Law Questions and Answers

Do any countries in the world own a maximum age limit for their prisoners?


Answers: I am not sure..but I come up with Mexico does.It's against there constitution to contribute life sentences..and if an individual is outdated enough it could be considered a vivacity sentence and the person is fined or serves extremely minimal time.

Could judge Ito own overridden the Oj verdict?


Answers: The singular thing the conciliator could have done is sustained a defense motion for a finding of not guilty, but the authority cannot do the opposite. ONce it go to the jury and they acquit, that's it...like it or not. The law/consitution requires finality.

The referee could not declare a mistrial after an acquittal. Mistrial would hold had to go down prior the announcement of the verdict. Usually while during the taking of evidence or when the jury is dead-locked.

I don't muse this jury acquitted him because they be concerned for a riot.

I think the jury be hyper-vigilant to the "proven beyond a reasonable doubt" standard due to the star status of the accused and the bad name of the case.

I focus the prosecution did a poor job of putting on their luggage and left too abundant holes in their covering...leading to justifiable doubth. OJ had THE best DNA experts on his side (Scheck and Dr. Lee). DNA be new at the time for trials and the Government really botched their preservation of the evidence and their presentation of it at trial.

They also botched the glove issue. The defense taunt and goaded the GOV into having OJ try the gloves on because the defense believed they would not fit. The GOV terminated up looking like idiots when they did not appear to fit (after promising the jury they would clealry see how the gloves tied OJ to the slayings surrounded by their opening statements).

I Don't necessarily agree near the verdict, but it occur from time to time. OJ paid like mad of good money for the best defense you can buy. The elected representatives came at it next to good attorneys but be overmatched.
He should have declared a mistrial and sent it posterior to the DA for reprosecution.

OJ was so OBVIOUSLY guilty.
I doubt it. The trial be already fixed to go within O.J.'s favor. He had profoundly more going for him than just reputation and power.

If memory serves me correctly, I seem to bring to mind threats reported from persons surrounded by the black community that if O.J. were found guilty that in that would be another riot like the LA riot.

Do I need a advocate for a DUI case surrounded by Califonia? What are the fines/penalties of DUI in CA?

i crashed my vehicle while driving under the influence. i did not hit anyone or hurt myself (thank God). As i be about to christen a tow truck to tow my car , nearby comes the police. They asked me few questions which lead to sobriety and breathelizer test. I score 0.11 BAC above the legal restrict, arrested and jailed for DUI. I will be going to court soon. My lawyer requests $2500 to represent me in court? should i use my advocate or just be in motion with a public protector? what kind of fines/penalties am i gonna be expecting? what preparations should i get before the court date? this is my first dui shield so any advice will be appreciated. trust me i've learn DONT DRINK & DRIVE.
Answers: You might not get a public supporter appointed. The Court will look at your income and assets, and might determine that you can afford one, even if you think you can't. If you've get a job, I'll bet the Court will deny the public supporter, or expect you to repay the Court for his/her service.

The breathalyzer reading is prima facie evidence that you were intoxicated, so it might be rock-hard to beat as your .11 is above the .08 boundary for prima facie evidence of DUI.

An attorney might be able to go and get you into some sort of diversion program or reduce your sentence. In my experience, $2500 is cheap for a devout DUI attorney.
If you admit you are guilty, and it absolutely looks like you are, after tell the prosecutor/DA/County Attorney that you a moment ago want to plead guilty. Ask them to dismiss any simple misdemeanor companion cases in exchange for you pleading guilty and getting the minimum punishment.

Google the penalty for OWI 1st in Cali.
Glad you "learnt" that, if how to spell.

Yes - pay the 2500 for an attorney - otherwise the courts will of late chew you up and spit you out and it will cost you far more in the long run.
Ok, I lately got a dui. Here is what I received:

$1648 fine
First time DUI Class (3 Month) $545
MADD class $35
HAMM Programm $100
You must very soon get a SR22 beside insurance

if this is your first DUI, you do not need a attorney.
$2500 is about right for an attorney. and you want one. Here's the deal. A DUI is serious and even though you didn't hit anybody the certainty that you were contained by an accident make it more serious.

If you show without an attorney the consider will feel that you are not taking this seriously and will throw the book at you. An attorney may be capable of cut you a deal of some sort. And if you factor surrounded by how much this will effect insurance 2500 is worth it.
Don't plead GUILTY! That is the absolute worst direction you can get, and it's irresponsible.

You can probably procure a plea deal surrounded by which you would get a minor charger in exchange for a No Contest plea.

Get an attorney. Don't steal advice from strangers on the Internet!

Good luck to you.

Is it illegal for your boss to snoop through your laptop at work?


Answers: No.
If it belongs to the company you work for, yes.

If not, yes. He can see what you've be doing on the clock.
Your personal laptop? In general yes. If it is the companies laptop, later no.

If it is personal but you are doing company work on it.I'm not sure. I think it is still unendorsed, but they could argue they had a right to the information contained therein.
If the computer belongs to the company consequently no - they have full rights to the computer and anything you do on it.

ALSO - if it is your personal laptop and you are using the Company net on it - then they still own a right to know what you are accessing.

If you use ANY company assets - including their internet access point (wired or wireless) - afterwards you are using their property.
If it is a personal laptop, then your boss have committed a civil trespass to chattels if you didn't grant her any authority to use the laptop, EVEN if it's connected to the company net. "Company policy" does not grant them consent unless you SIGNED OR AGREED TO SOMETHING to that effect SPECIFICALLY.

Your boss would own a privilege to unplug it from the wall at work, or unplug it from the company network, but not to snoop, and clearly not to take it.

Laws in China?

Does anybody know if nearby are any laws surrounded by china that limit the amount of children the Chinese can own? I know that there used to be a rule where on earth they could only hold 2 to 3 children, but is it still around?
Answers: I live in the crucial part of China as an ex pat from the USA. I enjoy spoken to people something like this issue, plus looked into the way the senate administers it and why it be done.

If China had not instituted the one child rule, in attendance would be 400 million more people. That is more after the USA population. The landmass of China is slightly more then the USA near less arable landscape. Before the one child rule was put contained by place, it was adjectives for families to own 5 to 10 children.

The one child rule is for the urban and city area's. Two and sometimes three children are allowed in the countryside. Some religions are exempt from it adjectives together.

Twins are highly prized contained by China. Children are not put to death contained by China. That is a rumor put out by China haters.

The rich circumvent the one child rule by paying the huge fines. Beijing recently started a electioneer to ostracize the rich for doing this.

The people get the message the one child rule, and while many don't approaching it, they all agree China is too crowded and as a result support the rule.

Gender selection is a problem, but not nearly as much as tons people focus in the west. According to the CIA world facts book (viewable at http://www.cia.gov ) if I remember the facts correctly, instinctive selection world wide open is about 1.05 males born for every womanly. The USA stands at 1.06. China stands at 1.11. Therefore, gender test in China represents .05 to .06% more respectively. China have recognized the problem and made sexual category selection against the regulation, plus curtailed the use of sonograms to help enforce that.

The country to really see out for is India. They have a population to be precise only 200 million smaller quantity then China near over twice the birthrate of the USA. They have ethnic group planning and obviously it is failing.

Peace

Jim

.

Source(s):
http://www.cia.gov

Look at their world facts book, verbs up India, the USA and China, compare them side by side. You'll find the problem does not really rest with China, and clearly not the way most within the west think, but more next to India who's population is growing rapidly and income disparity and poverty are increasing, while they verbs to build up their military. (China's military is going through modernization which is badly needed and presently they can afford it. They also reduced their military by 1 million a year ago)

.
I think the statute is that a couple can only own one child..

I got charged beside a DUI in California, it be reduced to a Reskless Driving. Can I get this expunged?

If I can obtain it expunged, how much does it cost and how long does it take? Also, if expunged from my criminal story will it ne removed from from my DMV printout?
Answers: Getting a reckless driving charge expunged is a really well brought-up idea. You really call for to talk to an attorney, though, or I don`t know a few, to find out what the fees would be. The attorney would also know about the DMV issues.

The best source for DUI information on the Internet is

http://www.totaldui.com

They enjoy state by state information on DUI laws, lots of DUI articles, and a form you can overrun out to find an attorney.

By the way, a friend of mine hired an attorney to find different (non-driving related) charges expunged from his record surrounded by Illinois. It was smaller number than $1k total. If I remember correctly, the charges and outcome are no longer public but I believe police still have a dictation of the arrest.

Anyway, good luck to you. Definitely gain the expungement.
After 7 years

What is wrong with making this video public if nearby is no sexual content nor porn or any child endagement?

http://video4people.blogspot.com is a video of a phone message from a mother to a daughter and you see the daughter's reaction and the video go on quite clearly but it's a mixed bag as to what the ramification of posting this are if there is no money or libel involved, a short time ago to show people at hand are worse phone messages than Dog Chapman and Alec Baldwin!
Answers: http://video4people.blogspot.com can only be destructive to the girl in the video crying as her mother scream into the answering machine unhampered so I guess purely as though no one know the name of http://video4people.blogspot ' s daughter's mother than it is fine. The daughter that videotape it already consented to her name as in good health as her friend who the mother mentions quite clearly and who the daughter mentions too, so it seem okay just something to revise from and know that there are even worse voice mail to family member from their mothers and fathers than merely Dog Chapman to his son and Alec Baldwin to his daughter! Listen for yourself and make the determination, it's intensely interesting to hear this!
The legal issues depend on within what state the recording be made. Without that, there is not a soul who can tell you the consequences.

I would also necessitate to know the context of the message: was it live or a recording/voice e-mail.
As it appears this was a voice communication or answering machine message she should not own an expectation the message is not being record. The courts have held that a individual leaving a message is by their activities consenting to being record. Since both parties consented to the demo it should be legal surrounded by all 50 states.

She have no basis for claiming slander as you are using her words unaltered.

I can see no issue beside displaying the video or sharing an audio file of the message.
the just problem i can see is - perhaps - making something private public --

if she be to sue her lawyer would probably look at invasion of privacy - but not entirely sure that's a in the lead argument - (depends on the state, court, etc)

as a general rule of thumb, i'd say-so, if you're not sure something like this is trial then newly don't do it -

Good luck

Can I get a restraining decree to make sure someone never call me again?

I am a business owner and there is this insane individual I used to buy product from. I cut ties specifically because she was so rugged to work with and would bawl and be really mean (even though we be making up something like 10% of her business - duh). So today she call and I don't even know what she was clich¨¦ because she was yell so loud and using such profanity. She eventually hung up and I'm still not exactly sure what she said. Is there any course I can make it banned for her to call here anymore?
Answers: You can achieve a restraining order to block someone from contacting you, but I don't believe you gather round the standards (yet) in this bag. You must be in physical threat -- consult an attorney.

You can simply block her number, there is a handset service option for doing that.

Having said that, you may contained by fact be contained by personal danger--how crazy is this person? Start documenting everything, especially if you see her slack around your store, your home, or following you.

If you see her, you may be able to hold her charged with stalking. Consult the police once you hold a few incidents documented, including telephone call (phone calls count as stalking behavior underneath the right circumstances.)

Be careful!
Called Harassment

You can if you can prove it.

Why cant people get up their minds???

Have ever known some one that other says how much they disgust cops but then at the first sign of trouble they pick up the phone and give the name the very individuals they claim to hate so they can facilitate them?
I know a few people similar to this. DO you?
Answers: Yes, these are the same family who are against war, but support period of war mongers, and judge others. They are small minded those that need to be cleansed and sterilized.
Unfortunately, almost everyone is approaching this. Most of my friends hate the cops but will turn to them within a second if they need minister to. I actually similar to cops. Unlike most people, I realize that most cops are not the jackasses that you see on television tasering race. Most are good honest citizens who are trying to keep the communities not detrimental.

Tasers and death and my condition?

So i am going to put my self through a college police academy in So Cal and required to know if anyone can help me out next to this question. I am 33 and enjoy border line high-ranking blood pressure "heredity" and in correct over all vigour, taking two pills a day low Mg's and below doctor's care and required to know if a person get tased in the academy could this be desperate or even deadly if they hold high or border smudge blood presaure?
Answers: First, in response to the IDIOT above, VERY FEW family who are tased die. Between 2001 and 2005, there be only 103 taser/stun-gun related departure in both the U.S. and Canada combined. Think of the thousands of the police officer in acadamies across the nation and how oodles times they are tased, and how many hundreds of time respectively day criminals are tased for non-compliance. You enjoy a better chance of dying surrounded by a car chance or from a lightning strike than from the shock of a taser.

The taser should not have any adverse or long-lasting effects. Contrary to what you hear on T.V., the electrical current does NOT leave behind through your body. There is no way that it can arc across your heart or any other essential organs unless you place one electrode on each side of your body cavity.

The "spark" or current pass the shortest distance between the two electrodes, using only the small nouns of skin between the two as a conductor. The electricity itself does not incapacitate the body, that effect comes from the pain and "overloading" of the over-sensitive system. And again, contrary to what you hear, you are NOT incapacitated for two minutes or whatever the claims may be. The second the electricity is removed, your jumpy system returns to normal; repossession time however varies from soul to person (heart rate take time to slow as well). If your heart can withstand the stress it endures when doing the running event of the physical fitness examination, it can withstand the rate it will go to when tased.

Tasers work by utilizing dignified voltage but low amperage. In an electrical current, the amperage is the aspect which is most harmful.

Also, at the acadamy, medical staff will more than credible be present and with the standards most departments preserve for health of their officer, you probably would not have be permitted to go to the acadamy if you weren't nutritious enough.
Are you going to ask suspects that you're almost to taser to fill out a medical questionnaire first?
To answer your examine high blood pressure could be considered a contributing risk factor because giant blood pressure can affect the heart. The heart is the organ that undergoes the most stress during a tasering because the electricity from the taser can interfere near the electrical impulses surrounded by the heart, causing it to hiccup.
It doesn't sound similar to your pressure condition is severe enough to hold affected your heart. Normally it take several years of persistent elevated blood pressure to enlarge the heart, so within your case the risk factor is little or none.

More Questions and Answers:
[2551] - [107] - [546] - [527] - [525] - [523] - [1482] - [554] - [2129] - [1539] - [2226] - [1592] - [843] - [1336] - [2266] - [1908] - [790] - [2181] - [2401] - [1003]


The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: