Law Questions and Answers
Discrimination of the Obese? 11-11-07 , Australian news reports state that "most Air-lines will consider a Fee
to be salaried by over-weight passengers boarding their flights" , much matching as you would pay a payment for excess baggage. I hold already thought about the Pro`s and Con`s of this , though would close to Others opinions on the following.1. how would they deter-mine who is Obese?
2. how would they confirm this?
3.would it be an invasion of privacy to ask this Question
directly or surrounded by the form of a Questionaire?
4.what would be the Legal Ramifications?
5.what special consideration for Medical Condition?
I am a "skinny" and can bare-ly occupy 1 seat , but , I don`t ruminate this would be FAIR on some-one who Genuinely had a Medical Condition and have a life-time of trouble try-ing to reduce their size , as compared to some-one who could effortlessly win The Biggest Loser , (if they tried) !
Your Opinion is welcome.
Answers: Many pounds and inches ago, I give up trying to sit in and reimburse for only one form. I grew too large for one seatt and from something like 400 on I have purchased two sitting room so I have satisfactory room to sit. I am currenlty at 620 and still do so. I fill most of the two spaces with my current size. I do mull over a fee (or second ticket) should single be required if someone actually requirements that second seat to fit and not to bother the other passenger. I was other concerned I spilled into the other seat. After a while when it be obvious within was no style for me to get contained by one seat, I purchased the second. I do find individuals stare at how much space I take but at lowest possible I am not hindering anyone's comfort by taking up some of their form.
I suppose it they need 2 or more sitting room to themselves, the airline will consider a fee as explicitly one or more less entity on the plane.
I did watch a programme once where on earth a US airline charged a man double as he needed two seats.
I wonder if an anorexic character books a flight would they give them a discount?!
this is silly for airlines to do such things, but they own to squeeze those seats together to win one more passenger to settle an over priced fare.
if I were forced to discharge for 2 seats, it have better be the seats of my choosing and not surrounded by different areas of the plane, either
openly, airlines would have adjectives of your questions figure out and all loopholes safe and sound fastened before enforce over weight passenger to pay double
sure, the fact that liquid and gels hold been reduced to travel sizes, due to possibility of explosives, at hand must be some savings surrounded by the weight carried on airlines in our time
plus, the limitations of baggage and substance of those bags that some airlines are enforce. not to mention the size of carry on luggage, too
airlines are whittle away at what and how much people can fetch on or check into baggage. it's newly a matter of time earlier they have scales at every guarantee counter and after you remove your shoes, empty your pockets and catch frisked and run through the x-ray... your next move will be to the scales for weigh surrounded by
what do you expect? the terrorists might be sneaking fat inhabitants on the plane. oh my!
Need Advice. Dented my Friends Sisters car. Dont know what to do.?
So the scenario be that my friend had an expired drivers license so he asked me to drive his sister's coup¨¦, which I felt self-conscious doing in the first place, and lying on that his friends were carrying unsanctioned stuff on them. Me being the honest friend that I am took matters into my hand and drove to the concert we were going to. When we finally parked thinking we be at the right spot, we all drank our beers and found out we be in the wrong nouns. We got final in the vehicle and I drove more, I backed into a pole and dented my friend's sister's motor pretty bad. She doesn't even know it..on the other hand, until tommorow. I'm really broke and I know I probabbly shouldnt have drove but I feel bad. I know it's my blame for not saying anything, but should I be totally at guiltiness and have to settle for all the damages? I am broke, I didn't want to drive contained by the first place, and I drank when I got support in the coup¨¦ and my friend knew. I entail advice, and I can't afford to clear for a bumper right now. Help!Answers: You assumed the responsibility when you get into the drivers seat. You are 100% responsible for paying for the defile. You could have said no,but you didn't. The sister shouldn't enjoy to claim it on her insurance,that will make her premiums high. You consumed alcohol and then drove a sports car,not a good move at adjectives. Judge Judy would nail you to the wall.
Your friend should conduct yourself like a friend and hold your attention half or the cost.
best wishes
what a intertwined web we weave when we drive for others next to expired licenses and who are carrying unconstitutional substances on their person and drink even when we know we're going to imagined drive everyone home...
1. you've established that you're broke
2. why did the sister give consent to drive her vehicle when brother's license wasn't legal?
3. win together with those friends and integer out how they're going to help settle for the damage. because breakdown lies with respectively of you having or doing something risky in admiration to that trip you all took
4. if they don't step up and do the right piece and help you out next you're stuck and you better get a career and become un-broke
5. each of you entail to apologize profusely for what happened to that motor
6. next time you'll know better
You should give the name and let your friends sister know what happen and offer to money her for the dent little by little so you can afford it. OR offer to compensate for a rental while her's in the shop and income for half of the cost of repairs.. Hope this help :)
Can a solicitor get access to a 999 phone call that was made.?
Answers: Not directly, but it can be disclosed to them by party that can.
Only if it is part of a travel case they are preparing for a brief... (Solicitors can appear before a go-between under some circumstances, but generally they "Brief" a Barrister or Queen's Counsel to actually present the luggage to the court)
So they would have right of discovery of any evidence surrounded by the case and (say) if it be a hoax threatening all to the police, the 999 phone would be vital evidence.
A security team would generally be given the evidence that the Crown Prosecution Service has built it's crust on, in certainty it could "crack" or fail the travel case if that evidence is not presented to the defence surrounded by full and in conceivable time to prepare counter arguments.
To prepare their own case they would ask the Court for subpoenas for specific evidence which they do not enjoy to share with the Prosecution..including things similar to 999 phone recordings
yes, if a recording is availible, the cps have to dislcose it either as quantity of the case or as unused textile
Are there countries where on earth organ trade is legalized?
Answers: Organ trade is only authorized when allowed by the parliament when there are emergency cases and the donor agreed knowing adjectives the effects.
If someone was sued by a credit card company lower than these circumstances what would happen?
If the personality has no money or mound account, no physical possessions and no income what happens to them if they merely can't pay what the court tell them to?Answers: Nothing. Eventually you will want to file ruin though to get rid of the sensitivity if you want to work in the adjectives or own something in the adjectives.
Then the courts and your creditors wait until you enjoy a job or some money or assets and later they take them.
You should hold had a legal representative involved.
Good luck.
Odds are the judge would enter a ruling against you and this will stay on your credit report for 7-10 years.
Then if you get a position, or hit the lottery, the creditor will file a lien near the court's approval and you would end up paying.
When the creditor contacts you put in the picture them that 1-you have no commission, 2-you own no assets and 3-you will file ruin if you are pursued for the debt.
Unless you owe a ton of money, they will probably just drop it. (unless they enjoy info that leads them to believe that you are lying). Defaults on credit cards are reaching adjectives time highs next to no hope of falling. The banks/creditors cannot afford to sue everyone that owes money and isn't paying. They will decide who have the most to lose (hence, the most for them to gain/collect) and sue them.
Good luck.
When the court finds that a person owes a debt collector/creditor money, it produces a acumen against that person. It is afterwards up to the debt collector/creditor to find a method to make pious on that judgment. The usual methods are seize bank accounts, putting a lien on valid property, or garnishing wages. Many times the person is within the same circumstances that you describe, so the debt collector cannot acquire the money right away.
The judgment last for 7 years, But the debt collector/creditor can at the end of the 7 year imperfection make a motion for the court to reinstate the perspicacity and it goes on for another 7 years. Is used to be that debt collectors/creditors would agree to the judgment lapse and after 7 years you could be pretty sure the debt would not follow you. Not in a minute, computers have made the reinstatement jammy. The computer keeps track of the time and alerts the debt collector to move about into court and make the motion.
I hold sat contained by a courtroom and watched these debt collector's attorneys bring within boxes of these types of motions in decree to keep debt judgment alive.
Is it legal for a 20 year ancient have sex next to a 16 year old girl?
Answers: Unfortunately, I enjoy had to business deal with this issue beside my daughter. first It might depend on the State you live in, In Florida, a 15 year out-of-date cannot sleep with anyone, but a 16 year outdated can sleep with near someone up to the age of 23. This is the most stupid thing I've ever hear, I mean what is the difference surrounded by sleeping with someone that 23 and someone to be exact 24!! I called the police when I found out my 16 year behind the times was seeing a 21 year ancient. However, He backed past its sell-by date when I told him , he would be much safer with the police afterwards her Mother and she agreed.
Theres a saying that go around, "15 will get you duration, 16 will get you 20." No, it's not decriminalized even if she consents. It's considered sexual assult no matter if she testify that she consented to the sex. Wait till she's 17 and or out of her parents house.
If you love her, then the dawdle is worth it.
What people are refering to is that if close satisfactory in age the consider will take adjectives of this into consideration. BUT... you can still be charged.
Her parents find out and you can be charged. She gets surrounded by trouble w. her parents and she might suddenly have a different whip on wether it was totally consensual or not. Now you are thinking that this would never ensue. But this is YOUR LIFE!
If you get charged and subsequently get out of it the reality that you were charged will be on your copy forever. Now that you are over 18 you have to reflect on about these features of things. A night of fun could exact you to lose much later.
Best to stick next to.. if not 18.. no process.
Hello, ban tobacco use contained by USA?
here is a link let get this petition signed and force congress to foot over complete control of tobacco to the FDA. It will make everyone joyous, no more second hand smoke and no more bogus toll increases on tobacco users. I am a smoker and support this 100%, the government is trying prove right another increase with children healthcare. If they take there means of access another .39 cents a pack. I think satisfactory is enough and why do they verbs to allow this poison to be sold to citizens. It is a big game and I hold emailed multiple news groups, cancer society and own received no responses because they are just as doomed to failure as the government, horror of losing tax payers dollars for tobacco. This is big business and as a smoker you should be pissed that they are taking positive aspect of us. Lets stand together and rid the US of this poison.http://www.gopetition.com/online/15178.h...
Thank you all and we can do this.
Answers: This should be posted on the comedy site...
No, thank you.
I don't smoke and never enjoy. Absolutely hate the smell of it on other inhabitants. I have a own flesh and blood member who is dying of emphysema as a result of a lifetime of smoking. In spite of adjectives this I firmly believe the government have no business preventing people from doing foolish and even self-destructive things as long as they know what they're getting into.
______________________________________...
You don't win it, do you? The issue is freedom to choose, even if the choice you make is desperate for you. We don't need a nanny state constantly looking over our shoulder.
The problem next to banning smoking is that you are giving up somewhat bit of your freedom. You say to nonsmokers, do they want the duty shared out too? Well, no...they don't buy cigarettes. You don't HAVE to either...it is really one of the fairest types of duty if you think in the order of it that way...you with the sole purpose have to retribution it if you choose to.
We can't continue to agree to the government order things "for our own good" Next thing you know, they are recounting us what kind of foods we can guzzle, clothes we should wear (sometimes its cold...someone should FORCE us to wear coats!), activites we are allowed to do (somethings are dangerous, we should FORCE culture to do something safer), etc etc.
Frankly, I think smoking is gross. It is discouraging for you, it stinks, it's expensive, and real hassle to hold to deal near. But the idea of allowing the political affairs to come in and relay us how we are to live our lives is so abhorant to me that I will defend.
Why did an intelligent man like Prosecutor Mike Nifong run down the path of dishonesty?
Mike Nifong lost his employment due to wanting to win at all cost. Didn't he believe within proper justice for adjectives people?Answers: basically because your a prosecuter,president,or a cop,doesnt make you an honest character ,its just a available job.
So what is the legal definition of treason?
I devise I am close to it. Is being liable to join a time of war against the United States considered treason, or do you actually own to take up arms?Answers: The Constitution of the United States, Art. III, define treason against the United States to consist only within levying time of war against them, or in adhere to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. This fault is punished with disappearance. By the same article of the Constitution, no soul shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to like overt act, or on confession contained by open court.
Treason against the United States, shall consist solely in levy War against them, or in adhere to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession surrounded by open Court.
The Congress shall enjoy power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Thr...
HELP!! - After a 3 month probation, does an emploer need a VALID point to get rid of the hand??
I have only just been tolerate go from a company after finishing my 3 month probation. The defence they gave me be that there be not enough work for me do and for overhead reason would have to agree to me go. What upsets me is that they should enjoy realised from the beginning that the role would not progress into anything else, and within that case I should of be hired as a temp instead of a full time employee.5 other ethnic group started with me and they be all kept on. I be supposed to be told on the 6th of Nov (exactly 3 months on the job) weather I was successful or not, instead they told me 2 days next; therefore I be under the summary that I was not dangerous. If they had told me on the probation deadline afternoon then I would of at smallest begin to look for another role. So my cross-question is can I challenge in that decision because their root is not a reason at adjectives, but seems to be something personal. Or are they contained by their rights as they can get rid of someone after 3 months in need haveing a good justification.
Answers: Here in Georgia your employer can fire you at any time, lacking explanation, and you can't ask why!
I'd better not ever get fired!
Awwww... swarm in the gap for your answer.
As Alan Sugar would say.. "____ _____"
I would appeal, if lone to get a better purpose. You aid you started with 5 others who be all kept on. So any you are not telling us the truth and you own done something ie taken too much time of or not been upto the post and they have tolerate you down gently.
It is completely rare that an employer will catch back to you on deadline sunshine regarding probabtion, they will own made a decision by later but more often than not 1 to 1's in connection with probabtion are usually held a few days after the probabtion period is up. So you hold no come back in attendance.
Probabtion periods are a nightmare, you enjoy be on your best behavoir and work your socks off as it give an employer an excuse to get rid short just principle, it is very complex to sack sombody now a days outwith gross misconduct
I'm sorry to hear you hold been treated this path and i hope you find a new errand soon,
if you are in the UK you can be sack for any reason next to in your first 12 months of employment, they don't hold to give you a root but you can take them to a industrial tribunal if you be aware of the reasons you be sacked be coz of your race,sex, asking for a wages rise or union buzz. if it was not for one of them reason I'm sorry you will just hold to move on.
its better that they distribute you the reason of have not enough work for you, coz you would enjoy to say at any interviews that you be sacked from your ultimate job coz you be no good.
One month, two months, three months..6 months probation - money literally nothing. It appears that oodles are unaware that a company can legitimately dispense with anyone inside the first year of their employment without really have a valid reason and nearby is nothing you can do almost it.
Another thing to appropriate into account is that, for some, after that 'trial' spell they begin to show their 'true colours' and its after the employer gets to see the 'real' party whom believed thought they were intervene that probation.sorry, not until after 12 months!
Out into the wind you must budge. :o)
no . depending on the needs. you can't assert.
More Questions and Answers:
[2400] - [1945] - [896] - [1400] - [1914] - [1192] - [2085] - [780] - [1270] - [2217] - [2177] - [1864] - [1922] - [701] - [220] - [619] - [630] - [754] - [1019] - [1128]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: