Law Questions and Answers
A mindtrap question..?
a popular attraction at the world's exhibition be a sealed chalice box containing 500.000 american one dollar bills. this was a fundraiser where on earth for $10 a ticket a person could guess how oodles bills the box contained. at the end of the exhibition, when the stamp was broken and the bills counted, nearby were singular 470.000. sid shady was responsible for enclose teh money. when questioned by shadow, shady said that he intuitively counted each bill by mitt. "to be sure" he added "i counted them twice by hand during the two days formerly the box was hermetic i could have be out 80 or 90 dollars, but not 30.000!" he protested. shadow insists shdy is lying. how can he be so sure?Answers: There are only 172,800 second in 48 hours. Counting 500,000 bills contained by 172,800 seconds is 2.89 bills per second. Doing it twice is virtually impossible.
There are 172,800 second in two days. Shady couldn't hold possibly counted all the bills by paw.
Lets assume you had the choice between stabbing Osama Bin Laden to departure or releasing him to go free...?
Would it be right to destroy him?Would you be able to do it yourself? (assume physical strength is not a problem.)
By the opening... when I say stabbing I denote stabbing and not shooting or poisoning (ie no clean path to kill someone).
Answers: I would (and could) eliminate UBL myself without press.
Not sure if it would be "right" to kill him, but it might be necessary.
(Knife: Randall No. 1 Fighter)
Neither would be done.
I would take him into the desert approximately 150 km from the nearest outpost, put him on his knees, put a .45 between his eyes and verbs the trigger.
Then I would dig a hole and roll him into it and cover it.
I would stay near until the hole was covered by the shifting sand after I would depart and never speak of it again.
No martyr, no gravesite, no evidence he ever existed or no longer exists. no nothing.
Most unquestionably, I would let him step free.
First of all, I don't believe I'm efficient of taking another human's life intentionally.
Secondly, I would hope that by setting him free, he might swot that all westerners are not infidels, and that here is a value within finding non-violent solutions to our problems.
I don't think it's my place to filch it upon myself to murder someone. I don't know what I would do. Part of me says duh he deserves to be stabbed it's smaller quantity then he's done to others-- but I don't deduce I could do it.
I just vanished a job and my boss open some of my personal mail. He made a copy previously forwarding it. Legal?
Unfortunately, it was a bill so it have information on it for some property I own. This can't be legal. Do I enjoy any recourse?Answers: Having personal mail deliver to you at work is not illegal, it may be a sacrilege of company policy..but it is not illegal.
USPS.GOV have a form on it to report incidents of mail theft/tampering to the Postal Inspection Service. I would strongly suggest you pack out the form and seek assistance from the Postal Inspection Service for this issue.
Even US Postal Service workers can not open First Class Mail lacking a warrant! What makes your employer reflect on HE can violate the law next to impunity?
Good Luck.
Postal worker
I will assume (since you said it was mortal forwarded) that you're talking roughly email. If it is email, then:
If the email be on the company's computer, the he was contained by the total right to look at it. Period.
No this isn't legal.
not permitted invasion of privacy even if it was on a business computer. I read this article not long ago where on earth the same entry happened it go to court. the girl was fired but received spinal column pay because the boss have invaded her privacy
Mmmm, if it was address to you, by name, not your company, after by USPS regulations he has committed a federal crime and I would report him and what he have don to USPS investigators and would follow up by filing federal e-mail crime on him.
how do you know he made a copy of it??,..
If you live in the United States and someone else open your mail short your permission, it is a Federal Violation. Contact your Post Master. He or she will communicate you the steps you can take.
As for copying it in the past forwarding it to you, it will be your word against his and that will be harder to prove.
Good Luck
It you had your "personal" communication sent to the Company's address, it legally belongs to the Company.
Would you trust your coworker after this?
October 31, 2007) — Monekia Moore, 34, has be arrested for stealing about $3,000 from the Greater Rochester chapter of the American Red Cross.While a Red Cross volunteer, Moore unfairly completed disaster assistance authorization forms, according to the Rochester Police Department, which is investigating the case.
Moore, of Rochester, be charged with third-degree opulent larceny and falsifying business documentation in the first level.
Funds were one stolen from the chapter for several weeks, according to a statement released this morning by the Greater Rochester chapter. Police are also investigating potential theft by another volunteer, according to the statement.
Answers: depends on who they are, basically because Monekia Moore is untrustworthy doesn't mean everyone is although I draw from your point that she probably seemed trustworthy and friendly.
after her not splitting it near me?
no way!
What is the percentage of federal and state withholding for California?
W-2 form for federal withholding and state withholdingAnswers: why don't report all of it cheater
Call the IRS within your area. There are 800 numbers, usually located contained by your Business White Pages phone book, for the specific form(s) you will fill out.
Can i work at Alton memorial hospital with a felony charge on my dictation?
Burgerly, Theft, reckless discharge of a firearm chargesAnswers: I checked the website at http://www.altonmemorialhospital.org/ and did not find an y specifics, however I doubt that you would grasp hired in a strength care paddock with a bloodthirsty felony on your record.
If Conrad Black had plead guilty, could he own received a lighter sentence?
Why did his expensive lawyer not push for him to do so? After all, Radler took a plea barter.Answers: It's entirely possible. However, we're unlikely to know why til after the appeals process is exhausted--and people start writing their books.
Signing my rights away...do i still have to earnings childsupport?
One of my good friends really requirements to know...if he signs his rights away for a child..does he still have to recompense childsupport?Answers: No he would not have to pay cheque child support anymore. Though he would be responsible for an arrears he may have accrue. Once his parental rights are terminated, the child is no longer legally his; thus, he have no more responsibility to care for the child. If he have had restricted contact with the child up until presently and someone wants to adopt the child, after I think he is doing the right point by terminating his parental rights. Unlike some population, I don't think this make him a bad personality at all. It make him someone who is doing what they think is right for their child, lately like anyone else who puts their child up for adoption so the child can live a better duration.
Yes. Why would he do that? So he doesn't have to wages child support? What a jerk. He shouldn't hold sex anymore or he should be much more choosy.
These poor kids. He needs to examine his conscience, if he have one.
No child support payments. Also, no rights at all to the child within any form.
By accepting the "termination of parental rights" the "mother" agrees to cut the "father" out of the child life completely. She also accept that she is solely responsible financially for that child for the duration (until 18 or emancipated)
If the court orders the termination of child support the answer is he does not enjoy to continue to payment child support. If the court does not order termination next he must continue to pay cheque. Either way if he is contained by arrears he will still owe that amount of money to the payee, unless the court also orders the arrears to be smug as well.
Make sure your friend have all this spelled out contained by the stipulation that goes in the past the judge to be signed by the mediate.
Two issues here:
First, he cannot just sign away his rights. There must be a petititon to call off parental rights and in most states, an attendent adoption or doings by CPS.
Second, FUTURE support he won't have to repay but past due arrears will hold to be satisfied unless forgiven by the agency or the get-together petitioning for the adoption.
EDITED BASED ON SHOUTING!!!!:
THen only olden due (arrears) child support will be in ask and that is unfurl to negotiation. Simply suggest to your friend that his approval without hostility to the adoption will be contingent upon a forgiveness of all arrears.
and subsequent time DON'T SHOUT!
EDITED BASED ON RESPONSE:
that's better <grin>
Depends on the context. A parent cannot ask to terminate his protective rights for the purposes of getting out of child support payments. The court would not allow this. If the parent is a danger to the child and concerned rights are terminated, he may still have to rate child support. In the context of adoption, child support payments are not longer paid unless near is a special situation. Ex. the maternal grandmother adopt the child, the father's rights are terminated, the father may still have to repay child support.
It all depends on the deem and the state.
Extra info:
If someone else is adopting the kid, he does not own to pay child support.
He must jump to court to do that. Terminating parental rights is a legal procedure that requires a court appearance.
Once the court puts it's stamp on it, later he is no longer the father. He has no rights at adjectives concerning the child - ever. And, because he is no longer the childs legal father, he doesn't hold to pay child support.
I wonder at a man who would permit his own flesh and blood go newly because he doesn't want to pay support. That child will track him down someday and want answers..
Yes
How long creditors take to sue someone?
I owe around 6500 to creditor. Creditor already turn it over to a tenet firm to collect the debt. But i am in no position to trademark any kind of payments on the debt. My creditor is using imperative firm. I heard they usually use collection agencies. Is in attendance a difference between law firm and collection agency? and how long it may clutch them either by creditor or statute firms to sue me since I am owing good amount of money?If i am surrounded by the process of filing liquidation and they sued me what would happen?
Answers: How in the order of not financing items that you can't pay for...? Seems assured enough. You entail to practice more common sense next to your money. I can't answer your question because I've never financed anything beyond my mechanism.
Do not declare collapse for 6500 because I said so. The trend for at least olden times decade has be for a collection agency to associate with a ruling firm to put a bigger scare into the average Joe or Jane who doesn't know they're not one within the same. The canon firm doesn't step in until the time is ripe to progress to court. Some firms, however, are in the business of collections and enjoy on site calling agents. Thus, you're getting calls and correspondence from a decree firm, but only from an agent, not a advocate. Don't get cocky, these collectors may not know much, but they know the collection law better than you. It's like going to Burger King and the Fry Guy demonstrably knows more in the region of fries than you.
It can take a collection agency six months to a year (sometimes even longer) since implementing existing legal management as in a court date. But trade name no mistake. For 6500, they are going to stalk you before the statute of limitations runs out.
Filing collapse is not a good opinion because, one, I said so. Two, you're going to have a semi-permanent skid dot on your financial record. Three, you will wind up up paying close to the entire amount, but you will only prolong the punishment. Plus, you hold to go to court and through credit counseling approaching you're some five year old kid who doesn't know how to free money. You are better off settling near the original creditors. If they won't do it, settle near the collection agencies. 50-60% is actually a clothed settlement. Expect to pay up to 80%. You may enjoy some stains on your credit report, but they will go away contained by four to six years. I did hear that Sears will keep it on your credit report for ten years, those bastards.
Do not factor within fees and penalties into the settlement amount, with the sole purpose talk roughly speaking the original debt owed. Fees and penalty the agency tacks on are in the neighbourhood impossible if not impossible for a collection agency to win. They include them on to inflate the total due and get them closer to an actual 100% salvage.
It would be a good concept to challenge the debts contained by writing by asking the agency for proof of the original debt. They never enjoy it, only the unproved creditor does and the OC doesn't want to be bothered after they sell the debt. This will not stop a lawsuit, however, if the debt is say aloud..over $1500. Agencies have sued for smaller quantity, but the lowest I've seen is going on for $1600.
If you are served and have to budge to court, the agency will send some money for play lawyer to bully you into submission. You purely remember that you don't have to compensate penalties and fees, but don't expect a Judge to believe the debt isn't yours. Be prepared to settle, but budge all the process to the Judge if you believe you are not getting a fair settlement.
Should a hostile witness be treated as criminal and a hindrance to even-handedness?
A hostile witness should be treated as criminal and a hindrance to even-handedness. Same should be the treatment for people innards false affidavits in courts. It should be made mandatory, minus exception that if an affidavit is found furnishing false information the court hearing the travel case must forward it for a registration of a criminal complaint and direct agencies to prosecute the offender. Court must also fix a time frame for investigating agency to report support for prosecution of the false affidavit offender.Answers: What get in your craw?
A hostile witness is not a criminal, in recent times not cooperative. And that's ok.
Perjury is another problem, and we have law for that already.
It is already against the law surrounded by the US to commit perjury or to hinder prosecution.
We own our hands, and our jail, full. Resources are limited. If you enjoy real evidence that false nouns has be given, turn it over to the DAs office or convey it to the judge surrounded by the case.
But don't expect anyone to create a charge force for this.
I can't stand hostile waitresses. I bet they spit it my food.
I've listed some statistics below, you may this usefull surrounded by understanding what your dealing beside here.
More Questions and Answers:
[211] - [128] - [1728] - [431] - [1040] - [306] - [363] - [2334] - [831] - [2262] - [695] - [1930] - [421] - [717] - [1211] - [1224] - [1424] - [1014] - [611] - [811]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: