States Constitution."
All people are asking for is that they be charged near and given appropriate sentences. Few people believe they should attain off short a conviction of some sort.
Just a suggestion, you should work on your grammar and spelling if you are going to send for others stupid. EDIT: I was not wise saying that grammar or spelling be prerequisites for discussion on Yahoo. I was basically commenting on it because you chose to call a catalogue of other people stupid.
What exactally is"faint hope clause". Does it exsist contained by the Texas parole board system?
Answers: Faint hope is a Canadian law, so it does not exist within Texas. It states merely that prisoners serving the maximum sentence of life within prison without the possibility of parole for 25 years may apply for impulsive parole after serving 15 years.
It is called "woozy hope" because there is not much hope that parole will be granted.
DA drop charges if accused offer victim money,civil suit ?unjust?
If you file charges consequently the accused offer a payoff is it illegal to bear it without an attorney? beside an attorney?... do you file civil suit first or second how does this all work?Answers: I meditate you are saying that officer were charged, and the sufferer in the grip was compensated an amount of money to drop the charges?
No it's not illegal, it happen all of the time. True depending on the crime the DA can and will step through with the covering. But it's hard to achieve a conviction on a case when the object doesn't want to prosecute or is uncooperative.
It's called "settling out of court".
Ummm. this sounds shady. The DA files criminal complaints. There does not requirement to be a cooperating victim. In other words, the subject can say, "don't prosecute" but if the DA feel that they have a armour they will prosecute anyway. If the accused offeres money to a casualty in a criminal case-this is VERY ILLEGAL- it is call witness tampering and is a felony within most jurisdictions. However, if it is a civil satchel (i.e. one person suing another short the government prosecutors involved) after this would be a settlement offer which is allowed. You can accept the submission in lieu of a civil suit or profile a suit and seek a difficult award.
-It sounds to me like you should articulate to a lawyer.
What are the top priority areas for law practice surrounded by USA?
Answers: Criminal defense. You will never run out of customers.
Yes, and if you are a criminal yourself, that always help when you are a lawyer.
Whats the maximum sentence for domestic violence/assault?
after and argument i punched my girfriend in her backbone twice, this is my first time and there be no serious injury, she dindt get bruises or anything, i live surrounded by ohio.Answers: The maximum sentence is for her to do to you what you did to her. See how you like it.
She may not enjoy got physical bruises but what do you know more or less emotional bruises??
Do you think we should lift up the legal drinking age to 21?
Answers: That would stir down really well contained by the armed forces. You can imagine a 19 year infirm just support from deployment chilling out near a lemonade and having the sh*t ripped out of him by his mate.
I remember coming back from my first tour In N. Ireland as an 18 year old-fashioned. I would have loved self told I couldn't have a pint next to my mates because I be not considered adult satisfactory!!
You can get your brains blown out within Afghanistan or Iraq but you can't buy a can of beer, packet of fags, box of matches, wound or a tube of glue surrounded by the local supermarket because you're under 21 - what a fecking banter!!
At what point do you become an adult contained by this country capable of making your own decision - 21, 31, 41 there will still be dicks walking the streets no issue what age they are.
Too much nanny state - thats the real problem contained by this country.
Wouldn't be fair to the more matured 18yr olds in society
and if the decriminalized age were changed here would be more ways found to sneak drinks anyway.
I think it should be excluded altogether.
(for the first answered -in the UK the drinking age is 18) Yes and No, i'm 18 in feb and wldnt want it to jump up cos id miss out on the mega 18th boozer. and yes it should becos afterwards there would b smaller amount teenage drunks and kids drunk at 13 cos parents afford em alcohol!
Hmmm.
If it were raise then nearby would be less ethnic group drinking at places, so potentially less accident from drink driving.
But on the other hand if you tilt it, it will become even more appealing to some youngsters, and quite seriously of teenagers who drink lots because they cant become more mature when they hit eighteen and dont drink as excessively, so if you upped the check would there stupidity transport on until they were 21?
It's a tough one!!
For everyone from the US, this is YA UK and so this is a UK cross-examine where the age cut back is 18 years old.
Seeing as the infinite majority of people on YA are younger next i would think the bulk of the answers will be for a time biased.
Why not concentrate on people beneath the current age, breathalizer them and then fine them if they hold been drinking, first time lb30, later lb50, then lb100, etc.
It have to be policed properly first instead of the current 'blind eye' approach, and if that still doesn't stop the fighting, the yob lifestyle then tilt it to 21.
And to the 18-21yr olds on here, do you really want to see 14 to 17yr old children surrounded by the nightclubs your going into? See them throwing up everywhere?
As far as the UK (legal drinking age 18) i don't have an idea that it would help things. We stipulation to change the attitutude to alcohol minus that you will still get a few licensees selling beneath age or parents buying for their children.
Children need to be introduced to alcohol from a childlike age, with meal, and taight that it is normal, otherwise it become a great piece that adults do and it is portrayed that the only instrument to have a devout night out is to win "hammered".
I cannot believe the number of US responses to this question - they really do come up with they are the only country contained by the world, don't they ?
To answer the question - no. I can see where on earth you're coming from, but under 21s would verbs to drink illegally anyway. Better to ensure that the law we already have are properly enforced.
Noooooooooo!!!
[ Note to Americans: It's 21 for you... Not for us. This is a UK ask ]
from the UK
what would be the point
underage drinkers would still be doing it
the law say you have to be 18
how oodles 10,11,12,13yr olds go down the park and receive bladdered? It would still happen children inevitability to be better educated in the region of alcohol abuse
p.s. doesnt bother me economically over 21
but young children should not be drinking
No.
There are law that forbid the publican selling drink for anyone already under the influence.
The police should enact their powers and check on outlets surrounded by problem areas and bring prosecutions against those who ignore this existing decree.
are you ******* stupid?
I need a respectable website that have the laws for Puritan times - adultery.?
It wishes to be a website that I could reference contained by a project. Thanks!Answers: You'd do a lot better by going to a university library, anything you see online is suspect. Go to elder books that chonicle colonial life contained by America.
I'd start at the wikipedia and they usually have links to other reference.
Is it illegal to not reimburse holiday pay within wisconsin if the business was closed due to the holiday?
Answers: It is up to the employer if they want to rate you for holidays or not. they are not required to.
No work, no pay...
You have the holiday off, why should you obtain extra ?
How long after not making car payments does a lien holder jump out for repossession in Arizona?
What are the law in Arizona if you don't build your car grant and hide the saloon? I know someone who hasn't made their payment surrounded by at least 3 months and is hiding the vehicle. I DO NOT CONDONE THIS IT'S A FRIEND OF A FRIEND; I THINK ITS WRONG! Maybe if I present facts this personage will be wise and basically turn it in!Answers: I deliberate its three months
If you're said to be "innocent until proven guilty" meaning you can be arrested for no basis right?
Being arrested doesn't mean you did something discouraging, wrong, against law. They freshly think you did, or claim they believe you did, or saw you do it. Yes conceivably you didn't, but in travel case you dd, we'll arrest you, put you jail, and keep on for your court date or get bailed out. Maybe you didn't do anything but you are still mortal punished, locked up, your freedom of movement is restricted to a cell or room. You are innocent possibly but you are still locked up. You gotta wait until a sort out decides whether you are truely innoscent. Cops can't trademark that determination before arresting. Yes, th more existing evidence the better. But evidence or no evidence, you can still get arrested and put within jail. I believe you are drunk and driving because you smell like beer, approaching you can't stench of beer and not be drunk. Maybe someone spilled it on you. Maybe you are over the legal constrain though, we'll arrest you just surrounded by case. Your at one remove guilty of a crime but guilty enough to be arrested, locked contained by jail, etc.Answers: You can't be held in need probable cause. The police are not permitted to arrest anyone without intention.
The jury, not the judge, determines guilt or innocence.
But otherwise, you are unsophisticatedly right.
Is there a sound out here? In order to be arrested police must own probable cause, defined as a unbiased probability that a crime has be committed AND that the arrested person have committed that crime. As for your drunk driving example, if you smell like beer the cop will donate you a breathlyzer test and if you blow beneath the legal check you won't be arrested (unless you are underage and there is a not a drop law).
True you can be arrested if you are innocent, but specifically why the process does not end at arrest and you take a trial in front of a jury of your peers. Furthermore, the State have a very large burden of proof-"beyond a reasonable doubt."
Correct, technically, but they do obligation probable cause, any from the police directly, or proven through an arrest warrant.
Recall the opening to "Law and Order"
one group ( Cops ) arrests on the cause of reports by witnesses
and evidence found at the scene of a crime...
the other group ( prosecutors ) uses the evidence and testimony to tempt a judge or jury to convict, while a defense squad attempts to prove the prosecutors wrong.
No, innocent until proven guilty does not mean you can be arrested for no source.
You are obviously used to with the concept of probable motive, but you just disagree that in that was probable bring in the situation you describe. The cops disagree. That's why we hold courts.
And, yes, resisting arrest when you are being pulled contained by for drunk driving will make you look more guilty. Drunks are more expected to be combative and the guilty are more likely to try to flee.
The cops don't know what you smell resembling before they verbs you over. So what else happened that get their attention?
If you want to put on the best defense here, you need to procure a little more convincing about it.
Good luck to you.
More Questions and Answers:
[1458] - [637] - [2082] - [2430] - [1026] - [1477] - [2283] - [875] - [648] - [894] - [1605] - [1104] - [39] - [2236] - [2513] - [2200] - [2298] - [1163] - [902] - [485]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: