Law Questions and Answers
Is it true that "None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free" as Goethe wrote?
Do you regard that this thought could well apply to hulking numbers of American citizens in our time? With recent Presidential and Congressional assaults on the Constitution and our individual liberty, how can Americans believe themselves to be as free as they were in the past 9/11?Answers: Quite possibly. I know my dad is not as free as he was. He is of Lebanese descent and an electrical manufacture. He is very smart and complex working. He gets checked at payment and hates it. It is incredibily unreasonable. My dad is a really nice guy. He's a nerd. He also be brought up Catholic but has little to do beside religion. He has plentifully of problems with Catholicism.
Fortunately, I haven't be subjected to much. I'm dark but citizens tend to think I'm Italian. Don't you love it when empire make snap judgment and they are wrong? It happens adjectives of the time. I do it too, as much as I try not to. I understand why it happen. But I at least variety the effort to correct. Some inhabitants just walk on and on as if they couldn't care smaller amount. I try to distance myself from those people.
As for the rest, it may be on the other hand to come. God only know what we are setting ourselves up for. Didn't Benjamin Franklin say something something like people that are ready to give up their freedoms don't deserve to be free?
The man who trades freedom for indemnity does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. Benjamin Franklin
Most general public these days, it seem, do not really want to be free. They SAY they want freedom - freedom of speech, expression, etc. - and then they transport take pinch from the government, PROVING that they really do not want to be free, but that they own chosen security instead. They're nil but big children, wanting to DO whatever they want, but enjoy no responsibility to care for themselves. (Find me a charge; give me living security; craft sure my job pays me no smaller amount than this amount; pay for my kids to stir to school; foot for my kids' health trouble; blah blah blah blah.)
If people TRULY want to be free, they own to stop accepting government handouts and expecting the federal parliament to hold their hands -- they hold to CARE FOR THEMSELVES. The government is supposed to protect me from YOU -- it's NOT supposed to protect me from ME! You can't relate the government you want it rotten your back ... and after go ahead and invite it on. (Like Jerry Seinfeld said, "Government is similar to parents for adults.")
And - Sahara - people are suspicious of Arab-looking folk because these are the inhabitants who have chosen to any FORCE people to convert or to murder them if they don't agree next to them. No matter how few and far between these general public may be in ratio to the sane ones, the majority of terrorist act have be committed by these people, which process that a judgment contained by favor of self preservation is anything but "snap."
And - Ben Franklin was chitchat about choosing to be taken diligence of by the government when he made his familiar quote. He wasn't talking more or less preserving yourself and your country by properly identifying the opponent.
The idea of civil liberty is an illusion. They exist solely so far as those in power allow them to. The moment that these liberty and the exercise of them becomes a threat to the power structure and the desires of the ruling fashionable, they can and will be limited/taken away. Just look at what happened during WWI, when populace were jailed for making statements against the time of war and the government (which I'm sure more than a few of the neofascist dullards trolling YA will construe a fine thing to reinstitute). We're simply seeing another crack in our apparition.
Is communincation betwwen agencies better post 9/11 attacks?
Dissemination of imformation between local, state, and federal law enforcement better after 9/11 attacks.Answers: Yes it is. Before in that were lines of communication that never crossed. I believe they enjoy moved to a more integrated system where they are competent to communicate much more effectively. The latest example be the wildfires in California. All the agencies be on top of things, and everything happen as planned.
The truth will all come out sooner or latter , no different between State, Fed. Gov,
By the way Clinton be a crook before and while and after he be Pres,, So is Bush
of course
What are the differences??
what are the differences between a trial, hearing or court????can at hand be court without a trial??
plzz relief
Answers: trial is an event in which party come together to a dispute present (in the form of evidence) in a formal setting, usually a court, until that time a judge, jury, or other designated finder of reality, in instruct to achieve a resolution to their dispute.
A audible range is generally distinguished from a trial surrounded by that it is usually shorter and often smaller amount formal. In the course of litigation, hearings are conducted as oral arguments surrounded by support of motions, whether to resolve the case minus further trial on a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment, or to want discrete issues of law, such as the admissibility of evidence, that will determine how the trial proceeds. Limited evidence and nouns may also be presented in hearing to supplement the legal arguments.
court is a public forum used by a power groundwork to adjudicate disputes and dispense civil, labour, administrative and criminal equality under its law. In common statute and civil law states, courts are the medium means for dispute resolution, and it is mostly understood that adjectives persons enjoy an ability to bring their claims in the past a court. Similarly, those accused of a crime enjoy the right to present their defense before a court. In our society, disputes involving law are resolved in the trial system. A legislative body make a law prohibiting one personality from purposely damaging another's property
A court may be a magistrates court or a crown court.
A trial occur when guilt is disputed, and will always be held at crown court, surrounded by front of a judge and jury.
Magistrates courts never hold trials. They business with minor offence and initial hearings, which are court procedures which may lead to sentencing, or referral to crown court.
A audible range is just within fron tof the judge, no jury.
A trial is two (or more) party going before a find with a jury.
Court is basically the place this all take place, although some people will say aloud, "I'm going to court today" which could be for their trial or their hearing.
A trial have a jury of your peers that listen to the testimony and make decisions base on the facts and tells the sort out whether your guilty or innocent.A hearing is two sides speak to the authority one at a time and the judge make the decision base on the information.
My case be dismissed but the court is not refunding my money?
But my bail amount check wasn't refund to me and it's been over three months.I call the courts and they told me that they weren't "ordered" to mail me support a check.
I paid $565.00 online and did a Trial By Declaration. I received a check of $108.00 from them and describing me I should appear before the adjudicate. I went to court and appeared. The consider told me that my officer didn't show up so I'm dismissed.
What about my money?
* 9 hours ago
* - 3 days departed to answer.
Additional Details
9 hours ago
i didnt get arrested or booked
Answers: Call the judge's chamber and talk to his directive clerk - he/she will help you.
Something is missing here. If you weren't arrested or booked, why be bail even necessary?
Why did you distribute over the correct amount and get a reimbursement?
maybe here is an accounting error due to that - maybe it shows you already be refunded.
If the court clerk said they weren't issued an establish by the judge, ask what you requirement to do to have that done.
Then do it. :)
You involve to tell us for what be the money and the facts surrounding why you were surrounded by court.
Also, knowing the country would be nice.
If I were you I would try chitchat to a lawyer becasue something sounds awful fishy and see if he can straighten it out for ya.
Do employees enjoy any kind of break rights?
by law does your employer enjoy to give you leave time, and if they do whats the min?Answers: No... and Yes...
No... in private companys
Yes... within union companys
If you work for a company that does not hold a union next your company has the chance to give you a time off time or not...
Usually in private companies later will give you a time off still even if its after two years of working there... also if private companies if they don't usually pass you vacations they usually contribute you non-paid vacations. explanation you can take the time stale and not get salaried for it and will not be cut hours or lost of job.
Look into it if you enjoy a union though...
You own a right according to whatever agreement in attendance was between you and your employer when hired. You do enjoy rights within the agreement; influence he promised you two weeks after the first year, three weeks after the 5th year, etc. ... then inferior to provide that.
But does an employer have to guarantee that you'll take vacation time? No. That's something you hold to find out before individual hired.
Yes. 2 weeks per year. Actually, it might be one week per year. I'm not sure.
You are given vacation time by directive.
I live in virginia and enjoy had to turn see the doctor, Can my boss fire me for this. I have other had a dr. no
I hold always have a dr. notes on my return and other gave them sense before an appt.Answers: if you hold had excessive absentee regardless of the reason for them you can be terminated. what is considered excessive vary from company to company depending on what your duties are and how they effect the operation of the business. even excused absences can be considered excessive.
Why would the boss fire you over this?
What else is going on that you verbs?
If you're a great worker then you shouldn't enjoy to worry.
Powers-Taylor Building
13 South Thirteenth Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219-4101
Phone: (804) 371-2327
TDD: (804) 786-2376
http://www.doli.virginia.gov/
this is the number to the labor board within Virginia call them and they can answer any question and tell you your rights
sure - you are probable hired at-will, which means you can be fired for any or no rationale at any time.
But you can quit for any or no reason at any time too.
If i killed myself=murder?
i am completely and totally against any form of suicide but if i kill myself, and i died, but the paramedics brought me back to go, would i be charged for murder. maybe i would a moment ago go to the loony bin because i be alive and i attempted suicide. would i also go to hell because kill myself like contained by the movie constantine?Answers: It's a lot close to a take on the antediluvian lawyer axiom. "Anyone who defends himself have an idiot for a client." to " Anyone who kills himself have an idiot for a victim." In your shield however, I lean toward the Darwin Awards theory and I would applaud you for your hard work to improve the gene pool and I would ignite you to continue within your efforts.
Murder is the unlawful and intentional bloodshed of a human being by another. So ... no.
xxR
This sound out is really out there...
But - Murder is when someone kill another person.
Suicide is when you murder yourself.
If you don't succeed, it's called attempted suicide, and you will be most predictable forced by the courts/law to under step psychiatric testing.
If the paramedics revived you, and you be charged with a crime ( which you won't be), the most they could bring you for would be " attempted " murder . But as I said, our legal system deal with attempted suicides near a 30 day supervision period within a mental health facility.
But even more importantly, you hold an obvious expectation of an after-life, which might proposal an alternative to suicidal considerations, such as an exploration aimed at deepening your nouns to a greater cosmic awareness, thus opening yourself to unsullied options , investigational approaches to life.
My pilfer on Death is that whatever it is or is not, it will do no obedient at all to speculate on it's outlook until you are in a position to examine it first-hand! Until consequently, LIFE is here for the mastering. Peace.
Can I sue a neigbor if their regrading their property causes ponding during rainfall on my side of the property?
Prior to their regrading to install a pool, we never had hose down accumulation of any sort on our side of the paling. The township does not have a rule against property regrading so it become a personal issue. I refer to the accumulation of wet as ponding because the size of the puddles is about 80x12 and sometimes 8 inches wide.Also concerned that if I don't take feat against neigbor, the ponding will affect property value.
Neighbors are not the type to have a word about this and adopt they caused it.
Answers: Yes. Changing surface hose down and/or flooding of your property is a common regulation trespass type of cause of accomplishment, in accumulation to any state statutes.
Are they not the type or are you just afraid to confront?
At lowest possible try talking to them first. They might not even realize there's a problem. Maybe they will do something to convert it. Even if you don't want to do it face-to-face, put it in writing (your concerns and observation). Tell them you want to avoid court, but will jump that route if absolutely essential.
They at least deserve that courtesy, don't they?
It is unquestionably dependent on which state you live.
Some states follow the so-called "common antagonist doctrine," which states that a property owner may use any means crucial to get rid of runoff, and is not liable for flooding neighboring property. (Of course, that would parsimonious that you're entitled to do the same.)
Some states follow a rule which make a landowner strictly liable for harm cause by artificially altering the natural flow of runoff.
Some states allow landowners to alter the colloquial flow of runoff, as long as it does not cause "unreasonable interference" near a neighbor's use of their property. If you live in one of these states, after the question become, is an 80x12 puddle unreasonable? Probably, if your entire lot is 80x12, probably not if your property is 5 acres.
You didn't specify what state you live in, so nobody can donate you an accurate answer to your question.
I got a Proceeding In Aid of Execution from a small claim I lost two years ago.?
I know what it's for, but what consiquences are at hand if I do not show.Answers: Sanctions, contempt of court -- you will make your thing worse and more expensive.
Is it ilegal to speak Spanish on the workplace?
Where can I find information about this?Answers: No, why should it be.
There is no canon that specifies whether you can or not. There is though an "Etiquette" policy in the work place that ENGLISH is the predominant expression one should be speaking. Out of courtesy to those who do not speak "Spanish" or any other foreign language..and do not deduce it One should speak ENGLISH. FYI..it is also known as "Common sense"
More Questions and Answers:
[154] - [171] - [2509] - [283] - [870] - [1903] - [2322] - [679] - [1777] - [513] - [1990] - [57] - [456] - [2245] - [1348] - [2185] - [598] - [1628] - [1782] - [1447]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: