Law Questions and Answers

Pledge of allegiance?

I was wondering if anyone know whether coercing students to say the pledge of allegiance every morning is lawful in California?

My daughter (4 years old) refuse to stand for the pledge because she said she "felt funny" in the region of how all the children stood together and recite it at the same time, and she get disciplined. Is this legal?

By the road, I fully support my daughter. I want her to love the United States on her own terms, not through a coerced pledge of allegiance every morning. Rude answers will be reported.

Answers: There is no requirement to read out the pledge, to stand or to put ones hand over one heart.

Since the dumbheads added "lower than God" to that patriotic pledge, it have become an affirmation of religion.

You need to enjoy a serious talk to her coach and remind the teacher to hold her political views to herself.

And, congratulate your daughter for standing up for what she believes --- at the tender age of 4. You're doing a obedient job near, mom.

I think it is great that your 4-year-old already have a strong personality and is competent to question and believe about things relatives never consider.

I don't think it is court to force someone to say it, but I've other been told to at lowest possible stand as a sign of respect. She shouldn't have be punished for it though.

In order for school to receive support from the government they must acknowledge US holidays supporting the country and must also support the country by proverb the pledge.
Please tell your daughter of this hurry, and dont spoil her with her "rights" resembling my mom did to my sister, who is in sixth position and expects us to do her homework.
She should respect adults and do as told.
She is only 4 years antiquated after all

I dont guess its legal to clear her do it, but out of respect for the thousand of people who enjoy died so that she could be alive, she should probably say it. Even if she doesnt agree, thousands hold died and more are dying so that she can have the right to existence.

And she is only 4 :) I dont come up with it really matters, but I am glad to see some strong minds and civilized parents!

Disciplining a 4 year old for not adage the pledge is extremely harsh. 4 year olds do not infer what the pledge means. If this is a public pre-school I would accessibly complain to the principal and/or board of education.

That man said, I'm sorry but it sounds like you are against the pledge (coerced) and your child may be picking up on this. Are you sure that this is your child's verdict or yours?

If it was my 5-year antediluvian son that came home and said he feel uncomfortable proverb the pledge, I would probably assume that there is something else bothering him (like a alarm of not being competent to remember the words). I don't think young-looking children understand the concepts of manipulation. If your child be older (say contained by high school) afterwards I would stand behind their judgment. But at that young of an age, I chew over this is a problem you have...not your child.

Sorry it's probably not the answer you want, and I'm not trying to attack you. I merely wanted to point out my honest observations.

EDIT: I follow better, thank you. Still, not knowing your child who may very all right be advanced, I would say that most 4 year olds don't hold an understanding of cohersion and I would guess that there be something else to it. Reading what you wrote, it sounds to me like she have a problem standing and reading as a group...not necessarily with the pledge. Again I would ring the teacher and address with her. Explain your side and I'm sure you'll see it be a simple misunderstanding. Most teachers freshly wants what is best for the kids.

Heaven forbid she say "God". Oh, did I just read aloud heaven?

SORRRYYY!!!

Wouldn't want to outrage anyone.

Aren't child support payments backwards?

Presently, the non-custodial parent pays child support to the custodial parent. Typically, the non-custodial parent gets the child every other weekend, or surrounded by an average month, just 4 out of 30 days.

Payment seem backwards to me. Rather, the custodial parent should be required to pay the non-custodial parent to compensate them for the loss of their child.

That is how it works beside everything else in a divorce. For example, if one entertainment is awarded the house, that party must compensate the other party. Same next to a car, boat, or anything else. But, not beside a child. Shouldn't who pays whom be reversed?

Answers: I don't think you're a deadbeat father - I reflect "outta here" is one of those FemNazis. Hopefully the amount of child support you have to settle up isn't too debilitating and exhorbitant close to ours. My husband has to salary $2,000/month PLUS he still pays all the medical/dental insurance for a juvenile daughter who won't even speak to him. All this money goes to her mega millionaire mother who is so cheap that I doubt any of it even go toward the daughter.

It ticks me off when FemNazis close to the grey haired woman above me assume child support is some measley amount. For us, $2000 a month is HUGE. We don't make plenty to get by and own taken out cash advance on credit cards just to payment it. We sold one car and I drive a 17 yr ancient Toyota with body destruction. We live in a original house. The mom owns 3 houses and lives in a fancy place within a rich neighborhood. My husband now works long days means of access into the night, adjectives to make ample so we won't go completely broke with this exhorbitant child support. The law have turned so within places like California, the mother get paid tons merely because she gave birth to a kid and the father (and his latest wife) have to bend over and purloin it. I'm very sorry if something similar happen to you.

Children are not property!

The payments are for the support of the children not to pay for their attainment.

Child support payments are for the benefit of the CHILD, not the parent.

Stop thinking about yourself and start thinking roughly the child.

Payments are not for the parent, it is for the child! The custodial parent who the child resides with should and does carry the money for the CHILD!

You are just looking for a pity get-together and are selfish it seem to me.

ummm...no. Children are not to be sold or traded like furniture or vehicle. The money should follow the children since it is for their benefit anyhow. If they spend more time with the custodial parent, that's who would be responsible for making sure the children are taken diligence of.
Children aren't "worth" a dollar amount. If lost time was so considerable to you, you wouldn't be talking just about the money part.

Another deadbeat father.

The custodial parent provides EVERYTHING for the child. The house, food, clothing, shoes, arts school expenses, babysitting or day attention, 24 hour a day thought, tending to the child when sick. Pays for doctors, dentists, snacks, medication.

The non-custodial parent pays for nil beyond the pitiful child support he may or may not pay depending upon his saloon payments.

A child is not a house, car or boat.

Grow up and discharge your measly little child support. Believe me, it doesn't mean much but every little bit help.

Should America thank Bernard Kerik?

...whose indictment is putting a damper on "Rude Rudy" Guiliani's campaign?

Why did "Rude Rudy" Guiliani (as he's specified to New Yorkers) want to stay on as NYC mayor an additional three months departed his term he said, to "manage" hundreds of millions contained by international donations to 9/11 families? (Until he be ordered to distribute the money). Why didn't he have better sensitivity about his confidante, Police Chief Kerik?

Answers: No, Rudy and adjectives the other republican candidates are running a futile movement and have little to no kismet of winning the standard election.

Is this against the law at adjectives?

Me and my girlfriend have be dating for almost 6 months now, and she's 15 and I'm 17 (just turned surrounded by October). Well the other day we be together and her mom caught her giving me a handjob (it's not the first time we've done something like that, but that's the uttermost we've ever gone and whatnot) anyways... her mom of course tell her dad and her dad is infuriated (although I would be as well, respectively, I know where on earth he is coming from) and he said to my girlfriend "I can't believe he has the odassity to come into my own home and molest my daughter surrounded by my own house, I'll have that bastard put within jail!" Of course he really won't cart legal matter, but still just thinking give or take a few it made me wonder... is what we did illegal? I scrounging age difference can mean deeply, but I'm not an adult... so I don't know... Also it's not approaching I made her or even asked her to do it for me, it just happen and it wasn't against her will... btw I live in Florida if that make a difference. thanks.

Answers: I don't give attention to it is illegal, newly stupid.

EDIT -- as a defense lawyer, I would voice that the asker does not fall beneath the statutes quoted here. Note that it is the girl doing the lewd and lascivious molestation, not the 17 year old guy. Her consent is not at issue, as she is not the one man touched sexually.

It took some hunting, but I think he could press charges on "Lewd or lascivious offenses committed upon or surrounded by the presence of persons smaller amount than 16 years of age" - >2007->Ch08OO->Section%2004#0800.04http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/inde...
Further in that statute, it states "An guilty party less than 18 years of age who commits lewd or lascivious molestation against a martyr 12 years of age or older but smaller quantity than 16 years of age commits a felony of the third degree, "

I won't blend the definition of "lewd or lascivious molestation" here for fear of offending anyone's sensibilities, but your hum meets the definition. :-)

Just FYI, her consent is not permitted as a defense on this charge.

You are 17..if you be 15, you'd probably be clear but at 17, you could get your little butt contained by trouble.

You really have no business messing around near a 15 year old girl. You're lucky daddy didn't knock your teeth out of your come first...or that the mother didn't snatch you baldheaded.

If that was MY daughter, you would be surrounded by a wheelchair.

I suggest you find another hobby - and friends your own age to play with since some father beats you to a bloody pulp.

In Florida as contained by most states the age of consent is 16. Since she is 15 and you are 17, yes that is informal. It is not statutory rape since there be no intercourse but if her father wanted to later he could press charges against you for taking indecent liberties next to a minor, and/or lewd behavior with a minor. And, when you turn 18 you can be charged near sexual molestion and if convicted will be forced to register with a sex offender's registry to be celebrated nationwide. To put it simple, person's below the age of 16 do not have the facility to consent, persons 16 and 17 years of age can consent to official sexual behavior with other folks 16 or 17 years of age, and persons over 18 years of age can consent to lawful sexual behavior with other individuals age 18 and over.

What is your reaction to the MSNBC show To Catch A Predator?

MSNBC have the show called "To entrap a predator", and it's about molesters and rapists, etc trying to solicit sex online from a entity they believe to be 13-15 years of age. Chris Hansen interviews the "pervs", and he finds out a lot in the region of them, especially if they've done it before. Many of these guys are repeat offender.

Do you believe it's an unethical practice to hold a sting operation and catch it adjectives on tape, or do you devise it's ok?

Also, do you think it's odd that the show never talks give or take a few the guy who committed suicide after being on the show?

Answers: YAYYYY FOR MSNBC for one pro-active in the protection of children!! It will filch national exposure, continuous coverage and diligent communities to protect children from these predators lurking around the neighborhoods. I believe they should absolutely ETHICAL and smartest to plan sting operation.. that way you can lift out more than one, tape it to staple them in court and variety sure it nails their coffin contained by court. How can anyone debate if it is ethical? They get rotten thinking about or acting out have sex with children.. who care if what means we do to "take into custody them" is ethical or not. I dont.

It's a pending civil satchel. The family is upset their pedophile brother be caught and did the right thing. So they aren't going to yak about it on the show.

How would it be dishonourable? Exactly ONE person is involved within the decision to turn have sex next to a minor.

It's not entrapement. They are very vigilant not to go online and say-so things like "15 wishes hot sex with adult". They draw from online as a minor and wait for the predators to come to them.

I certainly appreciate the show for doing what they are doing. It has put the concern of god into these pervs and they think twice almost go to the homes of young at heart children.

As for the guy that committed sucide. It was not NBC's quirk that he went to that home to own sex with a child. I'm sure he be embarrased. His family energy was over. His craft ruined. He took the easy passageway out.

As for being dishonourable, no it is not. These kind of shows enjoy been on for years, usually dealing beside drugs. Look at how popular Cops has be for years. These shows are important to coach Americans on the underbelly of our society and, in the words of the great GI Joe, "knowing is partially the battle."

I consider it is a great thing,

Even though near are still idiots who still respond and show up to these things. I bet you couldnt count the amount of people who bestow second thought to actually following through next to actually consultation the underaged person surrounded by real existence because they think it might fall up on TV and them in lock away.

If it keeps one girl from man molested it is worth it.

Also if you are commiting a crime what right do you have to expect privacy? You know how you stay stale the show. You dont go to a house expecting to come across a 13 year old girl for sex.

The guy who kill himself didnt kill himself becuase he be on the show he killed himself becuase he know what he did was wrong and shameful and didnt want to frontage up to his punishment

If you read the reports their convictions record is not that hot, probably because they are conversation to someone who is over 18 pretending to be under 18, which is probably not unlawful.

Its American style entertainment using sick people as the "christians" within the forum
Also amused by the team of six cops who attack him when they arrest them, so entertaining.

It's a unhappy serious subject, and I have enjoy no problem with the campaign, but to sell it as a TV show is taking perversion to a different rank

I'm all for it. It is call a "sting" and law enforcement uses that practice adjectives the time to catch the dregs and predators within our society...perfectly endorsed.

Imagine, if you can, that there really be a 13 year old girl home alone and one of those creeps come over. What do you think would crop up to that little girl???? HMMM????

How many other little girls hold those creeps messed around with????

Putting them on TV is fine near me.lets everyone go and get a good look at them - and will keep watch on out for him to keep him away from their kids..

As for the guy who committed suicide...too doomed to failure about that too. He be a worthless piece of humanity anyway. He didn't commit suicide because he was sorry - he did it because he get caught and knew his natural life was ruined. Do you wonder how masses little girls lives he might have ruined past he got caught????

Those men are sick, sick, sick and we adjectives should know who they are, where they are and maintain them separated from society.

Can a person beside the genetic code never turn to crime?

Answers: Your question is so undeveloped. In psychology, we discussed that super males or those males with YY genes are agreed to have a terrifically aggressive behavior like those you find contained by jails.

Keep up near technology?? Obviously, someone had no clue what you are conversation about. I am not sure around this, I did alot of research about it when my own son be little, because of his dads criminal activities. I never have any genetic testing done on my son, but this is a immensely interesting question. You singular hear about the ones near the extra chromosome who Do turn to crime, they never mention ones who have the code but dont. I will hold to watch this cross-examine to see the answers. Good one.

If i have a resisting arrest conviction can i become a private investigator?

Answers: It would be honourable to check with the local county investigator out of the courthouse, probably or The District Attorney's bureau or the sheriff's office. Or send for one and talk to a valid one in human being and get some info. My daughter desires to do something like that and she have discussed things with an investigator,========

Depends
how serious be it??
Sorry but probably not
They want clean ppl

Wow you kinda go the other on that one huh?

I hope not.

Hi Anthony

As long as you don't have a felony conviction you can do simply about any piece. Most states have their own law though, so you might want to check with your own state directive enforcement officials and or the license board.

Good Luck.cya.

If you could make a 28th ammendment, what would it be?

& whyy?

Answers: Legalize marijuana, regulate it, levy the hell out of it. Then lower the income tax rates correspondingly.

That adjectives Americans read the bible, so that they will have an even uncertainty to be saved. After they do, they can choose to do angelic or to do evil. But I'm sure that God will take assistance of that, because He has said that they will own no excuse. Amen!!!

Do u agree with children surrounded by need , the amount of money we tilt no child should be in obligation.?

a lot more money would catch donated if we knew where on earth it went.
why not telephone it The homeless and unemployed surrounded by need because of adjectives the polish here

Answers: I applaud you.

You have merely said exactly what I feel. We can't do anything more or less it because the people of this country would a bit beleive the endless drivel of lies that comes out of a persuaded PM's mouth than look around, see with their own two eyes and vote properly. The blatant waste of taxpayers money on perk for MPs alone could go a long process to combating true poverty for the poorest families surrounded by the u.k. In this day and age we should not enjoy a single child in the U.K move about hungry or without a roof over it's boss before money is dished out to 'whereveristan' for anything project the dictator of that country claims it needs the lolly for. it really makes my blood boil.

your'e right - no child SHOULD be surrounded by need, but copious are...

Children in requirement show precisely where adjectives the money goes - it's too confident to use that argument as an excuse not to gave anything.
Make a point of checking out what they do procure up to (link below) stop being so cynical, and don't conflate the immigration debate beside a genuine atempt to do some fitting for those children who REALLY DO need our aid

Wait... did you seriously blame the Polish?

I'm half-Polish

sorry, I have to bring up to date you, I'm not hurting any kids, homeless, or kids, and I don't know anyone who is, but I try to help them and I hope someone help sick people resembling you

Charity begins at home look after your own people because no one else will

Is Tudou legal?

there's so copious sites that are illegal i don't know which ones are permitted. so can someone tell me if Tudou is endorsed?

Answers: I am going to try it.
"Have you checked out Tudou.com, the Chinese video-sharing site? Yeah, yeah, the “Chinese YouTube.” Its name process “potato” in Mandarin – as surrounded by “couch potato,” according to the company’s boilerplate descriptions on press releases.

It’s been around since 2005, but is acquirement steam. Currently, 40 million Chinese Internet users are watching more than 1.2 billion videos respectively month on Tudou (according to Nielsen NetRatings). And Tudou recently announced that it will also nouns ads –a adjectives source of revenue.

What’s on Tudou? Yes, there are bootlegged episodes of TV shows such as Survivor or clips from movies such as Spider-Man -– which beg the question, how will American entertainment companies concordat with this? At equal time, Tudou is a fun window into what Chinese youth are wearing, listen to, watching, posting online, and how they decorate their apartments and bedrooms. It’s potentially a trend-watching or market-research tool for, in good health, couch potatoes."

More Questions and Answers:
[2042] - [1624] - [1949] - [547] - [2076] - [2538] - [682] - [2423] - [1095] - [199] - [109] - [1378] - [1239] - [787] - [2392] - [2306] - [645] - [2429] - [2420] - [418]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: