Law Questions and Answers

H.w q.'s on voting.?

its about voting registration contained by ur state, in dis armour, California. So, can u help w/ dis question?

1. where must u step to register? (i put da DMV, technically u can go there)
2. what permit must you bring to register?
3.How long must you live in ur state formerly you can register?
4. how long must you live at the same address?
5. does ur state place any restrictions on da right to vote of a individual convicted of a serious crime, if so, describe the restrictions.

i need those answers ASAP, in a minute if u excuse me, i have a composition to type.
Answers: Here's all the information you necessitate to register.
http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/election...

Is this slander?

If someone went to the board and told them I be ignoring customers while conversation on the phone and I got fired "because it be one to many mistakes" and it be not true supported by video footage, and I told people that this guy is one of the reason I got fired...could he win me for slander? better yet could I counter sue because he lied to the board almost me?
Answers: This is the standard that a court applies in lay down to determine whether you have be damaged by slander:

1. It is false information (it MUST be false)

2. explicitly presented in a plain way (not a joke)

3. slanderous (it hurts your reputation)

4. statements

5. about you

6. that affects your brief or your ability to formulate your money.

7. And that that statement is the CAUSE of the damage to your individual employed.

Sorry, I'm confused about the facts of your baggage. Just apply the rule above to your case.
slander


A type of vilification. Slander is an untruthful oral (spoken) statement about a creature that harms the person's reputation or standing in the community. Because slander is a tort (a civil wrong), the injured creature can bring a lawsuit against the person who made the false statement. If the statement is made via broadcast medium -- for example, over the radio or on TV -- it is considered libel, rather than slander, because the statement have the potential to reach a deeply wide audience.
If it's true that he made this up and you can prove it, afterwards you are telling THE TRUTH. I don't reckon that he can get you for slander--- You, however, could win him. Again, though, you have to prove that you are recounting the truth. The burden of proof is on the accuser; and yes, you can countersue if he is suing you.

I'd sue him first, though, if that is still a possibility. If he have already sued you, then he is a freaking moron.
Probably not a soul can sue anyone. And saying that someone lied is not slander spreading a unharmed bunch of lies like calling someone a ****,etc,etc so that personality couldn't get hired anywhere or standard... Stuff like that.

But I'm betting you can't sue anyone a short time ago because they lied and got you fired unless you hold evidence yourself that it was adjectives a lie after you can go fund to the board of where you worked and profile like a grievance.
Truth is other unprosecutable in a slander or liable casing...you are in the right. Yes you could sue the company for wrongful dissmissal and him for slander...really. Since he can't give you your employment back (assuming u still want it) I would enlighten H/R that you have video evidence that you be fired wrongfully an ask for reinstatement or a settlement. If they balk contact a labor attorney.

What to do after getting scamed?

Ok, What can i do after i have be scamed? Say i send a money charge (BTW whats the difference between money order and a POSTAL money order) and the entity already cashes it. What then? Also let say the money be for something illegal. What could i do.

Now what roughly western union or money gram etc. What could ensue if someone goes and get the money, and screws me? can i find back at them except just calling the cops and clich¨¦ they are doing something illegal (I couldnt enunciate what it was really for becuase its against the law in the first place)

Is in that a absolute untraceable fee method? Cash in the e-mail still gives someone your address.
Answers: There is no officially recognized way to win your money back when you are scammed contained by an illegal transaction.

That's the risk you pilfer when you are a criminal.
Read between the lines, you tried to purchase an illegal item and whoever took your money and run? Close enough?
Money proclaim or Postal money order, same entity. Money paid, writ sent and cashed, money gone.
What can you do now? Learn from it and pay attention. Pay by credit card for the protection it offers. Untraceable method of transferring money? Don't know of any.
what psyche do use the address i got to transport the money order. move about there find him and ask for ur money put money on.if he dosent...well whip a bat with you..articulate softly carry a big stick

VIOLATIONS of our UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?

When you are convicted of a crime let's say, DWI it is against our United States Constitution to be double and or excessively fined. Meaning, once you hold been sentenced by the mediate you can not (based on our Constitution) continue to be additionally fined.

EXAMPLE:

Texas Department of Motor Vehicles will seize an average of $3000.00 per person near DWI status (60) days AFTER their conviction. If this is not paid afterwards they revoke your license until you pay them surrounded by full. They have nil to do the Court Cause and they have zilch to do with the arresting Police Department.

Amendment VIII (8th Amendment) Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

I strongly believe that individuals convicted of DWI should face a strict cost no doubt. But I deliberate people should start to wake up up and really take a stand back they lose all of their independence and freedom and worst of all whats vanished of OUR CONSTITUTION!
Answers: Well in Arkansas I can come up with of two or three.

#1 No Alcohol sales on Sunday. Clearly an outdated "Blue Law" to be exact biased in favor of the Christian Holy Day. A betrayal of the First Amendment.

#2 A ban on carrying a handgun, blade, with a blade longer than 3 1/2", or a billy club on or around your entity on a public road or place. A clear violation of the second amendment. This pernickety crime is considered a violent misdemeanor and precludes the entity from applying for or holding a concealed carry authorization for five years from the time of conviction. My CCP expired and I was caught carrying and be convicted of this offense.

#3 This one is iffy? Disorderly conduct verbal. You are within violation of this statute if you verbally vote anything to anyone that may cause them to want to physically face-off you ie: "fighting words". A possible betrayal of at least the first amendment.

I'm sure in attendance are more. The first two are my pet peeves. I need that I could find a lawyer liable to take them adjectives the way to the US Supreme Court. Maybe after the D.C. Second Amendment suitcase is ruled on someone will come forward???

J B hit the nail on the chief. The local governments are using the misdemeanor traffic and other infractions to milk the citizenry dry. Do you know what the deputies do here when they disappear the department. They open up bail bonds and tow truck impound patio businesses to further screw us. I predict a bloody civil war surrounded by this country when the people bring enough of this B.S.!!!! There won't be adequate hangin' trees and rope to go around.

I agee also that it is unconstitutional to charge more to reinstate a license for DWI than for any other offense within which the license was revoked. I know that it take no more time or effort for any because my wife and I have have a DWI each and hold been through the process. It's a scam and a rip-off and if I live long ample maybe I'll take to see some of the A-holes that are doing this to the citizenry pay for their dirty deeds.
the liberals will agree the cons will disagree

cons believe within punishment firmly

they do not yet know that it doesnt work
Our Constitution however, does not guarantee us a driver's license.

And as far as DUI go, I think if someone does it their license should be revoked. Period. DUI isn't funny, and neither are its consequences.
Yours is an interesting quiz. I do think that what is excessive fines is a relative thing. It seems equal to allow a local government to verbs a fair fragment of its costs for prosecuting and administering judgements.

And after all, penalty should serve as a deterent to a behavior.

At virtually every level of administration now fees, license and penalties are going up hugely because these government are likely more and more bread strapped. It is unfortunate and nearby are limited ways of dealing near it.

Is it a violation of the 8th Amendment? Probably not at current time,but if you consistency it is, appeal under it hits US Supreme Court. It will be an interesting baggage.

Once again Shilo (answered question on 5th Amendment), you show your ignorance and inability to read and comprehend a examine.
The National Animal ID System (NAIS) is being pushed on livestock owners by the USDA. It violate several amendments - such as: freedom of religion, due process for property rights, privacy and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizure, and states’ rights.
When I personally question one of the USDA reps about this, he avoided the cross-examine. They are too busy working for their corporate clients to bother with us little ancestors demanding our rights.

Facts and statistics that support the USA PATRIOT act?

I call for some facts and statistics that one could use when arguing FOR the USA PATRIOT act. That is, I have need of facts and statistics that would be used by someone who wants to PATRIOT stroke to remain in tenet. Please, no responses that argue against the PATRIOT act, those are useless to me. I would also appreciate it if you could hand over a link to your source. Thank you.
Answers: No accurate answer for this. No significant attacks have be launched against the US since 9/11; the extent to which this may attributed to the Patriot Act is unknowable.
That is what congressional over verbs is for. They are supposed to be monitoring it. The trouble is, we are not privy to the information. We are only expected to blindly adopt it.

Double Jeopardy Rule: should be abolished?

What are the cons and pro's of this Double Jeopardy rule?

I don't study directive but I happen to enjoy to come up with some points that's pro abolish this Double Jeopardy Rule.

Not only see from the law side, but also answers from the perspective of morality, technically, philosophically etc. are adjectives welcome.
Answers: sure if you close to getting tried for the same crime over and over again until the prosecutors receive tired of it, go ahead and abolish it.

What if a state constitution conflicts with a supreme court ruling on the 1st amendment?

Is a state court's constitution independent and all right state grounds to ignore the supreme court's ruling on a 1st amendment issue?
Answers: If the the state constitution conflicts next to a supreme court ruling on the 1st amendment that mean that you are contained by the United States of America.
No it isn't. If you want to ignore the law of the country you're in, you enjoy to start your own country.
State laws enjoy authority only over those areas circuitously addressed at the national rank.
No,any federal law,especially the Bill of Rights and the Constitution is superior to state ruling.Eventually it will be challenged surrounded by the courts and overturned.
The US constitution is the supreme law, aim that no other law can progress against it.
US Constitution trumps all.

If it be not addressed contained by US constitution, then it is reserved for respectively state to deal beside.

10th Amendment , i believe
A State Constitution can grant rights over and above those granted by the Federal Constitution, but cannot 'cancel' Federal rights.

So if the conflict is that the Federal Supreme Court said that a regulation does NOT violate the 1st Amendment, but the law DOES violate the State Constitution, later the law is unconstitutional.

Richard
The US constitution and adjectives the US Supreme Court rulings interpret it win. State constitutions are required to be at least as restrictive as the US constitution.

Please help me next to information. Im pregnant and need guidance?

Hello

Im from Bolivia and i met a guy from australia 5 months ago, he came to live next to me and my family during 2 months, during that time he didnt income a penny for anything, was giving everything to him (food, electricity, a vehicle, everything!). After those 2 months he leave, and i found out i be pregnant, he promise me marriage, that we will sort it out any me going to australia or he moving in my country. With the time be more and more difficult find him to talk give or take a few the situation and now im 4 months pregnant and desperate roughly speaking what to do. Im planning to to australia, and give birth within, because everything is a mess in my country, I do focus will be the best for the baby. My question are.. If i can give birth near without have troubles because im planning to go near a tourist visa. And if i get some support from any institution within legal direction to get to my kid the last moniker of the father, and get next to it Child support, because i will be single mother. please help.
Answers: Boy this sounds close to a mess. I hope you can get some answers here but it sounds resembling you really need to do something similar to contacting the State Department. What I'm hearing is I don`t know this Australian guy disappeared? If that is true, I don't conjecture they're ever going believe (Australia, that is) that your baby is partly Australian. There is no biological test for residency.
Good luck

How Much Support Do I Have From Fellow Minnesotans?

My name is Kimberly. I would resembling to bring forth a bill to our state legislature to obtain harsher punishments for DWI offender. It just make me sick to hear about a soul getting their 3rd, 6th or even 19th DWI!!! I just want to know if within are others who live in the state that would support this bill? I get the impression so passionate roughly this subject not only because I own lost a family partaker to it but also because I was almost hit by a drunk driver myself! As a Law Enforcement Student I know that our policemen and women hold all the training they entail to get these folks off the streets but for adjectives their hard work they stride free sometimes even the next morning to go drink again!! I hold spoken publicly many times something like this subject and feel as though I simply cannot get everyone. I truly believe that something must be done! I can only hope my voice will be hear. -Comments Please- (good or bad)
Answers: i totally agree with you. i own no idea how you can obtain the ball rolling. it make me angry also about family getting off after so abundant DWI's. i don't like to drive sunshine or night anymore, so heaps people drinking and drugging during the hours of daylight too. good luck to you, and right luck with your schooling we obligation more of you.
It is ridiculous that people can rack up so frequent DWI's but the reality is that heaps people drive drunk.
These family are alcoholics and all to be exact being done to prevent them from drinking and driving is to fine the crap out of them which probably make them drink even more.
If we jailed all of the drunk drivers for an all right amount of time the jails would be flooded. I don't know what to do in the region of this problem but I do agree with you that soemthing desires to be done. I have worked surrounded by many bar and I have also be drunk many times so I know that drunk society never think that they are drunk. I come up with cracking down on the bars may assist. I've seen ethnic group puke and then recieve another drink from a bartender. Maybe we should prohibit alcohal and make conform marijauna the state would be a far more peaceful place.
Although nearby are a select few who choose to make the grievous mistake of drinking while drunk not everybody deserves the outcome of a DWI. If you are aware of a newer comercial it states that a DWI can cost a personality, and in turn a ethnic group up to $18,000 dollars before they are previous it. Do you know any familys that could survive when 18 grand get yanked close to that? I've acually written to Senator Coleman to decrease the penalty for the DWI's that caused no wound. Some of these people can not go and get home any other way and they of late happen to return with caught by an officer. I too have have a family appendage maimed by a drunk driver and adjectives I wanted is vengace. Two months subsequent I got ahold of the individuals adress and I had some choice words for them. When I arrived I found two out of work and claiming benefit parents who couldnt afford car insurance or a babysitter so they be forced to live in squalor because of the fatty fines. Later that family have to put up their newborn for adoption. I wouldnt wish this outside influence upon anyone. The punishment should match the crime.

Do you feel freedom of speech applies to pictures and information on the Internet?

suppose someone posted unkind information nearly you, on a website. Do you have the right to pinch it down? What about pictures of the rich and recognized on the internet? are these pictures protected by freedom of speech, meaning that even if they are embarrasing, the personality who posted them should be aloud to do so?
Answers: The basis of freedom of speech have more to do with a free press and the right of general public to assemble in protest, etc. Many other issues such as you are conversation about hold more to do with irresponsible use of free speech and a shortage of respect for others..
This is such a great topic. You can not put limitations on Freedom of Speech, otherwise you would not be free.

I do believe that people enjoy gone overboard protecting this right. I have to read out, I am not a very religious being. However I also believe that if you have nil nice to say something like a person consequently it should not be said. Easier, way easier said after done, because I am just as guilty as anyone. But some walk over-board, some say and do things that are thoroughly uncalled for.
I think ethnic group should think roughly how they would feel if these things be said and done to them. If they would freely accept this same slander, consequently they are not living.
If the information is true then it is permitted. Opinions are legal free speech. I wonder though why celebrity cannot get directions of protection or the like against the papparrazi

More Questions and Answers:
[676] - [1952] - [1462] - [2313] - [1282] - [1007] - [1727] - [2241] - [1855] - [115] - [1247] - [1713] - [531] - [145] - [801] - [1546] - [2224] - [932] - [60] - [1134]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: