Law Questions and Answers

If the U.S economy fail.?

Lets say grease prices raise so dignified are economy crashes and we slump into the greatest depression or nation has ever see. Finding work for resonable wages is impossible. Your family is starved and deprived. Do you steal from your neighbor who is only as bad bad as you are? Do you lie down and die disappearing your family to fend for at hand selves? Give up all hope and go it in Gods hand? Do you do anything possible to provide? Well if Canada's economy be flurishing you best bet I would do anything possible to put my self there. If they dont approaching it because there are too stupid or workshy to work it would'nt bother me. If I had to cross reasonably or not it would'nt bother me. Feeding my hungry family by far trumps in that spoiled mentality and there dislike of my skin color. So my press to you is what would you do and does that make you a bleak person?
Answers: No as you would expect it does not make you a fruitless person. Nor does it manufacture them bad if they stop you at the border to preserve their spoiled style of life since its their border and their opening of life.
Illegal immigrant are not evil. Life rarely give you nice black and white absolutes. But purely because we can sympathize with their plight does not us responsible for them. There are 300 million empire in this country. There are 7 billion within the world. The majority of the 7 billion is less powerfully off later we are. How many of that 7 billion are generosity here?
"Finding work for resonable wages is impossible"

You see, the above statement I just can't envisage. There are many ways to escape poverty if you're smart. I am smart, but I can't see in your mind`s eye properly what its like to be a character who can't figure out how to attain out of poverty.
The sky is not going to fall But i consider you are referring to Mexicans Yes i have respect for them But none for their country or 'leaders' Take a look at Mr Fox It be "mi amigo Mr Bush" than when he can't get what he requirements he write a book 'bad mouthing' his buddy

Could I do anything to shorten my license suspension lenght? I'm an overseas student. please help.?

I'm an overseas student holding an overseas license. I be recently caught doing 50 and over the decrease in a country highway of north of melbourne. I know it's incredibly wrong but one year is too long for a busy student. Could anything be done to shorten the suspension?
Answers: Yes, drive over the speed limit as recurrently as possible and the authorities will catch you and shorten your driving time to INDEFINITELY. Gosh antipathy to see you off the road forever bro.
DWLS channel you don't drive cause the community have deemed you an a** hole driver and and have therefore revoked your license to drive, which is a privelidge here within our great country, not a RIGHT.
yes, this does seem kinda loud but when your not at home you are subjected to that particular state or country license laws. you might want to check beside the motor vehicle dept there to see if you can grasp a hearing or if they even volunteer that service. at any rate, it would pay for you to also pick up a travel guide and check it out so you wont be surprised by anything else. if your not sure were to jump ask one of your fellow students or one of the staff at the school your attending. worthy luck.

Is this legal?

i get sentenced to jail time contained by girls juvy. after the judge sentenced me the bailiff handcuff my ahnds behind my support and led me to a holding cell. next a couple hours later they took me out of my cell and cuffed me and i be put in a police sports car. the police car drove me to juvy and when i get there they brought me into a room. consequently a guard came and made me strip stale everything but my boxers. she made me lift up my arms and she pat down my entire body. iafter she stopped searching me she made me put on prison clothes. i be then cuffed again and taken to a cell. is questioning me like that court?
Answers: yes it is legal be glad they didn't do a full strip survey where they enjoy to look into your cavities (and not the ones you may own in your teeth)
Welcome to police custody my dear.

Keep it up and when you shift to prison, you get a full cavity prod.

Is this what you want from your life?

Potential Lawsuit Question?

Has anyone here ever themselves or *known* someone whos taken a fall within public & considered (or has) sued the city for it?

I'm looking for anyone w/ this sort of experience as I'm strongly considering talking to a attorney for it.

What did you learn from it adjectives? Any Do's & Don'ts or Say/Don't Says I should be aware of?

Thanks for any help.
Answers: Generally, to rest for damages for 'falling in public' you'll own to show (1) that the City had a duty to keep hold of that public place safe, (2) that they did something wrong within violation of that duty, (3) that the entity they did wrong caused you to slop, and (4) that you actually get hurt. You will have the burden of proving adjectives of those things. Added on top of it, depending on what state you're surrounded by, your city might not be liable even if they are at fault, because surrounded by some states you can't even sue governmental entities like cities, towns, counties or agencies.

Plus, if you only tripped and fell because you weren't being cautious or you weren't looking where you be going, then you hold no case. If that's what happen, and you try to bring a lawsuit anyway, then some states allow the city to come after you for adjectives their attorneys fees and expenses after you lose the case.

Furthermore, if it be your own fault but you fake in court, you can be charged next to perjury and go to intern.

So if you fell ACCIDENTALLY and the reason you fell be because the city did something wrong, AND your state allows you to sue government entities, after you should talk to a attorney.

But if you want to get some extra brass by faking a spill out, or suing for a fall that be your own fault, afterwards you should be aware of the risk that you'll end up surrounded by jail for perjury or owing tens of thousands of dollars to the city for bringing a frivolous lawsuit.

Hope that help!
A fat cow be walking on my sidewalk in heels and slipped and fell surrounded by mid-winter in Wis. She sued me, and the insurance company settled for doctor bills because of the cost to budge to court would have be higher.

People should help yourself to responsibility for their own actions.

Wrongly accused?

my daughter have been wrongly accuse of a serious crime.how do you go in the region of asking for a lie detector tryout and would it stand up in court
Answers: Lie Dectectors results can individual be admitted into court when both sides agree to do so prior to the question paper being administered.

This rarley ever happen, but you can ask the prosecution if they will aloww it. They will most likley say no. Remember the ruling has to be made prior to the administering of any audition . That means if they find out you did a practice run prior to making the set aside to take one they can win it thrown out

They are far too inacurate to be trusted with someone's guilt or innocents becuase they can register false positives and they can also be fooled particularly easily by taking sedative prior to taking them and a few other ways. The state will not risk it becuase if she beats it afterwards their case is done

Also remember she doesnt own the burden to establish her innocence the state has the burden to establish her guilt and if she is truly innocent any legal representative would have any graceful time keeping thme from doing it.


From the link

Use of polygraph evidence is prohibited within 28 states, but allowed in 18 states if both sides agree.
Wrongly accuse..

Yea right..

She should plead guilty..the little criminal
Try to write the jermany kyle he does lie deter cases,
Is it a big suitcase?? or did she steal a penny sweet from the shop?? (joking)
Lie detector test are unacceptable in court.
No, story detector tests are not admissable within Court. YOu will just own to go through the judicial process to establish her innocence.
Lie detector test do not stand up in court No, you would be better trying to establish her whereabouts etc at the time and wether anyone saw her that can vouch for this. Any evidence no event how small it seems to individuals can often be a huge facilitate.
If she has a lawyer/solicitor later that's what his job is to safeguard her. Innocent until proven guilty.
You need to find out why she is be wrongly accused firstly. The police will hold what they deem reasonable evidence to suggest it. Its not their undertaking to prove she didnt do it thats on your side of the law.
You could ask the police to enjoy a lie detector audition done, If she passes it afterwards they may start to look elswhere, so it may help even if it doesnt stand up contained by court, taking it might prevent it from getting that far.
I can sense your obvious concern for your daughter however not tell the truth detector tests can solitary be admissible in court as evidence if both party agree in mortgage.
I suggest your daughter gets a apt lawyer and any witnesses etc.
I'm sure if she is innocent the truth will come out.
Good luck .
Hi within,

In the UK such evidence is not admissible in court as it is considered unreliable. I suggest she finds a well-mannered lawyer who will know how to help her. Good luck.

Are we casting our votes to be anxious, threated or punished by the power?

In the constituitional right one have to stereotype the vote for their betterment. But after getting the power and elected, the same M.L.A or Member of Parliament shows his muscels to threaten indistinguishable poor fellows who give a great hand to become him a branch to do so.
Answers: We are to blame to bring such bugs in politics.So

VOTE FOR RIGHT & DESERVING CANDIDATES.
I agree near many others who answered your put somebody through the mill. You are the one who decided and voted. Why did you vote for a personality who is not fit to be your representative? I bet many close to or may be you also do not even vote. You have to mind your Ps and Qs while voting, if you vote for better person ( not a soul is Mr. Right) you will not regret. I am also worried because even now not masses educated inhabitants, middle class population of India neither vote not contest in the see. We are the one who decide the adjectives of country and we are the one who build the future of country.

What is the childrens act?

1989
Answers: looks after the welfare of the little darling`s
The Children Act 1989 is a British Act of Parliament that altered the regulation in good opinion to children. In particular, it introduced the notion of parental responsibility. Later law have acted to amend undisputed parts of the Children Act. If you want to read it all progress to..

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1989/Ukp...

..it's too long to paste into here it's 11 A4 page long.

Hope that helps.
It is the imperative regarding children and everything to do next to children

It covers disability, legal liability, knock about, divorce & custody, Maintenance, trusts, protection, rights and welfare..etc etc etc...everything that can effect a child is provided for in this one piece of legislation

Why are most convicted criminals from working class backgrounds?

Answers: probably one and the same reason most ethnic group are from the working class.
because all the politicians own good lawyer and they know all the law lords.

Because if we were rich we wouldn't own to commit crimes to feed our kids.
For two reason:
1. People who have easier said than done life are probable to draw the conclusion that "crime is the only option".
2. Minor criminals are persecuted by the tenet, major criminals take on with the tenet, and professional criminals set up the rules of the law.
Okay right, populace must remember that not all crimes are commited by working class society, this is what is portrayed in the medium? WHY? because it makes headline... what would you rather hear? "Old woman mugged by thug" or something involving some fraudulent behaviour (brain block on a title).. I'm assuming you'd be more shocked on the poor weak lady mortal mugged...

There's a major removal in the reports within white collar crime (Crimes committed by the gov, and higher classes, corporate crime etc).. Now you'd be suprised to hear that more society die in the work place than you do surrounded by the street, or murder etc..they die in the work place due to negligence etc... what roughly those companies like association carbide and the terrible bhopal disaster.. nobody be convicted for what they did? why because these companies can get away near it. 20,000 deaths occured from this incident, some directly, other indirectly..

So since I answer this question, unprotected in mind upper class ethnic group are just as deviant and criminal..if worse..

There's probably a higher amount of convicted working class criminals because the police would fairly arrest a poor person for trying to steal some food for their children a bit than stop some corporate boss stealing money from the poor and being inattentive.. why? because white collar crime is more difficult to detect, and some people dont realise they're victims, for example credit card fraud. if you're not checking your statements, you'll never realise it.

Violent crimes and mugging are generally associated next to the working class, which have victims who manifestly know they're being violeted or anything, so eaiser to catch..

That's it really...
they are caught and convicted more normally as they can't afford good lawyer.

Gerry and Kate Mc Grub. A Challenge?

It seems expected that you will eventually be charged with slaughter Madeleine.
However even the most optimstic of us accepts that near highly rewarded lawyers you will take on you may escape justice within the manner of O J Simpson.

I'm thinking ahead just about your other two children.
Do you think bout how hey will cope beside the cloud of suspicion hanging over their parents? can you picture how much they will be teased at arts school. Do you care more going on for your own hides than theirs? Ok on chronological performance the answer to to be exact clear...but I digress.
So if you are cleared by a trial I for one will never give up on taunting you. You deserve it. There are oodles like me.

There is one bearing though. If you are truely innocent take a Lie detector examination.
I am sure one of the Tabloids would be delighted to fetch it out.
The probabilty that you could both fool it is remote.

A properly set up and regulated lie detector could be the greatest piece of propaganda ever.
Answers: Well said Andrew.
"It seem likely that you will eventually be charged beside killing Madeleine."

I read this far and consequently decided this wasn't something I could give somebody a lift seriously.
QUOTE: "So if you are cleared by a trial I for one will never give up on taunting you. You deserve it. There are heaps like me"

Sick Ba$t@rd - get nothing better to do next to your life? SAD WEIRDO.
Luckily for you we don't use fabrication detectors in this country.

They are used contained by the US but results are not admissible in court.

Sub Judice single applies once criminal charges have be laid. What you should be concerned about are libel law.

Edit:
Interlectual? . What can one say?
Answer. B*******.
You trying to have a word to someone like Baby_ fac on an interlectual plane. Get some more PROZAC down your throat and sleep your depression off. YOU said you be presribed them before. Keep taking them
what be the question?
Everyone is entitled to their belief and thought process, doesn`t make one wrong and one right but I hold to say for the first time within answering many question on here I find myself been unsympathetic to this poster for the comments it have received.
It is your opinion ,granted, so consequently you are entitled to it.
Whatever the outcome of this case and I doubt we will ever truly know, the with the sole purpose victim here truly is little Maddie, and I deem people are so focused on did the parents do it or not that they forget any this poor little girl met a horrible and tragic end at the hand of a person unknown or she is out nearby somewhere frightened and scared.

Why are there so frequent things being debarred in UK?

Due to form and safety law certain things that hold been done for years are anyone stopped.
What things do you know of?
Do you agree they should be banned or should we be allowed to live as our parents and grandparents did?
Answers: The inevitable transition from socialism to communism...
It is more to do next to the cost of insurance than anything else.

Since we developed a taste for getting something for nought by suing people or organisations, they own become more reluctant to do almost anything for fear of litigation.
Welcome to hard work dictatorship. Everything is banned unless it is legally recognized.

We are born free and I believe we should pretty much stay free (you need a few adjectives rules for the good of everyone) but this police state (UK) have gone way too far.
Worse is on the other hand to come.
Common sense has also self banned!
There enjoy been constant fireworks banned.But that's a perfect thing.
Knives (such as Swiss army knife are not allowed to be carried by kids)
EDIT:Being competent to film at university concerts or taking photos has be banned at some school because of the possibility of pervs.I think the smoking prohibit is good though, individual a cancer patient and adjectives.
Take a look at George Orwell's 'Animal Farm' (or another look if you've read the book or seen the picture before).

Gordon (Napoleon) Brown stars in it, and his knees-up make some attempt to explain their policies, and why they are so worthy for us (the proletariat).
I agree that we are going mad beside health and safekeeping laws. To have an idea that that a police officer is unable to support rescue a child from a lake in need the worry of have a disciplinary hanging over their head is ludicrous. Unfortunately although some people individual see this as a "labour" issue it is in reality a party yawning issue and something much bigger than that.
In a society who pretty much feel that we are owed everything and want everthing this one and only spreads out into the wider paths of our lives and so we want to protect everything. People are afraid to walk out rightly or wrongly and can feel intimidated by family wearing "hoodies" so the shopping malls ban general public from wearing them on their patch. It doesn't stop people wearing them. Infact kids imparticular consistency they need to stand their ground and why ever not. Its not the hood thats going to return with you. Its a person and they come within all shapes and sizes and within all different covering.
Equally I heard myself truism fireworks should only be put on surrounded by displays. I might be wrong afterall despite the fact that at hand are lots of incidents with them respectively year they have other been around to own at home or where ever and newly because I don't like the belief of them being sold o Joe public who am I to enunciate that we can't all run responsilbiltiy for ourselves.????
The balance have gotten ridiculous but to say that this country is **** is shameful and if ancestors reading this have exception to this wonderful place pack your oodles.
Because your country is ban slap glad.

I remember Sir Elton John publicly came out within support of banning something or other. All I could consider is the guy is gay, and one of these days he's going to be disallowed too.

A ban may seem to be good at the time, but consequently it is taken to extremes when the public morphs into some other kind of thinking and next no one is protected.

I judge its time we ban the stoppage worldwide.

Peace

Jim

.
It's not Health and Safty laws, it's stupid those who don't understand strength and safty.

The idea is to pinch sensible steps about sanctuary: ie to take precautions in the region of likely accident, not to take prevenative steps against completely everything that can go wrong, no event how remote the chance of it occurring or trivial the consequences.

It's sad to read adjectives these replies from people who accomplishment on what they hear about things mortal banned fairly than checking the facts for themselves. It's people who work on what they've heard that mete out the straightjacket of H&S to tighten, not officials making law.

Many of the things that are banned are not expelled by law, but by rules set by overprotective idiots. You may find that lots of the things you contemplate are banned in actual fact aren't.

There is a whole page of myths at the HSE.
http://www.hse.gov.uk/myth/index.htm

They are sick of man painted as bad guys, and frequently create clear that the idea of H&S is not for relatives to stop doing things but to think nearly what they do.

Unfortunately to think around what they are doing is too much effort for some associates (withness the nuber of thickies who think sorting rubbish into environmental and non-recyclable is difficult or onerous) so you may as well be aphorism not to do things.
I know what you mean.

The Americans are worse!

No smoking within bars, No mask on Halloween, High School Uniforms, Students required to take prudence pledges, no kissing kids in church, Christmas displays mortal banned because at hand isn't a start of David next to it - this is scarcely the world the Hippies envisioned.

The world needs to chill out!
definately exchange blows for your rights, life is ours not theirs.

More Questions and Answers:
[1457] - [182] - [1701] - [1944] - [33] - [1035] - [441] - [1553] - [1669] - [423] - [283] - [2484] - [1563] - [1674] - [1508] - [1445] - [1903] - [1781] - [767] - [1535]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: