Law Questions and Answers

Does Publishers Clearing House give away money as repeatedly as they claim? If not, is that legal?

I know PCH is ultimately just about trying to sell magazine and other stuff, and that the chances of ahead are slim. That's not my question.

I see that roughly once a week or so, they have a investigational $10 million sweepstakes. Are they really giving away money that often? And if they're not, is it official to say they're have a sweepstakes that they have no intention of awarding? It doesn't appear like it would be.

Please solitary answer if you have actual information around this, not just hearsay or speculation.
Answers: Yes, beneath the law, they MUST administer away the money they say they are giving away. And, within most states, a "sweepstakes" means that they cannot present preference to inhabitants who order magazine (otherwise it's a raffle, and they need to be licensed or otherwise it's forbidden gambling surrounded by almost every state).

I don't know if it's a "new" 10 million sweepstakes every week, but I think they afford away money pretty regularly. If they were lying, yes, they could be sued for disingenuous trade practices, false advertising, fraud, etc. by a varity of attorneys generals or probably within a class action by those who bought magazine or even wasted time believing they be entering a contest.

Now, you have to read their fine print. One item they COULD do is say that they own a $10 million drawing every week or so, but they only donate away the money if someone has certainly sent in the prizewinning number (kind of like how the lottery does it... they draw a number and don't pass out a jackpot if no one's played the number). I don't know if this is what they do... I would expect that would also be very suspect beneath the law.

Finally, realize that contained by the context of such a large operation, $10 million isn't adjectives that much money. If publisher's clearinghouse sent entry forms to 10 million american households (I would think that's a conservative number), and they earnings a first-class mail rate (which may be a bit illustrious, but considering how much those envelopes weigh, might not), they'd be spending $3.9 million JUST in postage! That doesn't count the cost for printing the envelopes and certificate, stuffing them, cross-checking mailing list, etc.
And don't forget what advertising costs! You're paying $25,000-$100,000 for one 30 second classified ad; millions during the Super Bowl. So the actual prize money is just a portion of their operating expenses. (That's why hobby shows are so popular and profitable--no writers to pay; no sets to tweaking; no actors to retribution... so prize money is just a drop within the bucket!)
So, they may be able to furnish away that much money

This Jena 6 case within Louisiana. Have they also been charged next to hate crime, or does that single apply to whites


Answers: Excellent point! I wondered if anyone noticed the blatant double-standard application here. Personally, the law should be colorblind and applied evenly across the racial/ethnic board, ergo, charge them near violation of civil rights, the hate-crime they committed when six brave blacks lynched and kill a solitary white. Equal justice for adjectives.
So, as a resident of Louisiana, this S*it is everywhere. For most of you from up North, you wouldn't understand the racism down here.

Kids scuffle. End of story.

Is hanging nooses right? By adjectives means, no. Are fight right? By all ability, no. But what many of you don't deduce is that seems to be the road it is down here. I, however, seem to be "used" to audible range stuff like that since it's be around all of my life span. Kids (especially in elevated school) will racially taunt one another. It happen. It doesn't mean, because you are call the "n" word, that you should go start hitting the hell out of folks. I grew up in a pretty much mixed glorious school beside a graduating class okay in the 300's near about 900 kids total surrounded by the school. You hear stuff resembling that. Most people merely blow it off. People nickname others names. Is it right? No. But they're kids.

If the shoe be on the other foot, though, it would be all over the place as far as the communication. If a group of white guys beat up a black guy, it would surely be considered racism also.

Sadly, racism exists and it's still pretty strong down south, especially here surrounded by Louisiana. I, by no means, am racist. Alot of my friends within high conservatory were black. I hear from them and from the white kids at school adjectives about the term calling, but of course, it other goes both ways. Blacks speak about whites, whites sermon about blacks. It's a short time ago skin color, people! Some relatives are so shallow as to only see the skin color of a character.

Do I think a few kids who get in a argument at school over something so stupid (name calling) should spend 22 years within prison? NO WAY! It just go to show how screwed up the system is.

Best of luck to those guys and I hope they don't have to spend 25% of their lives losing bars over a stupid confrontation that happened between green students in illustrious school. :( Jail for a short amount of time to put together them learn that battering someone to hospitilization because they called you a moniker, doesn't mean that you bring back off the hook so confidently, in my assessment.

What type of case could anyone brand against Mr E Chambers for trying to sue God?

Especialy if its the God you believe in and cause you to walk/drive to the courthouse and wait almost adjectives night surrounded by a dangerous nouns of town? Any advice would be welcome thx in advanced even if not a soul answers :/
Answers: What is he suing God for? Money? How is he going to collect?

It's a silly political statement.
Against this guy?
(1) Courts have no personal jurisdiction over God.
(2) There's no approach to serve God with process (there are relatives who claim to be his agent, but "apparent authority" technique only when the PRINCIPAL have taken action to make a contribution the agent authority for service... and there is no observable evidence that God have ordained anyone... at least not contained by the last 1500 years or so...)
(3) There's no remedy that a court can instruct from God. God doesn't use currency, and people can't enjoin god.


(I'm sure within are others... there enjoy been various suits against God... they usually don't make it long-gone a motion to dismiss...)
The purpose for his suit against god is in protest to the frivolous temper of the judicial system. He wants to show that contained by our judicial system anyone can sue anyone else for anything. Not to mention that a good advocate can win a case no business how ludacris the case is.


**************************************...



Nebraska State Senator Ernie Chambers have a new target at the moment: God.

Chambers filed a lawsuit within Douglas County Court Friday afternoon. However, Chambers isn't suing God because he has any variety of beef with the supernatural being. He says the suit is to scuffle possible laws restricting the file of frivolous lawsuits.
Sen. Chambers is suing God to make a point that anyone can sue anybody for any sense, or for no reason.

The behaviour to be taken against Mr. Chambers is the same as for anyone else who files a frivolous lawsuit--throw it out and palm off a fine for being a fool.

Educational guardianship?

my mom is giving my uncle educational guardianship...so i can attend arts school in his co.i be wondering this wont be giving up any of her rights will it.i mean similar to if i get surrounded by the hospital or something she still will be my legal guardian right...they will be sharing guardianship wont they?
Answers: An instructive guardianship does not mean your mother loses her rights to you. In spare to the school entity, it may well grant your uncle rights to make indisputable decisions for you if your mother cannot be reach (that would be smart), but does not mean she loses her rights.

An order for audible range to consider request for new council and any possible dispositions? what dispositions?

criminal satchel that deffendent having proof of file grievences to the bar as to councils non existants of council, lead to a hearing to consider the request for tentative council and any dispositions resulting therefrom. What dispositions can arise from this?
Answers: Your avatar looks like Dog the Bounty Hunter.
OK, I deliberate that what you are talking around is that you have complained almost your court appointed lawyer because you be aware of he is not representing you well.

In such a grip, the judge is required to hold a audible range to determine whether your complaints about his representation are lawful. During this hearing, he will ask you question and/or let you present your complaints and he will hear from your legal representative as well. If he finds your complaints in the order of his representation are legitimate, he will appoint you a latest lawyer. If not, he will require you to any keep your current legal representative or he could let you represent yourself if you want to (not a worthy idea).

If he refuses to appoint unusual counsel, he could direct your lawyer to do the things you get the impression he is not doing (such as visiting you, giving you police reports, discussion to a particular witness etc). He does not enjoy to but this often happen.

A disposition is simply a decision just about a particular issue that is more or smaller amount final. I say more or smaller number because almost any decision the settle makes can be raise on appeal if you are convicted.

If he denied your motion for new counsel, this can be an issue on appeal.

Take nurture.

P.S. Remember that simply because your lawyer tell you something you do not want to hear does not mean he is not acting within your best interest. Sometimes a lawyer have to tell his client that at hand is no basis to exclude some evidence or a confession or that the evidence is overwhelming and it is predictable he will be convicted. A good advocate does not lie to his client even when the report is bad. If your advocate is telling you something you don't want to hear, ask him why he think that and what are your options.

How if I've been deem too unfit for a "New deal" work placement by my Jobcentreplus adviser?

Can I still be classed as fit plenty to be classed as actively seeking employment and have to sign on to prove I'm looking for work, as I'm currently suffering from vitamin B defect, depression, anxiety and panic attacks and also own a alcohol problem, all of which I'm person treated for?

sos for posting it here, as didn't know what category to put it in!

Kind regard

Elric:-)
Answers: I am not quite sure how that works.
I reflect on that New Deal people would hold to have set minimum standards for vigour and you possibly dont meet them.
However, you are still fit tobe SEEKING work. You probably wount be given a employment with your form as it is at the moment but you can still be looking.
Jobseekers doesnt go on how much nouns you have, to some extent that you are atively looking.
It's because those people surrounded by authority don't know what they're doing.

An elderly neighbour of mine once received a girocheque for two pence - the postage and administration probably cost 500 times more than that.
Can you not step to your doctor and and get a sick facts to say you are depressed even more by signing on and return with you out of signing ?
It's ridiculous. Some pen pusher making these nonsensical rules and never really understanding the consequences. Get 'em told !!
ring me ...i got sh-it loads of beer.
I agree near everyone, this is right. maybe try the CAB to see if they can point you within the right direction.

goodluck
If you consider yourself unfit for work then you obligation to get a medical cert (sick note) from GP and contribute to DWP

They will then consider any incapicity benefit for you or income support
I'm not convinced that your story is true Elric...
I have a funny idea that you are pulling our legs...but if not, you hold already been giving some obedient advise so sort it out.
I thought you be getting put on Incapacity? didn't you say that a couple of weeks ago?
As far as the work placement go, count yourself lucky, everyone I've ever known who's be on one has said how sh*t they are! lol
As everyone else have said ..youshould probably be claiming incapacity benefit... and should have be advised to ..by the jobcentre...

..unless you enjoy no medical records of these anxiety/panic attacks...

if you do ...obtain a sick note from your GP.

dR Bad
and stay away from the drink..
ia'm sorry elric i quality for you,rsuffering and ache. walk to your doctor get the tabloid work together and take it to your career takecare

What is the statue of limitation to sue a doctor (civil case)?

i have a consensual sexual relationship with my doctor and its be over 18 months since i last be seen by him can i run back and sue him within civil court? Ohio
Answers: I am a NC attorney. In NC, the statute of limitations is 3 years, but can be extended.

I'm not sure why a consensual relationship would give rise to a lawsuit unless you be a minor, in which bag you were not weak enough to consent justifiably and therefore, it be not a consensual relationship.

In NC, it's unethical for an attorney to own sexual relations with a client. I'm not sure nearly doctors in Ohio. And, dishonourable behavior does not necessarily give rise to a statute suit. It might be before the State Medical Board instead.

Call an attorney who handle these types of cases and ask for a consultation. Look for an attorney who is board certified or has masses years of experience trying cases in court.

Best wishes.
that's not cool

Next media signs?

a friend of mind have 3 next medium signs/billboards on her property in different locations she just gets $530 a year for them these are hugh signs and she feel she should get like mad more. but does not know the art of negotiations. any sugestions
Answers: Before any debate, make sure your friend have a clear idea as to what they want... if it is probable and the value of the valid estate can be articulated.. that is roughly speaking all the neogitation skills needed; however... here are a few more question:

1. Is the media within a bathroom, on a billboard - what?
2. What does the original contract state?
3. When is the contract up?

While these are illustrious traffic locations, there are 3 voice of placement: 1. What the owner of the property values it at. 2. What the seller of the exposure values it at. 3. Does the location of the advertising drive the consumer to do or to believe something... the latter is the most vital.

If your friend's contract is up for negotiation.. then they involve to just weigh the pros & cons of sturdy negotiatiating and from there.. settle on how hard they want to push; however preserve in mind that a counter-offer is a no and the advertiser could stride.

I wish you capably.

Do I have to?

I recenty moved from southern california to south south SOUTH texas.
Needless to vote its a big change, and I miss california alot. Since texas is its own republic, after the pledge of alliegence, the school have you say-so a pledge to the state of texas.
Since I was not born here and own not even lived here for 2 months yet, I dont touch any obligation to do so, so today I chose not to and merely stood with the rest of the class near my hands at my sides.
When my guru asked me to say it again beside the rest of my class and i refused, she sent me out of my classroom.

Is that wrong? Or do I really hold to say the pledge to texas?
Im purely wondering cause I know some citizens with religious reason dont have to speak the pledge.
Answers: Following this link, it appears that you are required to utter the Texas pledge to its flag. You also appear to have an out and that is to say to bring a note from home asking that you be exempt from adage the pledge. I must say that your mentor should have provided you beside this information.

http://www.youthrights.org/forums/archiv...
You don't even have to right to be heard the pledge of allegiance if you don't want to. Since this is the U.S of A. you can do anything you want that doesn't go against societal norm and other things like dissing the governing body.

Threaten to call the ACLU if your mentor keeps bugging you.
lmaoo..
i dnt even utter the u.s pledge of alligiance or pray
and im in a catholic academy in ny...
nah.. you dont own to .
i guarantee you that.
^_^ just be respectful and stand melodiously like u did.
No you don't hold to.

However, just approaching any else who moves to Texas and doesn't like it here, you are free to be in motion back to where on earth you came from.

Or anywhere else, for that event.

If an employer offers severance carton...?

in exchange for not taking an hand grievance any further is that unethical, unsanctioned, both or neither?
Answers: neither. If the employee is dissatisfied beside something, and the employer doesn't wish to regulation it, it seems entirely all right to offer a financial settlement that allows the member of staff to leave to undesirable situaton and allows the employer to acquire rid of the source of disruption.
Your employer is covering his butt. You will most likely be required to sign paperwork that you will not bring this subject up again within any way.

More Questions and Answers:
[161] - [1714] - [1380] - [2229] - [1712] - [338] - [683] - [583] - [1048] - [1679] - [37] - [2119] - [959] - [1916] - [2050] - [353] - [476] - [2003] - [1403] - [891]


The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: