Law Questions and Answers
Can Social Services take you children for marijuana use that have not caused any criminal behavior?
To manufacture long story short...the oldest teenage child have to be removed by ss dept because of violent behavior and mother charged her near juvenille out of control. Since after SS dept has become involved and require parents to help yourself to drug test who enjoy honestly stated they use marijuana. There are 3 younger children in house who the courts are threatening to remove if she allows the oldest to come vertebrae home due to the marijuana use of parents which does not interfere with their power to provide and care for children. There hold never been any criminal charges file against either parent. Should the courts be allowed to remove these children?Answers: Its so trouble-free for people to step "well its the law", what happen when they tell a woman she can no longer own an abortion? What happens when adjectives the people who be lied to in the 50's almost smoking get their smoking privilege taken away. What happen when we have 4 million chitchat cameras like london? Do you really want to live contained by a nation were your children can be stolen from you and brainwashed by federal institutions. Thats what hitler did, and thats what so heaps of you label as "OMG COMMUNIST!!11! OMGOMG!11!" Institutions raise children. So insted of going "well thats the law" read between the lines that a person have the right to do whatever they want beside their body and they have since our completely existence, and its unamerican to go "capably its the law" because millions of people are going to do that to you when your the minority, when something i.e. part of your natural life is deemed "unacceptable"
And as far as americans following the viewpoint of the majority. You need to look at concrete majorities and try and understand it from a humanist point of picture. If they can steal their children, one day society will sit idly by as they hold somebody against their will and brainwash yours. As far as not being competent to properly parent a child if you smoke marijuana, people enjoy this vague misconception that adjectives drug users are irresponisble crack addicts. Get a grip and try and look outside your dogmatic perception there is such a entity known as responsiblity. And to adjectives you self-righteous who claim "to put your children first" Do you allow your children to poison their bodies and minds beside the garbage that is to say mass produced for them? Do you imbibe in alcohol or hold broken any laws yourself. Im sure the answer is yes for several of you but thanks to a block on perception its impossible to look outside your own spectacle and realize any substance you intake that effects your body in anway positive or unenthusiastic is a drug, alcohol, a chessburger, anything that causes a stimulus.
Yes, they can. Often they will drug theory test the adults to make sure within is no drug use. Drug use is irresponsible behavior and if there are already problems that hold caused the rule to get involved, you would reflect everyone would be willing to present up their illegal commotion in writ to keep custody of the child. It's unlikely to me that this would even be an issue. NOTHING would be allowed to endanger the status of my children.
Which is more important -- your drugs or your kid?
Well, technically, yes.
Personally, I regard as that marijuana should be legalized, but since it's illegal, afterwards ... well, they're breaking the ruling. As such, marijuana IS criminal behavior.
This is why you stay away from the government.
Who wishes to play by their rules.
yes. drug use is drug use.
the family courts are not surrounded by a position to grade the drug use unless it is declassified by the ruling.
It's proven that cannabis affects a person's mental state as does alcohol. The court simply want to protect the children from living with the instability of have parents who smoke drugs.
Cannabis is a drug. Look at it from the court point of view.
Getting stoned does not impact their flair to parent?
Are you toking up right along with them?
They own one child out of the house do to uncontrolled behavior, the smoke pot, and you thinkm they're "good" parents?
Umm - yeah I think the court wants to get involved here - without a doubt there are some issues that want to be worked.
You need a license to drive, to marry, to hunt, to fish.and on the other hand anyone can procreate...go digit.
MAKE A STAND FOR MARIJUANA USERS EVERYWHERE!
ITS BS THAT HEMP IS A ILLEGAL!!!
WE DESTROY OUR NATURAL RESOURCES WHEN WE COULD BE SAVING OUR PLANET WITH A INFINITITLY RENEWABLE RESOURCE!!!!
THAT DOES EVERYTHING OIL & COAL DOES! PLUS HUNDREDS OF THINGS COAL AND OIL CAN'T DO!! LIKE FEED AND CLOTHE US!!
ITS TIME AMERICA HEARD, AND KNEW THE REAL TRUTH!!!
Sonojudan
"A plant, given to us by god. Is the most dangerous item in America, bullsh!t.."
Social services doesn't remove kids from parents who smoke pot. I work contained by a rural area (which is harder on parental drug use than an urban area), and if a parent test positive for marijuana a safety plan is done to ensure that the child will be protected. And the family is monitored. But children are never removed purely because a parent tests positive for marijuana. In some cities, social services won't even respond to a referral concerning marijuana. Marijuana is seriously the tiniest of anyone's concerns. Hard drugs (heroin, meth, crack, etc.) are a little different.
Now, your press says that the courts want to remove the children if the parents tolerate the oldest child come back home. This is probably due to her vicious behaviors, which puts the safety of the other kids at risk. Obviously, if the child have to be removed the parents were not sufficiently expert to control the child in the first place--this mode that they also cannot assure the safety of the other children. This sounds close to a more plausible reason for the courts wanting to remove the children... the parent's inability to protect their children from maltreat by their sibling.
If someone takes you to court,and accuse,you of things they can't prove,and lied about the facts what can i d
This ex-girlfriend is taking me to court, trying to bring an Ex-parte. the things she wrote that I was do enjoy done, are not true and she has no prove of any of said things.on the other hand she signed the and dated the part that say, " I swear under cost of perjury,that these facts are true according to my best knowledge and belief." can I contained by the court room ask that she be charged with contempt of court, and put surrounded by jail, and or consequently sue her for lieing about me ?? Again in that is no prove, she can't back up what she is recounting the judge...she is trying to win me for harssment... She said something happened to her sports car way put a bet on in june and is presently saying that I did it, no prove, zilch but now she requirements to use this in the annoyance case.. Thanks..PS. Really involve help on this..Answers: you would enjoy to prove some how that she knows what she is adage is false and is intentionally trying to harm you by such statements
short prove either approach the court will most likely look at it as a he said she said afterwards an intentional tort
If you did it, man up and tell her formerly you get to court.
But if you didn't, agree to the court proceeding take place, afterwards sue her for slander or defamation of individuality.
As others said, it's hard to assist you without knowing more. I can pretty much guarantee you that she is not going to secure unit over this. However, if you get to court, and the authority agrees that the action is frivolous and she have no proof, you can ask for sanctions. Again, it depends on where on earth you live, but most courts will provide for monetary sanctions against a get-together that files a totally baseless lawsuit. This can be really hard to prove, especially if she is doing this on her own and not beside a lawyer, but you can thieve a shot.
About a lawsuit: in most states, you can't sue someone for making false statements surrounded by litigation, so the fact that she perjured herself wouldn't be grounds to sue her. On the other foot, you can sometimes sue on grounds called "misuse of process" or "malicious prosecution", which are base on someone dragging you into court for no reason. I give attention to it's a fair bet that no attorney is going to represent you in an feat like that, unless your girlfriend is really rich, or she have an insurance policy that would cover her if you win, like homeowners or a renter's policy. You can other try small claims court, though.
What is the penalty for a felon to go and get caught with a firearm(s)?
how much reformatory time, fines?Answers: Federal law provides that it is a felony for an individual who have been convicted of a felony contained by any court to possess any firearm. See, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g).
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 44 > § 922
(g) It shall be unlawful for any person—
(1) who has be convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by internment for a term exceeding one year;
(2) who is a fugitive from even-handedness;
(3) who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in paragraph 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802));
(4) who has be adjudicated as a mental defective or who have been committed to a mental institution;
(5) who, one an alien—
(A) is illegally or unlawfully surrounded by the United States; or
(B) except as provided in subsection (y)(2), have been admit to the United States under a nonimmigrant visa (as that occupancy is defined in slot 101(a)(26) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 (a)(26)));
(6) who has be discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions;
(7) who, have been a citizen of the United States, have renounced his citizenship;
(8) who is subject to a court order that—
(A) be issued after a hearing of which such soul received actual notice, and at which such entity had an opportunity to join;
(B) restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner of such personality or child of such intimate partner or person, or adjectives in other conduct that would place an intimate partner within reasonable distress of bodily injury to the partner or child; and
(C)
(i) includes a finding that such person represents a credible threat to the physical safekeeping of such intimate partner or child; or
(ii) by its terms explicitly prohibits the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against such intimate partner or child that would probably be expected to cause bodily injury; or
(9) who have been convicted within any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence,
to ship or transport surrounded by interstate or foreign commerce, or possess in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition; or to receive any firearm or ammunition which have been shipped or transported surrounded by interstate or foreign commerce.
924. Penalties
(2) Whoever knowingly violate subsection (a)(6), (d), (g), (h), (i), (j), or (o) of section 922 shall be fined as provided within this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.
Federal is up to 5 years, but I don't know in the region of the fine. State laws are adjectives over the map. Some states don't prevent felons from possessing guns at adjectives.
BTW, the federal law also prohibits possession of ammo.
Also, you can be tried for both state and federal firearm crimes.
What does 10% of a music video mean?
As I make out it, fair use would allow me to use any 10% of a music video or 30 seconds of music. What do they expect exactly by ten percent??? If I have misunderstood, how much of a music video am I competent to use for a non-profit video installation to be exhibited as an art project? Also, would I be able to do a series of video that used a separate 10% of the same music video?Answers: That is a quantitative length, not a qualitative one.
Unless there is another definition it would be ten percent of the amount of the lyrics and musical score or composition and video and anything more than that is irrelevant. If there are 200 words you capture 20 and if there are 2000 transcription you get 200, 4 min. of video you find 24 seconds of it.
Should Halliburton Corp be made to repay $16.5 Billion in no bid contracts from Iraq period of war?
I mean they the claimed to be an american company but presently that they pocketed the money and moved to the UAE shouldnt the Current contracts be pulled and given to a real American company resembling they were supposed too?Answers: Absolutely.
It is ludicrous for billions of taxpayer's dollars to be given to a company explicitly not BASED IN AMERICA.
We want a full refund.
Who would you present the contracts to? Haliburton has no competitors, to be exact why they were no bid contracts supposedly.
They inevitability to work a requirement for staying local in the contracts, its outstandingly unlikely there is any clause that will allow it.
___
Like who? Clinton awarded them no bid contracts for matching reason. Saying that anyone could hold done it does not suddenly spawn thousands of companies trying to do it.
Halliburton goes where on earth the oil is that is to say not in US territory. Millions have funneled into this Texas and immediately Dubai based Corp. Why would they hold to repay the money payed them? They got the contract they did the work, irregardless of the slave remunerated India workers they hired and use much as the Saudi's do the Suddanese. The money--follow the money the players involved all own dirty hands. Hello to Cheney, umm Bush people too.
Needed, like right presently... SOCIAL STUDIES!!!!?
Why was the dred scott edict important?What did the Missouri Comromise propose? What be the result?
Was John BRown a radical murderer or a hero? Defend your position.
Write a long answer to this if you can, or a short one anything, to all or however plentiful questions...
Answers: Nah, I don't muse I will. I don't feel approaching it right now...
Nice try.
Do you own homework.
Yahoo Answers have a Homework section. Go nearby and see if someone will do your work for you while you are playing on the computer.
Do you think burning the American flag should be made dubious?
Ever since this country was established, within had be contreversial debates on whether burning the flag should be made improper.Technically, this act and associates performing it are protected under the First Amendment within the US Constitution. However, many own argued that this should be changed and made illegal.
What do you imagine? Basic rights? Disrespect?
Answers: It is disrespectful. That's the point in burning it right?
However, it is an expression... And to be precise a guaranteed right that the flag represents.
Burning it just make you hypocritical - but being hypocritical is everyone's right.
Oddly, the merely way to dispose of an American flag is to burn it, respectfully.
Personally, I believe that burning a flag contained by protest is an extension of free speech. Also, included in that free speech is the right to express yourself through art, even if that manner smearing any flag with excrement.
I reckon we have plenty laws on paperwork. Now, if we could just bring back the President and Pals to follow them, we'd be okay.
I don't think those society who burn flags command too much respect, but I am not in favor of giving them the necessity of a law. In certainty, if I am not mistaken, the correct way to dispose of a flag is to burn it. I am not sure of this, but it seem I read it somewhere. One can't just toss it surrounded by the trash.
We have a seemingly never-ending War, 12 million illegal immigrant, hungry children, jobless people, underpaid folks, nonexistent environmental policies, exorbitant medical costs, uninsured citizens, the homeless, people near rotting teeth and no money for dentists, the Elderly trying to exist on SS, and many, copious other problems.
I would say that making a directive against flag-burning should rank at more or less Number 50,000 in charge of importance on the record of things we should do.
To be disrespectful is a basic right if you believe contained by the First Ammendment. It's showing the government their bustle is disrespectful of this country's freedoms and basic rights.
If a country's flag is so divine, there should be singular one version and remain locked within a vault next to only artistic impressions available. It's a symbol that have been duplicated billions of times over by presently.
The problem with this country is that we whole-heartedly believe that within order to protect one community or person's freedoms we enjoy to take another's.
Need advice for animal law- IMPORTANT?
please viewpoint my other question and endow with me any advice that will bring the ball rolling within my favour..http://au.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind...
Answers: I'm sorry for your depression and distress over losing your obviously much loved doggy. And your poor doggy be probably so stressed and scared to behave the path it did, but noone knew otherwise. It's newly the way things are and it's a easier said than done thing to put things into perspective when you're hurting - but blaming the RSPCA is not right.
It's a wounded fact of energy that the animal shelters in this country verbs around 200,000 unwanted/lost pets a year. The people who work and volunteer for the RSPCA definitely don't enjoy it. They own no choice and do their best (they are human too and may make desperate decisions lower than stress too) - but they have controlled funding and capacity and too lots people only just abandon, don't desex and don't microchip their pets. They are completely overwhelmed and stretched to dimensions especially since the popularity of designer pets - people fad buy, get sick of and present up on unwanted pets constantly.
Please don't further burden the RSPCA's resources with your claims, no concern how justified they may be to you. It will basically be taking away their resources and attention from the animals within their care. When you grain ready, possibly go to the RSPCA and adopt a clean doggy to save one from loss row (there are so many lovely ones wanting homes) and consistency assured that the doggy will be microchipped with your details and will never be lost.
(((hug)))
I'm sorry, and I get the impression your pain. I would return with a statement from the individual who found her and I would talk to a advocate. Hopefully the animal rights laws where on earth you are place more value on the animal's duration than in other places.
i want you luck.
If the person that turned the dog surrounded by, stated that she was a stray, next they may have have the right to put her down. Most shelters have a time parameter before they can do this. I do not yearning to sound penny-pinching, but was your dog tattooed, or did she own a chip? both are inexpensive( under $50) and smoothly done. You will have a exceptionally tough time convincing anyone of your concern if these things were not done. If they be done and your dog was put down, next you have a complaint that you can follow up on.
Doesnt it make sense that Iran own nuclear weapons, since we bombed their neighboring countries???
as a country, shouldnt they enjoy protection?If someone bombed mexico and canada, wouldnt we want something to protect us also?
Answers: Iran wants nukes for alike reason N. Korea have them. To blackmail other countries for foreign aid.
I suppose if we were paranoid.
And who would want to bomb Mexico or Canada anyways?
I know what you are trying to utter. The United Nations is attempting to control countries with Violent revenge driven ideals. Remember when Iran took over the American Embassy and held adjectives those people surrounded by lock up for over a year? Then disregarded the Geneva conventions that Embassies are not to be touched. They don't honor the Geneva Conventions, they can not be trusted. Imagine what they would do with a nuke If they have one. They are not responsible neighbors. If they would help face-off terrorism, they might get on someones GOOD LIST.
If i wanna press charges, how do you go something like it?
This girl who is 16 had stole my vehicle and wrecked it. and I'm 18. If i wanna get some money vertebrae...how can I press charges against her mother when her mother doesn't want anything to do with it.Answers: ummmm...enjoy you heard of the police? You should of hear of them by now.
First, you inevitability to file the police report. If you want her to get hold of arrested, you need to share the police "I want to press charges".
If you want to get the money pay for, you need to pocket them (the girl and her mother) to court and show the police report to the judge. If the amount you are trying to acquire is under $5,000, consequently you need to directory the claim in a small claim court.
Remember, the girl's mother can directory a claim against YOU for child endangerment. If she decides to directory and the judge decide it was your knock to let the coup¨¦ get stolen, she WILL win, and here will be a very roomy judgment issued against YOU. Also, if that's the travel case, the girl's mother can press charges against you and place you in incarcerate for a very long time for child endangerment.
More Questions and Answers:
[1338] - [555] - [1179] - [784] - [357] - [2029] - [1295] - [2114] - [1542] - [60] - [35] - [385] - [2567] - [69] - [1912] - [626] - [94] - [1997] - [1139] - [2259]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: