Law Questions and Answers
Did you know that is not against the decree for a child to run away?!!?
My 14 year old departed for school at 6 am on friday the 2nd and hasnt be home since..i posted flyers and called adjectives her friends and no luck yet.The sheriff told me it is vitally a waiting game til she decide she wants to shift home or she is found!! can you believe this sh*t! If they arent punished by the law what's going to stop them from doing it again??We cant punish relentlessly or we'll go to put inside..The child laws want to be changed!!Answers: Um, this doesn't sound approaching a question but I'll help yourself to a shot anyway.
Yeah its not against the law. I presume this is where the police settle on that its the parents job to punish the child, since they are with the sole purpose causing the inherited harm and not the community.
Harm against the community would stingy time in a juvinille vestibule... such as joy riding or stealing. Or worse.
But this is not to voice they should be doing something to help you. Isn't in attendance like a 24 hour directive or something? I ran away and even though I be 18 and the cops still helped my parents find me.
Good luck. I know you must be worried sick.
Ohmygawd - a regulation that hasn't been written all the same - - -
when i ran away from home and completed up in a holding cell - when they call my old man to come pick me up, he said 'she found her route there - she can find her method back' and hung up.
In my opinion, he shudda be thrown in penal complex - or I shudda been consent to go and not forced pay for.
having shared that, when my son come up missing, the trooper said the same item as you were told. in reality the guy told me he probably ran away near the circus (that was contained by town). Not sure if that was supposed to comfort me - but it sure didn't. Long story short - he come home less than an hour subsequent from a friend's home.
I think they of late need to lessen the time required until that time acting on a possible abduction.
Did you know that at age 12 they can leave and you can not force them to turn back home? You are still financially responsible for them though until age 18. There clearly is something wrong with the 'system', I agree.
We have to do a debate entity for our civics class and i have 2 argue against raise the driving age 2 18?
i need facts and statistics on these things on y i would NOT want to elevate it to 18 years old.Answers: revise how to spell
It could be tough to find facts, but I think AAA and insurance companies would be the place to start. If your parents hold a friendly insurance agent, you may be able to ask him where on earth to look for that data.
I feel that finding the number of insured drivers under 18, total number of insured drivers, and number of claims, injuries and death caused by drivers of many ages. I think your best argument would be if you find another group of drivers who is as dodgy or almost as dangerous as 16 and 17 year behind the times drivers. It would also be helpful to receive similar data for 18 year olds (or other adults) who are rookies--in their first year of driving--to wish whether 16 year olds are getting into wrecks from immaturity or inexperience?
I reckon the main argument against raise it is that so many associates under 18 enjoy to use a car (or an under-18 friend's car) to achieve to and from school, afterschool deeds, and part time job. If you raise the driving age to 18, that responsibility shifts spinal column to the parents, who may already be strapped for time or have younger kids to hackney cab around. (A lot of 17 year olds become mom and dad's taxi for the younger kids as cut of the chores they do to have a coup¨¦!)
i need to do equal thing for tommorow and this is adjectives ican think of...Parents would hold to drive their older teens to everything which is out of the put somebody through the mill to both the teen and the parent.
Why do people revision the laws that are so trivial.?
.and tend to be rather a fritter away of time, (riding w/out a helmet or being topless within NYC) as opposed to shifting laws that may spawn significant difference to the many issues that are problems to society ? similar to Health Insurance ?Answers: because change crucial laws is more difficult and more hazardous for a reelection!! and it needs more work!
trivial laws are useless but they show that the senate works
Not sure why you picked those two examples.
Helmet laws are a situation of grave public concern:
One side says that they squirrel away lives and also reduce the costs to society at huge that has to foot the vast medical bills and strain on the emergency health aid system, while the other speaks of freedom from obtrusive regulation.
Clothing laws are a issue of concern because one side says any such law should be gender neural - an far-reaching position in our age, and the other is concerned going on for sexual matters within public, which is also something many family fear.
Our elected representatives represent us the inhabitants, and these are matters to verbs about for lots of race, but not all.
Same near health insurance rearrange - it matters to some but not adjectives.
That's life!
The legislators own too much time on their hands and want to do something, anything, to obtain name acceptance and have something to brag in the region of when running for reelection.
CA gov. Arnie suggested our legislature should be part-time. Of course the leg. disagrees, but the citizens regard it's a wonderful idea.
Who said those law are unimportant? They may be "unimportant" to you, but they sure are considerable to others.
How is the law something like riding without a helmet adjectives? If a rider without a helmet smashes his chief against the sidewalk and suffers massive brain damage, society will lose a taxpayer, and costs will be incurred by adjectives of us in kind for him and his minor children, if he has any.
Now, tolerate me see what you are proposing. Give everyone free health thoroughness and make it legitimate not to wear a helmet while riding a motorcycle -- correct? Nice. And how much are YOU prepared to pay surrounded by taxes?
Who are the men that own and operate the company that counts the votes in the U.S.A.?
...and are they Republicans?Answers: Walden O'Dell is the CEO of Diebold. He is a highest Republican fundraiser and in 2003 said he be "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year." Draw your own conclusions. Especially since in attendance were a few Democratic strong holds in Ohio that go for Bush in 2004 even though exit polling showed Bush losing those precints by a cavernous margin.
Before anyone go off too far on the Republicans...Think rear legs to the Richard J Daley vote early and recurrently methodology of the late 20th century. That absolutely had an impact contained by the Democrats favor. That was preceeded by Tammany Hall contained by NY buying votes with Liquor. That be the preferred method of 'assisting' election outcomes of the 19th century. That is also why bar and liquor stores used to be closed on election days.
The US have a long history of assisting the election process. Both party find ways to do it.
Typically, it is done by volunteers from within respectively community,
under a small group of appointees made by the local system.
mayor/city council appoints election official who rely on volunteers for most of the work or hire temporary workers.
It is not a private company.
It is the voting appliance that counts the votes.
men and women count the absentee ballot.
But look at Bush and Gore.was not the individuals that time.
It is usually a group of volunteers that are governed by the (local) County Board of Elections. It can be anyone I ruminate, but I'm sure they have regulations beside being deputation neutral or not "pushing" one contender at the polls when you check people contained by. I have a neighbor that usually does it, but i didnt see her nearby this morning.
Is "Hypocritical Lewd" worse than "Honest Lewd"?
For example, when a conservative is busted in gay-sex-trolling at a restroom, versus Congressman Studds who have a physically-sexual relationship with a minor page, but he be applauded/reelected 5 times.ISN'T LEWD, JUST PLAIN LEWD??
What do you think?
Answers: If ethnic group are gay, that is their business not ours.
The issue beside Craig and others like him is not that they are gay - not a soul but themselves really cares going on for that - but that they are vehemently anti-gay within their public persona *and* in a position to put together others suffer for their own psychological demons that they are in adjectives denial about.
In the state of Texas, what happens after a petition to modify custody is enter?
I know the other person have 20 days to respond, if they don't respond, then what happen?Answers: I suppose it would be left up to the Judge who would be audible range the petition for modification.
Can the county force you to re-pay cash aid assistance that be received over a year ago?
Last year I received county cash aid and presently they are saying that I involve to re-pay an overpayment due to "unreported income" on my part. This be from August of 2006! Isn't their a limit to how far rear legs they can go subsidise and charge someone? Personally I beleive this is due to the county workers error not my neglegants :(Answers: Yes, they can go support several years to recoup money that be fraudulently claimed or paid contained by error. Now if you knew it be an over-payment and took action to achieve it corrected when it was payed such as sending a certified communiqu¨¦ of the error to them or if you can prove that you were forthright on your disclosure of income (Copy of your application) and that they be the ones in error and that an attempt to verbs those funds at this time would place you in an undue financial danger and the error was through no failure of your own and you had no justification to question the amount at the time it be received, you can get them to waive recoupment. Rule of thumb on financial documents, including any paperwork associated next to receiving public aid payments, is to preserve it for seven years.
They should provide proof, but if you were overpaid you want to repay it or it will negatively effect your credit rating.
I got an mip ticket?
Seriously, the system surrounded by michigan is so messed up. I get an mip ticket, and I cant apply for my licsense until i take the mip ticket taken care of (im 18) it wasnt even a driving offense, I be walking down the road, and the breath alyzed me? now when i wanna find a post, at a temp service, I cant get one until I catch it taken care of? Than the court requirements money from me? HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO PAY THEM WITHOUT NO JOB!? SO STUPID!Answers: First of all, a MIP-Alcohol is not a felony. Most job will not be too concerned with that on your story. I am not sure why you cannot get a temp situation without getting this cleared first.
Living within Michigan too, I realize that the job flea market is tough. You may have to thieve a job that you do not want (fast food?) to bring the money to pay the ticket so you can take your license.
I am concerned with the later line of your interrogate though. You broke the law, plain and simple. You do not enjoy to agree with it, lately live with it. Get some class of job, perchance even raking leaves to earn some change to pay the fine. Even within our tough economy in that are jobs available out at hand; just set your sights on getting a position, not what kind of errand you get.
community service
How do I report content on the web to be precise offensive and hopefully private?
I ran accross a site that I reckon was disgusting. I want to report it. Is in attendance a web site or anything that I can walk to and report it.Answers: Disgusting doesn't mean bent. Ogrish and Rotten are pretty disgusting. Being offensive isn't dubious, either.
Not really. If its a site that operate in your country you can contact the police, but they will most expected tell you to merely not visit it. Chances are, if you live contained by the US, the first amendment will protect the site. It has to in actuality be breaking a crime to be illegal.
EDIT - Remember, the essence of free speech is not surrounded by allowing people that agree near your morals being competent to speek freely, but those whose words make you sick to your stomach. We are a free society. Unfortunately we are even free to publish smut on the internet, whether legitimate or cartoonish. Sorry but it is not illegal, simply in horribly fruitless taste.
That depends on what the website is. If it's child porn or something approaching that, you can report it to the local police department or FBI. If you're not sure if it contains illegal content, you can still try the local police.
If it's only just something that you don't want to see, the only entity you can do it block it on your browser.
EDIT: Hey, I can understand why you focus that stuff should be illegal, but the trueness is, it's not. If you really believe that strongly, then start a group or a petition to win that stuff banned, but you'll be war an uphill battle. After adjectives, it is just cartoon, and as disgusting as they may be, there is no directive against drawings.
I have a fresh idea.
If you find it "offensive" DON'T LOOK AT IT.
I reason you being touchy is offensive...
Where can I report you?
Here's a innovative idea: Don't turn back to that site. I'd prefer if the efficiently disgusted didn't play the decency police for me.
Edit to attach:
Yeah, I assumed you weren't talking roughly child-porn. If that's the case, you can start at the local police.
Should senior citizens be prohibited from working in job where physical diversion is required?
Answers: That is called age nouns and it is explicitly prohibited by the Equal Opportunity Employment Act. The physical requirements of a job should be posted and if the creature can not perform as required by the livelihood, they will not be hired. Keep in mind that physical requirements are normally limited by OSHA or ISO-9000 standards, for instance, contained by most cases materials over fifty pounds require a two man lift or the faculty to use mechanical lifting equipment such as cranes, fork-lifts, chain-falls etc. Anyhow, short answer, NO Senior Citizens should not be prohibited from working any available job on the sole basis of age.
No, because some senior citizens are surrounded by better shape than some younger people.
It should be judge on an individual basis.
Then who would do the work? The kids immediately days certainly don't want to.
More Questions and Answers:
[2088] - [2131] - [2561] - [2042] - [1525] - [2294] - [303] - [572] - [1653] - [396] - [63] - [761] - [2267] - [263] - [1995] - [53] - [1524] - [2247] - [815] - [1207]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: