Law Questions and Answers

I support migrants' human + economic rights, but what nearly the state of the countries they're leaving?

I'm not discussion about individuals who are within imminent threat of what might by broad (humanist) consensus be understood as wrongful oppression.

but what happens to the countries pious people vacate? 'brain drain' isn't negligible. systemic corruption doesn't disappear.

don't know... on the one hand:

it's unwarranted to ask an individual, or family, to choose to live underneath a sick system, to abrogate their own goals, freshly to fight for collective reality (which aren't natural category anyway).

on the other hand:

things don't develop unless they're worked on. accident throws us into a given place - what do we owe what is given to us?

i believe that one of the chief human activities, one of the best ways to be human is to occupy politically with your community. is this a hangover from greek planning of 'ethnos', or can it be meaningful contained by some other way?

prisoner's dilemma, innit. depends on what we demarcate as rights and obligations, what we be set to when we talk in the order of citizenship...

Answers: I must admit that when I hear of so tons qualified foreign nurses coming to work in the NHS, I cannot support but think how much it must enjoy cost their government to train them, and that immediately neither they, nor the people of their country, will capture any benefit from them at all. Eventually those government will cease to provide training, which will result within the citizens of those countries being placed within such an awful and vulnerable position next to regards to condition care.

i believe immigration to be completely destructive for both countrys. we should work on rising the third world sittuation. if all of they're fit immature people come here!! afterwards they're country will die. its selfish and stupid. they should stay and exchange blows to put they're country back on its foot. not only that butwhat a bloody boring world we are making for ourselves if we verbs with this cultural melt pot. there will will be no point within going any where soon..every country willl look alike. mc donalds and KFCs welcoming you as you bring back off the plane..(((((LOVELY)))))...NOT!!

Ex owes 20,000.00?

My ex husband owes 20,000.00 of child support and the state is taking him to court in a month. We already enjoy all the paperwork. He hasn't call me for 2 weeks to see the kid's I have a discouraging feeling he is gonig to attempt suicide. He have done this 3 times before...What if he doesn't show up to court? What if he does and say's some stupid excuse for not paying? He hasn't worked for 2 years or at tiniest hasnt given any money for 2 years..what will they do?

Answers: He could be sent to jail. Unfortunately that will not donate you any child support.

Unfortunately, the system doesn't have a workable solution to child support.

And as another answerer mentioned, domestic crimes against mothers of these kids have increased since the inception of the "deadbeat dad" laws.

Fathers do have need of to be forced to assume responsibility for their kids, but I have severe reservations beside the current system. I believe it is causing more crime than it is solving.

I have a friend who was contained by a simular situation. He ended up spending 6 months contained by jail and have to get interest from his grandmothers CD's at the ridge and cash advance on his parent's credit cards to pay the stern child support.

It all depends on the intermediary. His ex-wife wasn't happy that he get remarried and got the hardest conciliator she could for the case.

If in that is no money you can get out of him next there is nil to win from the process yet you enjoy high risks.

Ever since the welfare reform of the mid 1990's , the state went after deadbeat dads next to children on welfare there have been a dramatic increase contained by murders of mothers of those children.

If the process is not in your hand then you cannot stop it, but you involve to take indemnity precautions. Whether or not he shows up to court, ask the court to ban his cleverness to buy or own weapons or ammo, base on his previous suicide attempts or threats of suicide.

Why is it that nobody noticed adjectives the dangerous products person imported into the U.S. until our pets get sick?

I don't recall anything anyone in press until the wheat glutton was found to be deathlike to our pets. Now it is just one product after another. Wasn't our organization testing these products previously that issue came to the public's awareness?

Answers: Maybe if we purchased American made items we wouldn't enjoy to import so much and businesses wouldn't close down and general public wouldn't lose jobs!

because not a soul pays attention until someone they love gets hurt or sick themselves. Its never defining until it hits close to home.

But then again I contemplate all this toy take out business is a conspiracy to raise our toy prices for the holidays. Sorta close to the gas..Bush wants to blame it other on other countries but never on our own. The government know we are not gonna let our kids budge any christmas without toys...and which be recalled...DISNEY...probably one of the largest toy maker.

Government wants us to be broke...We find broke..they get rich..So what do they tramp up..Our Fuel, Our toys and then bear away health insurance for those kids who necessitate it.

I don't buy this..we never notice anything...We DO consideration everything...but only the management will step in when they can see how to take home a profit even at the expense of their own people.

Because here is no government agency that assessment all products.

They would hold to have millions of workers to do that.

Can you picture if each and every product sold, have to be tested by a government hand before it could be sold ??

our gov is not worried almost us just themselves. it's adjectives abut saving a dollar for them, i plan look at us we are so in debt to china right presently it's pathetic, we hold no money to do anything. plus at the time it was freshly dog food and i guess nobody eat it but dogs

Should persistant criminals be allowed to request help?

from any of the emergency services or recieve any facilitate from the state? Should there be a 3 strikes and youre out rule?

Answers: No, they should be locked up or put on an uninhabited island near other criminals.

very alluring of course but no, this should not come up. Certainly in the UK, the principle of our NHS and other perfectionism services are based on a free service at the point of have need of without nouns. It would be unethical to check out of a person who wants emergency help lacking any assistance and could actually front to more crime being committed.

My nouns is to have a better equality system so all criminals in actual fact serve the whole of their sentence for a start and, the casualty of crime is put before the criminal. Here in the UK if read out someone is sentenced to serve four years for a crime, they actually lone serve 2 years - work that one out if you can!

There should be a fourth service
call suck the shotgun butt and I'll see if its loaded

The 3 strikes rule would put a 3rd time felony offender contained by prison for 25 to life, so they would not entail to request help from their state, as it would be provided for them! Perhaps I'm not intelligence your question correctly. In California, anyone next to an valid photo id card & a social surety card can get welfare services to assist them near food & a small cash allowance. It isn't plenty to pay for an apartment, so they finish up living in the streets, surrounded by shelters, or with anyone who will enjoy them. IF these criminals could not access services, don't you think it would endanger the public MORE because the crime rate would jump up when these criminals got hungry & could not win food or services? Having a criminal record shouldn't be paid a person smaller number when it comes to receiving services. What big-hearted of society would that be?

Are we being screwed over by the attorney handling my Mother's Probate?

My Mother died short a will 3 years ago. The estate is still in Probate. It seem like the with the sole purpose time the attorney works on it, is when I call him to see how things are going.
The attorney have done somethings that I feel are wrong/wasteful. Any Family Attorney's out nearby willing to review my complaints-to insist on whether the Attorney is screwing us over-what I can do from here?
Thanks

Answers: You don't have need of a family decree attorney. Is this attorney the executor named contained by the will? If not, talk to the executor of the will. If the attorney is the executor, back you spend any more money, make an appointment contained by person and give an account the attorney that you are not waiting any longer and will seek another attorney who can bar both attorney malpractice and estate law. If that doesn't frothy a fire under him, communicate to the attorney's partner of your concerns --in person(if he has one).

You can also petition the court to hold the executor replaced. Ask the "Clerk of Court" in your Probate Court how to be in motion about this, you may not stipulation another attorney.

But if you do, don't hesitate to hire one.

You also enjoy the right to demand an audit of the probate comings and goings. Tell the current attorney that you demand an direct audit. The estate will pay for the audit, and I suggest you choose the auditor because near have be some scandals in the order of sweetheart deals contained by the past.

Good luck and save demanding action.

beckon them everyday
the squeaky wheel get the grease
call another attorney for a consult
relate the one that's not doing his job you are turning within a complaint to the board

i am scared of something resembling that happening to me
my father have just become awfully ill
and i am not sure if at hand is a will or not
i am the only child so I don`t know it won't be as difficult

Any time a lawyer is used, you're anyone screwed over by some of the best screw jobs around.

If HIV becomes mandadorty carrying out tests who will protect the people that enjoy AIDS.?

I have migraines and not a soul will insure me or employee me and this is excluded as a preexisting condition by insurance(my biggest expense). The medication caused me to loose my house and no insurance will cover me immediately.

I fear tis will appear to anyone diagnosed with AIDS.

No one have protected me and my family from this nouns and if HIV testing become mandatory for all these relatives will have no choice but to commit crime to gain put in prison to attain health perfectionism.

Answers: We are lucky to live in a society where on earth Aids and HiV drugs are available at low cost.

I think mandatory HIV carrying out tests is a good entry though, as so many general public with the disease do not know they enjoy it.

I'm sorry that they won't help you near your expensive medications! That's awful...
I choice we lived in a country next to nationwide healthcare approaching every other leading country contained by the world.

But Americans are so greedy and afraid of taxes that they're not willing to evenly distribute the burden of healthcare on everyone's shoulders.. Until its their problem too.

Health insurance is pretty simple within America.

You purchase health insurance and allege it. You will be covered. If you maintain continuous coverage - you cannot be denied for preexisting conditions.

If you enjoy migraines that are disabling, then you can apply for SSI and Medicaid, but you will own to give up your assets to grasp onto Medicaid.

There are probably a lot of lobbyist groups for general public with AIDS. If conducting tests becomes mandatory, afterwards, if there already aren't, be law put into place to protect AIDS patients from the type of discrimination you are experiencing.

I am US citizen born and raised - i want to run for public bureau in the P.I.?

both my parents be born and raised surrounded by the Philippines - one of my goals contained by life be to run for public office here - does my U.S. citizenship matter - does anyone know any info on this

Answers: If one your parents where on earth still a Philippine Citizen at time of your birth you qualify for dual citizenship which would allow you to run for office here surrounded by the Philippines, if not afterwards you will not be allowed.

Not to be out of line here, but if you want to run for public department in the Phillipines, dont you reflect you should have some scholarship of the law here, and how to research it? I know I wouldnt want to vote for a public official who seek such important information on YA. I'd much fairly vote for someone who takes the time to do the research to find out what the requirements are...i.e. citizenship, birth here, dual citizenship...before entering the political arena.

Public bureau requires accountability and responsibility. (Present US Administration excepted.) That starts with due diligence on the cut of a candidate to know whether he or she is qualified to serve, and taking the time to find out for themself. Even if someone be to take the time to extend a link, the reliability of such a connection is only as angelic as the research skills of the poster, and the updated nature of the information posted. There is simply no substitute for first foot knowledge here.

I penny-pinching. I'm just saw.

So both of your parents were born and raise in the Philippines and you be born and raised contained by the United States. Your parents are they now citizens of the United States or do they still enjoy to renew their status (green card) every January.

If you want to run for public office within your parents home land I would suggest that you contact the bureau of Immigration and
let somebody know them who you are and what you are planning on doing and don't forget to mention about your parents furnish them a back ground and contact the Philippine system or the consulate office possibly they can help you realize your goal

Female FBI special agents?

I am considering a career beside the FBI and I was wondering if in attendance are any female FBI agents out in attendance that could tell me a bit going on for their experiences with the employment and how it has artificial their personal and/or family duration? Any responses would be wonderful. Thanks.

Answers: My aunt was a FBI agent and she loved her profession. Basically she traveled alot and worked on different cases. She could never talk almost her job unsurprisingly. The FBi also keeps track of you as far as what you influence on the phone to your family. They pretty much wiretap your unharmed house. I think getting into next to the FBI is pretty hard but I know they hold programs that help you attain in. Good luck within you studying

Help!! what is reasonable forseeability? for lesser victims of nervous shock?

Sorry i know i own asked similar questions... i cant take my head around it adjectives!

Answers: I don't know what you mean by subsidiary victims of nervous shock.

Reasonable forseeability routine that when someone commits an act of negligence or gross negligence, they will be found liable for injuries that turn out to third parties if those injuries be reasonably forseeable.

This process, if I drive my car negligently and plow it into a group of citizens, that it would be reasonably foreseeable that I would impose deaths and serious bodily injury to those individuals. Therefore, I would be liable for their deaths and injuries contained by a court of law.

If I drive my sports car negligently and plow it into a group of people, and someone surrounded by that group of people get angry because I plowed into them and he then go CRAZY and starts shooting people - I would not be liable for the injuries that the shooter cause because it is not reasonably foreseeable that by driving negligently I would explanation a man to go crazy and start shooting nation.

In your case, it seem like you be not a direct victim due to someone's sloppy actions. Instead, you be a secondary subject. I envision that you received a phone call that your boyfriend or husband received serious injuries due to someone else's risky actions and upon reception this phone call you go into a nervous shock.

If this is the baggage, then you would NOT know how to recover any damages for your disconcerted shock because not only be the negligent being not the proximate cause of your shock, but also you be not a direct "victim" of negligence.

The law operate like this because TOO plentiful lawsuits would be filed if minor "victims" could be compensated. It is also patently unfair for those who are remiss to be responsible for injuries that are not reasonably foreseeable.

BRIEF examples of Human Right Violations? How has United Nations acted?

Summary of ANY accomplishment of human right violation contained by the world and what United Nations Organization has done more or less it.

Thank You!

Answers: - war contained by lebanon started by israel last summer... they sent troops
- they avoided a time of war in the oriental timor

More Questions and Answers:
[963] - [571] - [2328] - [2193] - [1949] - [1990] - [2037] - [2171] - [713] - [241] - [538] - [1610] - [78] - [1923] - [1082] - [354] - [356] - [2093] - [2124] - [2251]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: