Law Questions and Answers

In danger. How to buy a gun contained by Georgia legaly and quick.?

I am a single mother and I bought a home a few weeks ago. I hired a contractor to do some work and he vanished. I arranged for someone else to finish the work.

Whatever...to be exact on ly a cival matter. However he have threatened myself and my chld . He tried to break into the house on friday. Please help!!!
Answers: you nouns like someone who requests a Dogue de Bordeaux
If you do acquire a firearm and use it to defend yourself against this man, this query can be used as evidence against you by the district attorney or by the man's family should they choose to sue you for damages after his destruction at your hands.

File a restraining direct at your local police department, and purchase a home defense firearm only after the situation with this fellow is resolved, or you are accessible to some huge liability if he does force you to kill him.
First you own to put a restraining order on him. Then you want to notify people surrounded by your neighborhood that he's not welcome around your house or property and why.
Then you involve a valid drivers license in GA, no felony or convictions of domestic disputes to be on your record. Then you can buy a fire arm.
I put on alert you to keep your gun within a digital safe that single you will know the code to.
Secondly, you need to swot how to properly fire and store (stow) your fire arm.
If you do drugs, don't get a fire arm. If you switch personality under the influence of alcohol, don't buy a fire arm.
If you buy your fire arm and enjoy to use it, aim below the waist or you'll be judged on the starting place of attempted murder to murder with the possibility of a dutiful lawyer pleading your casing down to manslaughter.
Then again you're a female so they'll be WAYYYYYYYYYY more lax towards your case vs. a man.
Goodluck...
You entail to have gun training formerly you can get a gun within most states.

Visit a federally licensed firearm shop and ask if you really want to, but it's probably not a good opinion. I'd suggest you call the cops if anything happen. Remember you cannot shoot someone just for breaking into your house.
Call police and directory charges.Get a restraining order.Get a dog.Go to your local gun shop and walk through the steps to purchase a gun.As them where you can catch training in sheltered and proper use of the weapon.Good luck!

Are you for or against marijuana?

i dont see what the big deal around it is. it is much safer than alcohol. wh isnt it even legal? it is a inherent herb
Answers: I'm for it because its here for a reason for medical or personal use . its safer and it relieves stress . i desire it was permissible man i would run out and get some afterwards but until then it only whiskey
You set the "natural herb" blazing and suck the smoke into your mouth, throat, and lungs. Those dire warnings on cigarette pack apply to your "natural herb" as powerfully.

Where did you ever get the belief that being intoxicated on a drug be any safer than being intoxicated on alcohol??
Marijuana is not much safer than alcohol. Marijuana impair your ability to operate a motor vehicle simply like alcohol does. The justification it seems as alcohol is more perilous is because it is more widely used than marijuana, therefore more society are killed by alcohol-impaired drivers than marijuana-impaired drivers.

Both substances are treacherous when abused. I believe alcohol and tobacco should be illegal as in good health. As a police officer, it is quite annoying to see how frequent people swearing these sunstances.
Marijuana should be legalized. I have never particular anyone to go out and kill in cold blood their mother or brother over it. Marijuana brings a pleasant euphoria to people and beside Aids patients it increases thier appetite. The problem with this together picture is the by keeping it illegal the crooked parliament is able to ensure that the price is kept sophisticated.
If you think going on for it everything that is from the land, water, and trees is for human consumption if prepared properly. Before the world become more civilized this is what the primative people lived on and it did not hurt them. When man take nature and turns it into something else is when it become harmful. Take for instance the Cocaine fern. The native South American inhabitants actually chew the cocain branch for endurance and as a social past-time. It is the "man" that go and takes what used to be unconscious and turns it into to something it should not be, making it harmful, a short time ago for a quick buck.
Opium is a unconscious herb, I suppose you are for it, too.
Marijuana can and does lead to harder and more serious drugs. Because after awhile, you system builds up a tolerence to it and the body craves something stroger to produce a better illustrious, so the user turns to something with newly a little more see.
I'm very against marijuana.
The one and only legal uses for Opium
is to form sedatives and misery killers,
morphine sulfate is remarkably addictive,
however, cancer patients would rather
own the addiction than the pain.
Marijuana is merely as deadly as cigarettes,
they both will endow with you cancer if you smoke it
and it can kill you of late as fast
beside second hand smoke, as economically.
If you are seeking to die,
just step out contained by front of a train.
It should not be illegal.

It's the liberals who are within favor of the government unfolding us how to live. People should run their own lives.

Pot was permitted in 1776 and should be presently.
Cannabis is a relatively benign, non-addictive, non-toxic herb with a documented history of use that stretches pay for thousands of years. It has be used successfully as a fiber for clothing, a foodstuff, a fuel, a medicine, a spiritual aid, and simply for relaxation and repose.

No civilized nation makes period of war against a plant, especially one as useful as Cannabis. Get informed. Get stirring. We can change wrong and cruel laws.
Neither for nor against.

Does the one drop rule still apply?

Is the "One Drop Rule" still in officially recognized use today?
Answers: Yes, sadly ample. They talk around it in a completely good essay by F. James Davis, who is a professor of sociology at Illinois State University, contained by this book, if you want to know more about it:

The Meaning of Difference, 4th Edition, by Rosenblum & Travis--just look it up on Amazon if you are interested.

Basically, the US court system still operate using the one-drop rule for the most part. As not long as 1983, a person be denied the right to change her see as it was nominated on her birth certificate (she have a great-great-great-great-grandmother who was Black, and adjectives of her other relatives were White, so she be listed as Black on her birth certificate).
Nope.

Now, it's doesn`t matter what you claim.

If these idiots ever vote in Reparations, the "one drop" rule will apply to empire that have "no drop" and are of a mind to lie.

Legal Question: Someone owes us money?

My boyfriends uncle talked us into moving to Florida, for work. It be terrible, and we have to move back. I departed a week before my boyfriend. during that week, He "sold" his uncle almost everything we owned: Washer, Dryer, Couch, love form, Bed, TV, DVD Recorder, XBOX... everything. except the clothes computer and refrigerator. He told me he was going to and I told him to return with something in writing, since he said his uncle wouldnt be capable of pay right away. BUT.. He didnt. So presently, 3 months later.. no money at adjectives. Is there anything we can do?? Legally? To win our stuff back, or money or something
Answers: First, do doesn`t matter what you can to get this surrounded by writing - email is good plenty. Email him and ask him when you can begin expecting payments on the $800 he owes you for the washer, dryer, etc...

Once he confirms surrounded by writing via email - then you own proof of your oral agreement.

Next - cross your fingers and hopes he pays. Keep hounding him, etc. There's nothing you can do unless you folder a small claims lawsuit in a Florida court within the county where he lives. You can't hire an attorney to do it because it would cost you more for the attorney - so you enjoy to do it yourselves.

Your best bet is to just hold on to hounding him once you get confirmation from him within an email that he owes you the particular amount.
Really beside no written document, you have a difficult evidence problem. That does not have it in mind you could not bring a small claims action for the clearing. Some states still have a create of action certain as replevin. That is an old adjectives law civil act for the recover of personal property. I don't know if Florida have this.

You will have to sue him surrounded by Florida in the county he lives. You may want to speak with an attorney. There may be optional damages that you may seek.

Do You Think We Just have "subjective" Views more or less Abortion- the fetus?

Many people discern that the fetus means its a living creature. Alot of the information out there and empire just shift on what they think, but do you consistency that unless it is 99.99% true that a fetus is a living being, Abortion is wrong???? Untill we can gain clear, undoubtable information, that beyond a reasonable doubt, I beleive that abortion is right!!. There isn't clear 100% evidence and its adjectives cloudy and people estimate its like that and its really not to formulate an view on it. Until it is crsytal clear, Abortion is right!!!
Answers: You know, there isn't any legitimate dispute about the physical quality of the fetus; the dispute is over the fetus's value. It is clearly a living individual of the species homo sapiens. The grill is: does the law certify this fetal human as a "person"? You know, there are court "persons" that are not even living organisms. And the human fetus is also a person for some purposes underneath the law
Then, possibly there will arise the cross-examine: How do you decide who or what is a personality? What are the criteria?
I'd go within the other direction though: if I'm not sure whether it's a human being or not, I'm not going to slaughter it.
Abortion is right as an absolute end resort. If you cannot carry the child to possession and give it up for adoption AND you enjoy used every method available to you to avoid pregnancy then abortion is proper.

Abortion happens to be official because no one have found a way to use the constitution to initiate taking away women's rights. We must remain diligent as voters so this does not rework.

For those who are against abortion: Thousands of abortions each year could be prevented by principle public sex education. If respectively of our people truly embedded the risks of pregnancy and how to prevent it, half of the women who require the services of clinics wouldn't requirement an appointment. Teach our daughters and sons to protect themselves and abortion rates will drop.

If you get married contained by a non-community property state, then seize divorce do you have to split your assets?

I be watching Las Vegas, and Sam was trying to get hold of half of the casino from her ex. The attorney said she was not qualified to half of the casino because she be married in Hawaii, a non-community property state.

Is that true?
Answers: I believe it depends on where on earth the divorce occurs not where on earth they were married. The individual defense would be that the divorcing party (petitioner) fled to a community property state contained by order to transport advantage of that state's more favorable law.

Most states that are not community property are still equitable division states. Any assets that were obtain during the marriage would be subject to equal or practical equal division. This protects previously owned non-commingled property and after acquired property.

Local law vary so a local attorney could update you more.
HELL IF A MAN GETS DEVORSED THERE SQUWED

Government Jobs and Tattoos?

Ive searched the internet a countless number of times, failing to stumble across any information on the requirments of have tattoos and working for the government. I am currently a college student who is hopefully on the right track of persuing a situation within the senate.

I will hopefully work within the FBI, CIA, ATF but i dont hold a clue on the regualtions of tattoos. I currently have one on my upper put money on which is not visible when i own a shirt on and i am thinking about getting another one that will be smoothly coverible with a shirt as very well. If anyone knows any information roughly tattoo requirments and a government available job such as the FBI, CIA, or ATF it would be greatly appreciated.

Links to sites that you may have come acrossed would be nice as well. Thanks again!
Answers: The FBI have always be image conscious, I wouldn't brag almost tattoos to them when applying.

Most agencies do not have anything specific roughly speaking tattoos, usually they just want you to be presentable looking and professional.

My stepson works as a registered nurse. He have a large, colorful tattoo that starts at the middle of the stern shoulder area, crosses over the not here shoulder to the left side of his chest and down the departed arm to his wrist. He applied and got a RN position at a prestigious hospital. He other wore a long sleeve uniform smock and no one know about the tattoo. Then, at a rotten duty picnic, he showed up in a cistern top. He told me his Nurse Manager almost fainted when she saw the tattoo.

Some folks admiration the tattoo in a pretty glum light. It may not effect your getting hired but it might hold you wager on on promotions down the road.
The policy for FBI and ATF is that it may not be obsene, ie. no nude women or profanity, and you must be able to cover it completely next to a t-shirt and shorts. It is slightly different with the CIA. Depending on the position, it can hold the same restrictions as the FBI & ATF, or possibly forbid tattoos adjectives together, although that is principally for clandestine and undercover field agents.

Candidates have to aver their Assets at the time of elections.But why no agency verifies it ?

It is see that most of the politicians amass huge assets when they are in power.Manytimes the corrupt ethnic group also enter politics after amassing huge assets.At the time of elections every candidate have to file affidavit for his assets. But it is surprising that the decree doesnot specify as to which agency should verify the veracity about the declared assets! This defeat the very purpose of making the directive about proclamation of the assets.It is necessary to formulate some agency responsible to verify the authenticity of the assets declared by the candidates. Measures to bring probity surrounded by public life and inculcate values contained by the new equals is a must for survival of democracy in India. "Honour the honest and punish the corrupt "have to be the new sloagan, if the system have to survive! It is the middle class who is mostly law abiding and follows nouns and morals which are seldom followed by the poor and the rich. Timely action could free the system from collapse !
Answers: The politicians don't buy assets in their cross. It would be in their spouse's/Children's or relatives describe. So on paper, the candidate very occasionally have huge assets.
For the integral assets a affidavit is made by the candidate which verify it.
If election commission found any fraudulent surrounded by it. He may cancel his candidature.
Or further he may desire for judicial action by cbi or other.
It's unworkable to verify at initial time because of large number of candidate in the see.
public reps are above public law
Their assets represent their liability to the voting and non voting public
pl also understand Politics is singular a business and not 'nishbhav seva' and is amenable to business laws and rules
Even the income import tax declarations that a adjectives man does is verified 1 per lakh cases, and that too when the authorities have reason to doubt the submission. And we are not even filing an affidavit. Our declaration may be wrong (most of the times they are wrong).

In the case of politicians, they own to file an affidavit, which if found untrue can hold disastrous consequences for the politicians.

It seems you hold some deep rooted grudge against the politicians. It also seem that you think that you are individual right and those in power are the wrong doers, and the country would own been better past its sell-by date if you were contained by power!
It is difficult to verify all.

I m lawyer surrounded by india n i want to practice in australiya how can ido this?

Answers: No uncertainty for you unless you qualify the law examinations of Australia that will allow you to obtain enrolled near their Bar Council. L.L.B. degree you hold from Indian University will not be recognised for this purpose even if you enjoy experience in the official profession of many years. If it be so easy I myself holding this L.L.B. scope from University of Delhi & enrolled next to Delhi Bar Council & active within this profession since 1983 would be sitting in Australia near my daughter & son in ruling.
A lawyer contained by India can have his breakfast here and dinner surrounded by Australiya, but to do practising he will have to swot up the australiyan law.

Besides, he will own to learn to spell Australia, as have been suggested by Vikash.
Indian and Australian law are very different. Go to Australia, catch admission contained by LLB course there, endorse with distinction and after may be u can practise law in attendance. Your Indian degree will not work/be standard in Australia. sorry, but this is the reality. And also please learn to spell Australia correctly past u make up your mind to run there.

Name 2 laws the constitution forbids the use of?

Answers: In the United States, the directive is derived from four sources. These four sources are constitutional law, administrative canon, statutory law, and the adjectives law (which includes overnight case law). The most important source of imperative is the United States Constitution. All other law falls lower than, and is subordinate to, that document. No law may contradict the United States Constitution. For example, if Congress pass a statute that conflicts with the Constitution, the Supreme Court may find that tenet unconstitutional.

Notably, a statute does not disappear automatically merely because it has be found unconstitutional; it must be deleted by a subsequent statute. Many federal and state statutes hold remained on the books for decades after they be ruled to be unconstitutional. However, under the principle of stare decisis, no sensible lower court will enforce an unconstitutional statute, and any court that does so will be reversed by the Supreme Court.

Congress' lawmaking power is constrained. More precisely, it is delegated by the American folks through the Constitution, which specifies areas where Congress may or may not legislate. Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution forbids Congress from ratification certain types of law. Congress may not, for instance, pass an ex post facto directive (a law that applies retroactively, or "after the fact"), or levy a toll on exports.
Ex post facto laws - law which take effect past they are enacted. For example, adage that it's illegal to capture an abortion, and arresting someone who had one second year, before the canon was passed.

Laws respecting an establishment of religion - For example, a ruling that candidates for city council must be Christians, or requiring prayer contained by public schools.
Artical 1, sector 9, paragraph 2, of the US Consitituion:

No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

Bills of Attainder. Which is an act of legislature declare a person or group of people guilty of some crime, and punishing them, without benefit of a trial.

Ex pos facto law, which are laws that retrospectively change the legal consequences of act committed or the legal status of facts and relationships that existed prior to the enactment of the ruling.

Examples: Congress can not pass a directive that a particular party is guilty of a crime. A bill of attainder.

Congress can not make possesion of a drug retroactive. An ex pos facto directive.

More Questions and Answers:
[1395] - [260] - [612] - [595] - [670] - [1071] - [788] - [1364] - [395] - [759] - [607] - [696] - [2315] - [1528] - [1275] - [761] - [887] - [1742] - [2510] - [2513]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: