Law Questions and Answers
How much should UPS pay for running my frail dog over in my driveway?
You know how they drive this time of year. He be old and couldn't move rapid at all. My problem is, the driver only just took off and pushed him for going on for eight feet beneath his tire before he finally run him over and then never stopped but sped on down the highway as me and my wife watch in horror and disbelief!Answers: MY GOSH to be exact HORRIBLE!!!!! Sorry to hear that. Get the best lawyer you can and SUE them because running over your dog is doomed to failure enough but it could hold definitely be a child. I am so sorry that this happened to you guys.
Yes they other drive like maniac and their trucks are probably too big for them to notice if they run over a small cat or a mouse..but a Large dog!!!!
UNBELIEVABLE!!!!
I know that suing might not be a classy entry to do but in some cases you enjoy take extreme measures to build a point. And anything that has to do beside enforcing driving safekeeping deserves to be taken to the courts.
God knows.possibly after your lawsuit UPS will enforce driving lessons on their drivers and by this you WILL unbelievably possibly be saving lives.
p.s And PLEASE do no read the scrap that these stupid people write. I CANNOT belive that populace can be THAT RUDE. FREAKING SOCIOPATHS!!!! THE MAN AND HIS WIFE JUST LOST THEIR DOG IN A VERY TRAGIC WAY. SHOW SOME FREAKIN COMPASSION OR AT LEAST RESPECT!
I know this is tough but please CALL THE POLICE NOW. They work 24hrs and the last entry that you need is to rouse up in the morning and hold to face this adjectives over again. Plus is better if you get a report right away.
HEY RONBOY what would you do if some wreckless driver run one of your 5 children or your grandkids over? Dont be such a JERK! and you call yourslef a christian..shame shame shame .what would Jesus do? Doesnt the Bible right to be heard Love thy neighbor? Well you do an excellent job at it by mocking peoples vibrations when they are down!
I undersand the hudge guilt that you feel over the driver loosing his chore. I know that by doing this you will not erase that terrible scene. But dont touch guilty for people human being jerks. Sometimes I win fed up beside being nice and constantly human being hit in the other cheeck. People call for to learn that nearby is a time and place for erything and ranting on and being a smart *** to someone who is hurt is ABUSE. foul language of power and people requirement to take control of their words. words do own meaning and they can be terrifically harmful at times. I am really angry at the insensitivity that inhabitants show. It makes me gag when you read this peoples profiles and they describe themselves as model human beings that live life the passageway that GOD intended them to.That is actually RONBOYS description of himself. It make me gag that people resembling this take GOD's term in vain. People approaching him give Christians a particularly bad nickname.
About UPS I belive that you sue the company not the driver. Maybe You can ask the company to post a "hows my driving" sticker to the back of their trucks. And this will noticeably make associates more aware and more cautious while drivig.
All I mull over about is the horrifying scene that you guys have to face due to someones lack of judgment. I know that you are a better human being for forgiving him. But it is around time that people start living the consequences of their arrangements. He started off by person extremely rude by making the comment about dogs. What give people the right that they perceive that they HAVE to go out of their road to make rude comments in need the smallest regard of hurting anybodys state of mind.
I think that the driver be probably scared as so I would hold been.and thats what prompted him to keep hold of driving. But to say that he didnt know he run a 70lbs dog? it is a complete lie.
It is terrifically easy for culture to judge and read aloud that when people sue it is because of the money. Pleople necessitate to learn that MONEY DOES NOT MAKE UP FOR LIFE! I decision that there be a way contained by which one could sue without have the monetary issue involved. Because like that we would enjoy more freedom to help enforce law to keep our race and our children safe. WRECKLESS DRIVING IS A CRIME. People and animals die becuase of this explanation.
I trully wish you and your wife the BEST. and you enjoy all my respect.
Nothing because you should hold your dog under control and not loose contained by the street. Read your story, it doesn't add up. You vote the dog was run over contained by the driveway but then shift on to add that the "driver simply took off and pushed him for more or less eight feet beneath his tire... never stopped but sped on down the highway." Your driveway is in the middle of a highway?
I'm sorry for your loss, but you requirement to admit that the dog's release is your own fault and stop trying to blame others.
Get an attorney. They have need of to pay you for thrilling pain and suffering and they requirement to pay the price of a pedigreed Labrador Retriever which I assume is at least $800.00.
I'm so sorry for your loss. It must hold been a unacceptable experience.
That is really sad. My father be a UPS driver for over 25 years and he would've felt categorically horrible if he killed someones dog. I'll ask him tomorrow what UPS would hold to say almost it (like what they tell their drivers in the order of stuff like this) and permit you know then what he say.
What I mean by 'what UPS would read aloud about this' is that companies share their employees reliable things not to do because it can bring about a lawsuit. UPS would share their drivers if someone can bring a lawsuit against them for running over a pet, etc. at their home.
I would make UPS buy me another dog of my choosing..or threaten to turn this into a hurtful law suit. Is this what they want? I would inform them that I will pinch the story to the press and produce a Federal case of it. I will be relentless surrounded by my pursuit of a fair and proper settlement. Obviously a court crust is the last piece on the list of things to transport out. I feel for your loss because I am a dog owner and I know how close a pet can become. He is piece of the family and this is the heart of your luggage.
Citizen's arrest?
say i'am contained by a shopping mall, i enjoy done nothing wronge or even if i hold, and arent-a-cop restrains me and performs a citizens arrest, can i resist and try and grasp away?
Answers: You can, but it is a crime. The lawfullness of an arrest does not turn on whether you have done anything wrong, but on whether the personage making the arrest had rationale to believe you have done something wrong. So, if you contest the description of someone who just robbed the hill, the arrest is lawful even though you didn't do it. If it is above-board, then the resistance is a crime.
freshly go next to the flow and show respect to the rent-a-cop, when they see you have done nil wrong, have an attorney dispatch them a lawsuit paper, you will win and probly grasp a nice payday, so i wouldn't resist at all, only just say ok and sue them subsequent that afternoon for harrasment, public humiliation, defemation of character, and torment and suffering. etc. i would be happy if someone unlawfully arrested me within a public place
Hypothesis?
In the U.S legal system, a defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Consider a null hypothesis Ho, that the defendant is innocent, and a alternative hypothesis H1, that the defendant is guilty. A jury have two possible decisions: Convict the defendant (i.e., reject the null hypothesis) or do not convict the defendant (i.e., do not reject the null hypothesis). Explain the classification of the risk of committing either a Type I or Type II error surrounded by this example.Answers: This question should enjoy been posted surrounded by the mathematics subsection or homework help.
In Hypothesis trialling consider the following table.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Reject H0 _ _ _ _ _ _ Don't Reject H0
H0 is True _ _ Type I Error _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
H0 is False _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Type II Error _
If you reject H0 when it is true you have a Type I error.
If you reject H0 when it is false you hold a Type II error.
The probability of committing a Type I error is bounded by the significance level, α, of the oral exam.
Pr{ Type I Error } ≤ α
The Probability of committing a Type II error is a function of the values in the rejection region. More normally than not we consider Power when developing a test.
Power = 1 - Pr{ Type II Error }
In vocabulary of the trial you have a Type I error as have an innocent person convicted and going to prison. A Type II Error would be have a guilty person set free.
To facilitate make sure you select your hypotheses correctly consider the following:
Consider the hypothesis as a trial against the null hypothesis. the notes is evidence against the mean. you assume the be determined is true and try to prove that it is not true.
If the question statement asks you to determine if here is a difference between the statistic and a value, afterwards you have a two tail exam, the null hypothesis, for example, would be μ = d vs the alternate hypothesis μ ≠ d
if the question ask to audition for an inequality you make sure that your results will be worth while. for example. read out you have a steel tablet that will be used in a construction project. if the tavern can support a load of 100,000 psi later you'll use the bar, if it cannot afterwards you will not use the bar.
if the null be μ ≥ 100,000 vs the alternate μ < 100,000 then will will enjoy a meaningless test. within this case if you reject the null hypothesis you will verbs that the alternate hypothesis is true and the mean nouns the bar can support is smaller quantity than 100,000 psi and you will not be able to use the railing. However, if you fail to reject the null afterwards you will conclude it is plausible the tight-fisted is greater than or equal to 100,000. You cannot ever conclude that the null is true. as a result you should not use the pub because you do not have proof that the close-fisted strength is high satisfactory.
if the null was μ ≤ 100,000 vs. the alternate μ > 100,000 and you reject the null consequently you conclude the alternate is true and the handrail is strong enough; if you founder to reject it is plausible the bar is not strong ample, so you don't use it. in this valise you have a perceptive result.
Any time you are defining the hypothesis test you stipulation to consider whether or not the results will be meaningful.
you dont hold dr. mcwilliams for a class do you, i have equal problem in my mth 220 book
What is definition of Summary Judgment when Defendant Motion for one and there's a Court date?
Best answer receives the points.Answers: A summary verdict is one given by the judge upon motion by the defense minus going to trial.
How old do you hold to be to get a state ego?
i almost 15 can i get one???If os wdo i turn to the place where empire get their drivers licence?
Answers: Probably any age, you purely can't get a drivers certification until you're the required age of your state, but you can probably get a state issued "ID" card. Or you could in recent times get a passport.
capably i live in michigan and the age here is sixteen so you might enjoy to wait till after. but i might be wrong it all depends where on earth you live at. check with your local d.m.v organization
Pro tanto allocation of damages?
could someone please refresh my memory on how this breadth of damages breaks down? also you may as well walk ahead and do the same for pro rata allocation as all right.Answers: The following information about pro tanto allocation is excerpted from Source #1 cited below:
"[Latin, For so much; for as much as one is competent; as far as it can go.] A possession that refers to a partial payment made on a claim.
"In an EMINENT DOMAIN skin, pro tanto describes the partial payment made by the rule for the taking of land. This contribution is given WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the petitioner can maintain an act for the full amount of the land.
"A pro tanto defense is a defendant's counter-claim against the plaintiff for one-half the requested damages."
The pro rata allocation is a bit more complicated. Check out a discussion within Source #2.
Shooting robbers?
i was only watching a video about a man who shot and kill two burgalers that were stealing his neighbors property. He call and reported them to 911 and said if the cops dont get here soon that he be going to shoot them. When the burgalurs left, he go outside and shot and killed both of the men. I beleive that i would enjoy done the same piece in his shoes. I saw the pictures of the men he kill, both had prior documentation and both looked like gangbangers to me. I believe he did the right point by saving the world from have to deal beside those parasites. How does everyone else consistency, i just cant believe that the man is possibly going to be charged next to murder, when he was doing what should enjoy been done a long time ago, perchance if our government would lock those like the burglars up forever, or slaughter them we would have repeat offender. like those theifs.Answers: No one have the right to protect property with virulent force. He should have stayed out of it and permit the police deal near it.
No one has the right to take out someone in the commision of a crime unless their own life span or property is in menace.whats next...general public with sniper rifles shooting drivers that dont come to a complete stop?. This guy shot an suspect beneath circumstances that a police officer cannot...there have to be limit to the use of terminal force both for police and private citizens,
p.s. You will get your aspiration..now that this guy have committed a crime he will be locked up
It's murder because at that moment, the men were not robbing him and be not going to hurt anyone, as they were departing the scene. You're only allowed to destroy someone in self defense if they pose an looming bodily threat on you or another person, and as they be leaving (obviously not trying to hurt anyone) and he have no reason to suppose they were armed, and he showed premeditation by calling the police and relating them he would kill them, he is guilty of murder.
Also, you cannot simply remnant someone's merit as a person on their appearance, or even their movements. You have one side of the story. Those two guys (or girls, i dont devise you specified), could have be in a unpromising situation. Either way, he be wrong to shoot them for robbing his neighbor but not hurting anyone. They deserved their due-process of the law approaching anyone else. Robbery isn't even a capital offense. He took the canon into his own hands and kill people. And our canon system doesn't stand for that.
I do not believe that someone that commits a robbery should die. But I do believe if your home is broken into you should have the right shoot on verbs anyone that entered your home by means of access of force. As far as government executions adjectives pedophiles, rapist and murderers should be treated as their victims then executed inside 30 days of being caught. not individual would it be a deterrent but it would save money and guarantee they wouldn't know how to hurt anyone else.
What age do you need to be to be properly ingaged?
Answers: old adequate to spell engaged correctly
You cannot become reasonably ingaged because there is no such word! Learn to use spell check.
If you are conversation engaged later there is no TRUE legal age requirement. An engagement is a social contention of intent for a couple to marry. In some societies it is made by the parents when the children are small. If both parties to the engagement are over 18 contained by the US when they become engaged and one of them breaks the engagement they can sometimes be sued for damages or breach of contract if the bride's ancestral has spent a considerable amount on the marriage festivies which they cannot recoup.
Does anyone know where i can find the covering Wilson v. Southwest Airlines Co. 517 F. Supp. 292 (N.D. Texas 1981)
I have search all over the internet and cannot find the actual baggage with the decision made by the judges and the reason for the decisions. (meaning what previous cases they used to come to the final decision). I dont hold access to west law or any other canon based websites requiring registration and expenditure. Any info will be greatly appreciated, thanks to everyone that help.Answers: Look under :
Wilson v. Southwest Airlines Co. 517 F. Supp. 292 (N.D. Texas 1981
Stetson Law -- Legal Research and Drafting surrounded by Employment Law (Professor ...
Wilson v. Southwest Airlines Co., 517 F. Supp. 292 (N.D. Tex. 1981) ... Texas Dep't of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 (1981) ...
www.law.stetson.edu/courses/lrd-el/def... - 44k - Cached
Action be filed stimulating airline's open refusal to hire males as a despoliation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. The District Court, Patrick E. Higginbotham, J., held that where one a female be not qualification required to perform successfully job of flight attendant and ticket agent with airline, functions served by member of staff sexuality in airline's operation were not dominant ones, and reality that marketing campaign focusing on sex appeal of attendants and ticket agents be necessary to distinguish airline surrounded by its early years did not organize to conclusion that sex discrimination be then, or be now, of business necessity, sex be not a bona fide occupational qualification for job of flight attendant or ticket agent with airline.
Ordered appropriately.
Conclusion.
In rejecting Southwest's BFOQ defense, this court follows Justice Marshall's admonition that the BFOQ exception should not be permitted to “swallow the rule.” See Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp., 400 U.S. 542, 545, 91 S.Ct. 496, 498, 27 L.Ed.2d 613 (1971) (Marshall, J. concurring). Southwest's position knows no principled decrease. Recognition of a sex BFOQ for Southwest's public contact personnel based on the airline's “love” movement opens the door for other employer freely to discriminate by tacking on sex or sex appeal as a qualification for any public contact position where on earth customers preferred employees of a one sex.[FN29] In order not to destabilize Congress' purpose to prevent employers from “refusing to hire an individual base on stereotyped characterizations of the sexes,” see Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp., supra, 400 U.S. at 545, 97 S.Ct. at 498, a BFOQ for sex must be denied where sex is merely adjectives for attracting customers of the opposite sex, but where on earth hiring both sexes will not alter or undermine the essential function of the employer's business. Rejecting a wider BFOQ for sex does not do away with the commercial exploitation of sex appeal. It only requires, consistent next to the purposes of Title VII, that employer's exploit the attractiveness and allure of a sexually integrated workforce. Neither Southwest, nor the traveling public, will suffer from such a rule. More to the point, it is my ruling that this is what Congress intended.
www.findlaw.com is free for case ruling I am pretty sure.
Does the US Supreme Court plan to correct a bogus decision?
In 1893 a valise involving Nix vs Hedden the US Supreme Court ruled that tomatoes, squash, cucumbers and egg plant were adjectives vegetables and Hedden was entitled to collect tariff levy on them at the port of entry in New York. Fruits be exempt from income tax. Botanically and as defined within the dictionary tomatoes are fruits. The supreme court, however says that contained by the US they are legally vegetables. Doesn't it appear like the supreme court would want to overturn this erroneous finding of the past?Answers: There are two crucial rules handed down surrounded by the opinion of Nix v. Hedden, 149 U.S. 304 (1893). The first is that "dictionaries are not of themselves evidence, but they may be referred to as aids to the memory and considerate of the court." This is important, because the court must examine policy considerations within determining its decisions. Should the court limitation itself to the exact definition as provided in the dictionary, it would also require of itself to dismiss any adjectives usage, common comprehension, or custom -- whether societal or in industry -- that would greatly diminish the court's resources to make disinterested judgments contained by the future. If the court would hold handed down and applied a rule that stated "dictionaries are of themselves direct evidence of the target of a word, and words must be taken at the meaning provided by dictionaries," next under the principle of stare decisis, the ruling would be required to be applied in adjectives Federal courts in the adjectives. The principle of stare decisis also requires the court to adhere to its prior rulings, unless in attendance is clear and compelling evidence that society, normative values, and policy considerations have shifted so substantially that a reversal of the ruling is required.
The second essential rule, of course, is that tomatoes are to be considered vegetables. A quote taken directly from the travel case may shed some light for you on the reasoning of the court:
"Botanically speaking, tomatoes are the fruit of a vine, in recent times as are cucumbers, squashes, beans, and peas. But in the adjectives language of the associates, whether sellers or consumers of provisions, adjectives these are vegetables which are grown in kitchen gardens, and which, whether eat cooked or raw, are, similar to potatoes, carrots, parsnips, turnips, beets, cauliflower, cabbage, celery, and lettuce, usually served at dinner contained by, with, or after the soup, fish, or meat which constitute the principal part of the repast, and not, resembling fruits generally, as dessert.
The attempt to class tomatoes as fruit is not unlike a recent attempt to class beans as seed, of which Mr. Justice Bradley, speaking for this court, said: ‘We do not see why they should be classified as seeds, any more than walnuts should be so classified. Both are seed, in the oral communication of botany or natural history, but not surrounded by commerce nor in adjectives parlance. On the other hand surrounded by speaking generally of provisions, beans may all right be included under the occupancy ‘vegetables.’"
The last factor of the answer to your question is that, within order for a prior declaration to be overturned, two adversarial parties must present a valise that would require the court to consider its prior ruling. The Supreme Court does not have the power to arbitrarily reverse a prior ruling at its frivolous.
In Re:
"If botany is a science and people study it and enjoy doctorate degrees contained by that science and they are all within agreement, then by what stretch of the imagination does an attorney beside a degree contained by law assume that he knows more around botany than a botanist. Let's face it the conclusion was a political one due to pressure from the White House. They necessarily sold their integrity in my belief and made a mockery of the court."
Courts are not necessarily concerned with the science of "botany." The court does not believe it know more about what a tomato is than a botanist; it readily admit that by the science it is a fruit. But courts are more concerned with the rule of tenet, which is a reflection of society's normative values. If the adjectives person perceives that a tomato is a vegetable, the court is going to tender more weight to that than the exact science of botany. As they stated surrounded by their decision, nation don't define nuts and beans as seed, though that IS technically what they are.
The law does not bow until that time the doctorate degrees of botantists and biologists. It should be equally noted that attorneys own doctorate degrees as all right, in the directive. And as for political pressure... pressure or not, Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States are appointed for life, no amount of political pressure can forceably remove them from their sitting room.
They Supreme Court can only prefer issues (and thereby potentially ovrturn previous Court rulings) when they are brought in front of them.
So unless the Court hear another case contained by which the fruit-or-vegetableness of a tomato is construed as a constitutional issue, I doubt they ever will.
I agree with the others on this issue. Unless it is again challenge and brought before them (US Supreme Court) they hold no choice but to leave it the approach it is. They also have the right to allow a lower court overturn it and not hear the issue.
This is a fairly mout point since we do not have any tariff actively in place (to my knowledge) near any country let alone near our neighbor to the north who cannot say equal thing.
Z
They own more important things to do.
I've in actual fact read that decision and there's support for that finding at the time it was given.
More Questions and Answers:
[174] - [2111] - [954] - [2243] - [1856] - [1268] - [416] - [1389] - [592] - [735] - [129] - [1139] - [2319] - [490] - [1069] - [202] - [1186] - [2392] - [1703] - [2560]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: