Law Questions and Answers
Is it against the law to own a relationship with a coworker?
My girlfriend who is 30 years hoary works in matching company that I work for. Could we get fired for have a relationship?Answers: As long as you guys are both over the age of consent, (18) and are interested in respectively other, then I don't see anything wrong near it. It's only unlawful if you are using her to acquire to something, blackmail, or cheating on your wife. Well... cheating is not illegal, but it should be.
BTW, lately becz your work says that you can't date inside the company, don't permit that stop you from love. If you like this personality, do it, IT IS NOT ILLEGAL, what are they going to do, fire you? That would be wrong. This country has freedom of speech, press, and feelings... if they did that, that would probably infringe on your rights, because you have the right to date somebody, which somehow falls beneath one of the above categories... or so I own heard.
It is not against the regulation, but it may be against Company policy.
Check your policy because if it is one or both could possible be terminated.
generally, no, it is not against the ruling. Some companies have policies give or take a few relationships in the department, but those are usually more towards married couples than dating ones.
But if you ever break up with her, it may be difficult for you both to hold to see each other at work adjectives the time.
Nothing in the decree forbids it.
Company policy might, however.
Better check with your company policy to see what is written.
U.S. Government should not ban the selling of guns surrounded by common places?
I hope to carry more points to support it.Like I thought about it is a business for race because they can earn money from selling guns.
Please feel free to share your point of vista. Thanks!
Answers: Unless the Constitution is changed, they can't ban it. The diverse states can [and do ] make it difficult to put on the market weapons.
See California's law, for example. Weapons are devices made for a particular purpose, purely like cars and trucks - it's the misuse of these tools that cause problems.
What is the differnce between actus reus and mens rea?
Although I have studied these for two years (law) I cannot appear to understand the clear distinction between the two.Answers: Actus reus is the wrongful handling itself (say me stealing money).
Mens rea is the wrongful state of mind, that I intended an unlawful act. If, for example, I logically believed that it was my own money that I be taking there would be no crime because in attendance would be no mens rea despite the actus reus
the actus reus is the "guilty act"
it is the material elements of a crime
the mens rea is the "guilty mind"
it is the mental part of a crime
In the crime of murder it is the (1) intent of a person (mens rea), the conscious jib, the knowing and purposefulness of
the (2) result of homicide, the act that set forth a series of events that resulted surrounded by the death of another human self.
without the mens rea but the actus reus, you do not hold criminal liability. For instance, a man polishes his gun and due to a manufacturing deformity, the gun goes past its sell-by date killing another human self. We do not hold the gun polisher criminally liable absent proof of negligence because of his mental state.
beside mens rea but not actus reus, you have criminal liability. For instance, a man points a gun at another and pulls the trigger, but he misses and shoots the wall. We enjoy attempted murder. The shooter intended to kill although we don't enjoy a killing.
In criminal ruling, we punish the mental state, not the act, although the stroke will determine how much we punish. It is the malice within the actor, the "unlit heart" that we wish to punish, because to be exact what causes the criminal to feat against the law.
The means of access to remember is actus reus is the act. mens rea is the mind.
In strict liability crimes (the exception), we do not require any state of mind, singular the material elements or the actus reus. Examples include speeding and statutory rape. Any level of criminal intent or the absence thereof is adequate in proving strict liability crimes.
There are some arrangements which amount to criminal acts per se, even when a human being performs them unthinkingly, beside no intention in mind. For example, if I am driving and fling my coup¨¦ door open because I am human being stung by a bee and I hit you as you pass by, this is an actus reus, a guilty perform, although I had no intention of hitting you and my individual real concern be getting rid of that bee. Such an action is particular as one carrying absolute liability and my state of mind is somewhat irrelevant.
Otherwise, surrounded by examining the guilt of a person charged beside a criminal offence, one have to look at his state of mind. It is for this reason that infallible people are not convicted of offence: people below the age of criminal responsibility (under 10) or people suffering from serious mental syndrome which causes them to perceive things within a different light from the rest of us. In pleading statutory ramparts, the state of mind is important, and to succeed surrounded by a plea of self defence, the ruling has be stated as using such force as would be justified within the circumstances as the person concerned subjectively believes them to be.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-defenc...
In this channel, certain whereabouts which would otherwise be criminal offences can be reasonable because of the state of mind of the person committing them.
If in that were any clear distinction, consequently there would not be such a complex body of casing law and the criminal decree would not give rise to so much detailed argument contained by court.
Is the free exercise of religion adequately protected contained by America's public schools today?
Answers: It's protected satisfactorily in churches across the country, which operate import tax free without the assistance of public duty dollars.
It should not have any protection or assistance within public schools. Schools, unless sponsored by a religious institution - such as private religious school, should not be forced to concern themselves with or tutor religious dogma outside of elective comparative religion courses where adjectives religions are given equal play.
There is no reason to protect a free exercise of religion contained by a public school. If you consistency that religion is so important to you that you must disrupt the school duty to teach and not preach, later go to a parochial institution.
You are assuming a right not in evidence.
Not at adjectives I am very religous and I travel to a public school and issues come up and i respond to them religously such as an evolution topic and the teacher will get terrifically short with me and take upset. Also my friend got sent to the deans organization for not stating he beleives in evolution by an atheist biology tutor. It is NOT protected at all!
Yes, nearby is no protection (for public) in school. It's called separation of church and state.
I shudder to reckon what is being qualified in the more swingeing Muslim schools contained by this country though.
It's called separation of Church and State. The directive requires (due to stupid atheists) that religion is not allowed contained by schools because it is apparently OFFENSIVE. What a nouns... Unfortunately, GOD is not allowed backbone in school, becz. of religious differences. That I believe is BULL! God should be allowed EVERYWHERE. 86% of the country believes in god. But as expected some atheists have to beckon their lawyers and grasp it banned from everywhere. What almost the Maj. what about our beliefs? It's time to notify the 14% minority to shut up and sit down, and if they don't like it, tough. If god be allowed back within schools, VA tech and perchance even Columbine might not have happen! Can I get an Amen from any christians?
Rightwing fundamaentalist christians? PLEASE! That is such a desperate statement I could puke. It's the muslims that are destroying this country anyway. Let's not forget 9/11/01 shall we? Bunch of towelheaded morons. But we will pull through, the muslims will desire they never did what they have done.
No one is forbidding exercise of religion within public schools.
If you want to pray, progress ahead. Just do it quietly.
If your religion requires you to rant, rave, speak surrounded by tonges, shout and yell, you may enjoy to do that on your lunch hour..off arts school grounds or out in the playground.
What you cannot do is insist on proverb prayers outloud in the classroom, endorsement out religious texts or any other whereabouts trying to focus others on your religion.
We ALL have freedom of religion. That medium you also are free to NOT believe, if you wish.
What kind of policemen be they?
ok. so i have a neighbor. he is underage. he is believed to market drugs. him and his friends are always smoking and drinking. this guy is contained by a gang. his mom called the police and they told her that they couldnt do anything make happen he is only 17. what can i do? i honestly dont want him around my younger siblings?Answers: The officer should have put him within the back of their cruiser and haul his behind sour to the Corrections Dept!
Just because he's 17, does not mean he can't be arrested for those crimes, those cops involve a lesson in the decree. If it's a local PD, call the County Sheriff's Dept, see what they can do, county have jurisdiction over local in some cases.
WOW! You're kid me , right?
Because i had a similar situation when my "WILDCHILD" granted she was gonna go the stuff. I had NO CLUE what it even be!! (Im for real, folks, i be very sheltered as a child, sorta close to a Quaker style religion. But my 2 year old brought down a cig pack beside "grass" in it! chewin on it!!! I be FURIOUS!!!! it could have kill him! YOU BETTER BELIEVE i called the cops, and yes i be heartbroken, but i cant own my oldest hurting my youngest! So she calls her daddy across the KY border and the cop told him to mind his own business, ...:)
I didnt convey her to jail, but i did manufacture her sit down and be counseled by 4 officers for 5 grueling hours!! LOL
Who has the most "Mistakes"? Right of Left? ...and WHAT did they really do wrong?
that Jefferson guy get caught with change in the freezer, and as you would expect Bill with Monica-But didn't the guy that funded going after Clinton merely get busted going to a hooker for years- yes- and the San Diego Congressman - rotten to jail...and better not mention Scooter Libby's porno writing, oh and the Ted Haggart guy -cured?, and um, Foley, and, the Mormon guy who only just got sent to prison, and the Speaker of the House who have an affair and had to step down- whats his first name? and Dik's daughter-lesbian, and the Larry Craig incident.. I know I'm forgetting someone- no, not Rush with his Oxycontin ("adjectives druggies should go to prison") and his Bahama Viagra trip. or Tom Delay and the chinese girls sweat shops on American islands-
dang! too tons to recall- help me remember a few more?
Um.. i claim "executive priveledge" "I lately don't recall" uh... "Mistakes were made"
"Military operation have ended"
uh... "what going on for the pig?"
=) six days, six weeks, I doubt six months-
Answers: Have you ever read a book called "Glass Houses"? It is adjectives about adjectives the crimes against humanity committed by those who were trying to bring Clinton down over the Monica article. *sm*
I actually singular have question to address your questions...
1) Does it really situation? Shouldn't we be looking forward to having some elected official in organization who won't do wrong, as opposed to looking backbone and placing blame on those who did wrong?
2) Why is it a "mistake" that Dick Cheney's daughter is a lesbian?
I said i would give q@a away but...?
i said i would hand over q and a away but i would like to ask this cross-question to all the bona fide contributers who have taken the time to post legit question and have some butcher switch wacko press the button and deny you the right of relply to your ligitimate question and stopping those that may enjoy been intrested from audible range the answers that i think q and a is suppost to be something like ...what do think folks.seamanabAnswers: I assume that you enjoy been reported for some of your question or answers. have you read the Community Guidelines to build sure you are following them? I agree that some members fraudulently hit the report button and this is in a minute being deal with. I tried to locate some of your question and answers but you have clicked the "private" button for them. I usually find that member who do this are hiding something.
Care to expand on that a little? I want to be sure that you miserable what I think you do.
What are the three levels of standard courts?
Answers: In the US federal system, there is the trial court call the Federal District Court. They try cases, determine the facts, and enforce orders
There is the appellate court call the Federal Circuit Court. They review errors or potential errors from the district court level.
There is the Supreme Court of the United States. They review the decision of the Circuit Courts and State Supreme courts.
These are in relation to the Federal system. Generally speaking in that is a trial court, an intermediate appellate court in most jurisdiction, and a court of last resort habitually called the Supreme Court, but not other (NY is strange in this sense).
The three level of general courts can also refer to criminal courts where on earth we have a distinguished jury to determine if the evidence supports the indictment, the jury trial to determine guilt or innocence, and the court of appeals to review the trial court and grand jury.
I would voice Trial (district courts), Appellate, and Supreme.
What is the difference between "courts of fact" and "courts of law"?
Answers: from Wikipedia:
"A trier of fact (or finder of fact) is a party who determines facts in a endorsed proceeding. To determine a fact is to agree on, from the evidence, whether something existed or some event occurred. In a jury trial, the jury is the trier of reality. The jury finds the facts and applies them to the law it is instructed by the peacemaker to use in decree to reach its punishment. Thus, in a jury trial, the findings of reality are made by the jury while the judge make legal rulings as to what evidence will be hear by the jury and what law govern the case."
i found this to be a interesting cross-examine but i have no hypothesis sorry :-) i will keep my eyes begin to this one
Remember Remember the 5th of November!?
Why is it that we are the only country within the world that celebrates a folks attempt to blow up a place of national goverment? I mean if any even so much as contemplated that in a minute we would arrest them shout terrorisam and put them in objective for many years.I know we are celebrate the fact that his attempt be foiled and that is why we burn him, but again even that seem a bit macarbe in this year of anti-terrorisam.
Even the rhyme that goes beside it acknowledges the certainty that there be gunpowder, treason and plot, three things now even if the final outcome event has-been would still not rule in celebration.
I know this is the solitary time in Britain (apart from perchance a tad at new year) that we enjoy fireworks but surely in todays culture and beside the way of the world that this celebration (if you can christen it that) needs to be rethinked.
Answers: Guy fawkes be the only personage to go into parliment beside good intentions,Pity he one-time.
You are not.
See...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Fawkes_...
More Questions and Answers:
[337] - [2199] - [1213] - [171] - [2324] - [1204] - [939] - [1887] - [1593] - [2442] - [2471] - [938] - [2496] - [1605] - [2165] - [313] - [1960] - [331] - [1246] - [1558]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: