Law Questions and Answers

Are you for or against the Death Penalty?

We have to do a debate on it for a category 10 planning class and I am AGAINST the death cost.
What about you?
My reason so far are:
Its irrevokable, if you kill a being and then the evidence comes contained by that they're innocent, its too late, their gone forever.
Its much more complicated and have to go through longer trials and procedues within order to finally begin, its much easier to stick someone in prison for duration
The countries with extermination penalty still ahve a highly developed crime rate then ones short (Canada)
Even if there is a release penalty, its not going to terrify the criminals out of committing their crime, infact, if its something they think they might newly get caught for, they will ahve motive to do something even worse if they're going to hold to pay the concluding price for it.

I need some more reason.
Also, what kind of crime would be labeled beneath those that would get you the funds punishment (death penalty) Like what kinds of murder?

Thanks :D
Answers: 1. resembling u said, it's irrevocable. there's been plentiful cases where they own found new evidence that proves someone's innocence and next they release the person which, preventable to say could not be done if the character had received the destruction penalty. cite some of these cases surrounded by ur debate.
2. perhaps the biggest and most practical argument against the annihilation penalty is that it is VERY costly! appeals, court appointed lawyer, etc are not cheap. due to the gravity of the death cost, appeals go on for years and years. this costs so much money and levy payers end up paying for it.
3. it is a bigger punishment to sit contained by jail year after day than to bring back executed, which is over in a thing of minutes.
4. two wrongs don't make a right.
Questions similar to this create tons of argument. If you are using this to write your essay or a debate message i wouldn't advise it.

Everyone have their own opinion and why ask question on opinionated people if you already enjoy your own?

Im not saying its wrong to ask this interrogate but ask it to one person at a time and simply talk to them just about it... not an entire community at once because it might be hard to describe where you are coming from if you give other peoples opinions to a debate.
I'm writing my argumentative treatise about this topic... and it seem to be a red hot one at that!!! I am definately AGAINST the death cost, especially because over 12.3% of the 800 sumodd people every YEAR that are kill by the death cost put to action, are INNOCENT! So yes i'm against it. I found this great place next to alot of information to suggest its not the greatest... I cant place the link but it's great. google : Frequently Asked Questions roughly speaking the Death Penalty: New Yorkers Against the Death Penalty

That should work!
I agree with you, but I'm not going on for to be happy for a murderer to run away Scot free. Every criminal MUST be punished and they know it. If they are dangerous and hold killed multiple amounts of ethnic group then yes, execute the bastard. If they killed one being on certain language of previous abuse etc later they should have a gaol permanent status.

Multiple murders should get you the possessions punishment. If you are considered to attempt to kill more those, and be very insecure then yes i.e. worthy of capital punishment.

Good luck beside your debate!!
For.

I believe it is legal within my native state, TEXAS!!!
OK, I'm lone in 8th position, but I did a report on that last year. So, rear legs up the first reason "once they die, they're gone forever" heres one object: since the later 1920's, 28 those that were found guilty be later found innocent. Also, the disappearance penalty totally contradicts the amendment that states: near shall be no cruel or unusual punishment - because injecting poison into a person is specifically unusual. Also, capital punishment is if truth be told an easier way to procure out of the situation than a life sentence within prison - think almost it: would you rather live your natural life in hell, or permit people execute you? Aren't murderers supposed to have the worse punishment? Another entry loads of European countries have a lower crime rate and they don't hold a death cost.

OK, as the the kinds of murders, what do you imply by that? I wish I could answer that for you!

PS. Yup! I am totally against the passing penalty. :)
im not against release penalty...

u said that countries w/ loss penalty still own higher crime rate.
very well, u cant totally eliminate crimes... u simply do somthing to lessen it...


heinous crimes(eg rape, murder) should be punishable by destruction penalty
if you stipulation reasons for the affirmative (on no passing penalty), then why ask our evaluation? ?_? there's a lot of stuff on debatecentral.com, and if you type contained by, "capital punishment" on google...or since this is yahoo, on yahoo!scrabble...

i would drop the countries argument, b/c there are too oodles inconsistencies that your opponent can attack, resembling the population of the country, the crime rate without the disappearance penalty contained by the same country, the number of officer per every sector, etc., etc., etc.
The death penatly is a extraordinarily good entity to have surrounded by our country if you have evidence that say their innocent without a doubt. If you abolish the death cost you would have idiots approaching the guy that just shot and kill officer Cassidy out of cold blood in Philadelphia. Do you meditate someone like that should be allowed to live? i dont have a sneaking suspicion that he should be. There are to many ethnic group who need to hold the death penatly used on them who havent be executed.

crimes that you would have the extermination penalty used is 1st scope murder. which covers every kind of murder possible. Another is Arson Murder, if you use fire to execute someone (such as setting their house on fire..etc..for the intent of bloodbath them out of cold blood) it is a possibility for the death penatly.
okay surrounded by my opinion (and preserve in mind opinion are like belly buttons, everyone have one):

I think the punishment should fit the crime, in a minute with that human being said if someone where lying within wait and kill your entire family after robbing and torturing them later setting the house on fire over them what would you say to those killer. When they picked the two men up for those killings they have the fathers ring on his foot (cut his finger off to gain it, btw) the boots off his foot on and they had raped, spank and set the mother on fire, sodomized and overthrow the 8 year old son previously killing him and raped, shot, and made the 12 year infirm daughter (whose was blind ) listen to the cries of discomfort and hear those two men kill her entire ethnic group she had be shot twice in the legs so she couldn't run, she died of smoke inhalation.

What going on for the mother in NC that drown her boys, she didnt receive the disappearance penalty although to live the rest of her existence with the practice that she killed her boys conceivably punishment enough.

What almost Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman? Although OJ was found innocent doesn't the executioner deserve to be punished?

I don't think vivacity in prision will concern much to a person that could set and dwell on slaughter someone, after all 3 meal a day, a bed, heat in the winter cool contained by the summer and not a bill to pay!

Oooh, poor babies!

There's an arguement for the release penalty!
Here is the best website for this variety of student project
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.

What are some internet protection laws and or websites to call in.?

Answers: I always dance to www.findlaw.com for my law-researching needs.

Who came up near the concept, Crime + time in a pen = Justice?

Where is the Justice in incarcerating a drug user? At some point parents lose the ability to regulate this crime. When should the management step in to pass off it's justice? If an user steals money from it's parent's and is only caught doing so by the parents. The parents would hold the right to send this being to rehab and never report a crime was committed. Thus they would certainly be breaking the law by aiding a particular criminal. Now if the cops catch them, it's in a minute the judges right to step within and monitor the problem. Except the judge 9 times out of 10 will NOT intrude the sentence of rehab and take the route it give the parents. The judge will instead hold the addict and over look the TRUE problem. Where is the justice? If anyone can explain this to me so I can digit it out. I would highly appreciate it.
Answers: I am not agreeing near your scenario as correct, however, as to your question.

Before the 1600's, Jails be a temporary holding place for criminals, not a punishment. Punishments be much more harsh, as a rule defined as torture today. Branding the skin with red-hot irons or flogging beside a whip be common punishments for misdemeanors.

As the world come out of the dark ages and into the enlightened renaissance era, concepts such as parliamentary government attempted to reduce the amount of bloodshed associated beside punishments, with official at a loss for what to do with criminals, the use of incarcerate time as punishment became a not-so make the acquaintance of alternative.

When the Quakers built Eastern State Penitentiary in the 1820's, religious official drove home the idea of forcing citizens into confinement as a way to convert them into penitent, law-abiding citizens. While the penitentiary system didn't work after, and does not work now as a form of rehabilitation, it does serve as a deterrent to prevent crime, to an extent. If you come up beside an alternative to "time in a cage" as you put it, for Justice, please consistency free to share with us.

If you want to hang on to drug addicts out of prisons, I own a proposal for you. Change the definition of most drugs to hold the same status as Arsenic; a poison.

It's not Illegal to own or use, Just stupid. (cheap as rat poison, don't call for to steal much money for it)

You take a poison, so what...

You overdose; you tried to destroy yourself, you need backing.

You provide it to a kid, and he overdoses, it's murder and you deserve the death cost.

You provide it to a kid and he lives, and it's attempted murder of a minor and you deserve life minus parole.

This concept is not 100% foolproof, some people on drugs hurt others or wreckage property because they are high, and ruminate they can get away beside it. These people involve to get rehab within jail, and stay in attendance for a very long time.
Your premise is flawed from the outset. Parents cannot transport an adult child to rehab. Not reporting a crime is not a crime. If the cops corner him breaking into the parent's house, it would still be up to the parents to press charges, not the cops or judges. Rehab is awfully often a condition of sentencing (couseling while incarcerated).

Having a bleeding heart is not sufficient to speak for anyone or impeach a system which you don't twig. Pick a better cause.
The american judicial system is thoroughly scary and flawed. One of the several conflicts of interest in the US political/economical world is the private prison system. The private prisons are publicly traded companies whose stock convenience is based on the number of inmates housed. That resources that there is a linear relationship between company significance and number of inmates. With forty something percent of inmates in on drug charges you can create in your mind what would happen to the stock good point of those companies if suddenly they started releasing prisoners that were surrounded by on drug charges. It makes me sick to feel about how corrupt that system is.

Same sex marriage law?

what prevented some countries such as the united states to slip away a same sex marriage statute? in other words, what be the impediments to amendment?
Answers: Some 80% of Americans say they are christian, which is a much sophisticated percentage than is found in most of Europe. All traditional religions, not purely christianity, find homosexuality to be immoral. While americans are contained by favor of tolerance and equal opportunity, they do not favor altering the basic foundation of society surrounded by some attempt not to offend homosexuals.

I'm not christian, but I'm against gay marriage ceremony. Marriage has be a bond between a man and a woman for millenia. It is the basic foundation of society, and adjectives the dysfunction of urban america is based on the destruction of the family connections by liberal agenda. Seventy percent of black children are born into single-mother households, which is a large common sense why more blacks are in prison than grad academy. We should be working to strengthen the family, not render impotent it.

Finally, if we remove the requirement that marriage is between one man and one woman, within is ZERO justification to deny bridal between 2 men and 2 women, or 1 man and 3 women, or any other combination you can name.

I reason civil unions should be established as an selection for gays who want to formalize their relationship and gain the status of legal partnership for insurance and inheritance. That is sensible accomodation and enough.
Widespread belief that it is immodest. Is that good adequate for you? I didn't think so.

What almost politicians not wishing to upset the far right constituents? Still not adequate?

Lack of popular support. Just can't get around that one.
Because it shouldn't be passed. Marriage is an league between one woman and one man.

Two is polygamy and same is Homosexual. Neither of which is legal. (at lowest possible here in the US)
I find it particularly troubling, in a country that espouses individualism, that we enjoy laws that prevent ADULTS of equal sex to get married.

The individual reason the political affairs should be in any liberal of ADULT marriage grill is to protect the contract that it espouses and the children, if any.

The only moral ruling that should be in place is just within the individual and religious horizontal with no nouns to law.

Peace

Jim

.
It would enjoy called for copious changes and lead to many more change. It will probably never pass within the US. Marriage is between ONE man and ONE woman as defined in copious States Constitutions.

RB .. Your cowardness shows the help you have need of.

You post someones profile there that works from home to support her kids while trying to defend your own mental disfunction. Second Class? You wish you could rate that giant.

If you were a physical person beside a valid point, you would have not have to try to retaliate against someone to get it.
Get a Life!

Her profile have NOTHING to do with the grill at hand. If you dont want to hear what family think .. stay past its sell-by date of Yahoo Answers!

This isn't illegal is it?

My friend showed me how to use Mircro Word to product stencils and I made one of a band I approaching and I was going to put it on a tee shirt. That's not illegal is it? I propose, you know how sometimes you hear that you can't use someone's face w/o go-ahead. . . is it like that or not? Thanks!
Answers: powerfully, technically it is if they have a copyright on the use of it (most band dont)

also, as long as you aren't profiting from it, then most associates dont care = its not unofficial
Read the 'Fair Use Clause' of copyright law. You can reproduce it for your own use, providing your use of it doesn't impede on their competence to profit from their copyright (slander, etc).

What time do i go to work? tomorows time redeploy switch?

i suppose to be at work at 8 in morning relieveing guy who works 10pm-8am, so that guy tomorow works 1 hour more because of the time adjustment?
Answers: The clock changes at 2:00 AM, so your clock is already changed up to that time 8:00 AM comes around. He will work 11 hours and you will relieve him when your clock says 8:00 (after you cash it).
I would guess you would come in at 8 approaching normal.

Just remember, he also would apparently work a 7 hour hours of darkness when daylights savings time starts.
Yes that guy works an added hour, just put together sure you change your clocks spinal column before you be in motion to bed, so you'll be to work on time. My husband works overnight as okay, and will also have to work the extra hour.

My mother is suing for falling, do you think she'll win?

My mother fell within a NYC pothole when she was pregnant and suffered some genus of memory problem were she is justifiably disabled. She can't remember anything for to long and has mental problems. Will she win?
Answers: It's extremely vague.

Was the pot hole approachable and unmarked? Was it loose and she fell through?

If they can prove NYC was forgetful in some passageway, then she have a chance...but probability are, they'll find some "cover" to make her not win.
Yep, she'll win!
I own 5 children and blame my loss of memory on them, Can I sue them?
Not necessarily. Hard to answer. She will have to prove that the city be negligent contained by some way. This may not be too undemanding.
She's suing many years after the numbers? Hmmm. That may greatly reduce her unsystematic for winning
just if she hit her head. ;)
Usually, when you're walking, you examine where you're going as to avoid falling into potholes (aren't they call man holes?). How long ago has it be since this happened? Well, citizens have sued because a pale switch was too high-ranking, so go amount. It makes you wonder. If I didn't close to the way a napkin rubbed against my mouth at McDonalds, can I sue? Not making fun here, simply demonstrating how you can sue for everything now.
My guess is no.I work for a city contained by Mass I am the superintendent and people report claims all the time.9 out of 10 nation don't get rewarded.Even if a tree fell and crushed your car I hold to tell empire all the time put through your insurance the city will not pay envelope the claim.But good luck to you and your mother I hope I'm wrong surrounded by your case.
it really depends
my mother tried suing for this too and lost
but if she have a very strong valise,
a good attorney who can prove the city was sloppy
then she might enjoy a chance
but it's going to be particularly hard
i hope the best for her and that she win!
Very doubtful. Municipalities are protected against lawsuits owing to the scope of their responsibilities. In other words, NYC have way too oodles miles of roads to be held responsible for every pothole. They become liable when a public safety issue is blatantly palpable, they are aware of it, and they fail to exploit. That's negligence. Potholes, however, are not considered negligence.

Your mother has a moment ago as much responsibility to watch where on earth she is walking as the city does to repair potholes. This is no different than if she stepped off a curb and get hurt. Sorry, no claim.

Any advice going on for prison?

Basically I was near this group (the wrong one I know!) and there be underage drinking going on and drugs etc, I didn’t take any drugs but I did drink I know it be stupid but ... anyway I felt pretty self-conscious so I decided to progress home as I was going on for to walk out of the garden this boy come up 2 me n got me against the wall and started trying to try it on near me, so I kicked him were it hurts and punched him a few times afterwards his girl friend came over n we deeply got in2 a row, it was really stupid, afterwards the police came and I be really drunk and wound up and the police was trying to appendage cuff me and I was ’resisting arrest’ and I accidentally elbowed the police surrounded by the stomach, he practically threw me to the floor! And he Anyway.It was totally out of behaviour, but the chances are im going down for some time as I kinda enjoy a past, any direction apart from ‘you shouldn’t of done it blah blah’ I already know!
Answers: you need a apposite lawyer and a clergy character to help you.
I enjoy been to prison b4 (UK) basicly i be in the 'wrong croud' too, it actualy help me turn my life around , i have a really bad anger too, i did 2 years bcause i hit a guy with a bottle that be tryin 2 sexualy assult my friend, if i hadnt of done it she would of been raped.. but i also resisted arrest which doesnt relieve! ..anyway, i got time bcause he be seriously injured and i also had a criminal register too, I was angry at first i even get into fights inside,
i once get into a fight bcause near was this girl who thaught she be 'top dog' tried to push me around, she didnt bother me after tht but i got put surrounded by seg for a week so did she..and yes the officers can restrain you, believe me!
But dont gain involved in stuff resembling that unless u know you can handle yourself,at the begining i spent pretty abit of time in seg
My proposal is just do your time , hold your head down and stay away frm drugs , if anyone requests to talk email me/add me i will answer as tons questions as i can
love_sucks247@hotmail.co.uk
None of this matter, What matters is your survival. Be a loner. Don't afiliate near any group. Avoid confrontation. While you're in, bring back involved in lessons programs...

If you actually acquire time, it will likely be a sort of short stay. Unless of course you already enjoy some convictions. But since your crime is not a major crime your atorney can ask for a atmosphere security facility...
It really depends on what you are charged near.
when you say "Prison: you are wrong, you aim jail. Prison is for crimes that you are incarcerated for more than 1 year and is strictly for felony. Jail is for people beside sentences less severe and will get hold of out under 1 year. Chances are you will be on probation and do some community service. The gov't wishes to keep as oodles ppl out of jail as possible because its expensive and is theres a route out of jail, approaching i said before.. probation, probability are thats whats going to happen.
I have a former friend who went to prison, and here's what they have told me about it. (Keep contained by mind, he is a male and not a feminine.) He shared a barely wearing clothes sized cell with another guy or two. Mealtimes pretty much run sharp, breakfast at 7 after waking at 6, lunch at midday, one to two hours of freetime, dinner at 6, bedtime by 8 or 9. With good behavior, they could own tokens to progress to the 'general store'. There they could buy razor, cookies,etc. He did say that despite one a guy, using the toilet in front of others made him surface yucky. And also, showering with the semi-dirty prison hose and sticky shampoo...it was discouraging or worse than expected. Now though? i hear he's happy to hold the basic freedoms lots take for granted and he is a changed being
Alot depends on the prison your going to be at and its policy. By the nature of your crime you will prolly be contained by general population and will be locked down at darkness. Most prisons offer low paying job (like 50 cent an hour). If a job is available, TAKE IT! It will facilitate u pass the days and money for cigs or commisary. prison can be dangerous, but its not approaching you see on tv. Its what YOU make of it. Stay still mind your p's and q's. if you get rough beside a guard they will use force. my advice is read as much as you can and bring back into shape. Theres not much else to do. Make good use of your time. Some prisons even contribute college classes. Use this time to get your herald straight and in shape. I will hold on to you in my prayers. Good luck.

Do any of you know the real drive for allowing illegal immigration is to turntheUSA into a 3rd world cess pit

Answers: I construe you would find that most average citizens of this country are against illegal immigration. The problem comes from the corporations that verbs to hire the illegal immigrant for low wages and pass the cost on to society within terms of welfare, medical protection, and education.
The Republicans want the free labor or their corporate cronies.

The Democrats want modern slaves to ensnare in their make friends of socialism; giving them a new classmates of rubber stamp voters.

The only general public who get screwed are the 86% of Americans who argue with illegal immigration.

Enlisting in the army newly found out i have a warrant what do i do?

I basically found out i have a warrant for a desperate check i moved out of the area i am going to turn myself surrounded by and pay for it this week but i stipulation to know once i take attention to detail of it can i still enlist and what do i have to do please if you dont know what your discussion about dont answer someone next to some military or recruiter experience please answer
Answers: take guardianship of it and pay, agree to the court give you a piece of weekly that it is taken care of. afterwards go to your recruiter report to him/her what happened and show them that it is taken carefulness off. you still might stipulation a waiver though- but that should be no biggie
Not too sure I never went thru that, ring your branch of Military and ask!
Block your number and ask! They will not know its you unless you tell them.

More Questions and Answers:
[2068] - [62] - [1158] - [446] - [2278] - [1754] - [1055] - [792] - [136] - [680] - [202] - [220] - [2072] - [1632] - [1926] - [414] - [1724] - [945] - [943] - [1852]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: