Law Questions and Answers

I was charged near drink driving in N.Ireland. At court the Police/PPSNI could not find the paperwork.?

The Case be adjourned for one week to locate the paperwork. If they cannot trace and hold lost this paperwork relating to my case can I ask my solicitor to request the mediate to throw the case against me out?

Answers: yes you can. this happen to a friend of mine.

You sure can :)

Please don't drink and drive, but hey you got away on this one. Cheers!

It won't be thrown out untill the police hold had time to put things right. I be involved in a valise where PSNI paperwork and witnesses be lost /unavailable over a period of eighteen months. The police be given more time at each audible range until the magistrate ordered that the case would not be hear until the evidence was adjectives in place. THEN they dropped the charges as a witness have changed their statement.
You might get lucky if documents such as meter readings are lost or inaccurate. Whatever you do - DON'T plead guilty to make it be in motion away!! This may be their only hope if their evidence is lost or flawed.

Yes, and count yourself lucky that (a) you didnt hurt / butcher anyone and (b) you got away near it this time. Take this as a warning and dont do it again

Can you have a party with you surrounded by a meeting of your peers as a non biased human being?

If you are called into a junction as a target of two different organizations.. can you bring a soul with you.. is it legitimate?

Answers: It may not be legal. But you CAN bring your attorney beside you. In order to afford you a better answer, I need to know the organization involved and their individual policies on such "meetings."

If the date is at my house, to have a beer and keep watch on a game, after no you can't bring someone else. If the meeting is beside the IRS, then you can. There is no nonspecific rule of law that govern all possible meeting.

What is the actions should be taken to arrest the ship within the port ?

what is the actions should be taken to arrest the ship within the port ?

Answers: I'm not quite sure what you're asking, but the Maritime law (Admiralty) would apply.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maritime_la...
http://www.admiraltylaw.com/

Where is the port? Different laws apply contained by different countries.

What law is this?

Is here a law that say that Creationism can't be taught surrounded by schools? Would it be included contained by the seperation of Church and state? If anyone has any information, that would be great.

Answers: That is indeed the seperation of church and state issue. Why would anyone train something that they can't prove?

This controversy dates wager on to 1633 and before when Galileo
first published his book "Dialogue" on Copernicus' view on whether the Earth revolves around the Sun or as the Bible suggests the other way around. Even the theologians and Law thinker are still battling it out to this highly day. Laws own been passed within the Supreme Court banning the training of Creationism in school which I think is a downfall that the U.S. is immediately reaping sown seed.

Solution to the plight of IAS officers and other civil servants?

The certainty is a 7 layer ranking (from Asst. Secretary to Cabinet Secretary) for an IAS and other civil servants in his craft in India.

This ranking has created a fasten of 'pleasing' his superiors instead of 'performing' for the nation for the civil servant.

Hence most of the civil servants precious passion and potential is person wasted contained by 'pleasing' this hierarchy throughout his job.

Government should constitute a panel of

1. farmer
2. industrialist
3. professor
4. trade association member
5. associate of parliament

to evaluate and appraise all civil servants acting out in India so that they can 'objectively' accomplish for India.

Please share your view.

Answers: Only Native American Indians have "plight".

As you rightly said, they are servants, not for civil populace but for politicians and government agencies.

They study frozen to become servants - I would definelty not that sort of servant even if the pay is markedly high????

Is it illegal to keep hold of money that you find if you know who it belongs to?

For instance if I were to find a wallet that belonged to someone identified within the wallet do I legally entail to return it. Or if I were to locate a shoulder bag of money somewhere and there be nothing more that an adress written on the pack am I legally responsible to return it?

Or would these topple under the constitutional right of

FINDERS KEEPERS LOSERS WEEPERS

I'm merely wondering if its illegal to hang on to the cash and dump the wallet surrounded by a mailbox? I know morally none of you answering this question own never done anything wrong. So dont give me no its the right point to do bull-oney cause if i cant preserve the money for myself i would rather throw the wallet away so nobody get it. Court of law reality!!!

Answers: it is a larceny. There are three theories of larceny that can get you charged beside the crime:

(1) Wrongful taking
(2) Wrongful withholding
(3) Taking with false pretenses.

Your crime is number two. You are withholding funds from their rightful owners and that is to say a larceny.

Larceny is the taking and carrying away the property of another with the intent of forever depriving the owner of said property. You are doing it because you have sound grounds to identify the owner and are withholding it.

The only constitution I'm comfortable with that say "Finders Keepers" is the Constitution of a Third Grade playground, which becomes invalid when you (1) graduate from echelon school and/or (2) make tracks the playground.

At some time in your life span, you will lose your wallet, or will lose something...than the law of karma will apply. Best wishes within your decision making.

lmao nearby is no constitutional right of finders keepers losers weepers.

it is informal to keep the money but most of the time it can't be prosecuted b/c at hand will be no proof you took it.

please send the wallet support to them even if you decide to save the money

If I catch you returning my wallet near $40 missing, i'll find you and put my boot in yourass. I contemplate probably you'd do the same...

I ruminate this has something to do near, "treat others as you want to be treated."

Why are you asking the question? You've evidently already made up your mind. You don't want to do the right and moral thing (you don't even want to be reminded that it's the "right point to do"). All you're trying to do is justify why you kept the money to clear your own conscience.

Just because it's trial doesn't mean it's right.

Follow your conscience. Do the right article and return the money. You'll feel better give or take a few yourself in the long run. -RKO- 12/09/07

OK, here's a statute for you, surrounded by plain English in reality:

"One who finds lost property under circumstances which endow with him knowledge of or manner of inquiry as to the true owner, and who appropriates such property to his own use, or to the use of another person barred thereto, without first making average and just hard work to find the owner and to restore the property to him, is guilty of theft."

California Penal Code article 485.

Your state, if not California, most assuredly have a nearly identical statute, probably titled something close to, "misappropriation of lost property."

There is no "constitutional right of FINDERS KEEPERS LOSERS WEEPERS". The phrase "finders keepers, losers weepers" is a children's proverb and is not in the Constitution.

If you head off it were you find it (do not even pick it up and absolutely do not remove either the luggage or the wallet from where you found it), you are probably ok taking no endeavour. You cannot keep or spend the dosh. If you do remove either the casing or the wallet from where you found it and the personality who left it here later returns in that to retrieve it (and would have be able to do so if you have not taken it), then they are emphatically entitled to it. (There is a special exception having to do beside shipwrecks, but I do not think it applies here.)

It's stealing..only just as if you had picked his pockets and taken the wallet.

"Finder's keeper, loser's weepers" is not a legal defense and won't hold up within court.

Why would anyone want to do it anyway.it doesn't belong to the finder...

Crime question...?

our educationalist asked as to describe the following questions. i lately wanted to contribute more planning. 10 points for best describer
1, what is crime?
2, give at least possible to reasons why corruption is refuarded as a crime
3, out dash the causes of corruption.(why do peopel corrupt?)
4, mention some forms of corruption.

Answers: 1. A crime is a civil or criminal wrong which offend the morals and interest of society.
2. corruption is regarded as a crime because it offend the morals and interests of society.
3. people are corrupt because they are inherently evil, they obtain power hungry, they are selfish, they don't vigilance about the moral consequences of their arrangements, or they are money hungry.
4. lying, stealing, cheating, de-frauding

How can you legally be removed from your house as a minor?

Answers: Children's services and the courts are charged beside seeing you have a past the worst and sane environment to grow up in.

Yes, if the parents are shown to be unfit as parents or they are placing the minor children surrounded by undue danger by maintain an unfit home by neglect or cruelty inflicted upon the minor children. The minors may be made ward of the court and under the supervision of children's services.

Break and enter to recover property and surrounded by doing so cause wound to property.?

Someone has gone cleaned out.
They have my property.
I break a lock to enter the building to restore your health the property.
When in the building, I accidently wreak damage to the property.
In Ontario, what are my charges for
a) entering the building.
b) risky the building.
c) trying to recover my own property.
What should I hold done to recover my property reasonably?
This is a school project. Where can I find Ontario official precedents such as this?

Answers: You did illegally enter.
You did sabotage the building
If you can prove it's your property, possibly not.

Totally the wrong way to toy with the problem; that's why we have police and the courts.

What the actions should be taken to arrest the ship contained by the port ?