Law Questions and Answers

I am a Christian, I believe in the ten commandments?

adjectives sense ,do the right things, dont hurt each other, but we procure blown up for that, people who steal our benifits and houses, but beware, Christians have get it about right, we dont want to blow uo a nouns of muslim people on in attendance way to work, and we wont. You dont alarm us and never will

Answers: I am not a Christian, I don't want to hurt people, or upset citizens, but I do not love the people who desire to kill and hurt inhabitants as Christians are told by the words of Jesus Christ in the Bible, to do.

I do however believe that to read is to realize there is nought to forgive.

I.R.A
The Spanish Inquisition
David Koresh
Timothy Mc Veigh

Countless other

Yes, if followed correctly and without bigotry Christianity is a moral moral code.

But it is foolish to think Christianity have the monopoly on morality.

1) This is an answers site, not an inane polemics site.

2) You are not a Christian, because if you were you would show tolerance and compassion to adjectives of mankind.

3) "Let he without sin die the first stone." (why is that so conveniently overlooked by people similar to you.)

And while we're on the subject of conveniently overlooked bible quotes:

4) "Judge not lest thee be judge."

You just transport on pretending that the Crusades, the Inquisition, and the war within Iraq funded by fundies never happened. Explain yourself to your God when the time comes.

How long after someones dies do you have to folder for probate in missouri?

Answers: As soon as possible. Nothing can be distributed from their estate until Letters Probate are received.

Exactly what is corporal punishment, and is it legal within Calif.? orU.S.A.for that matter?

I be having a conversation near a friend and we agreed beating the kids be a bad means of access to raise them. And next spanking came up. According to state or federal LAW is spanking legitimate, or is it considered corporal punishment?

Answers: Corporal, some archers on the tower..!! NOW..!!

I dont know about California law regarding corporal punishment, i create in your mind they support some sort of liberal idealogy against it. Corporal punishment is a choice made by parents in how to address their childrens misbehavior using "force" or hand on. If no permanent injury of a physical quality results it's totally legal and supported by L.E. The physical question is at what age is this type of practice forceful. I say once children become teens abstraction their priviledges is a more effective bearing to discipline them. Spanking a kid isn't abuse and near is no cut and dry answer to your question because respectively circumstance may vary. Hopefully adjectives sense will dictate wheter or not a parent crosses the line far satisfactory for the government to be involved contained by their parenting, that's the idea.

Who's the owner in texas, if you find grease in your property ?

Answers: That depends on a great deal of things. Until around the beginning of the 20th century, the surface owner owned adjectives of the oil, gas, and other minerals below the ground. But then ancestors started separating the mineral estate from the surface estate. This could be done in a few different ways. A surface owner could put on the market the surface and reserve a fraction or all of the minerals. Say, for example they convey the surface and reserve 1/2 of the minerals. The soul who buys the land would receive the surface and the other 1/2 of the minerals.
A person who owns the minerals can also convey slice or all of the minerals they own by executing a mineral action.

A person might own the surface and none of the minerals. The minerals could be owned by 100 different culture, because they were reserved or sold stale early surrounded by the history of the land, and the minerals own been passed down through inheritances.

You hold to go to the courthouse surrounded by the county where the property is and research the title to find out who owns the minerals beneath your land. That's what landmen do. The mineral owners can lease their minerals to grease companies and reserve a fraction of the royalty from whatever is produced.

The government/state. There is a article called lofty domain, giving the government the power to buy any property they would similar to from any individual (even if the person requirements to or not).

"Eminent domain (United States) in adjectives law legitimate systems is the inherent power of the state to seize a citizen's private property, expropriate property, or rights within property, without the owner's consent. The property is taken any for government use or by lobby group to third parties who will devote it to "public use"."

Philo is correct simply a title search within the courthouse of the county the property lies in will provide who owns the mineral rights. Some archives in rural courhouses enjoy not been microfished earlier say 1950 so it will pilfer a lot of arduous work if it does not show up contained by the recent title policies. A landman is someone who deals near this daily, finding long lost owners of mineral rights and could probably do this a great deal faster for you.Also mineral rights are broken up into categories,mineral rights, executive rights and royalties. Mineral rights minus the royalties will only make a contribution you a mineral lease payment but no residuals stale of the production, you might be able to return with a surface lease payment for right to be heard pumpjacks on your property but the money is in the royalties.Unfortunately contained by Texas these have be seperated on some properties down through the years.

Do you agree with Richard Sander give or take a few Black law students and the "mistmatch effect"?

For info, please see: http://writ.lp.findlaw.com/amar/20070831...

I'm Black and give attention to that he is largely correct. What do you think?

Answers: yes, most black students inevitability to be coddled along in college. they simply cannot compete near the white and asian students, scholasticly. if they went to less significant colleges, they could be somewhat succesful as lesser lawyer, instead of flunking out in the grad academy process.

No, I do not. The basic flaw within this arguement is that it accepts one of the false premises of the (white) racist: that affirmative action allows unqualified individuals into pedantic programs, including but not limited to, decree schools.

I'm not accusing--I suspect the author bought into this specific myth unintentionally.

Look--I work at atop-tier research institution. The focus is on science/technology, not regulation. But we have similar affirmative doings programs. And the bottom line is this: the programs are designed NOT to allow unqualified students within, but to make a place for minority students who hold the ability to do the work, but enjoy some disadvantage in their situation resulting from their minorty status..

Students are not cut any slack in courses--they must come upon all like peas in a pod standards as any othr student. If they make it, they do it on merit, interval.

And--I don't know what law school were examined. But I do know (not a guess, I have occasion to research this a couple of yers ago) tht at my (and several other universities) these students enjoy equal grades and graduation rates, on average--which runs directly counter to this "mismatch" thesis.

My point is not to uncritically shelter affirmative action programs. They are a tool--but no more. If unacquainted properly, they could indeed lead to the class of "mismatch" described. But-in ost cases they are used properly--and work to open doors tha twould be closed to copious students otherwise. And--I've seen for myself time and time again these students prform well--often outperforming their fellow students. It's not tough to see why--these students have have a tough time--but BECAUSE of that they know how to work and how to persevere. When it comes to motivation and discipline, they enjoy the middle-class white kids beat! :)

BTW--I'm white, not that it should issue.

How do I find out about my city's echo ordinance? If there is not one, are nearby general law to go by?

I live contained by a high traffic/consrtruction nouns, but what I'm really interested in knowing is how rash and late my neighbors can hold parties, use loud power tools, etc. I hold a feeling they're working outside/listening to loud music/partying too impulsive and too late. I find insomnia, so sometimes it bothers me -- but I don't know if I'm being irrational. How do I find out the law regarding this? I own been unsuccessfull online or by calling the city office.

Answers: Try a library. Public, college or law library at the courthouse. Find the municipal code. The rumbling ordinance should be in within somewhere.

I would suggest you speak with a decree enforcement officer in regard to any local ordinance, sometimes you can find the local ordinances on-line at the police department's website. Every city is different surrounded by their ordinances, so I would enunciate start there.

Can anyone represent you in a trial or does it HAVE to be an attorney?

I do know you can represent yourself. The piece is who can afford $5000 for an attorney in a serious criminal satchel and with a public ally who doesn't have much time to work on the covering you're fate is pretty much hermetic...guilty. Can someone represent you without human being an attorney or member of the public house, if not after why?

Answers: It has to be you or a licensed attorney.

My cross-examine to you is why would you want to put your freedom in the hand of an amatur who does not know the procedural rules of the court, rules of evidence, and the local laws? That $5,000 won't do you much suitable sitting in the ridge while you are sitting in lock away.

Representing someone in a "serious criminal case" is more that doing a Perry Mason type speech that you see on tv. In reality actual court is very little approaching what is seen contained by a 60 min + commercial segment. A lawyer spends 3 full years erudition how to represent someone, this is not a do-it-yourself course. When representing someone in a criminal armour the attorney must be aware of the specific court procedures, rules of evidence, the evidence against the client, how previous cases that are similar have be handled, the clients register, how the charges were drafted, the specific rule of canon that was allegedly violated, how other states contract with that imperative, precedent, statutes, cases on appeal, etc.

Besides, having a non-lawyer represent you will probably inflict problems for that person. That non-lawyer may not know how to get hold of records, historys, and other documents that are needed to study for your grip. Also if that non-lawyer really screws up, you are out of luck --- if the attorney really screws up you can appeal due to removal of sufficient representation.

There are some things that a person MUST hire a professional for --- surgery, dentestry, and court representation. And lawyers, close to you, are legally entited to bring back PAID for their work. You don't want to have a advocate represent you, then a moment ago plead guilty and save the state the money it costs for the nouns trial.

Where do u go to complain against discouraging doctors?

Is there a standard place I can go to that handle this.

Answers: You can try the American Medical Association (see link below), or your state medical board.

Good luck!

You usually contact the medical society in the nouns (usually a county). They will be able to recount you how to lodge a formal complain, if that's what you want to do.

There are also other things you can do. (1) Make an appointment with your doctor or write a communication and lodge a formal complaint. (2) If you have HMO insurance, speak to the IPA for whom the doctor works. (3) File a lawsuit.

The state medical licensing board.

If we convict police for operating with "The Code of Silence"...should we instigate convicting politicians?

...i mean it's plain that the hypocrisy in Washington,D.C. have hit an all time lofty...should we pass a regulation and hav it enforced by a private citizens group?

Answers: Do we treat the symptoms of the disease or the disease itself? Just because the powers that be are not dealing with the problem, does that tight-fisted the problem shouldn't (or can't) be dealt next to?

Why not have it enforced by a citizens group? If politicians are not responsive to the wishes of the citizens, any replace them or over rule them.

I firmly believe that corruption in any form doesn't simply happen but is, at the least possible, allowed to happen, any through active encourgement (to take your piece of the action) a wink and a nod or at least a turned person in charge.

If you reward bad behaivor, even if the reward is no prosecution or feigned ignorance, why are you surprised when more doomed to failure behaviour surfaces? Where does the buck stop? Either the politicians did know or should own known.

If you hold the evidence or you can find the evidence, why would you not convict anyone involved? I'm sick and tired of giving people the benefit of doubt. As long as we, as citizens, allow this to shift on, we are just as guilty as the politicians. It's call personal responsibility.

If the buck stops at the politician, why not at the citizen who doesn't raise hell when this happen. The reason we are surrounded by this mess is because of a collective unspoken agreement to let someone else contract with the problem. It's call apathy and we are all guilty.

I be asked last darkness why I'm working so hard for 9/11 truth when my pains make little to no difference. I be speachless for a second that the question be even asked. Typical victum mentality. I am powerless because I have no power. Thus, because I enjoy no power, why even try to gain power or make change? After all, I'm powerless...

While not a soul deserves to be treated in the attitude that we are, we sure asked for it by our indifference and apathy.

Over 200 Republican members of Congress, aides, and lobbyists own been convicted, indicted, or implicated contained by corruption in the later 7 years, including the entire leadership. Do you really expect that the rest of the Republicans didn't know what their party be doing?

Republicans are the best evidence that we have for the moral abyss to be exact the Republican party.

What does it mean that four states within u.s.a. don't follow the law going on for minimum wage?

Answers: It means that the statute contained by those states calls for a lower amount per hour than the current Federal rate. But employer must pay the superior of the two. So in those four states, workers earn the Federal minimum wage. In other states, where their law call for a sophisticated rate, employees earn the state wage.

If the Federal rate ever fell below those states' rates, afterwards employees would be remunerated the state amount.

Your question is NOT clear!
Each state sets their own law about minimum wage.

first stale just so everyone here know. it is a federal law not a state one and if the states are not following the tenet on minimum wage then it call for a class action suit and petitions to the supreem court

I don't know the other 3 but rest assured Florida is the number 1!!!

The answer to your cross-question is on the page you linked to:

Note: Where Federal and state regulation have different minimum wage rates, the high standard applies.

There are certain job that are extempt from the

Fair Labor Standards Act.

Some states include those extempted jobs, beneath the minimum wage laws, some states do not.

Those four states, own a lower minimum wage for those extempted jobs, after the federal minimum wage.

List of extemptions is below.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article...

More Questions and Answers:
[1842] - [168] - [2004] - [501] - [2046] - [1044] - [211] - [1625] - [1817] - [35] - [1770] - [2280] - [1744] - [1924] - [2497] - [2250] - [1850] - [2564] - [2122] - [65]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: