Law Questions and Answers
Can an person be sued for libel by a second delegation who is insulted in a personal dispatch from the first party?
Actually, the second do forwarded the first party's email to the third party and the third shindig is threating to sue the first party for libel and slander. This be a private email from the first party to the second entertainment. The first party stated that a friend be screwed over by the third party surrounded by the letter to the second participant. Can the first party be sued for libel even though this be a private letter? This be email was not made public by the first participant. Please help.Answers: No, because, by this point, it is hearsay. It is impracticable to prove that the first party in fact wrote the first e-mail (despite what the letter may speak about senders and such). The imaginative could have be altered by the second party. Unless nearby is primary source proof against the first party, the third gathering cannot sue and win.
The concept of libel involves damage to ones public reputation; or financial loss. Further, the requirements for proving libel to a "public personality" (radio, tv, movie, music, politics) are much harder to prove than for a character in private time.
Libel? Maybe! But a court would probably tell you to acquire lost before they would hear this grip.
A homeowner in our HOA sent out a derogatory newsletter as if it be from the Board--is that a crime?
This person is not on the board, nor did he enjoy approval from the board, yet he sent out a satirical 3-page 'newsletter' next to critical pictures of the community, as if it was an civil servant Board presentation to the homeowners association. What can the board do...were any law broken that he can be prosecuted for?Answers: If he claimed it was leader then he can be charged near fraud...if it was prominently satirical then why would you press charges?
not a crime, as he wasn't trying to bring people to present him money based on the false pretense. The HOA could abstractly have a civil exploit, but in the bunking off of damages to the HOA, there is no point. Most lawyer would recommend that you find something more interesting to focus on.
Is my buddies girlfriend's rape his fault?
They be fighting contained by the car, she hit him and demanded to be consent to out of the car. He told her the nouns was not nontoxic. She told him off and he said screw it and vanished her. Two guys in a vehicle pick her up and gang raped her for two hours. She blames him. I think it be her own stupid fault. The D.A. asked question and let him know that his ex requests him charged as an participating suspect for leaving her surrounded by a bad neigborhood. Who is right?Answers: He gone her, he gave her a qualification, she did not heed the warning, how can he be charged? He didn't force her out of the coup¨¦ and call the guys over. it's adjectives a misfortune and she paid a price for it.
If she gone by herself, then it's her error.
If he forced her out, then in that could be lawsuit.
she's just stupid !
and he's not to blame, he give her fair reproving...she didn't respect the warning, and get screwed, literally .
she's to blame, PERIOD..
It is a very miserable situation. However, he can not be charged because he did not criminally do anything wrong.
Maybe people should grant the drama queen act a rest.
She's trying to blame him for her own stupidity.
He told her it be a bad nouns.
What she's wanting her boyfriend charged with won't stand up contained by court.
I'm sorry she got raped, but..
She should be charged beside stupidity.
He gave her a f¨ºte warning, it's her own eccentricity for not listening (regardless of the circumstances of the argument or their relationship).
She have no right to blame him, as he is should not be liable or responsible for the actions of the rapists. It be HER decision to evacuate the car and turn. As unfortunate as it is, she payed the consequence for her outcome. He tried to get her to stay contained by the car, didn't he? Your buddy can influence that he would've allowed to let her run in a more safer nouns.
I repeat: YES he did let her step with A FAIR WARNING. But it be HER DECISION to not take it into consideration and LEFT.
Hope this help.
Uhm...
Why doesn't she sue those who raped her? O_o
The guys who raped her are responsible for the rape.
The boy friend was given a choice, tolerate her out or be guilty of kidnapping. She be an adult demanding to be "permit go" of his company and he had no officially recognized right to refuse her constraint. He possible could have gotten out of the motor and given it to her so she could drive to a safe nouns but then conceivably he would have be raped.
He did leave her surrounded by an area he know was hazardous. He could have stayed surrounded by the area following her until she found a minicab. Then again, she was pretty stupid getting into a coup¨¦ with two strangers.
But the rape be the fault of the two guys who did it. She have no right to blame the boy friend for doing as she demanded. While his choices were character of stupid, they are not the cause of the rape. As far as the cops charging him i.e. stupid. It may be that they have not a clue of who to arrest and are using him as a agency of prosecuting someone. A scape goat.
A foil. A pawn.
Seems pretty much everyone contained by this situation is stupid.
Your friend has no criminal liability.
Something is not kosher nearly the DA (an attorney) telling hiim that she requests him charged. Under every concept I can think of (as an attorney) at hand is nothing you can charge him beside. He is not a principal actor (didn't commit the crime, didn't conspire surrounded by the commission of the crime, and did not encourage the crime by others). Had the DA thought he be a suspect, he would have Mirandized your friend. DA probably talk to him to make sure he didn't set her up is my guess.
Despite within being no criminal liability, she may also believe he have civil liability, but don't see much success within that considering the circumstances. He had no duty to her as she acted voluntarily to bring back out of his car contained by that neighborhood despite his warnings/protestations not to. Thus, he did not put her in peril, which would create a duty that may manufacture him potentially liable.
Obviously, she wants your buddy to have a feeling responsible, but at best it would be moral/emotional resonsibility and that's it.
I feel her backache, but it's her pain alone.
The problem here is like peas in a pod problem in adjectives of these types of cases. You are only getting one side of the story. How do you KNOW he didn't put her out? You weren't nearby. It's he-said, she-said. I have to agree that a material man would not leave his woman contained by a bad nouns, no matter what. You are supposed to protect the ones you love, even from themselves if required. During arguments people are recurrently irrational and say or do stupid things. I be in a motor once with my ex (someone else be driving; I was within front passenger, he was contained by the back) and he actually open the door and jumped out of the sports car while it was moving. My friend who be driving was approaching, "What should I do?! Should I go fund and get him??" And I said, "Of course! We can't merely leave him, he might be hurt." If he get hurt, it'd be his own fault but I'd blame myself, too for disappearing him there when I could enjoy helped him or gotten him to a hospital. If your friend is a valid man, he should feel a abiding amount of guilt also, whether it's warranted or not. Is the D.A. considering charging him? If they are afterwards there is more to this story than what you know. People commonly retouch events to shade themselves as more noble than they really are.
Do I need to achieve permission from user to use their trellis videos?
I see alot of viral video accross the internet and would like to use them within a segment that I will be doing on my site. However I cannot find any info on copyright issue with this. Are these video considered public domain? or do I need to attain permission to use them?Answers: they are within the public domain and since they are not copyright protected you can use them as you wish
Prob. not you can a short time ago copy and paste it somewhere!
What happens when authority data approach the everyday lives, of their citizens, as a ritual of sacrifice?
Like with the Unit surrounded by the Federal Government that is supposed to protect children from toxic toy's act as if a few sacrificed children are worth doesn`t matter what money is saved by doing nil to protect kids from Chinese imports painted next to lead paint, for example!Answers: Under the current corporate oligarchy, not much hapens to them. If there's plenty of a public outcry they'll mark a scapegoat and sacrifice hir.
I grew up beside lead adjectives around me and no one know the difference . Since when does the government accept the responsibility to hold your hand every time you cross the street. Thank God they take in for questioning what they do, monitoring is much better today but budgets are constantly being cut,
Is this scenario legal?
let's speak I was riding my bike around my neighborhood and this guy tries to steal my bike. we start conflict and I break his arm... severely. am I able to be arrested or worse. even though I be defending my bike from being stolen? and I live contained by Maryland.Answers: Defending yourself, and property is one thing. SEVERELY breaking someones arm is another. I'm sure you've hear of the word brutality. That alone could turn you from a victim to an perpetrator.
First he was assaulting you when he hit you to try to catch your bicycle, it doesn't matter if you pushed or swung first. He is the assailant lower than the law, not you.
The individual way you could possibly be charged is if he tolerate go of the bicycle and later started walking away and it was emminetly clear that you and your property be no longer in menace. If you then followed him and hit his arm beside a tire-iron, then you might be charged.
HOWEVER, If he did hike away and you followed him and broke his arm and he then asked for assaut charges to be made against you, you still wouldn't be charged. Because of his previous assault against you adjectives you would have to say-so is that you didn't know what was on his mind, you thought he be going to look for a rock or a pipe to continue his assualt.
defending yourself and your property is your right, but it is a tricky proposition. You can use non-deadly force to prevent injury or thieving, but the degree of force must be justifiable and not more than is necessary. Where lots get within trouble is by using force for retribution instead of for prevention. If your resistance inspires the thief to forget the task and run away, and you chase after him, the use of force is no longer preventative. BTW, even if you are contained by the right, you can still be arrested and charged. In fact, if you be not involved at all, if they get the wrong guy, you could still be arrested and charged. No cop, prosecutor, judge or jury is foolproof.
What exactly is political opportunity?
I know from the definition I have that it is a democratic system break open to all and competing interest groups maintain it balanced. I'm trying to apply it to Universal Health Care. I don't want to hear family say do your own homework because I am...I'm purely a little confused. I would really appreciate it if someone could explain it somewhat better so I can figure out how to correctly apply it, OR impart me an example of it...you could use anything, doesn't even have to in the region of the healthcare movement.Answers: Take a look at it this way, within the US, we're supposed to have lots of Political Opportunity, which is to influence, anyone is supposed to be able to hop in and acquire elected, regardless of wealth, status, see, etc. However, the truth is, political opportunity is limited to work politicians who are high ranking member of one of the two most powerful parties.
In the situation of Universal strength Care, everyone is supposed to be looking out for our (the American people) best interest. Various interest groups look at whats best financially and these include interest groups that represent HMO's, Insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies, etc. These with the political party look out for the American People, which may be providing Universal Health Care so that everyone is covered, or not, so that taxes don't go up and that the vigour care system doesn't bring back abused as it does in other countries.
Although adjectives of these groups are supposed to be looking out for our best interests, they often look out for their own. All those groups that represent HMO's, et al, are adjectives looking out their profit margins. Similarly, most congressmen look for whats going to get them relected, regardless of what's biddable for most Americans.
I hope this helps.
Is there valid consideration ???
a promised contained by writing to pay a debt, which be due from b to c, on c's agreement to extend the time of payment for one yearis here valid consideration ???
Answers: Yes, the agreement to extend time on the payments would be the consideration; especially if interest is not being charged during that time.
Do you think scientists should be allowed to create embryos specifically for research?
Do you guess scientists should be allowed to create embryos specifically for research?I need the Pros/Cons for this topic to comfort me write my paper. Any websites, insight, personal beliefs are welcome and appreciated. Thanks!!
Answers: No I don't think they should. Using stem cell for medical reasons is fine, but not embryonic stem cell.
Everything mutates over time. I am not talking lone scientifically, but sociologically as well.
We can use abortion as an example. When it be legalized, it was allowed until the 6th week of pregnancy. Today it is up to the 8th month and even the 9th. It will continue to mutate and here will come a time when we abort living, breathing babies for little or no reason. In certainty, we do starve babies that are thought to be defective or probable loss causes. So I guess we are already here. Next it will be you and me. Should we become too expensive or too much stress on family or the public and own little or no chance of long possession survival. Or we are X years old and become a problem of any sort.
Things are up quite in haste today. To say we won't live to see such things is not a logical statement. Who would own thought, 30 or 40 years ago that they would have lived to see animals and associates cloned?
The stakes are far too serious and destructive to continue surrounded by the direction we are going.
Yes-- The potential for medical breakthroughs is well documented It could be said that man kind future might depend on it.
Why can we not plug ?
If we can plug a seepage,If we can plug a leakage,
WHY CAN WE NOT PLUG CORRUPTION WHICH IS ALSO A FORM OF SEEPAPAGE/ LEAKAGE? DIFFERENCE IS ONLY THAT SEEPAGE/ LEAKAGE IS DUE TO POROUS IN MATERIAL AND CORRUPTION IS DUE TO POROUS IN HUMAN MATERIAL.
Answers: I am plugging adjectives the time. Plugging Ron Paul.
Google the Tax Free Tip Act, Family EducationFreedom Act,
Social Security for Americans Only Act, Teacher Tax cut Act
If you are having a problem Plugging, a moment ago read these Bills the Congressman introduced to The House of Representatives
and all of a sudden you will grain the need to Plug too
plug the leage --it is bank burst
Transnission & distribution losses of electricity ( T & D ) losses 50/60 %
water distribution losses 80 %
food corporatio losses 40, 000 crores
efficacy of delivery of charity to target group 6 %.
Cos of bureauracy 50,000 crores and output the afore said losses
You can solely plug the leaks if you stand your grounds adjectives the time, irrespective of what happens. That's why they do not train the following stories in school any more:
Styawadi Harish Chandra
Myur Dhawaj
Prahlad
Styawan & Savitri etc.
More Questions and Answers:
[1973] - [1609] - [1897] - [301] - [1943] - [2468] - [276] - [902] - [1868] - [1877] - [2253] - [1649] - [1064] - [2051] - [2538] - [2354] - [1359] - [692] - [831] - [1250]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: