Law Questions and Answers
Is it illegal or abandoned to download videos from video.google.com?
When I'm at work, I rummage through for videos on video.google.com. Whenever I find a video that's hosted on the Google servers, Google provides an preference to download it in an iPod compatible format.It seem to me that this practice would either be illegitimate or at least wicked being that I would be downloading somebody else's intellectual property for free. But if it is informal or at least debauched, then why would Google allow it?
I'm proud to read out that I've purchased everything in my iTunes library, I've purchased adjectives the (expensive) software on my computer and I'm very much against piracy, but I don't receive this Google download option. Is this unendorsed, is there a technicality or a loophole I don't know going on for or is this actually considered fully official and ethical?
Answers: I believe there are some lawsuits contained by progress right now against Google next to respect to copyrighted material that Google have made available for Google users to download or access.
The owner of copyright has the right to pursue copyright violation any way they please. Some of them progress after the people who distribute the copies within violation of copyright. Some of them turn after the people who receive the copies.
I conjure up that if some copyright infringement case is won against Google, the subsequent step will be a court order to donate up the IP addresses of adjectives the people who get the copies.
You may recall a scandal at Wikipedia where on earth someone posted some libelous information. It was traced to the IP address of a private company, which tracked down which member of staff did it. The employee claimed it be done as a joke, that he did not believe Wikipedia be for real. That guy no longer have a job, because his employer did not appreciate getting into the national communication regarding the scandal.
Then at hand is the question of whether this amusement is appropriate to be doing when you are at work, being remunerated by your employer. Most of us are allowed reasonable e-coffee breaks, but Internet deeds unrelated to work needs to be done surrounded by extreme moderation.
There have be several stories in the local report about population getting fired because they were caught near porn on their work computers.
I believe there's a lot of ignorance and injudiciousness out there.
Visit any rag site on-line. They all hold copyright notices around their content, and at the same time kind it easy to print, download, or e-mail their stuff. Isn't that a contradiction?
Take a look at any file book. There is a copyright notice. We are not supposed to be copying the objects in in attendance, but most teaching involves taking proceedings from the text books, writing down the exercises contained by it, doing the exercises, checking the ansers. Isn't the very temper of using a text book how it is designed to be used, a defiance of copyright?
My job includes writing software (paid for by my employer). I am hugely careful to include copyright notice inside the code, especially derivative cases ... that's where I cut & stick parts of other programs that do standard functions, where the standard functions own copyright notices from the computer tool maker ... well the combined code have copyright notices within it from all the different tools I used to write the hot code.
Is it normal that after marry my dream girl I started feeling that my sister-in-law is in reality my ideal?
Actually me and my wife have a long affair and we decided to marry. Now after 3 years of wedding ceremony and 2 cute kids, I started feeling that my sister within law is certainly the ideal girl for me cuz I surface more comfortable with her, we share almost adjectives common things surrounded by us, like experience sports, new venture and stuff. Do you guyz think it is majority and if it is what should I do? Why am I being dragged more and more towards her daylight by day? I am awareness bad for response all this. How can i discourage it or I shouldn't at adjectives.Answers: It has be my considerable and unpleasant experience that the grass is not greener on the other side. You may think it is, but when you finally attain there, to your shock and surprise, it in reality isn't.
Do a quick cost/benefit analysis of the situation. From pretty much every angle, you stand to lose one hell of a great deal more than you could ever gain. I really can't think of any style that you can come out ahead in this precise situation except by staying with your wife and kids.
Oh, and another point. Please don't ever, under any circumstances, relate your wife about your vibrations for her sister. She will not understand. It is lately not in the feminine DNA to be sympathetic or understanding roughly these things - not even one little tiny bit.
Man up, soldier on, and avoid your sister in ruling as best that you can. Think of her as the enemy. She may be a lovely character, but you have to grow to loathe her because she is causing you to come up with of doing vile, wicked things to your relatives.
What you are feeling is common and it will pass. Give it time.
Tis the 'grass is other greener' syndrome.. Your sis in tenet must realise how you feel and if so should stern away and allow you and your wife, her sister, the space you need to build and strengthen your conjugal.
Yes it's normal and you involve to keep your eye on 'your wife' and no where on earth else.
Don't be stupid. You just close to the S.I.L. because you haven't had anything contemporary for a while and she is close by. Think of it this way if you be in motion for it and so does she you end up beside a girl that would cheat on her own sister which means she'll eventually cheat on you too. If you progress for it and she doesn't then she will relay your wife and you can kiss the family goodbye and say-so hello to Mr. Alimony and Mr. Child Support.
Well as long as you don't have any urges for the mother within law that would be gross!!!
i know im not a guy but i ponder u should get over this state of mind .. i mean dont u love ur wife n ur kids .. u enjoy to think U HAVE KIDS which scheme responsibility .k
but f u cant over those feelings u should report ur sister in decree n ur wife about them cus they want to know n u cant hide this 4 ever
WELL i dont know around u but thats what i think
grass is other greener on the other side of the fence
How do i "Patent/Copyright" for my stuff? The correct procedure? Thanks.?
Answers: First, go to: http://www.uspto.gov/
Read everything
Decide which is appropriate to protect your work:
* official document
* trademark
* copyright
You can file yourself, you do not inevitability a lawyer. I own done it both ways. A lawyer is going to cost you several thousand dollars, versus 20 hours or so of work.
You will obligation a lawyer if someone starts infringing on your impression. You MAY need a attorney to help you put up for sale your idea to someone else.
You will call for to file an application next to the US Patent and Trademark Office.
While you can do it yourself, I strongly recommend you consult with a exclusive rights or trademark lawyer.
Patent and Copyright are two different processes. Literary-type stuff is Copyrighted as soon as it is finished. You can "register" the material near the Library of Congress (LOC) for greater protection, but it is not necessary.
Patenting requires a more detailed process including a "search" of existing inventions. You may want to consult a rights attorney or service for more information.
Good Luck.
First figure out if you entail a patent (invention or idea) or a copyright (creative work of wrting, musical copy or video/movie).
If it is a copyright, go to the US Copyright department website and fill out an application (it's rpretty undemanding, I've done it) and send within the $40 fee and it's done.
If it is a official document, you are best off hiring a government grant attorney because it is very complicated. You could do it yourself but if you do a impossible job near the application it will either be rejected or if it is official it might be easily circumvented by someone who know what they are doing. (I'm the inventor on several patents so I know). It will cost some big bucks (maybe up to $50,000 depending on how complicated the pasture is) so it ought to be something that is really worth it.
But first do a thorough government grant search (there are free several searchable exclusive rights sites online) and decide for yourself if your invention is really individual. That search is the first entry a patent attorney will want to see anyway.
I bought sainsburys brown rice & as i was wash it i found 5 baby BEATLES crawling through it?
im so shocked and disgusted by this......i afterwards looked through the whole pack of rice and found tons more of these babe-in-arms beatles at the bottom of the packet...
i feel utterly sick to my stomach!!
whats worse is that i made roast chicken and dont believe i can eat it in a minute :(
Am i entitled for compensation??
Answers: In my opinion, you should a moment ago take it rear legs to the store & notify them so they can take the product sour their shelves. They'll compensate you for your purchase.
This happened to me near a couple boxes of spaghetti from Winn Dixie (a local grocery store in FL). It have these bugs called "weevils" contained by it.
I think you return it to the store and bring your money back and next you write a letter to the company and enjoy them explain what they are doing to fix the problem. If you do not like the answer consequently do not buy their product and tell your friends.
I do not presume you can get compensated for your chicken that you are not sufficiently expert to eat.
you are entitled to a compensation or a new daypack of rice... unless you can prove damages, which I don't think you will know how to. The fact that you have a feeling bad does not prove right monetary compensation.
Get over it and move on near your life!
you hold no damages, therefore you own no case,..whip the rice back to the store for a repayment, or a new collection of rice,..
Where's the outrage when it comes to babies being not here in a saloon all year?
when the parent(s) forgot the child in the backbone seat? There is other more outrage when a dog or some other animal is left within a vehicle or mistreated instead of a child being gone in a motor or mistreated. Locally there be a candle light vigil for the dog but nought even remotely close for a baby. Am I only just over-reacting? I agree that both or terrible but why shield the parent when a baby is moved out in a motor but lynch the pet owner??http://www.azcentral.com/community/phoen...
Answers: As one previous answer said the assumption is that the owner fully intended to keep the dog contained by the car adjectives day and that when it comes to a child the assumption is that it be an accident. I know it is concrete to believe that a parent could actually 'forget' to drop their child bad and not realize they are in the coup¨¦ but it happens. In a relatively small amount of cases it is due to drugs or alcohol. In some cases it be intentional to leave the child surrounded by the car - those individuals usually enjoy a history of child abuse (death be not necessarily the intended outcome). In other cases which I think are the most tragic (all child death are tragic) are the ones where the parent truly does forget. It happened contained by the relatively small town I was living surrounded by within the finishing two years. Interestingly, the rise in these types of death correlates to some degree near air heaps and it becoming mandatory to place your child in the vertebrae seat. I am a parent and I would similar to to think that in that is no way ever that I could below any circumstances forget my child in the coup¨¦ but it does happen to suitable parents. In the case that I am au fait with it be a change contained by routine and a mom with abundantly of things on her mind between work and home. The baby be asleep when the husband put the baby contained by the car form into the car and made no disturbance the entire time the mother was driving. This mother customarily did not drop this child off at daycare the other parent did. She drove to work as she customarily would. After work she got posterior into the car and drove to the daycare to pick the child up - not realize that the baby be still and had be in the coup¨¦ all hours of daylight. This was a tragedy and not an intentional one.
If it is intentional afterwards it definately should be prosecuted and we should be outraged - approximately 49% ( according to a CNN newsreport) of these incidents are prosecuted. But don't persecute the parent until all the facts are surrounded by.
I personally am outraged when anyone deliberately disregards a life and it results contained by death - whether it be a child or a dog. It comes down to personal responsibility.
I can't answer why they would have a vigil for a dog and not for a toddler but I can speculate that it was animal rights running taking to the oppurtunity to bring light to a situation.
There is outrage...
I a moment ago think it is more hush, out of respect for the family.
I see parents getting surrounded by trouble for it all the time contained by the news.
it get's my goat
Hooters be here life I guess, I am surprised not a soul didn't say anything more rapidly but she is basically working at a strip club resembling those people trouble.
This actually points out the type of nation that go to hooters, nobody said nil.
you are completely right. A baby be recently vanished in a motor and DIED, and no charges were file. A police dog (I know he's a cop and should have certain better) was not here in a vehicle and passed away and the officer was brought up on charges. I am not dictum what the officer did was OK by any routine, but what's up with that?
I'm only just glad in this instance this mother be arrested.
Because the assumptions is that the kid was not here in the motor by mistake. And that the animal was vanished in in attendance on purpose (thinking a few minutes won't be to long).
"Locally in attendance was a candle flimsy vigil for the dog " - prpbably by some DA peta types!!
Because people are in recent times plain dumb! I don't know a better answer to your question consequently this.
Can an employer tell you that you enjoy to get a flu shot?
Hi, I live within Texas, and my boss is telling me that I own to get the flu shot. He say that if I dont and I get sick near the flu, I will not get payed even though I enjoy plenty of sick days. Basically, saying that if I achieve strep throat or something I can use my sick days but if I get the flu I cant use any of my days. Is this legally recognized?Answers: You cannot be forced to get the flu shot (maybe beside the exception of military personnel...are you in the military, and is your boss your commanding officer?)
Flu shots usually contain thimerosol and egg products, to which tons people are allergic.
Assuming you are civilian, your boss cannot progress back on your employment contract, which almost of course doesn't say that you can't filch sick leave for the flu. He must honor your necessitate for sick days, and you in turn must comply next to whatever restrictions apply beneath the employment contract as well.
If he seriously tries to not foot you pursuant to your employment contract, you can sue him, but you may as well look for another living too. In fact, find a better work with a better boss and ditch this lousy profession.
Of course he can't. Ask him if he intends on paying for all the flu shots he is making his organization get?
How to get a Court Appointed Lawyer while your contained by jail waiting for your court date?
Someone I know is within Waldo County Jail in Maine and have a court date set on November 7th. He wants to plead guilty (b/c he is) but be told he needs a court app. attorney to do so. How would he go more or less doing getting one before his court date???If any one know please help me
Answers: Basically, he in recent times has to say aloud "I want a lawyer appointed for me." He should bring up to date the guards in his penal complex, and if no lawyer is appointed for him until that time his court date, he should tell the find at his court date that he cannot plead because wants a legal representative to be appointed for him.
The lawyer will recommend him on whether or not he should plead guilty. In any event, he may be able to plead a better sentence for him. Do not proceed lacking a lawyer!
If he have been charged next to a felony, he should have have counsel at his arraignment. November 7 is too far away for it to be his arraignment, because under federal canon, the defendant must be arraigned within 72 hours after arrest.
In other words, near is something seriously wrong with the facts as presented. Perhaps he have been found to hold the means to retain counsel, but have refused to do so. In that suitcase, the court will enter a not guilty plea and the case will proceed to trial.
Define source of law.?
Answers: Legal history or the history of canon is the study of how law have evolved and why it changed. Legal history is closely connected to the development of civilizations and is set within the wider context of social history. Among certain jurists and historians of endorsed process it has be seen as the video recording of the evolution of laws and the hi-tech explanation of how these laws enjoy evolved with the vision of better understanding the origins of an assortment of legal concepts, some consider it a branch of intellectual history. Twentieth century historians hold viewed permitted history in a more contextualized demeanour more in stripe with the thinking of social historians. They enjoy looked at legal institutions as complex systems of rules, players and symbols and own seen these elements interact beside society to change, shape, resist or promote certain aspects of civil society.
Landlord using (and clogging) bathroom facilities?
My boyfriend have had an apartment since untimely early-mid summer and his landlord can be unnatural sometimes. Today, he had blessing to enter the apartment to fix a leaky kitchen faucet. When my boyfriend arrived home from school, the tenant was outside looking around contained by his car. When my boyfriend go up to his apartment, he saw that the toilet had be used and (gross) was clogged. I don't know if nearby is any problem with this...but I know I would be cracked. Does the landlord enjoy a right to do this?Answers: Where should he go? On the runner?
There is no legal issue here.
If he have permission to enter, in attendance was a restrained expectation that he could use the toilet. If the toilet did not plunge/flush clear then the resident needed to telephone call again for maintenance. Tenant manager law vary from state to state, that would be the MN answer.
That is of course the "legal" answer. From a customer service point of spectacle, this was really unpromising. The manager/owner needs some module in resident retention.
oh hell yeah nearby is a problem first of all your BF did grant permission to enter the apt. to fix a leaky kitchen faucet that's fine but he doesn't enjoy the right to enter another part of the apt. unless it is an emergency close to to use the bathroom if it wasn't then adjectives he had to do is do the position and leave.
You or your BF should contact the "FAIR HOUSING ACT" and wallet a complaint against his landlord and relay them what he had done and that his just reason of individual in the apt the first place is to fix the kitchen faucet and start making a register of the weird things that he have done since your BF moved in oh you can find a information bank of the fair housing stroke in your local phone book look below government listings.
Look beneath the listings for tenants and landlords
Is violating yahoo's community guidelines a criminal offense?
Answers: No, but it could miserable losing your account.
More Questions and Answers:
[2490] - [404] - [946] - [659] - [1076] - [509] - [2466] - [1789] - [2463] - [1838] - [904] - [1222] - [193] - [2180] - [334] - [1003] - [685] - [2079] - [1367] - [259]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: