Law Questions and Answers

If you don't know the law, and its not a national directive?

and you get caught breaking it, are you liable for prosecution?
For instance, if I am going 60, but the speed mark out drops across state lines to 50 but there is NO documentation of that, can I be pulled over?

Answers: Does "Ignorance of the Law is no Excuse" ring a bell?

Yes, you are responsible for KNOWING the regulation wherever you are.

The answer to your quiz is simple, YES you can be pulled over for questioning. You know or you donot know that in that is a law existing contained by that place and you broke it, therefore you are liable to be prosecuted and be detain. Since the law have no time to annouce there promulgated decree's and procedings through journalists and other public outlet the government presume that adjectives citizen know the law. Yes you might enunciate that is stupid, not adjectives people know the imperative. Ignorance of the law is not an excuse to comply beside it.

I led my friend my credit cards but she is not paying off now, can i sue her?

I lead my friend my credits card 3 years ago and she promise (orally) that she would pay me put money on like one year following. She didnt keep her promise, and she still owe me $3500 right in a minute (2 years later). Its been a niggle in axx whenever i ask her to rate me back. She threaten me to exterminate her a few times and claimed that she would commit a suicide a few times when i ask her for the money. Can sue her? if yes, i am suing her for?

P.S.- she has a store. I am 100% sure she used my credit cards on her own credit electrical device on her store and i didnt sign anything. Can i sue her for stealing my credit cards?

Answers: Not to state the obvious, but what the heck be you thinking? Never lend money. If I say I'm lend money, I have the mentality and expectation that I will never see it again. It save lots of frustration like this. I agree near the guy about going to the CC company although I'm not sure what pious it will do after so long. I would talk to an attorney in the order of it. It also sounds like it might be a fun shield for those Judge Judy kinda shows as it would be small claims.

No . I'm sure that in your Credit card agreement it clearly states you must not organize your cards to anyone else.

You could get into trouble your self for doing such an incredibly stupid entry!

you can sue anyone it doesn't mean you will win

that's why you don't dispense your credit card to anyone , you don't get a Friend a phone you don't consent to your Friend have your pin number

come on these are adjectives common seance

neither a borrower nor a lender be

Stealing your cards? No, because you loaned the cards to her. I am not sure you can sue for an oral agreement t repay, but you are entitled to go to small claims court to ask. Without a written agreement, I don't know how much you can do, though. Obviously she isn't much of a friend, not solitary not paying you back but using excited blackmail.

Can a package sent thru UPS own an explosive within it?

I purely ordered a pre-owned movie on Amazon & had it sent to my house. It smells close to cigarette smoke, but nothing else. Someone within my family is paranoid & think it may explode and blow up the house. It was deliver yesterday & opened today, so wouldn't it hold exploded by now? BTW, the movie is It's A Wonderful Life, so why the heck would someone want to blow up a Christmas movie is beyond me. Help prove this is complete insanity! Thanks for the abet!

Answers: Oh, didn't they tell you? Osama is working as a shipper at Amazon.com presently! LOLOL!!
It probably smells like cigarette smoke because, somewhere along the approach, the packaging sit in a warehouse run by a smoker.
Bombs don't smell resembling cigarettes.
If the odour was suspicious, it never would hold made it to you the bomb squad would have be called to check it out in the past it even left the pick-up focus.

UPS is only one shipper that handle hazardous materials.
Explosives would have a different smell.

The model of the video smelling like cigarette smoke mortal an explosive device is utterly ridiculous. To answer your question, "Can a box sent thru UPS have an explosive inside it?", the answer is legally, no. Could it start? Of course it could. However the scenario which you describe sounds more like a crust of ignorance and paranoia.

Um...UPS (and Homeland Security) frown on that. I recommend you open the window and breath some fresh air.

ups won't adopt explosives

It could, but I seriously doubt yours does. It smells like smoke because it be pre-owned, period. Sometimes bubble wrap can gain a smoky aroma especially when warm but more potential it just get exposed to cigarette smoke from the previous owner. Enjoy the film it's one of the best!

UPS have regulations, but that doesn't mean it would be completely impossible to gain one through.

if the stench of cigarette smoke is the only entry that makes you suspect an explosive, later the chances are probably fairly slim. you say it's a pre-owned movie - be it shipped by the previous owner? if so, they're probably a smoker, and your movie reaks from being contained by their home.

first of adjectives, you're paranoid. second, it probably smells like smoke because the owner be a smoker. what do u expect, its pre-owned.

Did you know that your donations to the America Red Cross went towards?

Snacks and hose down stations for protesters of the Jena 6. Al Sharpton calls for a civil rights protest of an arrest of 6 black males, some of which have previous arrests for assault. When they are prosecuted for the 6 beating 1 white high-ranking school student to the ground and consequently stomping his head.

I've be giving to the Red Cross for many years through an automatic payroll assumption from my retired pay check through combined federal movement (CFC)

Never in my abundant years would have thought that the American Red Cross supplies Al Sharpton's protesters next to support. Al Sharpton is a fake. I'm not even sure he is a minister as he claims to be. Should the Red Cross be supporting his anti white agenda beside donation dollars. I don't think so... What do you expect?

Answers: you would have thought a soul would have shut up after looking resembling a fool for all the crap he said give or take a few the duke lacross players and then have the allegations almost undeniably proven to be completely false

and to the those contesting that, youre right... it doesnt say anything more or less the redcross in within. i read the article earlier and i know the author is relating the truth, that was contained by there apparently it get pulled from the article. i wonder if the red cross didnt like the publicity

I agree near you. I think they should lone be using the money to help innocent relations that are dealing with a diaster. It sounds approaching you are saying that they provided sea or something for the protesters?

If you have any links for info on this please post. I am interested, if found to be true I will never donate a penny to them again.

No- not when the Red Cross's position is to supply assistance at disaster sites.

I better see the Red Cross at my darn Christmas Parade handing out coffee afterwards by George.

Maybe they believe this rally to be a disaster? Idk

You hold been misinformed by definitely someone who doesnt like the American Red Cross. Our Funds move about towards Disaster Services and Educating our communities in Health & Safety.

Where surrounded by the Article does it mention the American Red Cross?

I dont mean anything show by the comments I have posted I a short time ago think that This article really requirements to be looked into and studied before decide that American Red Cross is indeed supporting the protesters. To me all this article is doing is speaking out for everyone when surrounded by reality this is simply one person's opinion. And I dream up I've must've read the wrong article because I am having a knotty time finding the American Red Cross in within. And of course I am not saying to believe me over a okay known site, I in recent times wanted to express some thoughts.

The connection you provide does not contain that language anywhere surrounded by the article and I cannot find that info in any Google or other online rummage through.

So, questioning your source is legal.

Should the government actively provoke people to marry?

I hold to write a paper and my design are kind of biased.

Answers: I should articulate no, its just going to increase the divorce rate.

Yes.
adjectives studies show that marriage stabalizes a society and have many other positive benefits.

I do not deem the government should own anything to do with it at adjectives. The original concept of marriage ceremony was and still is to some relatives, a commitment through GOD as a union to become a loved ones and have children lacking sinning. What part of this is governing body related, unless they are trying to make money from it.
Good luck near your paper.

The command should stay out of people's lives in that arena. They can reward nuptials by lowering taxes for married couples, etc., but how else can they actively encourage? A PR struggle? hmmm Those don't often work. First I deduce the govt. should work on actively encouraging people to stop have babies they can't afford to care for. That is primary. You can't fine-tuning it once you've had a newborn. Marriage you can always return with out of if necessary.

I just read an answer roughly speaking the Jena 6, and some girl said "those poor black kids" and felt bleak for them not..

the victim! How is this even possible?! How can you discern bad for 6 kids that batter down another? What kind of country is this?

Answers: lt's the cause why he was worsted you're failing to grasp. Sure this is America, so as Americans we all enjoy the right to be treated equally, and this is not showing up in this skin. They are trying to boys under assault, did you know to be exact a felony? Did you know that they will probably spend the beginning of their energy in a prison near murderers and theives? You think the white boy is the casualty because of your ignorance, he is the victim of an unnecassary assault, but he is also the attacker beside his racist actions. No one is saw the boy's were wrong, but it is an unreasonable treatment that they are recieving. These kids were students! There are other these kinds of incidents at large schools but own you ever heard of them individual tried for attempted murder? The kid should have be suspended or expelled, not treated as top listed criminals. If you read the report you would see that althought the white man's face be a bit swollen, he was still even competent to go to a social event next on that evening. They have blown this incident out of proportions and will organize to ruining the future's of 6 boys. If this had be a black on black crime do you think it would still hold been as prominent as it be? Think again.

There are a lot of misguided bigots out there- be ware.

ADD: Theo- you deduce those boys knew that what they be doing was a felony?
I guess if they didn't want to be contained by trouble they wouldn't have done it.
It's awfully simple they chose to commit a crime regardless of whatever crime soneone else committed- it is a crime
2 wrongs don't ever brand a right.

This is Mike Bells 5th arrest for violent crime too..

Have you read that anywhere?

>>What sort of country is this?<<

The kind of country that think that THREATENING violence (i.e., the rope in the tree) is WORSE than actual terror campaign (i.e., beating and stomping an comatose teenager).

to big dave, not even the culprits have ever suggested that their object made those nooses or ever did anything wrong.
he was overcome into unconsciousness for anyone white and being alone.

People forget give or take a few the actual victim of an incident such as this, and tend to appropriate sides based on other factor, such as:
race
religion
politics
etc.
What if 6 white kids have beaten a black kid? Where would these same complainers be sided next?
Remove RACE from it, and just utter that 6 kids beat 1 kid, and tolerate the courts do their job!!!!!

Are you some variety of communist? Lynching is a great American tradition, sanctioned by the State of Texas and the Bush Administration.

Isn't that what is going on in Iraq? We have a crime, rounded up a posse and tried to head them stale at the Kyber Pass. When that didn't work, we lynched a few other ******* to make ourselves touch safer. That's the American way.

Those poor young at heart black men just lynched a white boy, within our national tradition. They were self good Americans. Since they could not find the soul who hung up the nooses in the tree, they picked on the white boy they could find.

Hanging a rope from a tree (no one gets hurt)- 6 guys pummeling 1 scantily (he got hurt), which is worse?...?

I'm sure that anyone who saw this pulse down would be shocked, I know I would. 6 people defeat down one to the ground and kicking them can actually result in death. I know the kid didn't hold to get hospitalized, but give attention to about it, you own 12 feet kicking at this kid- what if one hit him within the head so strong that he suffered a major injury? I construe this should be treated as attempted murder. I don't care what color skin you enjoy, you should know that 6 on 1 is not right. Treat those kids like the pieces of %$@! that they are.

Answers: slight both sides to the conquering coup --,.. huh?say whuh?!

Isn't this a remarkably very discernible question?!?! And I agree near you totally.

Of course the person getting injured is worse. It's a felony.

Hanging ropes from a tree? It be maybe a vandalism of school policy, nearby is no crime involved, and nobody got hurt.

One bustle leaves scars on the outside...
the other leaves scar inside...

Is one different than the other ?
--------------------------------------...
''hippie nonsense,cracka ?

I don't contemplate so...read the actual article: the kid who got thumped attended a social function the subsequent day.

Lose the attitude and show that it's not adjectives
" Me, me, me only me."

What are the South Carolina Laws on Child support for a disable child?

Answers: There is a standard amount of support for any child based upon the parents' incomes and other factor. If a child is disabled, it can augment the amount of support the non-custodial parent may have to settle up.

Why is it that parents are the blame for missing children?

I've heard cases where on earth a child goes missing and sooner or latter the parents are suspects for murder(example: McCanns and those parents whose baby be Sabrina).

If they did murder the child then why are they making crack to notify the world that their child is missing?

Was there a baggage that the parent actually kill the child but reported them missing?

Answers: Actually, the numbers show that most abductions are family related and does not involve a stranger. When a child is missing you own to call the cops, at that point others carry involved and make phone call to the media and other sources of assistance to locate the child and although the police focus on the family, other investigators are concentrating on other option. Think about this too. If your child is out on your front porch playing and you be in motion in to pour another cup of coffee and return to find that your child is missing you furrow frantically for what seems to be an eternity, you name the police, there is just one genuine response from the mother and this responce have a few characteristics, the characteristics of the response really cannot be faked and someone who is trained will make out.

It's because the parents are responsible for the kid.
I dunno... I get what your saw but kids rely on their parents for everything... and it's a parents responsibility to make sure they don't bring abducted. Or that they don't shoot them.
Meh. :/

If parents were never looked at as suspects consequently they could get away next to the murder of their child.

When a child goes missing, everyone is looked at as a possibility. That's in recent times the police doing a proper and good duty.

a few years ago a mother named susan smith surrounded by south carolina killed her kids two boys and said a black man took them

the parents are to blame for kids turning up missing because its our job to watch our kids. the valise of the baby i am not sure of.
near older children if parents didnt resign from them in cars or home alone or sent them out to play alone they wouldnt turn missing

most cases of murdered kids are by their parents

parents report them missing first to keep the roast off of them

Because parents enjoy the most access to their own children.

And if a child goes missing eventually family/friends/neighbors would sense and they would report it and then the parents as expected would look even more guilty for never reporting it in the first place. So as expected, even the guilty have to report it.

*AFM - you're thinking of Susan Smith.

ably because the parents has the responsibility to look after their children. it is on their shoulder doesn`t matter what happens to their children. On the other mitt, the parents should not be charged with the crime, unless there's a witness.. i guess

What do think nearly the Jena 6 and do you think that the situation is individual handle properly?

I surmise that handling of the situation is ridiculous. I live in Michigan and on a virtuous day surrounded by Detriot there is at lowest one voilent crime. So how is this Jena incident any different from anywhere else? That I don't know but I guarantee you that any school you step into across the US at some point there be a interacial fight but you don't see the medium making a big deal out of it. Don't seize me wrong I think that its ridiculous that they considered necessary to try this Mycal Bell kid as an adult and furthermore they considered necessary to try him for attempted murder. Granted it was deeply cowardly for a 6on1 attack but the other kid must have be defending himself someway especially if he was competent to go to a academy function later that hours of darkness. And the thing nearly the nooses,give me damn break they didn't hurt anybody. If anything they hurt a bunch of mood. There is nowhere in the canon does it state that you can't hang a rope. So I say win over it move on and do business with some of the valid problem we face here surrounded by US

Answers: I dont really think its anyone handled properly but any way both the white students and the black students should hold respected each other and not own taken things farther.

The best way to fiddle with this incident is:
Remove the racial aspect and medium frenzy from the case.
Show it as 6 kids spank up 1 kid.
Let the court do its job.
We don't stipulation Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton or anyone else trying to make headline by playing the racial aspect to reporters.

Yep a very big difference between a rope within a tree and a boy beaten till he be unconscious and beyond for what a word if that.

The boy have blindness and a swollen head and still have headaches which as you would expect a doctor can't determine the cause and nonetheless grown people can't take in why they want these poor innocent jena 6 locked up.

If it were me or my kid I'd lock them up and everyone here know they would too.

Nope I'm not a racist just confused as to why they a white boy getting overpowered means zilch while a rope in a tree which hurt not a soul physically is more imprtant.

Should they be charged?
Hell, yes.

As adults?
Hell, NO!

They are kids.
They did a very brutal, gang-style hammering on one unarmed kid.
They deserve to be tried, but as juveniles, and it should be tried as a hate crime.

The trial wants to be fair, but the suspects deserve punishment to the full extent of the imperative.

The only entity that made the Jena-6 incident different from any other case of nouns is that someone actually payed profusely of attention to it and really made a big deal out of it. This undamaged discrimination problem is something that we've adjectives from our parents and not much people really quiz the things they've learned contained by life that's why discrimintation, and other refusal issues, still continue. Also, different populace face discrimintation adjectives the time. Yes, a black person may obverse discrimination contained by a white community but a white person may also obverse discrimintation in a black community. What's the difference? The table are just turned around. The truth is, everything may already be hopeless and too behind schedule for our present generation but in that is still hope for the next

More Questions and Answers:
[1144] - [1570] - [2421] - [673] - [1937] - [2342] - [1946] - [913] - [83] - [2048] - [102] - [1795] - [1383] - [1798] - [1446] - [1133] - [1616] - [370] - [804] - [23]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: