Law Questions and Answers

Can I Say NO to getting breathalyzed?

I was at a celebration in Utah a year ago, and the cops come in exact someone let them contained by. So I was surrounded by the back, next to no alc in foot. They still gave everyone surrounded by the party breathalyzers and get a ticket. Could I have said NO?
Answers: Yes you can. And lacking alcohol in appendage, I have doubts as to teh officer's "probable cause" for asking you to clutch a BA. What ws the ticket for? You weren't driving. Underage drinking? If so, you should have fought it.
I am not sure in the order of Utah, but I know in some places you can articulate no, but if you do they call a supervisor who will establish your fate and mostly means your going to sit contained by the tank for a few hours.

Saying "no" is other an option bu it is not other the best option.
Yes... but most states will automatically suspend your license if you do.

Some states may purloin you to a hospital to get a blood experiment.
If you were not surrounded by a car yes you can.
how ever if you are contained by a car and hold a drivers license. If you say NO the cost is worse than that of a DUI.

Driving a privilege not a right


The above posters all assume you be driving. You stated that you were not.
Because you be not driving or operating any vehicle (as I understand you ) I believe you be coerced into taking the test. What I don't realize is why they would bother to test anyone. Alcohol is a allowed product. Were you underage?

If so. you got what you deserve.
I'm guilty of duplicate thing.. no taste here, just close watch.
I would guess that each state have its own guidelines - in Maine, for instance, refuse a breathalyzer is the same as an access of guilt.
If you have be drinking - stay out of Maine - it has some of the toughest drunk driving law in the country.
You can say aloud no to a breathalyser, but then they assume guilt and bust you anyways.
not a hundred percent bet you all be under the permissible drinking age or disturbing the peace or both. That's the reason you be breathalyzed. is that pretty close to the whole story? Normally they won't do that near adults. Sure you could have said no. Why? You be going to jail anyway,There are other charges they could find along next to being drunk.

Can i still become a nurse with a dismissed domestic brutality charge from 9 years ago on my record?

The state board is kinda giving me a tough time about it. along beside a dui charge from 2003 i'm kinda worried. I mean i'm 30 in a minute. i was 21 when the domestic intimidation charge happened but it be dropped the prosecutor literally laughed when he saw the charges because it be completely the other parties scorn. as for the dui i blew exactly at .08 and back within 03 the laws be stiff just not as stiff as they are very soon. I need relieve, i'm worried i've come to far to just quit.
Answers: If the charge be dismissed, then what is the problem? Are you sure it be dismissed? Or did you get it dismissed after probation. If you get it dismissed after probation, you need to seize it expunged. As for the DUI, just right to be heard you had one drink too heaps while leaving the local restaurant and you get busted. You paid your dues, academic from the mistake, and haven't repeated it.

However, the public licensing boards (state lessons commission, real estate, health) own the job to weed out as various bad apples as possible.

Just be sincere, explain everything and say aloud that you are a completely different person. You shouldn't own any trouble.

Also, get an attorney if at all possible.
Any dismissed charge is -- legally -- as if it never happen. The state cannot use a dismissed charge against you.

As for the DUI -- if you were found guilty -- that could be used against you -- if you be found not-guilty or if it was dismissed -- consequently again, it cannot.

Get real answers from millions of physical people.?

Can I press charge against a 17 year antediluvian boy who having sex next to my 15 years old daughter?
Answers: YOU can't press charges -- the prosecutor would press charges. And whether the conduct you are describing is unendorsed or not depends on the state.

My question is does anybody believe that marijuana will be endorsed in the US anytime soon?

Me individually I believe that it should be. I think that alcohol is bearing worse health clever and marijuana could actually minister to our economoy. If it was endorsed the government could rates it similar to alcohol, they can use hemp for many different things(rope,clothes and frequent other things too), and correct me if Im wrong but I even heard that cannabis even puts out more oxygen later trees. Well please share with me your opinion on this.
Answers: Whether is should be and whether it will be are two completely different questions. I agree beside your argument on the legalization. Makes perfect sense to me. But we live within a Christian society and the war on drugs have been going on for far too long to basically do a 180 and decide to make conform it. It would take a MASSIVE propaganda assault to convince the common herd of our views on this issue.
I agree that it should be officially recognized, but I doubt that we will see it in our lifetime.

The problem is that the political affairs can't regulate it when people will grow it at home. If the management can't get their sticky corpulent fingers on all the duty money, then they might not bother.

There have a hard adequate time getting medical marijuana passed in states.
should be legally recognized? yes
WILL be legal? no (not surrounded by my lifetime)
MJ has be demonized for so long that the likely hood of it ever self legal surrounded by the US is probably slim to nil.

People have be indoctrinated into thinking it is a step on to harder stuff. And there may be some truth to that, but so is alcohol.

I one-sidedly do not use either, but still dream up that legalization of most drugs could free up resources to fight indisputable crime. It would also allow regulation, and bankrupt plentiful criminal organizations who use drugs to fund their other operation.
I'm sure that Yahoo will delete this question and transport you a violation become aware of, and may even scold adjectives of us who answer, but here goes anyway:

No, it's unlikely that marijuana will be legalized, or even decriminalized soon. There's too much of a stigma attached to it, as those who freely imbibe alcohol and smoke cigarettes suppose of marijuana as a "hippie drug."

If you think more or less all the money spent on interdiction, arrest, prosecution, and incarceration, you'll come up near many billions of dollars save by decriminalizing this plant.

If you think around the billions in sale taxes that could be collected, as well as the secondary income to farmers for growing it, it sounds even better for the financial health of the country.

I don't chew over any intelligent person believes marijuana is suitable for you, but you are probably correct in that it's absolutely no worse than alcohol or tobacco.
I wish.hey even the governor Arnold said he doesn't consider it a drug 'cuz it grows on a fern.lol

I agree!!

Can I sue a business that refuses to stop reporting a symmetry owed on my credit report 3yrs after bankrupcy?

Wells Fargo Bank still says I owe them over 40K. The productive amount on my bankrupcy was around 30K. They are still charging behind fees and interest. I've called them every month for olden times three years to tell them that they be included on my bankrupcy and plaese stop reporting it as a balance owed. They said respectively time they would take trouble of it. To date they have not. What can I do? What's my officially recognized recourse?
Answers: Provide documentation of this debt being included (and discharged) contained by your Bankruptcy, to each of the 3 Credit Bureaus. They are required by ruling to remove erroneous entries or you can sue them for $1,000.00 (each) for non-compliance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).

Provide impossible to tell apart documentation to Wells Fargo (certified mail), along with your assertion of your right to notify the Bankruptcy Court of the creditors' continued betrayal of Federal Bankruptcy Laws, which can result in the issuance of a $10,000.00 fine.

Inquire next to your attorney about YOUR personal option for litigation against Wells Fargo as well.

Good Luck.
You can pocket them to court yes. If they weren't present at your bankruptcy audible range to enforce their claim against you. Then the debt was forgiven and that would hold been noted within the bankruptcy paperwork.

If they constantly throw out to do anything about it. Then your best bet is to contact the court and hold them deal beside it.
You can put a correction/explanation in your credit report. Contact the credit agency and they will report to you how to do it. It must be in writing. Phone call will only gain you so far. Put your request to Wells Fargo in writing including the valise number of the bankruptcy and relate them that you are putting an explanation in your credit report.

Hwat kind of attorney would I need to find if i needed to sue over unlawful eviction?


Answers: A dumb one. If the eviction was unlawful, why didn't you retain an attorney to shield against it?
Probably the time to have deal with the lawfulness of the eviction would own been when you be evicted in court.

Now it sounds resembling you want to appeal on procedural grounds, and that is going to be a really very long shot.

If you want to do it, next just start calling lawyer in your local pallid pages. But probably not the one that represented you surrounded by the first case :)
One that handle landlord and tenant directive. They are listed contained by your local telephone book. Sometimes it is lower than Real Estate law.

Suppose that a local businessperson, McDougal is a good friend of Krunch ,the owner of local candy store .?

Suppose that a local businessperson, McDougal is a devout friend of Krunch ,the owner of local candy store . Every day on his lunch hour McDougal go into Krunch's candy store and spends about 5 minutes looking at the candy. After examining krunch's candy and conversation with krunch, McDougal usually buys one or two candy bar.One afternoon, McDougal goes into Krunch's Candy shop,looks at the candy,and picks up a $ 1 candy inn. Seeing that Krunch is very busy, he catch Krunch's eye, waves the candy pole at Krunch without adage a word, and walks out. Is within contract?
*(Express versus Implied Contracts)
Answers: From the situation, its an implied contract
Who cares? They are friends and Krunch know that McDougal will pay Krunch the dollar the subsequent day. Krunch is not going to christen the police or charge interest. McDougal is not going to stiff Krunch and force him to sue. Therefore, there is no possible "satchel or controversy" that a court could consider.

Being Harrassed by former Landscapers?

We had a Landscaping Company doing our courtyard work for a while, but then we fired them and hired a different company because they weren't doing the charge they promised to do and were overcharging us. When they disappeared, they were rewarded in full.

Now, they hang on to calling us at least three or four times a week asking to "diary the next appointment" and I share them every time they call that we no longer want their services.. they wait a few days and send for again.

It's getting very annoying. What can be done nearly it?
Answers: You could retain a lawyer and win the lawyer to distribute them a letter of representation relating them not to contact you anymore.
You could also send them a epistle yourself telling them to stop and desist their contact with you.
a. Change your phone number (and do not tender them the new number)
b. Get caller-id and do not answer the call from them
c. Put your number on the do-not-call list (which does not apply to them WHILE they hold an existing business relationship with you) AND end their business relationship with you, within writing.
d. Complain to the BBB.
e. Schedule the appointment for sometime at least 120 years after when you be born. Since you will be dead by afterwards, it will be someone else's problem.

Can i get harrassment charges or a restraining demand???

my husbands ex's are harrassing us.they put dog poop in his truck they enjoy broke into our bedroom.they follow him around.they threaten to have me whitewashed up.the cops won't do anything what can i do???
Answers: File a criminal case of unreasonable vexation and grave threats against the ex of your husband by narrating adjectives the irregularities that were made against you and your properties so that appropriate performance will be made by the Police and the Court.
restraining order most likey...
The cops HAVE to do something...
Considering they treaten you.
ooh tricky situation!! try cops within another town/ city. see whta they say and if they read out you can then describe the cops in your town/city that they should be doing something or take the other town's police to tell them for you
hoipe i help x
I would move..Far, far, far, far away.
FILE A RESTRAINING ORDER AND BEAT THEIR MOTHER FREAKIN BUTTS
consult an attorney. file for a restraining lay down, by law they enjoy to issue one if you have any evidence. I'd start carrying a video camera to capture them.

if all else failsl, a short time ago kill the biatch
Way too much drama for me

You plainly need to database for a restraining order, and he does as economically.

I don't do drama very powerfully, but if you're willing to stick it out, silver the locks and invest in some surveillance equipment. You can also phone a security service to patrol your house when you're not nearby.
Write them a letter outlining everything that they did and emergency they stop. Make sure it is polite, but tell them that you no longer want anything to do near them and that you will turn the matter over to a permitted source if you have to. Have it sent certified communication and get proof of service.

Should they preserve this up, you can give a copy to the police and a legal representative.

Whats the difference between assigning and sub-letting?

I have get a 10 year lease on a flat but i want to go travelling for 2 years but i'm not sure whether i will come stern or not. What would be best to assign or sub-let the lease? Uk law
Answers: Assigning ability you get someone to appropriate over your entire lease with adjectives liabilities.
Sub-letting process that you are still the record lease holder, but you negotiate next to someone else to live in your space for a spell less than your remaining lease. Hence, you would be looking for someone to sub-lease.
However, cause sure your lease agreement allows you the ability to sub-lease. Some lease require the consent of the lessor.
You must check your lease.

To assign is to pass adjectives the benefit of the lease to someone else who then become liable fot adjectives the tenants obligation. Most landlords don't like this and may charge to make available consent to the assignment.

Landlord probably also has to agree to sub-letting. This finances that you let to someone else but hold the liabilities. So if your sub tenant does not money rent or damages the flat you will be liable which might prove difficult if you are 5000 miles away.

You also need to check if your lease have any value - discuss to (real) estate agent.
In a sub-let, the original tenant is still the direct tenant -- and allows someone else to lease from them -- mode of a two-stage lease. But the original tenant remains "on the hook" for the lease amount, and the sub-let is simply for a portion of the time.

An assignment is a one-time transfer -- the current person take over the lease, and the previous tenant is (often) off the hook. But more specifically, the previous tenant transfers (assigns) their entire remaining lease permanent status. The previous tenant doesn't take the lease rear over like they do at the appendage of the sub-let.
The whole lease is assigned to a third delegation for the remainder of the term the assignees taking over the intact responsibility for the lease. The property is sub-let and the original lesee is responsible for ensure that the terms of the lease are honoured by the sub-lettee. unless the canon has changed I give attention to that if the assignee fails to take out his responsibilities like income the rent the original lessee is still responsible. i guess this may have changed

More Questions and Answers:
[2176] - [1440] - [832] - [105] - [1036] - [824] - [956] - [84] - [1971] - [194] - [1589] - [1472] - [2347] - [264] - [2266] - [1944] - [800] - [327] - [2237] - [751]


The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: