Law Questions and Answers

Can you go to detain for depositing a lotto scam check?

my daughter called and said she deposit a lotto check to get underway a checking account. next someone told her it was a scam check. can she step to jail?
Answers: She will enjoy to make apt on that check or else she will be surrounded by trouble.
She needs to get the check good ASAP.

Most plausible, a prosecutor won't nail her...she'll involve to pay restitution. It be obviously angelic enough to fool a financial institution, so I can see why she'd be fooled.
In this grip, "intent" will cover her legally.

She should explain what happen to the bank. They see problems approaching this all the time.

The edge will tell her to cover the check next to some other check or source of money and all will be powerfully.
big time!


who's your daddy, and what does he do?
Judges are not stupid. They'll question her and ask her where on earth she got the check.

They'll also investigate her answers if she tell the truth she won't go to detention centre.

But if she had anything to do near making the phony check she'll be arrested for fraud.
I am going to tell you, bank are getting really serious about those sorts of things. About 2 years ago, while work searching, I get one of those "to good to be true" offer. A large production company across the pond needed reps contained by the US to process payments for them. What they wanted be people beside US bank accounts to currency checks and send them the $$$, while keeping a presentage. I signed up and received my 1st check $15,000 and I be to keep 10%, really well brought-up money. Well, I deposited the check and when I went rear legs to the bank to go and get the money to wire to the company, I be met by the banks fruad head, who told me that they check was stolen, and also the local sherrif, who arrested me. I have $11k bail and didnt even get any money out of the agreement.

My advise to your daughter would be to contact the edge, tell them that she be unaware to the check be fraudulent and what she can do. Its alot better to get this over beside upfront they for her to get arrested while at work or contained by the gorcery store.
No, she won't go to secure unit...but she will be responsible to return any money to the bank if she withdraw funds.

What Kind of Person Calls a woman who has be raped, beaten or molested child by a relative a whore?

Answers: I don't know, but I would suggest it would at best be an uninformed or unconscious person and at worst would be a entity guilty of as much or worse.

A person who have been sexually misuse is one who has be damaged. A soul who calls them name is aggravating the damage.
an insensitive clod.

but after what do you expect him to say when he did that stuff to you or someone else?

they own "issues".

worry simply about taking protection of your own issues.
social worker.
someone who wants to assistance.
someone who's concerned.
someone who cares.
The considerate of person who would do such a entity is either:

In denial, or have issues with women

or

Telling the truth because heaps women who were molested as children meander up being extremely sexually promiscuous

Which one applies depends on the circumstances.
Insensitive, brain inert, idiot. Filled with Pride and self righteousness, especially when it is a rape martyr or a child is molested and then raped.. Rape victims Can be both Male and Female. Predators are both Male and womanly!

If they call a child or a woman a whore, when raped, these population are in denial of facts and usually do everything possible to cover up the predator's misdeeds, especially if he or she is married or surrounded by another relationship, to save facade in the community. To me they are in recent times as guilty.

Young girls as recently as ending week at Oprah's school fell prey to a feminine child Predator. It takes more courage to stand up to them and recount what they did. That's the politically Correct thing to do!

The other issue is if a being Accused of Rape is innocent and the charges Not true they become the victim of a Lie, they should be given restitution and a Public apology and put within a Permanent record!

Why do so many folks deny what happen to the Native Americans was an injustice?

It clearly be... deny it?
Answers: They are either naive or evil. There's no two ways about it.
First sour, "Native American" as you use the term never existed.

Second, everything they suffered they did to other tribes, time to stop the whining, suck it up and verbs.

Third and most important, they are lucky they be even allowed to continue to exist, thankfulness to the kindness of their betters.
It be - but what exactly would you propose be done about it?

I am a Native American nouns - you can't turn back the clock and read out "ooops" because all the relations involved (both the wrong and the wronged) are no longer with us.

This is the problem - individuals want to talk roughly speaking past wrongs as if they are chains that hold them down today ---- verbs. The past is olden times, and as long as we live in olden times looking for solice for people who are long gone we can't move forward and live within today.
I've never heard anyone argue that point.


Worse nonetheless, we haven't learned from this, and history will soon repeat itself when Mexico does it to us... it have started already.
I haven't heard anyone deny it any. Even absent an citations on the asker's constituent, I will assume he is right and bite.

Our concept of justice is clearly derived from our Judeo-Christian roots, ratification through Ancient Rome's politics and then through the magna-Carta and onto our own political revolution of the 18th Century.

None of that be part of the Native American culture, fluently.

So it is fair to vote that the concept of justice be foreign and unknown to them until and maybe even all right after the arrival of Europeans.

Our concept of justice, such as it is, requires a *mutual* consideration and participation surrounded by the system.

Since the Native Americans, at the time you are asking about, be not integrated into the system, it is not really fair to apply the concept of even-handedness to the situation or not.

Clearly, it was not a situation that cries out "Justice be done!".

But that is separate and different from proverb it was an "injustice" although it is assured to see how people can walk from "Justice was not done" to "It be an injustice" if they don't consider the nuances of the plan of "justice" as I explained above.

I would say it be neither just nor unwarranted, it just was(no pun intended) :)

Same go for pioneers who may have be killed by Indians - their death was not basically, but it was not excessive either. It be simply external to the system of just/unjust.

(Aside: this is a big part of why we are have issues in Iraq too - our cultural values come from our history and don't mesh very well with their separate history. No wonder they are resisting near all they hold!)
IMO It's the same point as the people who deny the holocaust.

Holocaust destruction toll is estimated at between 9 and 11 million.

The native loss toll is estimated at between 11.5 million and up.

Laws&Restrictions on wedding and departure at 17?

To start, I live in Michigan, and I've hear many mixed answers on both topics.. I own heard several times you cannot make tracks home without parental consent at 17, unless you are married. So, if I get married at 17, would I need parental consent to do so? Would I inevitability parental consent if the wedding be held in Canada? And is it true that if I am married, I can give up your job without parental consent?

Just to clarify, I am not one of those teenagers whose mommy wouldn't buy them an ipod so they antipathy their life and want to move out.. I enjoy genuine reason for asking this question, and am not asking for myself. I am asking for a friend who I've watch be mistreated for years now, and is approaching her 17th birthday. So if you could please not distribute me the immaturity and suck it up comments, that would be very much appreciated.
Answers: Wouldn't it be better to help her by exposing the name-calling? She is just give or take a few old ample to take charge of herself, & may go to a foster home for a while, but that may be better than the consequesces. Marraige isn't an escape, it can be a existence sentence, especially if you don't chose well.
She can travel to the court and get what is call emancipation of minor. look at this site for details:

http://www.peoples-law.org/children/eman...
In Michigan within are four ways in which a minor can be emancipated:

1) when validly married;
2) when reaching the age of 18 years;

3) during the term when the minor is on active duty next to the armed forces; and

4) for the purposes of consenting to routine, nonsurgical medical care or emergency medical treatment when the minor is surrounded by the custody of a law enforcement agency and the minor's parent or guardian cannot be promptly located. This ending emancipation ends upon the termination of medical precision or treatment or upon the minor's release from custody, whichever occurs first.

However, a creature under the age of 18 cannot marry surrounded by Michigan unless you have the consent of at most minuscule one parent, normally required to be given contained by person at the clerk's organization.

The alternative is for her to apply to the court for a writ of emancipation, which the court would give in if it found that she meets the statutory criteria (mainly that she is financially agnostic and socially has adequate maturity to live on her own).

If you're surrounded by or near Ann Arbor, appointment the U of M law university and ask for the legal clinic and see what the interested beavers law students can accomplish. The little ones necessitate to feel resembling lawyers and this is an nouns where they can probably do some devout.

I would not recommend the Canada trip, because if mommy and daddy get really ticked, the groom could find himself facing charges of violate the Hobbs Act when he gets support.
Ok, I feel the discomfort and understand your frustration, but please cart it from someone older when we read out marriage is not the agency. Im not sure of the laws within Michigan, but in most states children can emancipate themselves from their parents. I would recommend exploring this. What is the worst valise scenario if she leaves the home and moves in beside a friend or family that know what is going on and is willing to facilitate her? What the parents will call the police? Well at that time, she tell them that she is not going home, that there is assault and she refuses to walk. The police will not make her progress if she feels that here is a potential for harm. I have an idea that there are other option that are not being explored possibly because of your age, or possibly because we do not know everything explicitly going on. I suggest talking to another full-size who knows the boy and girl. I would also suggest chitchat to a school counselor. Consult your state agencys for free permissible aid, etc.
Wish I could help more, but stipulation to know what "mistreat is".

Whats the difference between a majistrates court and a crown court?

whats the difference between a majistrates court and a crown court
Answers: The Magistrates’ Court is the lowest of all the criminal courts and the court surrounded by which all criminal cases are first planned. It hears 96% of adjectives criminal cases. They are heard up to that time either three lay magistrates (people short legal training) or one District Judge (a justifiably qualified person).
The Magistrates’ Court deals beside minor criminal offences including minor theft, assaults and speeding offences. The court can sentence those found guilty to a maximum of six months captivity or a lb5,000 fine, as well as some community sentences (probation, community service, curfews etc).
Although largely a criminal court, the Magistrates’ Court have very restricted civil power. It deals near matters relating to divorce including custody of children and property matter, but not the divorce itself, as well as the renewal of alcohol and gaming licence for pubs/clubs and betting shops respectively.

In the Crown Court cases are heard in the past a judgeand jury. The Crown Court hears serious criminal cases, including murder, manslaughter, rape, riot as ably as theft and fraud involving considerable sums of money.

The decree in a Crown Court is not deliver by the judge, but instead by a group of twelve member of the public known as the jury. Once they enjoy decided whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty, the trendsetter then pass sentence. If found guilty, defendants can face the maximum sentence possible by any court within England and Wales, that of life incarceration. The Crown Court can also fine defendants as well as some community sentences (probation, community service, curfews etc), although these are unlikely within a court hearing as serious matter.
crown court have more power to put you away for longer.
and they wear wig
Magistrates court is a Mickey Mouse affair presided over by workshy grocers on fat expenses. Crown Court is a unadulterated court.
9 months to life...

mags cant senternce you to more than 9 months, mags are unpaid volunteers near one paid stipendiary magistrate, who is trained... they recieve guidance bad teh clerk of the court.

judges know their stuff... and get hold of paid around 80k...

i can represent relatives in a magistrates below the makenzies friend rule... in a crown court i sit at the spinal column...
http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/infoa...

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/infoa...
all cases start at mags court.but as they can single fine up to lb5000 or imprison for max 6 months.serious offence have to be moved up to the crown court

Magistrates are chair by volunteer upstanding members of the community near no legal qualification.crown court is resided over by a style guru
Hi there, the differences between the Magistrates and the Crown are as follows:
The magistrates are mostly lay general public who do not get rewarded for their position, but can claim expenses. They are guided by the court clerk. Magistrates receive training but are not legally qualified. The majority of criminal cases start out contained by the Magistrates court. If the offence is a summary sin it will be dealt beside by the magistrates. If the offence is triable any way the Magistrates may adopt jurisdiction or decline and send the valise to the crown. This happens when the Magistrates do not consider their sentencing powers sufficient. If an felony triable either agency is accepted the Magistrates can still dispatch the defendant to the Crown for sentencing anyway. An indictable offence will automatically be sent to the Crown court on committal.

There is no jury surrounded by a Magistrates court and they are well set for rubber stamping decisions and individual a police court. The Crown has a jury who opt the matter of guilt.

There are advantages and disadvantages to both courts for a defendant, but individual factor have to be taken into reason when deciding which court to elect if the resentment is triable either style. In the Magistrates court Solicitors appear for their clients, whereas in the Crown court Barristers are instructed to conduct yourself.

SERIOUS!!!!l?

What site can i find all the info roughly the abortion case
Roe vs Wade.Please aid!!!!
Answers: google, ask.com . good luck
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/hi...
http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade
Type it surrounded by your searchbar. I am sure you will get multiple hits.

Is a topless massage crooked in MA?

Could it be considered 'prostitution'? Why?
Answers: This only in - second ago... MA state legislature has passed the Bill that not one and only authorizes but encourages topless chafe - i.e. the one in which both client and masseuse are topless or, even better, completely uncovered. 211 - Yea, 1 - Nay. Can you believe it? Nothing about "in good spirits ending" though...
y u wanna no
cause u SICK approaching dat
All massages are done topless, near a sheet to cover breasts when lying on the back. What do you suggest? My jugs don't entail massaging.
Who's topless the maseusse or the one getting the manipulate?

I was hit by a motor that ran a stop sign two weeks ago. The driver did not hold insurance.?

If the woman drivng the car would hold stayed at the scene of the accident, she would hold been arrested and lost her children. I did not infer I was seriously injured, so we both gone the scene before the police arrived. Before we moved out, we made the agreement that if I DID need medical treatment, she would whip responsibility. It turned out that I sustained a back injury that I requirement medical attention for. I contacted the woman about this, and presently she refuses to help yourself to hold up to her promise.since I have physical proof of the calamity (her car be damaged and my bicycle still have paint from her car on it, plus I hold a witness to the incident), will I be able to justifiably get her to cart responsibility for this (pay for the hospital visit, medication, and surgery if it is needed)?
Answers: First off...sorry to hear you be injured...that really sucks!

This is a complicated matter...and any answers you receive here (even from educated people) may not be accurate because insurance is controlled on an individual state by state basis...so the law or statutes that govern accidents approaching yours vary widely from place to place.

Michigan is also somewhat matchless because it's one of only a handful of states that have what's called "no-fault" auto insurance...which is much different than what the majority of Americans convey.

As other posters have pointed out...if you haven't already file an accident report, you should do so directly. Rather than telephone call the police...go to a police station...bear your bike, all the paperwork from your doctor and your witness. And, in the past you go, write down the details you remember and any other information that you have a feeling is pertinent...so nothing influential is inadvertently omitted.

You can file a small claims court grip...that's probably your best bet if your bills aren't that much. Small claims court cases can typically only propose you a limited settlement (I believe $3000 is the Michigan limit)...it doesn't business if your bills exceed that amount, that is the maximum you can collect.

And, if you run to small claims court, keep surrounded by mind...even if you feel she's at culpability...your witness feels she's at bad habit...EVEN IF SHE ADMITTED TO BEING AT FAULT when it happened...you, your witness and even she don't in actuality determine who's at fault! If you move about to court, the judge will determine who is rightfully at fault. Be prepared, assume zilch...and make sure you research the traffic codes and law in your nouns...one assumption or misstatement to the judge could cost you the entire satchel. Be smart...know what the laws are...not only what you 'feel' happened during the happenstance!!

I would weigh the cost of hiring an attorney vs. what your medical bills and lost wages amount to (lost wages will be tough/impossible for you to prove...because you were out of work @ the time of the accident). A good attorney can go and get you a much larger award (or settlement) than you're likely to take doing it yourself...but they will get between 33 and 40% of any sensitivity they collect for you!!

As for her assets...and collecting on a judgment against her. Even if you hire an attorney, and win the crust...unless your injuries are extremely severe and she is determined to have acted w/ depraved indifference...and/or if you can prove she hit you intentionally...the court is unlikely to force the public sale of her home...motorcycle or trailer. More than likely they will allow her a monthly compensation option, so your medical bills can be salaried off over time. And, typically this is adequate to doctors and/or hospitals...they just want their money...even if it's within small monthly payments.

I would start by sending her emails and/or registered letters that recount the events of the coincidence...and try to get her to adopt responsibility or admit guilt (something along the lines of."even if you can't settle up for all the bills right very soon, can you at least wage something now and the rest subsequently?" or..."would it help if we set up a small monthly transmittal plan instead of paying it all at once?" .once she accept or commits, you've got her!! This will gross a court case (at any level) easier to prove...and pass you more leverage to force her to pay short actually have to go to court.

Feel better and fitting luck!!

*Edit*

One last entry...you say that "she is buying her house"...assuming you penny-pinching she's paying a morgtage (not "planning" or "preparing" to buy it)...than she will most likely hold insurance on her home. Typically a home owners policy has some form of "personal liability" coverage. Now, it may NOT cover her liability while operating a motor vehicle...but afterwards again it may (remember insurance coverages and rules vary form state to state). It's worth looking into...and researching who owns her home is relatively smooth provided you have her address.
The first answer is wrong. If you are within the US, there is a statute of limitations on file suit on bodily injury claims. In my state, PA, it is two years. You can take trial action any time you desire, before the time cut back runs out.
If you are insured on any auto insurance policy, you should make a claim beneath your own policy to cover medical expenses.
If the woman won't cooperate, hire an attorney and file suit.
Either track there isn't much that can be done. You can directory a civil suit against her for your medical bills as well as your property wreck, time missed from work, depreciation on your bike and loss of use of your bike. But even if you win the civil suit, if she has little to no assets it will be some time if at adjectives that you see that money.
Contact your insurance company and see what your options are base on the coverage from your own carrier.


The house can not be seized if it is her homestead, also property such as transportation can not be seized. The types of assests your lookign for is property which is not her homestead, stocks, bonds, etc.

What is a signature bond? Are there any risks involved for the signer?

Someone get arrested for real estate fraud. Hes looking to return with a signature bond. He needs someone minus a criminal background and a opportunity to sign for him. I dont know anything about this. What would I be agreeing to if I sign? Is it a honest idea. I dont want to win involved in anything.
Answers: It is matching as posting the money for the bond. If he skips out, you pay.

Is it illegal to burn canadian money?

Is near a federal offense for burning canadian money? Can you be fined and sent to prison. Also can you show me a site that mentions the laws and offense, that states whether it is unfair or not here in canada. Im discussion about burning canadian currency not american. Its for a statute project. Thanks
Answers: I know it's not illegl in America end in if the money is in your pocket, it is yours. If you burn it it's your problem.

More Questions and Answers:
[432] - [99] - [2226] - [709] - [1411] - [1079] - [525] - [1709] - [583] - [2082] - [1535] - [735] - [1542] - [345] - [688] - [2018] - [1076] - [391] - [763] - [1112]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: