Law Questions and Answers
American's, education, union, plus labor & Industries?
Much like physicians, pilots & CPA's will America's adjectives employee's at ALL levels call for to certified for employment by the Dept of Labor & industries? Janitors, carpenters, pro atheletes, I mean every body little one sitters also? Will the day come when adjectives will need to attend a state manage institute of higher education(academic or trade) to be eligible for ANY employment? Will Americans see the morning when they are assigned jobs by skill even thru the Dept of Labor & Industries? Will state managed union dictate worker conditions by creed? I'm noticing that the field of education, state manage labor(L&I) & unions come across to be getting EXTREMELY inter woven. Will the day of "picking" your pen of interest be replaced by an aptitude test & your paddock of employment be selected for you? Think just about it, already you degree(education) in a grazing land say a pilot, verify & register(L&I) for authorization to work & the union is mandatory. Is this where on earth we end up. You update me.Answers: First you certify lawyers, after you certify paralegals, then you certify permissible secretaries. (I'm not exaggerating; check out California law.) Give the bureaucrats an inch and they will other take several yard.
What you are describing is the road to socialism and eventually communism. I always voice if you don't want to get nearby, don't head down that road.
What we requirement is considerably LESS regulation of employment and small business, and in some areas even massive businesses. Most of what really needs to be done can be experienced in tort ruling, or in stockholders' suits, and do not involve to be explicitly regulated by the government. For example, do we call for all the micro-management of the Interstate Commerce Commission, or in recent times an ability to enforce the law about fraud and product liability and the approaching? Same goes for the entire bureaucratic interweave. Cutting red tape is well-mannered for the economy and improve our liberty.
Check out what Ron Paul have to say in the region of these matters.
establishment i ssuposed to be in place for two things just
1. protect our sovereignty
2. protect citizens rights against force or fraud
anything else is beyond the jurisdiction of government. If we allow gov to expand its role into places that it doesnt belong - after thats on us and we should be ashamed of ourselves for allowing it to happen.
The constitution rightly delinates the powers of senate and confines them to certain movements within specific teritories. People blantly assume that the feds are other right and whatever they do is for the righteous of the country.
Unfortunately this is not true. Government is self-serving. In order for them to grow they must breed people dependent upon them. The more the dependency the bigger the command. The trick is to STOP being dependent on the management and stand on our two feet.
If we as a empire stand united and communicate the governemnt what is going to be done we woudl be better off. If not, what are they gong to do - throw us adjectives into jail - put a wall around the US and ring up it a prison?
We are supposed to be a UNION of states supporting each other. OOPPPPPSSS - did I simply say grouping - LOL. How do you think the union got started - it be a group of people banded together for a adjectives cause and force their employer to fashion changes. We shoudl be doing one and the same with our governing body but we dont.
If you join a gang of adulterers and progress around adulterating does that trademark you an adulthood?
Answers: "Boyz within the Adulthood" by John Singleton?
It makes you an adulterer too.
Need advice on getting laptop returned to me - Pls read?
Back within February I had a friend name and his PC's were ruined. I took both of them and left him a router which he said he would retribution for and also told him he could borrow my daughter's laptop because I knew it would be a while in the past I would have time to even sit down to look at his computers.Well It took me months to sit down to even look at them. I have a surprise pregnancy which let's just speak really took it's toll on me. I'm finally due to give birth any morning now.
I did fix his pc's.
I've be trying to get a hold of him and enjoy only be successful one time and that is when I call his work # from a blocked line. He told me he would telephone call me the next morning but he didn't.
I have not here NUMEROUS messages and I am pretty distressed now. He will not beckon me back.
What do I do? He have a good employment and can certainly afford to buy his own laptop. This is my 12 year olds laptop and it's almost 2 years hoary.
What should be my next step?
Thanks for any suggestions.
Answers: It sounds close to he's dodging you. Was he supposed to pay you for fixing the computers? Send him a certified note, detailing all your attempts to bring in touch near him and his lack of respons and follow-through. Tell him that his computers are fixed, and that you stipulation your daughter's laptop back. Tell him he have 2 weeks to arrange a meeting near you to return your daughter's laptop and get his computers (and settle up you for your work if that was element of the deal). Tell him if he doesn't comply, you will sue him if necessary.
Good luck,
Dana (attorney)
Sue him for the fair-minded market importance of the laptop and router in your local small claims court. It's early, easy and cheap, and you don't stipulation a lawyer (In most States you're not even allowed one)
Note that a small claims court can single award you the VALUE of the laptop, they can't order it returned.
Richard
I'd utter that between the two answers you've received previously, you've got the subsequent steps you need to pinch. Write and send the certified memorandum, including a bill for the work done on the PCs, and if he doesn't respond within the time you specify, profile in small claims court.
Yet another question in the order of illegal immigration . . .?
We've adjectives read the analogy about someone breaking into your house and stealing food . . . and while it initially make sense, could you prosecute this if were not an analogy but certainty. Could you prosecute someone who truly wanted to . . . very well, not starve to death? Could you give the name the police, see them handcuffed, separated from their nearest and dearest, jailed and adjudicated over need of food? I can see both sides of the argument . . . Can you? I'm not talking going on for illegal immigrant who commit additional crimes (for hypothetical purposes exclude them) . . . I'm single talking in the order of illegal immigrant who are here for economic asylum. I'm also not chitchat about seal the borders . . . just could you individually prosecute?Answers: Yes I could. I belong here (this is my country) and I cannot qualify for any benefits because "my income is too high".
I think that the illegals should jump back to their country and quarrel for their rights, the same as the founding father had to do. It take effort, not newly marching and wave a flag.
I personally know some unauthorized aliens, and while I like them, I still want them to be in motion home and apply to come here legally. Yes, I'd dance for prosecution in your scenario.
Here's a better concept, outside the box of that question...near ain't a thing wrong beside the piece of land to the south...why don't they build a capitalistic/democracy approaching we used to have, and afterwards there's no need to come here and steal?
Who breaks into a house to steal food?
And yes, I would press charges.
1 personality stealing 1 loaf of bread, minute
100000000 stealing 1000000000 loaves's of bread?
Can you justify that?
i cant
It is against the regulation to break and enter. There is no "fine print" on the issue of why someone broke and entered. If they are unauthorized then they should be sent vertebrae and let Mexico become economically nouns so they don't have to enter our borders dishonestly for as you call it"financial asylum". When are you people going to swot that there monetary asylum becomes our (the U.S.A.'s) ecomonic decline...
BESIDES...
There are also other programs available for empire in call for whether illegal or not and these should be prosued first earlier risking life and upper limb breaking into someone elses home.
Let's see, the person sneaks across the border (breaking a law) breaks an entering (also against the law) steals your food (also against the law) and you don't want to convey him to jail where on earth he will get steday meal?????????????
Yeah great reasoning ...
PS
First if you are going to steal shoplifting is much easier than breaking an entering and is a lower offense. Also there are food bank and charities that GIVE food away.
Do you think the GOV will ever normalize marijuana?
Answers: No. It is very simple and I don't work out why ppl ask this question so regularly.
Marijuana can not be made legal because it is a drug that alters the mind and does injure to the body even when used in MODERATION.
In layman's language, one beer does no harm to your body and does not return with you high, whereas, one toke rotten of a joint does.
At some point the gov will standardize. We always follow suit beside the north for some reason.
California driving laws right in a minute?
for the laws right presently when i have capable everything, am i allowed to drive alone (get a license when i'm 16) o r do i have to hang around until i'm 18??Answers: Yes, 16 is fine. They just do not want you to be driving alone between undisputed hours of the night or beside any of your teenage friends for the first year or until you achieve 18, which ever comes first. (See California Vehicle Code section 12814.6.) http://www.dmv.ca.gov/teenweb/dl_btn2/dl...
*/End of Line.
I am pretty sure you can drive at 16 provided you purloin driver's education and surpass the tests.
Good luck,
Dana (attorney and former California resident)
California is 16
Explain the liability of an employer for the torts committed by an employer today?
Vicarious Liability. I dont undestand this question and i dont read what vicarious liability is! Any help would be appreciatedAnswers: Vicarious liability is also particular by the latin phrase "respondeat superior" and it basically manner that an employer (or a principal) is liable for the torts or wrongs of the employees (or agents). For example, if you get hit by a car driven by a Domino's pizza driver, Dominos would be responsible for paying the damages if their driver be at fault. The driver is also intuitively responsible.
Hope that helps,
Dana (attorney)
My boss said?
he will fire me if i dont get specs is that legal im individual 15Answers: If your eye sight is affecting your career performance than it is legitimate.
You didn't mention what type of job you are surrounded by nor what state you work in, but if your verbs needs to be protected, after you need to wear safekeeping glasses.
If you entail corrective lenses for processing orders or daily work correctly, then you necessitate to get it corrected.
In short if your skills and talent aren't up to the employers expectations consequently he is certainly entitled to stuff that position with someone who can.
Not surrounded by Canada it isn't and no you're not fat and yes you're pretty and no you don't want to eradicate yourself. Anything else I can do for you?
Copyright on old art interview?
I want to make t-shirts using the artwork from the Roman Empire era. Of course, the innovative art is "owned" by a museum, but I found photographs of the art in an art book. Can I photograph the page from this book and go forward near my shirts, since the original artist is long gone? Does the author of the book enjoy protection from my photographing his photographs, even though the art work the author photographed is copyright-free??Answers: You legally can.. because it is outdated. Same applies to classical music from that era.
The photographer would own a copyright in the pictures of the art. You would own to take your own pictures to use them on shirts. You could also see if you could negotiate a license to use the pictures on t-shirts.
Good luck,
Dana (attorney)
The being who took the photograph in the book would own the copyright to the symbol, even though the object within the photo is not protected by copyright. There are two objects here - the object surrounded by the photo (public domain) and the photograph of that object (copyrighted). If you run ahead with your plan, the photographer would absolutely be able to sue you for copyright infringement.
What do you think of the certainty that a top "intelligence" officer thinks Americans inevitability to redefine "privacy"...
to allow government and business to "properly safeguard people's private communications and financial information" ? Do you want affairs of state to collect and "safeguard" all of your conversations and financial information? Would you agree that if this is what our top intelligence officer come up with that we should redefine "intelligent"?Answers: Heck no! Its lately another plot from the government to try to gain more control over us than they hold already.
Hehe you have a point near. Honestly if you think give or take a few it, the amount of information out there to be collected nearly any one or group of individuals is outstanding. And can all be access by just just about any company or individual either for the asking or monetary. Needless to say aloud what the government have as well.
Redefining "privacy" I muse would be a good notion, but not with one or two central data basis. This would be to convenient for hackers or other intrusions.
Welcome to Fascism it is knocking on the door, are we going to consent to it in? Once the door is pried unfurl, it opens fairly easily.
Stop it in a minute!
This pisses me off! Our parliament is already too large and spends our tariff dollars poorly. Why they feel they involve to do this is rediculous!!!! Makes me want to move to Canada
More Questions and Answers:
[916] - [816] - [95] - [856] - [358] - [960] - [1409] - [2477] - [1357] - [632] - [434] - [113] - [1255] - [346] - [1083] - [1066] - [769] - [45] - [1538] - [1673]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: