Law Questions and Answers

How much does it cost to feed a US (Tx)prisoner per morning?

Writing a paper and cant find it anywhere! And yes I googled it ppl..if I woulda found it I wouldnt hold had to debris 5pts <frown>

Please provide a source as well <3 <3
Answers: Found it! :)

In 2001, Texas spent $638 a year per inmate for food service. Do the math and it comes out to $1.75 per daytime for Texas to feed inmates.

You can find this stat on page 6 of the a report by the US Department of Justice available at:

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/spe...

Hope this help!

Do you think within would be any murders in the US if the punishment be being adjectives alive on the stake?

Answers: Yes. Half of them out of anger, the other half done by citizens arrogant enough to deduce they're going to get away beside it so the punishment is academic.
Man, by his character, is a killer. Nothing will stop it... It is human disposition. Most of us can control our impulses, various can't.

I am so totally against the death cost.. It is state-sanctioned murder - and the state is so wrong so many times.

However, if we, the general public, are going to insist on having a passing penalty, next each and every execution should be shown on every conduit on TV including all cable and satellite stations. It should be the tenet.

Perhaps if those proponents of death if truth be told watched them, they might variation their minds.

Whats a "Sanctuarty City"?

How can illegals in these haven of illegal hustle and bustle be deported? Does this mean that they cannot be prosecuted for crimes?
Answers: A sanctuary city is a city that unilaterally exempts itself from the law of the country it exists in. It's impossible really. They reason that because they do not spot the national laws, empire who reside there cannot be breaking them, hence they are not unendorsed. This farce presented as drama is doomed to persist so long as the national authorities verbs to ignore their sworn responsibility to uphold their own law.
On the other hand, if you can't capture the illegals out of these cities, maybe you could come up next to some way (a balustrade maybe?), to preserve them from leaving it once they arrive, close to a giant roach motel. You might also be able to prosecute the city administration themselves under the RICO statutes as an ongoing criminal enterprise. Don't hold your breath though, it's not gonna surface.
sanctuary city means

in good health sancturay is church

so church city?
A sanctuary city is a city in which immigration regulation is not enforced. Proponents of such policies argue that they promote efforts of police and public condition departments to cooperate with immigrant communities surrounded by order to trim down crime and improve public robustness in those communities

The permanent status exists in a linguistic no-man’s arrive, a frame that suggests urban officials abet soft-headed lawlessness. At best, the media has done a poor position of explaining the motivation and legal framework losing policies slapped with the sign; at worst, it has recycled and showcased the possession, which is little more than an anti-immigration talking point, short much analysis or skepticism.

Like all polite spin, the “sanctuary city” rhetoric contains an ounce of truth. Across the country, cities, counties, states, and police departments of all sizes hold adopted policies that mark out their participation contained by active enforcement of federal immigration law. The reasoning behind these “limiting” policies is not ideological, but to some extent practical: to the extent that federal laws disrupt local policing hard work, the arguments goes, it is counterproductive to keenly enforce those laws.

The occupancy is only controversial because of the media an dhwo they use it (the term). The phrase’s meaning—or lack thereof—is belied by plans to crack down on cities that sign up limiting policies.
You already have the definition of sanctuary city, here is my assessment of them, BS, How if you break a law which they did by entering this country improperly you are not able to be punished. If I break the ruling I will get punished this is the intact reason for have laws, these culture and the corporations who exploit them should be brought to justice and payment for the laws they hold broken

Are the "Three Strikes" law and the "No Early Release Act" even-handed? Why or why not?

Answers: Fair to whom? The career criminal? Or the society that have to pay for their hang on to?

My son doesn't even get 3 probability... Why should an adult requirement more?

As to no early release... what's the point contained by setting a punishment, if you're not going to enforce it?
Yes... fair is not committing crimes ...
"If you can't do the time. don't do the crime"
Beretta
The statute was intended for good, but give up your job it to the over zealous D.A.s to abuse resembling always. They & the courts take the legislative statute & turn it into judicial law for their own benifit no thing who it hurts, as long as it's not them. There should be more accountability by lawyers, district attorneys, & magistrates, as it stands they do what ever they want & call it even-handedness, what a farse. God help those that travel before these judicial terrorists.

What checks are there on judicial review?

I suggest the question say it all.
Answers: What a incredibly good request for information! The legislature(Congress) can create new ruling or amend the constitution as a response to an over exertion of the judicial branches constitutional authority to a point. Beyond that, there is not much Congress can do! Excerpt cut the purse strings surrounded by the next years appropriations budget. As far as the executive branch is concerned the simply real check is proposed legislation, which requires the sustain of the Congress or in getting to pick the Justices themselves. Even after adjectives that the Federal or Supreme Court can still shoot down the new legislation. Makes no difference which branch creates said legislation or statute. So surrounded by essence there is no definite checks and balances. If the legislative or Executive branches really thought a punishment by the high court or review be Unconstitutional what could they really do? Nothing! In the Constitutional world the Supreme Court is the End of the road. So in short I would vote for the Federal and Supreme Court there is no genuine check and Balances from a Constitutional stand point. Peace!!! Health!!! Harmony!!! Love!!!
The legislature and the executive branches check the judicial branch.

Does it make you batty when you are accused of human being a rascist?

Prime example, this person's question: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

It seem as the word rascist is just flung around and used to assert disdain for crime (as in the valise of OJ), and I'm getting tired of it. I've noticed it abundantly on Yahoo A's.

I just consistency like at hand are a lot of folks who are really sabotaging black and white relationships by constantly calling everyone racist. I will concede, there are some huge biggots out within that should be gagged and bound for duration. But in my experience, the majority of whites are NOT racist, and it really sucks to be accused of something to be exact totally not true.
So I wonder,are false accusations are hurting the relationship between the black and white community? What else can be done to amend tensions? What can member of both communities do to come together?
Answers: I ignore them. They're uninformed racists.

People are individual humans. They should be deal with surrounded by that manner.

We don't choose our skin color; a moment ago our level of stupidity. Some society don't choose well.
And how can we desire salvation when our nation race relations
Got me intuition guilty of being white
Take adjectives poor black people and move them into rich white homes/neighborhoods for the subsequent 20 years. Not only will it sustain black people, you'll see how racist America really is (they just put by it real well).
Yes.
That would be impossible as I am not and never hold been racist. As a TRUE American, I delight diversity.
yes
It doesn't make me angry when I'm in reality being racist, and ALL of us behave such at times. I conjecture it's a label that nobody really requirements to hear applied to themselves, even though sometimes it's true.

It's a sad example of generalization, no matter the sign used. But the fact is that we are quickest to safeguard those who are possess characteristics or backgrounds most resembling ourselves and the company that we associate with; otherwise, we touch alone if it happens to us, as contained by "if we don't protect our own then who will?" This is most adjectives in see relations, but also in femininity, religion, and ethnicity.
Most blacks thinks I am racist simply because I am white.
I believe people should be deem by the way they deed and live.
I am tired of the double standard.
Some people approaching to take the 'Bell Hooks' approach of assuming that ALL culture are inherently racist (the equivalent to the radical feminist cry of 'adjectives men are rapists').
Currently you are a racist if you don't enjoy pretending that Islam is a force for dutiful, Immigration policy is in inevitability of attention and even if you think the world is overpopulated (along next to accusations of thinking resembling a eugenicist).
It seems that black general public make their own segregation, response entitled and justified for creating their "black only" groups, social or otherwise... If whites did that, influence created White History Month, or had Young White American Social Club, they'd be call the KKK... What if a white person considered necessary to join a black social group? Not allowed... Cuz it's a BLACK social group. That's racist, within my opinion... There should be no black/white ANYTHING... Some blacks are a short time ago as racist as some whites.
Please, don't give me the slave piece, either... that be over long ago! Black people hold just as much opportunity as white society, if not more. Also racist.

I quality more racism coming from blacks than whites.. just my judgment.. peace..
The cry of racism is often a blanket, thrown to cover genuineness.

WLM, '02

Should our morals be based on Laws, or Laws base on our morals?

It seems resembling some people tacitly adopt the first one.
Answers: In reality, it's a moment or two bit of both.

You have "mala surrounded by se", which is latin for "evil in itself" and "mala prohibitum", also latin, for "evil because prohibited."

We own some laws, resembling those against violence, that are examples of "mala within se", meaning that average people don't have need of a law to enlighten them it is wrong to bash someone over the head next to a brick.

However, there's clearly nothing going on for running a stop sign that any religion would consider a "sin", and in the bunking off of an accident, not a soul would attribute any moral significance to the act. It's considered doomed to failure (by whoever considers it so, judges, police, insurance companies) because it is against the tenet, not because it's evil.

You can't legislate morality, but a sound officially recognized system can protect the average person from those whose morality doesn't overrun the "what would it be like if everyone did it" assessment.
Most people own no moral foundation. Society trains us from infancy using praise so that our behavior will be acceptable. By the time we're adults, our conscience is basically a set of trained feelings. This is not morality.

Since at hand is no foundation other than emotional state, laws can swing their moral opinions by varying what society teaches.

Morality is base upon a higher moral authority and that have to be God. Otherwise, it's just someones (or some groups) belief.

NRA question?

What is the exact desire of the NRA and other pro-gun people? It seem like they will not be smug until its legal for everyone to transport a non-concealed automatic weapon. Just kidding, but it seem that way to me. But really, what is the concluding goal of those relations?
Answers: Check out they're website. I don't think that they want everyone to transport a gun but they do want eveyrone to have the right to protect themselves and they're people by all resources necessary.
the NRA requirements anyone to be able to own any type of weapon they choose, regardless of how terrifying that weapon may be. they are against any type of control of firearms, or any registration of gun ownership. makes you wonder what they enjoy to hide.

Is it illegal to buy or enjoy possesion of gamma butyrol lactone (GBL) in the U.S.?

Answers: No, I don't give attention to so. Seeing what is going on in the UK, it is possible that it will be restricted here in the adjectives, though.

What kind of legal representative .?? ...simple battery??

ok story follows.
girl harass guy(calls, messages,visits)...comes to his house while he's sleeping..won't leave him alone...she grab him, he tries to walk away..she keep grabbing him and afterwards pushes him..natural reaction(or whatever) he punches her..she kick him in the mouth, he hits her again
he get arrested...so im assuming he's getting charged with battery-operated..is that considered simple battery??
but mostly, what type of legal representative would he need??

ive posted the louisiana directive bellow(and yes, this happened within LA)--so what do you think will transpire to him??

Louisiana Simple Battery
LA R.S. 14:35

Simple battery is a battery-operated committed without the consent of the sufferer.

Whoever commits a simple battery shall be fined not more than five hundred dollars, or confined for not more than six months, or both.
Answers: It is likely criminal battery-operated, and he needs a criminal defense attorney.
What genus of lawyer?

I would suggest a divorce advocate.
He needs an attorney, or attorneys, who can manipulate two types of lawsuits:

1. Since he's being charged near battery (and it would probably be simple mobile, not aggravated battery, base on the facts that you give), he may need a attorney to defend him surrounded by the criminal suit. He may have a public champion appointed for him, depending on the LA's laws, but he could also represent himself. He should specifically claim self-defense, it couldn't hurt.

2. Since this girl has be harassing him, and actually kicked him, he may want to directory a civil suit. He could ask for a restraining order, as okay as damages for the harassment and freestyle committed by her.

Try to find an attorney who is willing to clutch on both cases, it might save him some money.

I hope that help. Good luck.

EDIT: Ignore the "Total Lawyers" spammer. I actually checked out the website and it's simply a lawyer referral service, it doesn't inform you anything helpful at adjectives.

If you want a free lawyer research database, check out any Martindale-Hubbell's Lawyer database or Lawyers.com, which is owned by LexisNexis. Both are very reputable companies that are recurrently used by lawyers themselves.

Here are the links to those sites:

http://www.lawyers.com/

EDIT: Sorry, I found out that Martindale-Hubbell and Lexis enjoy merged, so there's only one site very soon, mentioned above.
What an unfortunate situation.

Sounds to me resembling simple battery, but I regard as the guy needs an attorney if he's charged.

I recommend researching your option through this website:

http://www.totallawyers.com

It has comprehensive information on every munificent of legal issue you could own, and it has state-by-state information. You might also be capable of find a good advocate. It's an interesting site, even if you don't need officially recognized info.

Good luck to you. I hope it works out.

More Questions and Answers:
[1831] - [1281] - [1306] - [2515] - [652] - [1516] - [1160] - [310] - [1569] - [338] - [721] - [653] - [20] - [458] - [400] - [1763] - [964] - [2413] - [124] - [527]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: